Comparison of single versus double TightRope system in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic acromioclavicular stabilization for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

BACKGROUND

Standard open acromioclavicular (AC) stabilization is associated with increased postoperative complications including deltoid injury, infection, tunnel complications, loss of reduction, and wound/cosmetic concerns. Arthroscopy may offer superior visualization and advantages that limit these risks. The aim of this prospective non-randomized study is to evaluate advantages and long-term reliability of arthroscopic AC stabilization.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with acute grade III, IV and V AC dislocations underwent arthroscopic AC reconstruction with long-term assessment by clinical AC examination, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog scale, Specific AC Score and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. Radiographs verified conservation of initial reduction and presence of coracoclavicular (CC) ossifications. Complications, revision rate, and satisfaction were assessed and compared to the literature.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 67.6 months. All clinical outcome scores improved and differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). Initial postoperative radiographs consistently showed complete reduction. Two patients experienced relapse to grade II AC dislocation without clinical implications. In total, 71.8% showed CC ossifications without functional impairment, and in 31.3% concomitant injuries were observed. Reintervention rate was 9.4%, and 96.9% of patients were satisfied with procedure outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic stabilization for acute AC joint dislocations offers satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes, and our results show that the arthroscopic technique is reliable in the long run. We report better reduction in maintenance, fewer complications, and similar reoperation rates compared to other techniques. Level of evidence: III.

The Effect of Clavicular Tunnel Position on Reduction Loss in Patients with Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations Operated with a Single-Bundle Suspensory Loop Device

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations offers numerous options, and ongoing debates persist regarding their comparative effectiveness. Among these options, the suspensory loop device (SLD) is one of the most favored treatment modalities. Despite the observed high reduction loss rate associated with SLD, the treatment yields favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with acute type 3 and 5 ACJ dislocations who underwent open and arthroscopic procedures using a single-bundle SLD, and to evaluate the effect of clavicular tunnel position on reduction loss.

METHODS

Thirty-seven eligible patients diagnosed with acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation who underwent open and arthroscopic surgery with a single-bundle SLD between January 2015 and March 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data and radiological measurements including coracoclavicular (CC) interval, clavicle length (CL), and implant distance (ID) were recorded. The ID/CL ratio was calculated and a value between 0.17 and 0.24 was considered as "acceptable implant position". Reduction loss and other complications were noted. Patients were divided into two groups: open (Group 1) and arthroscopic (Group 2). Constant Murray Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were used for clinical and functional outcomes. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis of variables.

RESULTS

The study included six females (16.2%) and 31 males (83.8%) with a mean age of 40.2 ± 14.7 years (range: 20-75). The mean follow-up period was 22.3 ± 16.7 months (range: 6-72). The average time from trauma to surgery was 6.3 ± 5.3 days (range: 1-18). At the last follow-up, the CMS was 89.3 ± 8.8 and the VAS score was 2.1 ± 0.9. The mean ID/CL ratio was 0.19 ± 0.1 and 19 patients (51.4%) were between 0.17 and 0.24. Reduction loss was observed in nine patients (24.3%). There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding operation time (p = 0.998), ID/CL ratio (p = 0.442), reduction loss (p = 0.458), CMS (p = 0.325), and VAS score (p = 0.699). Of the 28 patients without reduction loss, 16 had an ID/CL ratio between 0.17 and 0.24 (p = 0.43). Furthermore, within the 0.17-0.24 interval, CMS was higher with an average of 91.8 ± 5.1 compared to the other intervals (p = 0.559).

CONCLUSION

The clinical and functional outcomes of acute type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocation operated open and arthroscopically with single-bundle SLD are similar and satisfactory. A clavicular tunnel position in the range of 0.17-0.24 (ID/CL ratio) is recommended to maintain postoperative reduction.

Editorial Commentary: Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction With Double-Bundle Constructs Provides Improved Maintenance of Reduction but Comparable Clinical Outcomes Versus Single-Bundle Constructs

Treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations is dependent on a variety of factors, including severity, acuity, patient demographics, activity level, and surgeon preferences. For more severe or unstable separations (Rockwood types IIIB, IV, V, and VI), surgical intervention is typically recommended. Over 160 surgical techniques have been described, but none have emerged as a gold standard. Arthroscopic-assisted or all-arthroscopic fixation of the coracoclavicular ligaments with suture buttons has become increasingly popular due to lower complication rates compared with more rigid fixation. Configurations include single-bundle (SB) constructs and double-bundle (DB) configurations that more anatomically reconstruct the conoid and trapezoid ligaments but with longer operative times. Clinical studies with short-term follow-up have demonstrated improved maintenance of fixation for DB compared with SB constructs but no significant differences in clinical outcomes. In our experience, SB suture button-only constructs lead to unacceptable failures due to loss of reduction. We recommend either a single suture button construct augmented with allograft or DB suture button constructs for the treatment of acute AC joint separations.

[Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instabilities]

Acromioclavicular joint instabilities are one of the most common injuries of the shoulder girdle. Diagnostic measures include the vertical and horizontal components of instability. The main goals of treatment include pain reduction, joint stabilization, and return to physical activity. For operative treatment, there are numerous techniques available. Recently, minimally-invasive techniques were developed and showed equal results as with open approach. These procedures facilitate simultaneous treatment of concomitant shoulder lesions and reduce soft tissue trauma as well as the risk of infection. This article presents an overview of such minimally-invasive techniques for both acute and chronic instabilities. Both techniques address the aspect of horizontal instability, which was found to compromise clinical results. For an acute injury, we describe the use of a low-profile button system combined with an additional acromioclavicular cerclage. In the chronic setting with a bidirectional (vertical and horizontal) instability, a free tendon graft combined with a single TightRope augmentation is recommended.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Double-Bundle Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tape Provides Superior Vertical Stability Than the Single-Bundle Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between single- and double-bundle arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic-assisted CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes for acute AC joint dislocation from July 2014 to March 2019 were identified. This study included patients treated for acute AC joint dislocation within 2 weeks after an injury, with a Rockwood classification of III or V and at least 2 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction technique: group I (single-bundle technique) and group II (double-bundle technique). The clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain score between the 2 groups. On the plain radiograph, the CC interval ratio (CCIR) was measured to evaluate maintenance of CC interval fixation. Postoperative complications, including reduction failure, were also documented.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (26 in group I, 32 in group II) were enrolled. There were no significant differences in CCIR between the 2 groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, the CCIR of group I was significantly greater than that of group II 6 months postoperatively (group I: 160.5% ± 48.5%, group II: 125.4% ± 38.9% at 6 months postoperatively, P = .01; group I: 164.0% ± 57.3%, group II: 123.2% ± 35.9% at the last visit, P = .01). Despite radiologic differences, the clinical outcomes demonstrated no significant differences between 2 the groups (ASES score: 93.5 ± 5.2 in group I, 94.4 ± 4.5 in group II, P = .54; Constant score: 92.9 ± 5.3 in group I, 94.8 ± 4.3 in group II, P = .16). Reduction failure occurred in 4 patients (15.3%) in group I and in 1 patient (3.2%) in group II (P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic-assisted double-bundle CC ligament reconstruction using cortical fixation buttons with suture tapes provided superior vertical stability than the single-bundle technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Joint Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Double-Bundle Techniques Are Anatomically and Biomechanically Favored

For coracoclavicular (CC) joint reconstruction in the setting of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint Rockwood type III or V dislocations, flexible fixation shows better clinical outcomes and complication rates than rigid fixation. Single-bundle CC reconstruction reconstructs the conoid ligament but poorly controls anteroposterior stability and is nonanatomic in nature. Thus, we favor double-bundle CC reconstruction incorporating a trapezoid bundle, replicating the broad insertion of the CC ligaments. Biomechanical data confirm improved stability with double-bundle, flexible fixation reconstruction, especially with the lateral clavicular tunnel in a more posterolateral location. An early clinical outcome study supports the double-bundle approach; meticulous surgical technique is required to avoid double-trouble complication rates.

Comparing the Anatomical Landmarks Versus the Coracoid-Based Landmarks Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization After High-Grade Acromioclavicular Injury: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

In acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, the aim of treatment is robust reduction and stabilization of the joint. The anatomical landmarks method is most commonly used for stabilization, but loss of reduction often occurs because of the suture tunnels.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to evaluate and compare the stability of coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using the anatomical landmarks and coracoid-based landmarks techniques in treating a high-grade AC joint injury. It was hypothesized that stabilization using coracoid-based landmarks would provide better stability.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (8 male and 2 female pairs) were randomized into 2 operative technique groups: 10 shoulders in the anatomical landmarks group and 10 shoulders in the coracoid-based landmarks group. The CC ligaments and AC capsule were cut at the midlevel, and CC stabilization and AC capsule repair were performed. For the anatomical landmarks technique, two 2.5-mm clavicular tunnels were created at 25 and 45 mm from the AC joint, while for the coracoid-based landmarks technique, two 2.5-mm clavicular tunnels were drilled using the medial and lateral borders of the coracoid base to choose the tunnel sites. Before injury creation and after stabilization, each shoulder underwent a loading force of 70 N in the superior and anteroposterior directions, and the displacement distance and stiffness were compared between the 2 techniques using the paired t test.

RESULTS

The mean difference in displacement before and after stabilization was higher in the anatomical landmarks technique than the coracoid-based landmarks technique (1.82 ± 3.52 vs -0.18 ± 4.78 mm in the superior direction and 7.47 ± 9.35 vs 1.76 ± 3.91 mm in the anteroposterior direction), but none of the differences in displacement or stiffness were statistically significant between the groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant biomechanical differences in displacement or stiffness were seen between the anatomical landmarks technique and the coracoid-based landmarks technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Either stabilization technique can be utilized for repair of the CC ligaments in an acute AC injury setting.

Arthroscopically Assisted Double-Loop Suture Repair for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption

The surgical management of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) injuries has evolved during the last decades. Numerous surgical techniques exist and recently arthroscopically assisted or all endoscopic techniques have gained popularity due to certain advantages. The goals of the new anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques are to achieve anatomic reduction of the ACJ to allow and facilitate primary healing of AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments, and also to minimize the risk of associated complications. We regularly use the open repair with double-loop sutures for the acute ACJ disruption, as described by Dimakopoulos et al. at 2006. In this surgical technique article, we present the arthroscopically assisted technique for the double-loop suture repair.