1
|
Olsen RJ, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Nawabi DH, Ramkumar PN. The Fundamentals and Applications of Wearable Sensor Devices in Sports Medicine: A Scoping Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00098-7. [PMID: 38331364 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (1) characterize the various forms of wearable sensor devices (WSDs) and (2) review the peer-reviewed literature of applied wearable technology within sports medicine. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases, from inception through 2023, was conducted to identify eligible studies using WSDs within sports medicine. Data extraction was performed of study demographics and sensor specifications. Included studies were categorized by application: athletic training, rehabilitation, and research. RESULTS In total, 43 studies met criteria for inclusion in this review. Forms of WSDs include pedometers, accelerometers, encoders (consisting of magnetometers and gyroscopes), force sensors, global positioning system trackers, and inertial measurement units. Outcome metrics include step counts; gait, limb motion, and angular positioning; foot and skin pressure; change of direction and inclination, including analysis of both body parts and athletes on a field; displacement and velocity of body segments and joints; heart rate; plethysmography; sport-specific kinematics; range of motion, symmetry, and alignment; head impact; sleep; throwing biomechanics; and kinetic and spatiotemporal running metrics. WSDs are used in athletic training to assess sport-specific biomechanics and workload with a goal of injury prevention and training optimization, as well as for rehabilitation monitoring and research such as for risk predicting and aiding diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS WSDs enable real-time monitoring of human performance across a variety of implementations and settings, allowing collection of metrics otherwise not achievable. WSDs are powerful tools with multiple applications within athletic training, patient rehabilitation, and orthopaedic and sports medicine research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Wearable technology may represent the missing link to quantitatively addressing return to play and previous performance. WSDs are commercially available and portable adjuncts that allow clinicians, trainers, and individual athletes to monitor biomechanical parameters, workload, and recovery status to better contextualize personalized training, injury risk, and rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena J Olsen
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | | | - Joshua J Woo
- Brown University/The Warren Alpert School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A
| | - Danyal H Nawabi
- Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Prem N Ramkumar
- Long Beach Orthopedic Institute, Long Beach, California, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haddas R, Lawlor M, Moghadam E, Fields A, Wood A. Spine patient care with wearable medical technology: state-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges: a systematic review. Spine J 2023; 23:929-944. [PMID: 36893918 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Healthcare reforms that demand quantitative outcomes and technical innovations have emphasized the use of Disability and Functional Outcome Measurements (DFOMs) to spinal conditions and interventions. Virtual healthcare has become increasingly important following the COVID-19 pandemic and wearable medical devices have proven to be a useful adjunct. Thus, given the advancement of wearable technology, broad adoption of commercial devices (ie, smartwatches, phone applications, and wearable monitors) by the general public, and the growing demand from consumers to take control of their health, the medical industry is now primed to formally incorporate evidence-based wearable device-mediated telehealth into standards of care. PURPOSE To (1) identify all wearable devices in the peer-reviewed literature that were used to assess DFOMs in Spine, (2) analyze clinical studies implementing such devices in spine care, and (3) provide clinical commentary on how such devices might be integrated into standards of care. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A systematic review. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review was conducted in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines (PRISMA) across the following databases: PubMed; MEDLINE; EMBASE (Elsevier); and Scopus. Articles related to wearables systems in spine healthcare were selected. Extracted data was collected as per a predetermined checklist including wearable device type, study design, and clinical indices studied. RESULTS Of the 2,646 publications that were initially screened, 55 were extensively analyzed and selected for retrieval. Ultimately 39 publications were identified as being suitable for inclusion based on the relevance of their content to the core objectives of this systematic review. The most relevant studies were included, with a focus on wearables technologies that can be used in patients' home environments. CONCLUSIONS Wearable technologies mentioned in this paper have the potential to revolutionize spine healthcare through their ability to collect data continuously and in any environment. In this paper, the vast majority of wearable spine devices rely exclusively on accelerometers. Thus, these metrics provide information about general health rather than specific impairments caused by spinal conditions. As wearable technology becomes more prevalent in orthopedics, healthcare costs may be reduced and patient outcomes will improve. A combination of DFOMs gathered using a wearable device in conjunction with patient-reported outcomes and radiographic measurements will provide a comprehensive evaluation of a spine patient's health and assist the physician with patient-specific treatment decision-making. Establishing these ubiquitous diagnostic capabilities will allow improvement in patient monitoring and help us learn about postoperative recovery and the impact of our interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ram Haddas
