Triceps fascial tongue exposure for intra-articular distal humerus fracture: revisiting the Van Gorder approach

A novel configuration for the fixation of intra-articular C2.3 distal humerus fractures with the potential for minimally invasive surgery: a biomechanical evaluation and finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Distal humerus fractures are a challenge to treat, and the current standard of care, open reduction internal fixation with a double-plate, has a high rate of complications. We proposed a novel internal fixation configuration, lateral intramedullary nail and medial plate (LINMP) and verified its rigidity through biomechanical tests and finite element analysis.

METHODS

The study involved biomechanical testing of 30 synthetic humerus models to compare 2 different fixation systems for an AO 13C-2.3 type fracture. The orthogonal double-plate (ODP) group and the LINMP group were compared through biomechanical testing to measure stiffness and failure load fewer than 3 working conditions. Based on the results, we optimized the intramedullary nail by eliminating the holes at the distal end of the nail and incorporating a 2-hole external locking plate. The Finite element analysis was also conducted to further compare the modified LINMP configuration with the previous 2 fixation configurations.

RESULTS

In biomechanical tests, the ODP group exhibited lower stiffness under bending and compression forces compared to the LINMP group, but higher stiffness and failure loads under torsion force. In finite element analysis, the modified LINMP reduces the maximum stress of the fixation structure without significantly reducing the stiffness under bending stress and axial compression conditions. In torsion stress conditions, the modified LINMP enhances both the maximum stress and the stiffness, although it remains marginally inferior to the ODP structure.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the innovative LINMP presents comparable or slightly superior concerning bending and axial loading compared to orthogonal double-plate osteosynthesis for distal humeral intra-articular fractures, which might become a minimally invasive option for these fractures.

Percent articular exposure of the distal humerus with triceps fascial tongue approach compared with olecranon osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Distal humerus fractures are common and can be difficult to treat. No one approach to the distal humerus has been shown to be superior to another; however, the olecranon osteotomy remains the gold standard for complex, intra-articular fractures. Understanding the percent of articular exposure with approaches to the distal humerus is important for success. The goal of this study is to show the percent of articular exposure of the triceps fascial tongue approach as compared with the olecranon osteotomy.

METHODS

Twelve fresh frozen cadavers were separated randomly into 2 groups of 6 each. The first group of 6 specimens was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approaches with the collaterals maintained and with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated. The second group of 6 was allocated to the triceps fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals followed by an olecranon osteotomy. The articular exposure was marked after performing each approach, and the percent of articular exposure was quantified by using 3D scanning. Standard deviations were calculated for each.

RESULTS

The average percent visualization of the distal humerus articular surface in the fascial tongue approach while maintaining the collaterals was 36% in the first cohort and 37% in the second cohort with a standard deviation of 5% in both cohorts. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the fascial tongue approach with the collaterals released off the ulna and elbow dislocated was 85.09% with a standard deviation of 4%. The average percent of the distal humerus articular surface exposed in the olecranon osteotomy group was 57.9% with a standard deviation of 5%.

CONCLUSION

The triceps fascial tongue approach allows for visualization of about one-third of the joint, which may be adequate for many intra-articular distal humerus fractures. For added exposure of the articular surface, the collaterals may be elevated from the ulna and the elbow dislocated allowing for a substantial increase in percent of articular exposure compared with the collateral retaining fascial tongue approach and the olecranon osteotomy.

Triceps tongue versus olecranon osteotomy for intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

There are various approaches to the distal humerus when managing a distal humeral fracture, and controversy exists regarding which approach is optimal. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of the triceps tongue (TT) approach when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-A, B, and C distal humeral fractures. Secondarily, we aimed to compare the outcomes of the TT approach vs. olecranon osteotomy (OO) when used for osteosynthesis of AO type 13-C distal humeral fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with distal humeral fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation by either a TT or OO approach between 2007 and 2019 at 2 separate institutions. TT patients with AO type 13-C fractures were matched to OO patients at a 1:1 ratio based on age, sex, and fracture characteristics. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, elbow motion, fracture union, complications, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients treated with the TT approach were assessed, and the matched TT and OO cohorts each comprised 15 patients. The TT group showed less blood loss (119.3 mL vs. 268.5 mL, P = .03), had greater maximal flexion (126° vs. 116°, P = .03), and achieved a larger flexion-extension arc (108° vs. 93°, P = .05) than the OO group. In the OO cohort, 27% of patients had complications directly related to the OO, and OO patients had a higher rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis (33% vs. 0%, P = .04). There was no difference in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (P = .08), procedure time (P = .2), total number of patients with ≥1 complication (P = .5), difficulty with union (P = .7), or number of patients requiring revision surgery (P = .7).

