Oral Appliances in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

A mandibular advancement device associated with lingual control: a new treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea?

PURPOSE

Oral appliances (OA) have become the main alternative to positive pressure airway devices (PAP) for the control of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite literature support, controversies about the mode of action and the effectiveness of these devices persist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of modified mandibular advancement devices (MAD) in patients with OSA who failed treatment with MAD and to evaluate the role of the tongue as a factor in patients who failed treatment with MAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients unable to control the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) using a MAD were subsequently treated with a modified version that included a tongue trimming accessory. The objective was to stabilize the tongue by preventing it from sliding with the consequent collapse of the upper airway (UA). New polysomnography (PSG) was performed with the modified MAD in place.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients who failed MAD therapy were studied including 15 men (75%) with mean age (± standard deviation) of 58.5 ± 13.1 years and BMI 29.6 ± 5.0 Kg/m2. After installing the tongue trimmer, the number of patients who achieved complete success with the new MAD (AHI < 5) went from 0 to 30% and those who achieved partial success (5 < AHI < 10) went from 0 to 20%. The number of patient responders (AHI reduced by at least 50%) went from 20 to 75%.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the tongue, even in the presence of a MAD, may be one of the contributing factors for the collapse of the UA and consequent device ineffectiveness. By stabilizing the tongue through the insertion of a tongue trimmer, the MAD became more effective in many cases.

Comparing efficacy of the mandibular advancement device after drug-induced sleep endoscopy and continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare objective and self-reported outcomes of two treatments for managing mild, moderate, and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults: a mandibular advancement device (MAD) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with OSA by means of polysomnography (PSG) included one group treated with a custom-made, two-piece, adjustable MAD and a second group treated with CPAP for 8 weeks. Before the initiation of the treatment, all patients assigned to MAD underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), and all CPAP group patients underwent manual titration of CPAP after PSG. Objective (PSG) and self-reported (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] and Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]) data were used to assess outcomes. Collected data included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), mean capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), arousal index (AI), degree of daytime sleepiness, and quality of life. A PSG follow-up after 8 weeks with MAD in situ, and data from the CPAP data card were used to assess the effect of the two treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients included 30 treated with MAD and 29 treated with CPAP. Between baseline and the 8-week follow-up, the mean AHI score decreased significantly from 35.1 to 6.8 episodes/h (p < 0.001) in patients treated with MAD and from 35.2 to 3.0 episodes/h (p < 0.001) in patients treated with CPAP. The mean AHI score at the 8-week follow-up was significantly lower in CPAP group than in MAD group (p = 0.003). The two groups did not differ significantly at follow-up regarding SpO2 (p = 0.571), ODI (p = 0.273), AI (p = 0.100), ESS score (p = 0.648), and SF-36 score (p = 0.237).

CONCLUSION

In the short term, patients on CPAP attained better PSG outcomes in terms of AHI reduction. Both MAD after DISE evaluation and CPAP resulted in similar improvements in clinical symptoms and health-related quality of life, even in patients with severe OSA.

Appliances Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a recurrent partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep caused by narrowing or collapse of the pharyngeal wall. It leads to microstimulation and oxyhemoglobin desaturation, resulting in sleepiness and loud snoring. OSA negatively affects the cardiovascular system and may contribute to neurocognitive impairment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. The effectiveness was assessed by using the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI). An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted between 1998 and 2021. Articles were independently assessed by three reviewers. The quality of a randomised control trial (RCT) is assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias method. The tool GRADE was used to achieve the desired level of confidence for each outcome reported. Several studies used continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mandibular advancement devices (MAD), and tongue retention devices (TRD). The meta-analysis included a total of six papers that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that CPAP significantly improved AHI compared with an oral appliance (random effects: difference in means = 8.40, 95% CI = 7.21 to 9.60). It was also found that oral appliance (OA) therapy significantly improved AHI compared with baseline before appliance therapy (random effects: mean difference = 13.40, 95% CI = 10.87 to 15.93; p.00001). For mild to moderate OSA, CPAP is considered the gold standard. Our meta-analysis of six RCTs found favorable evidence for OSA patients receiving oral devices; however, they were less effective than CPAP. A subgroup analysis found that MAD may be a beneficial treatment for mild to moderate OSA patients who do not respond to CPAP. The findings suggest that oral appliances may be an effective treatment for OSA, especially in patients with mild to moderate OSA.

