Outcomes of combined anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears

Rotator Cuff Arthropathy: A Comprehensive Review

Rotator cuff arthropathy is a spectrum of disease states secondary to full-thickness cuff tears classified by rotator cuff insufficiency and degenerative disease within the shoulder joint. Diagnosis can be made through standard physical exam and radiographic films demonstrating varying levels of weakness, along with acetabularization, femoralization, and superior migration of the humeral head. Severity of disease is classified through both the Hamada and Seebauer grading systems, which are used clinically to determine the appropriate treatment algorithm. Treatment exists along the spectrum from conservative therapy with physical therapy to a definitive treatment with total joint replacement. Depending on a patient's progression and other comorbidities, arthroscopic treatments may additionally be used in specific circumstances as joint-sparing techniques. In recent years, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has produced increasingly favorable outcomes with improvements in pain and function while simultaneously diminishing complication rates, making it generally accepted as standard of care. This disease limits quality of life for a large population of patients and efforts toward optimization of the treatment regimen is critical. This review provides an overview on the diagnostic criteria, classification, pathoanatomic changes, biomechanics, treatment options, outcomes, and complications of rotator cuff arthropathy.

Combined Anterior Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer (aLDTM) for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Transfer of the anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) tendons has demonstrated favorable outcomes in patients with irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears1. The objective of this procedure is to restore internal rotation strength, enhance active range of motion, and provide pain relief while preserving the glenohumeral joint.

Description

The incision extended from the coracoid to the inferior border of the pectoralis major tendon, following the deltopectoral interval located laterally to the coracoid. While preserving the pectoralis major tendon, the latissimus dorsi (LD) and teres major (TM) tendons are identified and detached from the humerus without separating the tendons. The LDTM tendons are grasped, and nonabsorbable sutures are placed in a continuous running-locking suture fashion. Traction is applied to the sutures while bluntly releasing the adhesions surrounding the LDTM muscles in order to enable further mobilization and excursion. With the patient's arm positioned in full internal rotation and at 45° of abduction for physiological tensioning, the LDTM tendons are attached 2 cm distal to the lateral edge of the greater tuberosity and lateral to the biceps groove with use of 1 medial anchor and 3 lateral anchors.

Alternatives

Arthroscopic partial repair, superior capsular reconstruction, pectoralis major tendon transfer, and isolated LD tendon transfer are potential alternative treatments. In cases in which these options are not feasible or have been unsuccessful, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can be considered as a treatment option.

Rationale

Arthroscopic partial repair can provide pain relief, but its effectiveness in improving range of motion and muscle strength is limited2,3. Additionally, there is a high risk of retear, with reported rates as high as 52%4. Superior capsular reconstruction is considered a viable treatment, but it is not recommended in cases involving irreparable subscapularis tears5-7. Pectoralis major transfer may lead to less favorable clinical outcomes in cases in which an irreparable subscapularis tear and an irreparable supraspinatus tear are simultaneously present8-10. In cases of irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears, the transfer of the LD tendon alone may not fully restore the superior migration and anterior subluxation of the humeral head.11. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be another option in these cases, but it does not preserve the glenohumeral joint.

Expected Outcomes

The procedure involves stabilizing the superior translation of the humeral head by rebalancing the force couple, as the TM tendon exhibits scapulohumeral kinematics similar to the subscapularis tendon. Additionally, the procedure effectively reduces anterior glenohumeral subluxation through the combined effect of the posterior line of pull from the combined LDTM tendons and the scapulohumeral kinematics of the teres minor tendon. Also, by fixing the transferred LDTM tendons just distal to the greater tuberosity, the vector becomes less vertical, thereby preventing axillary nerve impingement and achieving appropriate tendon tensioning. The use of this procedure is supported by a study of 30 patients who were followed for a minimum of 2 years1. Significant improvements were observed in various scoring systems, including the pain VAS (visual analogue scale), Constant, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), UCLA (University of California-Los Angeles), SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation), and ADLIR (Activities of Daily Living requiring active Internal Rotation) scores. Importantly, there was no significant progression of cuff tear arthropathy observed during the final follow-up. Additionally, preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation (15 of 30 patients) was restored in all patients after LDTM tendon transfer.

Important Tips

Careful attention should be paid to the anterior humeral circumflex vessels to prevent bleeding.The radial nerve, passing through the anteroinferior surface of the LDTM tendons, should be carefully identified and protected to avoid iatrogenic injury.To maintain physiologic tension, the patient's arm should be positioned in full internal rotation and 45° of abduction.To avoid axillary nerve impingement, the LDTM tendons should be fixed just distal to the greater tuberosity and lateral to the biceps groove.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

SCR = superior capsular reconstructionLDTM = latissimus dorsi combined with teres majorASRCTs = anterosuperior rotator cuff tearsA/S = arthroscopicROM = range of motionTM = teres majorTm = teres minorLD = latissimus dorsiSSC = subscapularisSSP = supraspinatusPM = Pectoralis majorPm = Pectoralis minorRSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsUCLA = University of California-Los AngelesADLIR = Activities of Daily Living requiring active Internal RotationGT = greater tuberosityACR = anterior capsular reconstructionFF = forward flexionER = external rotationIR = internal rotationAHD = acromiohumeral distanceMRI = magnetic resonance imagingISP = infraspinatusPEEK = polyetheretherketonePOD = postoperative dayEMG = electromyographySD = standard deviationBMI = body mass indexDM = diabetes mellitusHTN = hypertensionVAS = visual analogue scaleSANE = Single Assessment Numeric EvaluationaROM =active range of motion.

