Posterior shoulder capsule of the dominant arm is stiffer in baseball players than that in nonthrowing population

Adaptive pathology: new insights into the physical examination and imaging of the thrower's shoulder and elbow

Throwing with high velocity requires extremes of glenohumeral external rotation of the abducted arm where particularly high forces in the shoulder and elbow are endured. Repeated throwing leads to dominant-arm bony remodeling of the humerus, glenoid, and elbow, and multiple soft tissue changes that would be considered abnormal. Many of these features are thought to be adaptive and protective. The purpose of this work is to (1) define the concept of adaptive pathology; (2) review the mechanics of the throwing motion; (3) review pertinent physical examination and imaging findings seen in asymptomatic throwers' shoulders and elbows and describe how these changes develop and may be adaptive-allowing the thrower to perform at high levels; and then (4) review the principles of surgical treatment in the throwing athletes, which should focus on reducing symptoms, but not necessarily restoring the thrower's anatomy to normal.

Length-Tension Differences Between Concentric and Eccentric Shoulder Rotation Strength

ABSTRACT

Giordano, KA, Cassidy, MM, and Oliver, GD. Length-tension differences between concentric and eccentric shoulder rotation strength. J Strength Cond Res 38(2): 253-258, 2024-Eccentric contractions generally produce more force than concentric contractions. However, if length-tension relationships affect both contractions equally remains unknown. Therefore, our purpose was to compare concentric versus eccentric shoulder external and internal rotation strength across a continuous 90° arc. Fifty-two physically active individuals performed isokinetic concentric and eccentric shoulder external rotation and internal rotation through a 90° arc (forearm horizontal to forearm vertical) with the shoulder elevated in both the frontal and scapular planes. Statistical parametric mapping analysis compared concentric and eccentric trials within subjects. Frontal plane eccentric external rotation torque was greater than concentric 30°-90° (p < 0.01) external rotation, and concentric external rotation torque was greater 5°-15° external rotation (p = 0.01). Frontal plane, eccentric internal rotation torque was greater than concentric 15°-55° external rotation (p < 0.01), and concentric torque was greater at forearm horizontal (p = 0.05) and 70°-90° external rotation (p < 0.01). Scapular plane eccentric external rotation torque was greater than concentric 30°-90° external rotation (p < 0.01) and concentric external rotation torque was greater 5°-20° external rotation (p < 0.01). Scapular plane eccentric internal rotation torque was greater than concentric 15°-60° external rotation (p < 0.01), and concentric torque was greater at forearm horizontal (p = 0.05) and 78°-90° external rotation (p = 0.02). Coaches, clinicians, and researchers should interpret data from studies reporting isokinetic data with the understanding that isokinetic peak strength values are not comparing the same muscle length and are not an appropriate measure for all muscle lengths. Furthermore, shoulder stability is affected through decreased eccentric force production at end ranges of shoulder rotation.