Fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review

Intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures does not achieve superior functional results to non-operative treatment in the long term

INTRODUCTION

Non-operative treatment (NOT) of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) has regained significance due to recent evidence. Additionally, positive outcomes of plate osteosynthesis and fracture arthroplasty prompt a reassessment of the role of intramedullary nailing (IMN). While favorable short and medium-term results have been documented following IMN, little is known regarding functional outcomes and quality of life in the long-term.

METHODS

Data from 180 patients with dislocated PHF of Neer types III, IV and V, treated at our level-I trauma center between 2004 and 2014 using IMN or NOT therapy, were scanned. Patients were re-evaluated after a minimum of 5 years to assess functional outcomes (age- and sex-adapted Constant Score, QuickDASH), quality of life (SF12), and complications or reoperations.

RESULTS

Out of the initially identified 180 patients, 51 were unavailable for follow-up (FU) and 71 had deceased during the FU period. Functional outcomes and quality of life was, therefore, assessed in 58 patients (30 IMN, 28 NOT) with an average age at injury of 68 years after a mean FU time of 10.3 ± 3.4 years. Epidemiological patient characteristics did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups (p > .05). The functional outcome assessed by age- and sex-adapted Constant Score (NOT: 74 ± 28; IMN: 68 ± 24; p = .438), QuickDASH (NOT: 25 ± 27; IMN: 31 ± 23; p = .374) or quality of life using the SF12 (p > .05) revealed no significant disparities in long-term outcomes between the treatment groups. 10 of 30 patients in the IMN group underwent surgical revision to address complications, exceeding mere implant removal. Conversely, no patient in the NOT group underwent a revision surgery during the FU period.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long-term, functional and quality of life-related outcomes of IMN did not diverge significantly from those of NOT, while causing a higher incidence of follow-up interventions.

Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: indications and technical considerations

Background

The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) continues to increase with an aging population, and intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking plate fixation are two commonly employed techniques for the surgical management of PHF. However, the optimal fixation method can be a source of ongoing controversy. Some influencing factors include the extent of humeral head involvement, fracture complexity, patient age, and surgeon preference. There are many studies that provide a mix of data either when comparing the two techniques or analyzing them in isolation. The aim of this review is to further elucidate the indications and technical considerations involved specifically in IMN vs. locking plate fixation for PHF to further aid orthopedic surgeons when choosing surgical management.

Methods

A narrative approach was chosen for this review allowing for a comprehensive review of literature, including recent findings pertaining to the comparison of management options for PHF. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria involved studies that discussed "proximal humerus fracture" and either "intramedullary nail" or "locking plate fixation."

Results

Complications such as avascular necrosis, hardware failure, additional surgical interventions, infection, fracture redisplacement, rotator cuff rupture, and nonunion did not show significant differences between the two groups. Newer generation humeral nails have minimized early complications. As both techniques undergo further refinement and utilization when specifically indicated, functional outcomes, potential complications, and postoperative pain continue to be improved.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient factors such as fracture type, age, bone quality, and functional expectations. Surgeon experience also plays a role. While certain presentations may exhibit trends that favor one fixation, no specific technique can be universally recommended. Both IMN and LP have shown comparable and satisfactory outcomes, and the final fixation method chosen should take into account the unique characteristics of each patient.

What Are the Long-term Outcomes of Locking Plates for Nonosteoporotic Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humeral Fractures With a Minimum 10-year Follow-up Period?

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) often occur in elderly individuals who experience low-energy falls. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the proximal humerus is typically performed in young, active patients because of their good bone quality and high functional demands. Although good short-term results have been reported after ORIF in young patients, few studies have specifically evaluated long-term outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the long-term clinical outcomes scores and (2) radiologic outcomes of nonosteoporotic three-part and four-part PHFs treated with locking plates? (3) What complications occurred after treatment, and what factors are associated with poor postoperative functional outcomes scores and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head after ORIF?

METHODS

Between June 2005 and December 2012, we surgically treated 774 patients for displaced two-, three-, and four-part PHFs. Approximately 75% (581 of 774) underwent ORIF, 10% (77 of 774) underwent hemiarthroplasty, 7% (54 of 774) underwent intramedullary nailing, 5% (39 of 774) underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and the remaining 3% (23 of 774) underwent other surgical treatments. We considered those who had ORIF as potentially eligible. Based on that criterion, 75% (581) were eligible. However, only patients with nonosteoporotic three- and four-part PHFs (cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis greater than 6 mm on a preoperative AP radiograph of the affected shoulder) and a minimum of 10 years of follow-up were included. Sixty-four percent (498 of 774) of the patients were excluded because of simple or osteoporotic fractures, 1% (7 of 774) were excluded because of ipsilateral limb multiple fractures, 0.3% (2 of 774) were excluded because of pathologic PHFs, and another 2% (13 of 774) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 10 years, leaving 8% (61 of 774) for analysis here. The mean age at surgery was 45 ± 12 years, with a mean follow-up of 13 years. Fifty-seven percent (35 of 61) of the patients were men. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the University of California Loas Angeles (UCLA) score (range 0 to 35; higher scores represent better shoulder function) and Constant score (range 0 to 100; higher scores represent better shoulder function) at least 10 years postoperatively. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess the cortical bone thickness of the proximal humerus, neck-shaft angle, head-to-tuberosity distance, and radiologically confirmable complications. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with poor postoperative functional scores (UCLA score ≤ 27 or Constant score ≤ 70) and AVN of the humeral head; the association between AVN and postoperative functional outcomes was also assessed.