Increased latissimus dorsi and teres major muscle volume after anterior transfer for irreparable anterior superior rotator cuff tear: correlation with improved internal rotation strength

INTRODUCTION

While the well-established correlation between increased muscle volume and enhanced muscle strength is widely recognized, there have been no studies assessing volumetric muscle changes in transfer surgery in the shoulder. This study aimed to evaluate changes in transferred muscle volume and their clinical implications in anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major (aLDTM) tendon transfer in patients with anterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears (ASIRCTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study retrospectively examined 40 patients who underwent aLDTM tendon transfers for ASIRCTs between August 2018 and January 2022. Using ImageJ software, the LDTM muscle was segmented in T2-weighted oblique axial images, and total muscle volume (tLDTMV) of both immediate and postoperative 1-year were calculated. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between ΔtLDTMV and ΔASES scores, Δactive-ROM, and Δstrength.

RESULTS

The current study revealed an 11.4% increase in tLDTMV at 1-year postoperative. Patients were grouped based on postoperative ASES score: Group 1 (Optimal, n = 17) and Group 2 (Suboptimal, n = 23). Although tLDTMVimmediate postoperative values were similar between groups (P = 0.954), tLDTMV1-year postoperative value was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (P = 0.021). In correlation analysis, ΔtLDTMV showed significant correlations with ΔASES score (r = 0.525, P < 0.001), ΔaROM of forward elevation (FE) (r = 0.476, P = 0.002), ΔaROM of internal rotation (IR) at back (r = 0.398, P = 0.011), Δstrength of FE (r = 0.328, P = 0.039), Δ strength of IR at 90° abduction (r = 0.331, P = 0.037), and IR at side (r = 0.346, P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant increase in tLDTMV was observed at 1-year postoperative for ASIRCT patients. Notably, greater ΔtLDTMV exhibited a correlation with better ASES scores, increased aROM and strength in both FE and IR. Nevertheless, further research is required by employing more robust standardized measurement tools and a larger sample size.

Joint-preserving treatment for global irreparable rotator cuff tears: combined anterior Latissimus dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer

INTRODUCTION

Treating global irreparable rotator cuff tears (GIRCTs) that involve both antero-and postero-superior cuff tendon tears could be a challenging problem. There has been limited joint-preserving treatment options in high-demand patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis. The study aims to assess the clinical outcome of combined anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon (aLDTM) transfer for patients with both GIRCTs and minimal glenohumeral arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent combined aLDTM transfer for GIRCTs between 2018 May and 2020 October. Clinical outcomes include pain VAS, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), activities of daily living requiring active internal rotation (ADLIR) score, active range of motion (aROM), strength, rates of pseudoparalysis or pseudoparesis reversal and return to work. Radiographic assessment included the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, and transferred tendon integrity at final follow-up.

RESULTS

23 patients (mean age: 64.7 ± 5.9 years [55-74]) were included and the mean follow-up period was 28.2 ± 4.3 [24‒36] months. Postoperatively, VAS, Constant, ASES, UCLA, and ADLIR scores significantly improved at final follow-up (P < .001). Postoperative aROM was significantly improved in forward elevation (FE) to 129° ± 29°, abduction (ABD) to 105° ± t3°, and internal rotation (IR) at back to 5.9 ± 2.5. Strength of both FE and IR were also significantly improved (P < .001). Patients with preoperative pseudoparalysis (2 of 4 patients) and pseudoparesis (6 of 6 patients) experienced a reversal. No significant change in AHD and hamada grade was confirmed at final follow-up. 3 patients experienced partial tear of the transferred tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found significant improvement in clinical outcomes with no significant progression of arthritis by final follow-up. The aLDTM transfer could be an alternative choice of joint-preserving treatment option for young and active patients with GIRCTs and minimal glenohumeral arthritis. However, large and long-term studies should be conducted to establish its adequacy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Latissimus Dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer increases internal rotation torque following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty with subscapularis insufficiency

INTRODUCTION

Limitation of active Internal Rotation (IR) following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with massive Rotator Cuff Tears (mRCTs) with subscapularis insufficiency remains a challenge. Recently, RSA with Latissimus dorsi and Teres major (LDTM) transfer in patients with limited active IR has been demonstrated as a reliable treatment option. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the IR torque following LDTM transfer with RSA in mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency to RSA without tendon transfer.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested (mean age: 64.5 ± 1.9 years) using a custom shoulder testing system that permits loading conditions of mRCT with subscapularis insufficiency. Two conditions were tested and compared. The first condition was RSA alone and the second condition was RSA with LDTM transfer. RSA with a medialized glenoid and lateralized humerus design was used for all specimens. The specimens were tested at 0°, 20° and 40° abduction at three different muscle loads: baseline, double, and triple, while the Teres minor and deltoid loads were kept constant. IR torque was measured with a torque wrench at 0°, 20°, and 40° abduction and 60° and 45° IR positions. Force required for anterior dislocation was measured at 20° abduction and 10° IR position.