CONCLUSIONS

The TT approach is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of distal humeral fractures. When compared with the OO approach for AO type 13-C fractures, the TT approach did not differ regarding functional outcomes but showed increased range of motion, decreased intraoperative blood loss, and a lower rate of postoperative ulnar nerve neuritis. The TT approach should be considered as a safe and reliable first-line approach for intra-articular distal humeral fractures because it allows adequate visualization of the articular surface, eliminates complications related to osteotomy including delayed union or nonunion and hardware failure or irritation, and allows for easy conversion to total elbow arthroplasty.

Biomechanical Evaluation of 2 Common Approaches for Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Triceps Tongue Compared With Triceps Reflecting

PURPOSE

We hypothesize that the triceps tongue approach will be equivalent in strength to the triceps reflecting approach in load to failure following a cyclic preload.

METHODS

Seven paired fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected using the triceps reflecting approach or triceps tongue approach to the posterior elbow. The triceps was then repaired in each specimen, and the elbows were placed in a testing jig. Elbows were preloaded in a cyclic fashion at 5 lbs (2.3 kgf) for 200 cycles in flexion/extension, followed by load to failure. The stiffness and ultimate failure strength for each specimen were determined. We defined ultimate failure as gapping in the suture construct of 4 mm or suture breakage.

RESULTS

One of the triceps tongue specimens was excluded due to a testing error, resulting in 6 elbows in this group. There were no tendon repair failures during the cyclic preload. The median ultimate failure of the reflecting group occurred at 65 pounds, compared to 115 pounds in the tongue group. This was significantly different. The reflecting approach consistently failed along the entire bone-tendon interface. The tongue approach failed at the proximal repair site in 4 of 6 specimens, while the longitudinal aspect of the tendon repair remained intact.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a cyclic preload of 5 lbs for 200 cycles, the triceps tongue repair is stronger than triceps reflecting in ultimate failure. The mode of failure of triceps tongue repair may be superior to that of triceps reflecting.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study may help guide surgeons when choosing a "triceps off" approach to total elbow arthroplasty.

The Van Gorder approach for total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of the triceps during exposure for total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is critical to a successful outcome. Previously described techniques include elevating the triceps insertion from one side or leaving the triceps insertion attached and dislocating the joint. Another approach to the elbow, first described in 1933 by Willis Campbell, MD, and subsequently modified by George Van Gorder, MD, involves turning down the triceps tendon without disrupting the triceps insertion. This approach offers complete visualization of the joint and provides excellent exposure for TEA. Only the original report of the technique and a small series of patients using this technique for TEA exist in the literature. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of the Van Gorder approach in a large series of patients undergoing TEA.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEA from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients who underwent primary TEA performed through the Van Gorder approach with at least 6 months' follow-up were included for analysis. Patients with prior elbow surgery were excluded. Demographic data, indication for surgery, postoperative range of motion, triceps function, and need for additional surgery were recorded. Prospectively collected visual analog scale (VAS) and Global Health Quality of Life scores were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62 years, 81% were female, and the average follow-up was 30.2 months. The most common surgical indications included inflammatory arthritis (47%), osteoarthritis (24%), and fracture (19%). Postoperatively, average elbow arc of motion was an 8°-137°. There was 1 patient (1.89%) who developed failure of their triceps extension mechanism. A total of 10 patients (19%) underwent additional elbow surgery most commonly for superficial wound complications. Preoperative VAS scores decreased significantly, starting at 3 months postoperatively (6.76 to 3.37, P < .001), and remained constant at the 12- and 24-month postoperative visits.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study evaluating the Van Gorder surgical approach to the elbow for primary TEA with an average follow-up of 32 months. Overall rates of triceps failure and reoperation are consistent with other approaches for TEA.

Surgical management for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow

The objective of this review is to summarize the surgical options for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, reported clinical outcomes, and suggested indications in previous literatures. The surgical management of primary elbow arthritis has evolved because of an improved understanding of pathologic mechanisms and manifestations as well as the development of novel surgical techniques and devices. Osteocapsular arthroplasty (OCA), elbow debridement, distraction arthroplasty, and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have been employed for managing elbow osteoarthritis. Elbow debridement and OCA can be helpful in most cases of symptomatic elbow arthritis. TEA is usually recommended for end-stage arthritis in elderly patients after prosthetic implants have been in place for long periods or after complications. Distraction arthroplasty might find a place in the treatment of younger, active patients with end-stage arthritis.