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
| | - Mark Lawlor
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Ehsan Moghadam
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Andrew Fields
- Medtronic Spine & Biologics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haddas R. Assessing disability and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders utilizing wearable medical technology: Opportunities and challenges. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2023; 36:779-782. [PMID: 37248882 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-235002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
4
|
Preuss FR, Fossum BW, Peebles AM, Eble SK, Provencher MT. Subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis of cadaveric biomechanical strength outcomes. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 2:437-441. [PMID: 37588468 PMCID: PMC10426677 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Hypothesis/Background There is no consensus on whether to repair the subscapularis in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). There have been an assortment of studies showing mixed results regarding shoulder stability and postoperative strength outcomes when looking at subscapularis repair in rTSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate differences in biomechanical strength outcomes of cadaveric subscapularis repair vs. no repair in rTSA.Increased force will be required to move the shoulder through normal range of motion (ROM) in cadaveric rTSA shoulders with the subscapularis repaired when compared with no subscapularis repair. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The databases used to search the keywords used for the concepts of subscapularis, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and muscle strength were PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language cadaveric studies evaluating rTSA and subscapularis management were included, with subscapularis repair surgical techniques and strength outcomes being evaluated for each article meeting inclusion criteria. Results The search yielded 4113 articles that were screened for inclusion criteria by 4 authors. Two articles met inclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the final full-text review. A total of 11 shoulders were represented between these 2 studies. Heterogeneity of the data across the 2 studies did not allow for meta-analysis. Hansen et al found that repair of the subscapularis with rTSA significantly increased the mean joint reaction force and the force required by the posterior deltoid, total deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor, total posterior rotator cuff, and pectoralis major muscles. Giles et al found that rotator cuff repair and glenosphere lateralization both increased total joint load. Conclusion The present review of biomechanical literature shows that repair of the subscapularis in the setting of rTSA can effectively restore shoulder strength by increasing joint reactive forces and ROM force requirements of other rotator cuff muscles and of the deltoid muscle. Available biomechanical evidence is limited, and further biomechanical studies evaluating the strength of various subscapularis repair techniques are needed to evaluate the effects of these techniques on joint reactive forces and muscle forces required for ROM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fletcher R. Preuss
- David Geffen School of Medicine at The University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Matthew T. Provencher
- The Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA
- The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Braun BJ, Grimm B, Hanflik AM, Richter PH, Sivananthan S, Yarboro SR, Marmor MT. Wearable technology in orthopedic trauma surgery - An AO trauma survey and review of current and future applications. Injury 2022; 53:1961-1965. [PMID: 35307166 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The use of wearable sensors to track activity is increasing. Therefore, a survey among AO Trauma members was conducted to provide an overview of their current utilization and determine future needs and directions. A cross sectional expert opinion survey was administered to members of AO Trauma. Respondents were surveyed concerning their experience, subspeciality, current use characteristics, as well as future needs concerning wearable technology. Three hundred and thirty-three survey sets were available for analysis (Response Rate 16.2%). 20.7% of respondents already use wearable technology as part of their clinical treatment. The most prevalent technology was accelerometry combined with smartphones (75.4%) to measure general patient activity. To facilitate the use of wearable technology in the future, the most pressing issues were cost, patient compliance and validity of results. Wearable activity monitors are currently being used in trauma surgery. Surgeons employing these technologies mostly measure simple activity or activity associated parameters. Cost was the greatest perceived barrier to implementation. Further research, especially concerning the interpretation of the outcome values obtained, is required to facilitate wearable activity monitoring as an objective patient outcome measurement tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt J Braun
- University Hospital Tuebingen on Behalf of the Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, BG Hospital, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, Tuebingen 72076, Germany.