RESULTS

RSA with LDTM transfer had significantly higher IR torque at all abductions and muscle loading compared with RSA without transfer (average at all positions; RSA without transfer: 0.80 ± 0.02 Nm, LDTM transfer for all loads: 1.43 ± 0.10 Nm). RSA with LDTM transfer (91.4 ± 3.9 N) needed higher force for anterior dislocation compared to RSA alone (89.4 ± 4.1 N), but there was no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

LDTM transfer with RSA increases IR torque compared to RSA without tendon transfer in a cadaveric model. LDTM transfer with RSA may be a reliable treatment option for patients with mRCT and subscapularis insufficiency who are expected to have limited active IR following RSA.

Biomechanical comparison of combined latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer vs. latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in shoulders with irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) can result in a gradual loss of active elevation and internal rotation, superior and anterior translation of the humeral head, and cuff tear arthropathy. Joint-preserving treatment options for IASRCTs in young and high-demand elderly patients remain a subject of ongoing debate. The aim of the study was to evaluate the biomechanical efficacy of the combined latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon (LDTM) transfer and compare it to an isolated latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer in a cadaveric IASRCT model.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 68.3 ± 5.2 years; range 58-71) were tested with a custom shoulder testing system. All specimens were tested at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane under 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) IASRCT, (3) combined LDTM transfer, and (4) isolated LD transfer. The superior and anteroinferior translation and subacromial contact pressure were measured. The effects of 3 different LD and LDTM muscle loading conditions were investigated to determine the effectiveness of the muscle transfer conditions. A linear mixed effect model was used for statistical analysis, followed by a Tukey post hoc test.

RESULTS

IASRCTs significantly increased superior translation, anteroinferior translation, and subacromial peak contact pressure. Combined LDTM transfer significantly decreased superior and anteroinferior translation compared with IASRCTs in all positions and muscle loadings. Isolated LD transfer did not significantly decrease superior (P > .115) and anteroinferior translation (P > .151) compared to IASRCT at any abduction and muscle loads except superior translation at 60° abduction and 90° of external rotation (ER) (P < .036). LDTM transfer also significantly decreased peak contact pressure from the IASRCT condition at every abduction angle (P < .046). However, isolated LD transfer significantly decreased subacromial peak contact pressure only at 30° abduction and 0° and 30° of ER with triple loading (P < .048), as well as at 60° abduction and 90° of ER (P < .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined LDTM transfer decreased superior translation, anteroinferior translation, and subacromial contact pressure compared with the IASRCT condition. Isolated LD transfer did not improve glenohumeral translation and subacromial contact pressure. Combined LDTM transfer may be a more reliable treatment option than isolated LD transfer in patients with an IASRCT.

Latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tear improves kinematics and internal rotation compared to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer

INTRODUCTION

Latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) tendon transfer has demonstrated better clinical outcomes compared to Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer for irreparable anterosuperior cuff (subscapularis/supraspinatus) tears; however, the biomechanical effects of these procedures are unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare kinematics and internal rotation of LDTM transfer to LD transfer for anterosuperior cuff tear.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested in four conditions; (1) intact, (2) anterosuperior rotator cuff tear, (3) LDTM transfer, and (4) LD transfer. Glenohumeral kinematics and internal rotation at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane were measured. Muscle loading was applied based on physiological cross-sectional area ratios with three muscle loading conditions to simulate potentially increased tension due to the advanced insertion site of the transferred tendons.

RESULTS

The anterosuperior rotator cuff tear leads to a significant superior shift of the humeral head compared to intact at 0° and 30° abduction (p < 0.039). Both the LDTM (p < 0.047) and LD transfers (p < 0.032) significantly shifted the humeral head inferiorly compared to the tear condition.; however, the LDTM transfer shifted the head in the anteroinferior direction compared to the LD transfer at 60° abduction and 30° ER (p < 0.045). Both LDTM and LD transfer significantly increased internal resting rotation (p < 0.008) and maximum internal rotation (p < 0.008) compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact at 30° and 60° abduction. LDTM transfer resulted in a significant internal resting rotation compared with the LD transfer at 30° abduction with double muscle loading (p = 0.02). At 0° abduction, the LDTM transfer (p < 0.027) significantly increased maximum internal rotation compared to anterosuperior rotator cuff tear and intact.

CONCLUSION

Although both LDTM and LD tendon transfer improved the abnormal humeral head apex position and internal rotation compared with the tear condition, the LDTM transfer was biomechanically superior to the LD transfer in a cadaveric model.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.