Footprint size matters: wider coronal greater tuberosity width is associated with increased rates of healing after rotator cuff repair

The relationship between the shape of rotator cuff tears and shoulder anatomical parameters

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to investigate the potential relationship between shoulder anatomical parameters and the shape of rotator cuff tears (L-shaped, U-shaped, and crescent-shaped).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 160 (n:160) patients. Patients were divided into four groups: crescent type, u type and L type tears and control group. There were 40 cases in each group. The operated patients were divided into three groups based on the shape of the tears in arthroscopic images. Measurements of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), Greater Tuberosity Angle (GTA), Acromion Index (AI), Lateral Acromion Angle (LAA), and Humerus Footprint width (coronal width and sagittal width) were taken in each group and compared.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into four different groups: Crescent type group (n:40), L type group (n:40), U type group (n:40) and control group (n:40). Upon assessing the coronal and sagittal width measurements, The mean coranal width measurement of the L-type tear group was 12.62 ± 0.29 mm, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean sagittal width of the L-type tear group was 34.95 ± 0.29 mm, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). When the groups were evaluated based on GTA, CSA, and AI data, the mean GTA measurement of the L-type tear group was 73.03 ± 0.95 degrees, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean CSA measurement of the L-type tear group was 34.77 ± 0.66 degrees, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). The mean AI measurement of the L-type tear group was 0.77 ± 0.02, which was significantly higher than all other groups (p < 0.05). When the groups were evaluated based on LAA data, the mean LAA measurement of the L-type tear group was 76.98 ± 1.04 degrees, which was significantly lower than all other groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our study, especially in L-shaped tears, measurements of GTA, CSA, AI, LAA, coronal and sagittal width were found to be different compared to the control group. These results suggest that shoulder anatomy affects the mechanisms of rotator cuff tear formation and that these parameters play a more significant role in L-shaped tears.

Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation Is Associated With Lower Retear Rates for Large Tears: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair with and without patch augmentation.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that directly compared outcomes between rotator cuff repair (RCR) with versus without patch augmentation. Patients were evaluated based on retear rate, histological outcomes, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (Constant score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score; University of California-Los Angeles shoulder scale; Simple Shoulder Test; EuroQol-visual analog scale; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; and PENN shoulder score questionnaire).

RESULTS

Six studies (1 level I, 5 level II) met inclusion criteria, including 188 patients undergoing RCR alone (Control) and 193 patients undergoing RCR with patch augmentation (Patch). Patient age ranged from 56.0 to 68.0 years. The mean follow-up time ranged from 14.0 to 68.4 months. The average body mass index ranged from 24.4 to 29.4, and the overall percentage of males ranged from 32.5% to 82.3%. Three studies found significantly decreased retear rates with patch augmentation. The retear rate ranged from 34.0% to 65.4% in the Control group and 9.1% to 52.9% in the Patch group. One study found a significant difference for the Constant score favoring the Patch group. Two studies found a significant difference for the ASES score favoring the Patch group. One study found significantly better results with patch augmentation in terms of repaired tendon thickness and footprint coverage, based on magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Patch augmentation of rotator cuff repairs may be associated with lower retear rates for large tears. There is limited evidence to suggest that patch augmentation is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, systematic review of level I and II studies.

The Double-Circle System in the Greater Tuberosity: Using Radius to Predict Rotator Cuff Tear

OBJECTIVE

In this study we concerned on the morphological characteristics of the greater tuberosity of humerus and proposed the double-circle radius ratio as a new predictor for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study and patients who visited our hospital and were diagnosed with or without rotator cuff tears via magnetic resonance imaging from January 2018 to July 2021 were enrolled and classified into two groups respectively. In a standard anteroposterior view, the radius of the best-fit circle of humeral head and the radius of the concentric circle passing through the most lateral edge of the greater tuberosity were measured in each shoulder. The ratio of these two radiuses was named as the double-circle radius ratio. Angular parameters including the greater tuberosity angle and the critical shoulder angle were also measured in the anteroposterior view. Independent samples t tests and chi-square tests were used to find significant differences between groups. Significant associations between those measured variables and demographic characteristics were analyzed with simple linear regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were pictured to determine applied cutoff values by using Youden index. Multivariable-adjusted analysis for the occurrence of rotator cuff tears was carried out by using multiple logistic regression analysis. For all tests a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve shoulders with rotator cuff tears and 42 shoulders without rotator cuff tears were included. The mean value of the double-circle radius ratio was significantly larger in shoulders with rotator cuff tears (1.42 ± 0.09 vs. 1.30 ± 0.07, P = 0.000). With simple linear regression analysis, the radiuses of the humeral head and the greater tuberosity were significantly associated with heights and weights. In receiver operating characteristic curves, the largest area was found under the curve of the double-circle radius ratio as 0.846 (95% CI, 0.781-0.911; P = 0.000) with an applied cutoff value as 1.38 (sensitivity, 70.5%; specificity, 88.1%). Multivariable-adjusted analysis showed that a value of the double-circle radius ratio >1.38 resulted in 11.252-fold odds of developing rotator cuff tears (95% CI, 3.388-37.368; P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The double-circle radius ratio is significantly larger in patients with rotator cuff tears and could be regarded as an eligible predictor for rotator cuff tears.