Heterogeneity of pain-related psychological distress in patients seeking care for shoulder pathology

General and Pain-Associated Psychological Distress Phenotypes Among Patients With Low Back Pain in the Military Health System

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to describe rates of general and pain-related psychological distress for individuals with low back pain (LBP) in the Military Health System (MHS). We identified common phenotypes defined by rates of general and pain-related psychological distress and compared phenotypes on their level of pain interference, physical function, anxiety, and depression.

METHODS

We created a cohort from two completed trials assessing nonpharmacological treatment for LBP in the MHS (n = 510 total). The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag assessment tool identified the presence of 11 different yellow flags. Latent class analysis (LCA) used yellow flag indicators to identify common psychological phenotypes. We then compared Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems measures of pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety across phenotypes.

RESULTS

LCA identified five phenotypes (percentage of the sample): low distress (32%), high distress (27%), poor pain coping and low self-efficacy (18%), low self-efficacy and acceptance (14%), and poor pain coping (10%). Highly distressed phenotypes reported higher levels of pain interference, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety than those with other phenotypes, whereas the low distress phenotype had significantly lower pain interference and higher physical function scores than those characterized by all other phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

These phenotypes provide opportunities for clinicians and researchers to develop novel LBP treatment pathways tailored to patients with different profiles of psychological distress. Future work is needed to validate their predictive capabilities for clinical outcomes.

The relationship between kinesiophobia, balance, and upper extremity functions in patients with painful shoulder pathology

BACKGROUND

Poor balance ability may contribute to shoulder pathology in patients with existing shoulder pathologies or vice versa. The relationship between kinesiophobia and chronic shoulder pain intensity has been researched, although the conclusions are conflicting. To our knowledge, no study in the literature explores the association between kinesiophobia and balance in patients with shoulder pain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between kinesiophobia, upper extremity functions, and balance abilities in patients with shoulder pain.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING

Physical medicine and rehabilitation hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 44 patients with shoulder pain were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The pain severity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were used to assess the patients. Ultrasound was used to diagnose underlying shoulder joint problems. Static and dynamic postural control was evaluated.

RESULTS

The most common pathologies detected by ultrasound were supraspinatus tendinitis/rupture (77.3%), cortical irregularity (68.2%), and bursitis (63.6%). TSK score did not correlate with age, body mass index, symptom duration, or VAS score in rest (all p > .05), but it was associated with scores on the BBS (r = -0.437, p = .003), SPADI-pain (r = 0.474, p = .001), SPADI-disability (r = 0.355, p = .018), SPADI-total (r = 0.405, p = .006), and VAS in activity (r = 0.331, p = .028). According to multiple linear regression analysis, BBS score, SPADI-total score, and anterior-posterior sway length were significant predictors of TSK (r = 0.645, r2  = 0.416).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings of this study, the main risk factors for high levels of kinesiophobia are poor balance, severe pain, and disability. In addition to mechanical causes of shoulder pain, diagnosing and intervening on underlying balance issues and psychosocial causes of shoulder pain will improve treatment success.

Pain-Associated Psychological Distress Is of High Prevalence in Patients With Hip Pain: Characterizing Psychological Distress and Phenotypes

Purpose

To identify common pain-related psychological factors among patients seeking care for athletic hip pain, as well as characterize psychological distress phenotypes and compare hip-specific quality-of-life measures across those phenotypes.

Methods

A total of 721 patients were recruited from hip preservation clinics. The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag Assessment Tool (OSPRO-YF) was used to identify the presence or absence of 11 different pain-associated psychological distress characteristics (yellow flags), while the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) was used to assess hip-related quality of life. Latent class analysis identified patient subgroups (phenotypes) based on naturally occurring combinations of distress characteristics. An analysis of variance was used to compare demographics, number of yellow flags, and iHOT-12 scores across phenotypes.

Results

The median (interquartile range) number of yellow flags was 6 (3-9), with 13.5% of the sample reporting 11 yellow flags. Latent class analysis (L2 = 543.3, classification errors = 0.082) resulted in 4 phenotypes: high distress (n = 299, 41.5%), low distress (n = 172, 23.9%), low self-efficacy and acceptance (n = 74, 10.3%), and negative pain coping (n = 276, 24.4%). Significant differences in mean yellow flags existed between all phenotypes except low self-efficacy and negative pain coping. There were no differences in demographics between phenotypes. The high distress class had the lowest mean iHOT-12 score (mean [SD], 23.5 [17.6]), with significant differences found between each phenotypic class.

Conclusions

There was a high prevalence of pain-associated psychological distress in patients presenting to tertiary hip arthroscopy clinics with hip pain. Furthermore, hip quality-of-life outcome scores were uniformly lower in patients with higher levels of psychological distress.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.