1
|
Shitara H, Ichinose T, Sasaki T, Hamano N, Kamiyama M, Miyamoto R, Ino F, Nakase K, Honda A, Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Chikuda H. Preoperative Nutrition Impacts Retear Rate After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2024:00004623-990000000-01179. [PMID: 39213337 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.01189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rotator cuff retear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a concern in older patients. However, only a few of its risk factors are amenable to preoperative intervention. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between preoperative nutritional status and rotator cuff retears after ARCR. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included patients aged ≥65 years with rotator cuff tears who underwent ARCR. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) was used to assess preoperative nutritional status. Data collection encompassed patient demographics, clinical assessments, and surgical specifics. Patients were divided into healed and retear groups based on 2-year post-ARCR magnetic resonance imaging results. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding factors and detect independent risk factors for retears. The GNRI cutoff value for retear prediction was determined by a stratum-specific likelihood ratio; clinical outcomes were compared based on the cutoff values obtained. RESULTS Overall, 143 patients were included. The retear rate was 20.3%. The albumin level, GNRI, postoperative shoulder strength of abduction and external rotation, and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Constant scores in the retear group were significantly lower than those in the healed group. The logistic regression analysis showed that low risk of morbidity and mortality (compared with no risk) based on the GNRI (odds ratio [OR], 3.39) and medial-lateral tear size per mm (OR = 1.10) were independent risk factors for a retear 2 years after ARCR. Stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis identified data-driven strata as GNRI < 103, 103 ≤ GNRI < 109, and GNRI ≥ 109. Univariate analysis showed that patients with GNRI < 103 had a significantly higher retear risk than those with 103 ≤ GNRI < 109 and those with GNRI ≥ 109. Logistic regression analysis showed that GNRI < 103 compared with 103 ≤ GNRI < 109 (OR = 3.88) and GNRI < 103 compared with GNRI ≥ 109 (OR = 5.62), along with the medial-lateral tear size per mm (OR = 1.10), were independent risk factors for a retear at 2 years after ARCR. CONCLUSIONS When assessing the risk of a retear after ARCR, GNRI ≥ 103 may indicate good preoperative nutritional status. However, more data are essential to ascertain the importance of this finding. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitoshi Shitara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kara M, Kara Ö, Durmuş ME, Analay P, Şener FE, Çıtır BN, Korkmaz GO, Ünlü Z, Tiftik T, Gürçay E, Mülkoğlu C, Yalçınkaya B, Bağcıer F, Aksakal MF, Erdoğan K, Sertçelik A, Çakır B, Kaymak B, Özçakar L. The Relationship Among Probable SARCopenia, Osteoporosis and SuprasPinatus Tendon Tears in Postmenopausal Women: The SARCOSP Study. Calcif Tissue Int 2024; 114:340-347. [PMID: 38342790 PMCID: PMC10957602 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-024-01183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the relationship among probable sarcopenia, osteoporosis (OP) and supraspinatus tendon (SSP) tears in postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women screened/followed for OP were recruited. Demographic data, comorbidities, exercise/smoking status, and handgrip strength values were recorded. Probable sarcopenia was diagnosed as handgrip strength values < 20 kg. Achilles and SSP thicknesses were measured using ultrasound. Among 1443 postmenopausal women, 268 (18.6%) subjects had SSP tears. Unilateral tears were on the dominant side in 146 (10.1%) and on the non-dominant side in 55 women (3.8%). In contrast to those without, women with SSP tears had older age, lower level of education, thinner SSP and lower grip strength (all p < 0.05). In addition, they had higher frequencies of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, DM, OP and probable sarcopenia, but lower exercise frequency (all p < 0.05). Binary logistic regression modeling revealed that age [odds ratio (OR): 1.046 (1.024-1.067 95% CI)], hypertension [OR: 1.560 (1.145-2.124 95% CI)], OP [OR: 1.371 (1.022-1.839 95% CI)] and probable sarcopenia [OR: 1.386 (1.031-1.861 95% CI)] were significant predictors for SSP tears (all p < 0.05). This study showed that age, presence of hypertension, probable sarcopenia and OP were related with SSP tears in postmenopausal women. To this end, although OP appeared to be related to SSP tears, SSP tear/thickness evaluation can be recommended for OP patients, especially those who have other risk factors such as older age, higher BMI, hypertension, and probable sarcopenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Kara
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Özgür Kara
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Esad Durmuş
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pelin Analay
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Fatıma Edibe Şener
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Beyza Nur Çıtır
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gizem Olgu Korkmaz
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Zeliha Ünlü
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Tülay Tiftik
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Eda Gürçay
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cevriye Mülkoğlu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berkay Yalçınkaya
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Bağcıer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Basaksehir Cam Sakura Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mahmud Fazıl Aksakal
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kübra Erdoğan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sertçelik
- Department of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Banu Çakır
- Department of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bayram Kaymak
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Levent Özçakar
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|