RESULTS

At the most-recent follow-up, these patients had a mean UCLA score of 31 ± 3 and a Constant score of 88 ± 10. The mean neck-shaft angle was 133° ± 10°, and 23% (14 of 61) of patients experienced AVN of the humeral head during follow-up. Twenty-nine complications in 30% (18 of 61) of patients were reported. After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age and gender, we found that the presence of greater tuberosity malposition (odds ratio 18 [95% confidence interval 2 to 167]; p = 0.01) and immediate postoperative neck-shaft angle less than 130° (OR 19 [95% CI 3 to 127]; p = 0.002) were associated with poor postoperative functional scores. Four-part PHFs (OR 13 [95% CI 2 to 82]; p = 0.008) and metaphyseal extension less than 8 mm (OR 7 [95% CI 1 to 35]; p = 0.03) were associated with AVN of the humeral head. For patients who met the criteria for anatomic reduction (achievement of all of the following three criteria: neck-shaft angle ≥ 130°, head-shaft displacement < 5 mm, and head-to-tuberosity distance greater than or equal to 3 mm and less than or equal to 20 mm), there were no differences in postoperative functional scores between patients with AVN and those without.

CONCLUSION

ORIF of nonosteoporotic proximal humeral fractures with locking plates led to favorable functional and radiologic outcomes at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. When encountering complex PHFs in patients with good bone quality, every effort must be made to achieve an anatomic reduction of the fracture as far as possible, which may not reduce the risk of AVN (this occurred in nearly one-fourth of patients). However, good outcomes can usually be expected, even in patients with AVN. Because this was a retrospective study with a high risk of bias owing to sparse data, the factors associated with poor postoperative functional outcomes must be further investigated in large prospective studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Valgising angular stable plate fixation in the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

The frequency of proximal humeral fractures shows an increasing tendency, especially in the elderly, who are frequently affected by osteoporosis. The adequate treatment of complex, displaced fractures poses a serious challenge. Among surgical treatment options, osteosynthesis with an angular stable plate is preferred, however, the implant-related complication rate may be exceptionally high. In our present study, we report the short-term outcomes of our new method of valgising angular stable plate fixation which we use for multifragmentary, displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of 52 patients (46 female and 6 male, age: 71.9 ± 9.6) who suffered dislocated three- or four-part fractures and underwent valgising angular stable plate fixation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 17.3 months, while the functional outcomes were as following: excellent in 26, good in 18, moderate in 5 and poor in 3 patients. The mean Constant-Murley Score was 82.5 ± 11.2. Functional outcomes only showed significant correlation (p = 0.031) with age and were proven unrelated to fracture type, BMI and known primary diseases. The cumulative complication rate was 9.6% and revision rate was 5.8%. Neurological deficit, pseudoarthrosis or avascular humeral head necrosis did not occur during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Valgising angular stable plate fixation that we apply for proximal humeral fractures provided favourable functional outcomes and a low postoperative complication rate due to the optimal head and plate placement. The method is especially effective for the treatment of displaced three- and four-part fractures with weakened, osteoporotic bone structure.

"Champagne Fracture": A Superior Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus: A Case Report

A 79-year-old right-handed woman presented with an indirect trauma to her left shoulder after a fall down the stairs. X-rays and computed tomography showed a four-part glenohumeral fracture-dislocation with a subcutaneous ectopic location of the humeral head in the retroclavicular space. A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was performed using a deltopectoral approach with direct superior extraction of the humeral head. The result at 2 years was a subjective shoulder value of 80%, an absolute Constant score of 59, and a relative Constant score of 92/100. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description in the literature of such a lesion of superior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation and its treatment.

Double Plating for Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

Double plating for proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is an option to increase the primary fixation stability. Clinical data is missing for assessment of clinical and radiological outcome, as well as complications. We retrospectively examined 35 patients with unilateral PHF, who were treated with double plating for PHF between 2013 and 2019. The mean age was 59.5 ± 12 years and the leading fracture type was a varus dislocation (Resch type IV in 55.3%). A head-split was present in 22.9% of the cases. The primary outcome measurement was the radiological neck shaft angle (NSA). The radiological follow-up was 21 ± 16.6 months and the NSA did not differ between the intraoperative and follow-up time point (131.5 ± 6.9° vs. 136.6 ± 13.7°; p = 0.267). The clinical follow-up was 29.5 ± 15.3 months. The Constant-score was 78.5 ± 17 points, the simple-shoulder-test (SST) was 9.3 ± 3.2 points and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) was 78.8 ± 19.5%. The over-all complication rate was 31.4%, and without stiffness 14.3%. An avascular necrosis occurred in two patients (5.7%). In conclusion, this study shows good radiological and functional outcomes after double plating of highly complex proximal humeral fractures, while the complication rate is comparable to the literature. Double plating is a viable option especially for younger patients with complex fractures as a potential alternative to fracture arthroplasty.