| | - Bernd Grimm
- Human Motion, Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Digital Methods Group, Luxembourg, Institute of Health, Transversal activities, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Andrew M Hanflik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Downey Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Downey, CA, United States
| | - Peter H Richter
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Meir T Marmor
- Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Preuss FR, Eble SK, Peebles AM, Osuna-Garcia A, Provencher CAPTMT. Shoulder strength outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis. JSES REVIEWS, REPORTS, AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 2:131-134. [PMID: 37587955 PMCID: PMC10426537 DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Hypothesis and Background There is no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with or without subscapularis repair. Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of rTSA. However, consensus has yet to be reached on whether postoperative strength after rTSA differs based on subscapularis management. The purpose of this review is to evaluate shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA with and without subscapularis tendon repair. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the key terms "subscapularis" AND "reverse total shoulder arthroplasty" AND "muscle strength" in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language studies evaluating shoulder strength outcomes after rTSA published from January 1, 2000, to present were evaluated. Strength outcomes reported included abduction strength (kg) and internal rotation strength (kg) using an electric spring balance and external rotation strength (lb) using a handheld dynamometer. Heterogeneity of data in the included studies did not allow for meta-analysis. Resuts The search yielded 4253 unique results, which were screened for inclusion according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Two articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the final full-text review. A total of 267 shoulders were represented, 111 with subscapularis repair and 156 without subscapularis repair. No significant differences in abduction (P = .39), internal rotation (P = .09), and external rotation (P = .463) strength were observed between subscapularis repair and nonrepair groups. Conclusion There were no differences in abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation strength after rTSA with or without subscapularis repair. The literature on postoperative strength outcomes after rTSA is limited, and further study in this area is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fletcher R. Preuss
- David Geffen School of Medicine at The University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Antonia Osuna-Garcia
- Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, The University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aldon-Villegas R, Ridao-Fernández C, Torres-Enamorado D, Chamorro-Moriana G. How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:845. [PMID: 34066777 PMCID: PMC8151204 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this review was to compile validated functional shoulder assessment tools and analyse the methodological quality of their validations. Secondarily, we aimed to provide a comparison of the tools, including parameter descriptions, indications/applications, languages and operating instructions, to choose the most suitable for future clinical and research approaches. A systematic review (PRISMA) was conducted using: PubMed, WoS Scopus, CINHAL, Dialnet and reference lists until 2020. The main criteria for inclusion were that papers were original studies of validated tools or validation studies. Pre-established tables showed tools, validations, items/components, etc. The QUADAS-2 and COSMIN-RB were used to assess the methodological quality of validations. Ultimately, 85 studies were selected, 32 tools and 111 validations. Risk of bias scored lower than applicability, and patient selection got the best scores (QUADAS-2). Internal consistency had the highest quality and PROMs development the lowest (COSMIN-RB). Responsiveness was the most analysed metric property. Modified UCLA and SST obtained the highest quality in shoulder instability surgery, and SPADI in pain. The most approached topic was activities of daily living (81%). We compiled 32 validated functional shoulder assessment tools, and conducted an analysis of the methodological quality of 111 validations associated with them. Modified UCLA and SST showed the highest methodological quality in instability surgery and SPADI in pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocio Aldon-Villegas
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| | - Carmen Ridao-Fernández
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| | - Dolores Torres-Enamorado
- Research Group “Women, Well-Being and Citizenship” SEJ066, Department of Nursing, University of Seville, 41930 Bormujos, Spain;
| | - Gema Chamorro-Moriana
- Research Group “Area of Physiotherapy” CTS-305, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain; (R.A.-V.); (G.C.-M.)
| |
Collapse
|