A State-of-the-Art Review on Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) affects many patients worldwide every year. It represents a leading cause of hospitalization and still, today, mortality remains high, albeit the progress in treatment strategies. Several factors contribute to the development and progression of HF. Among these, sleep apnea syndrome represents a common but still underestimated factor because its prevalence is substantially higher in patients with HF than in the general population and is related to a worse prognosis. This review summarizes the current knowledge about sleep apnea syndrome coexisting with HF in terms of morbidity and mortality to provide actual and future perspectives about the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of this association.

Prevalence of patients at risk for developing obstructive sleep apnea based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire at King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder. Its susceptibility can easily be detected when it is at an early stage as can patients who are at risk of OSA. A simple questionnaire such as STOP-BANG (SB) can facilitate early detection. Our study aims to assess the risk of OSA and evaluate its correlating risk factors in patients attending King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, using the SB questionnaire.

METHODS

Ethical approval was obtained. A random sample of patients ages 18-80 years, who visited KAUFD between November 2016 and April 2017 were recruited. Three highly trained and calibrated dental interns obtained the following measurements (weight, height, blood pressure, and neck circumference) and administered the questionnaire in a face-to-face interview.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (62% females) participated in the study with a mean age of 34.6 years and hypertension reported as 16.4%. According to the SB, 31% of patients were found at high risk of OSA. Large neck circumference (40.22[±4.7] cm) and gender (66% males) were found to be significantly correlated with high-risk patients; p < .001.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one third of the patients were at high risk of OSA, with men and patients having large neck circumference being significantly more affected. Systolic blood pressure, hypertension, and smoking were found to be high in high-risk patients. However, they were not statistically and significantly different from those patients who were not in high risk. The role of a dentist should be to utilize the questionnaire to detect any patient at risk of OSA and refer them accordingly.

Evaluation and Management of Snoring

Snoring can be harmless (primary) or a symptom of sleep-disordered breathing (secondary) and should alert the physician to evaluate the patient for risks thereof. Phenotypes of snoring and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are anatomic and nonanatomic and identifying these phenotypes and their interrelationships are critical to effective therapy. Mouth breathing alerts the physician to nasal airway obstruction, signals orofacial growth changes in children, and heralds the progression of SDB. Systematic evaluation to establish phenotypes includes assessing sleep habits, comorbidities, upper airway examination, polysomnography, and drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Strategies for treatment should be personalized and precise to the phenotype(s) to achieve the most benefit.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

This comprehensive review of the 2019 restorative dental literature is offered to inform busy dentists regarding remarkable publications and noteworthy progress made in the profession. Developed by the Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, each author brings discipline-specific expertise to 1 of 8 sections of the report: (1) prosthodontics; (2) periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; (3) implant dentistry; (4) dental materials and therapeutics; (5) occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; (6) sleep-related breathing disorders; (7) oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and (8) dental caries and cariology. The report targets important information likely to influence day-to-day dental treatment decisions. Each review is not intended to stand alone but to update interested readers so that they may visit source material when greater detail is desired. As the profession moves toward evidence-based clinical decision-making, an incredible volume of potentially valuable dental literature continues to increase. It is the intention of this review and its authors to provide assistance in negotiating the extensive dental literature published in 2019. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in the clinical management of dental patients.

Efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy as a First-Line Treatment for Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Korean Prospective Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Responses to oral appliances (OAs) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) vary, and have not been fully evaluated in Korean patients. In this study we aimed to determine the efficacy of OAs for the first-line treatment of Korean patients with moderate or severe OSA.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective observational study included 45 patients with moderate or severe OSA that had been newly diagnosed between March 2017 and May 2018 and who underwent OA treatment for 1 month. Questionnaires were completed and polysomnography (PSG) was performed before and after OA treatment. The primary outcome measures were improvement in the absolute apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the percentage reduction in the AHI. The secondary outcomes were improvements in the questionnaire scores related to sleep-associated symptoms and PSG parameters.

RESULTS

The patients were aged 47.4±12.1 years (mean±SD), only two of them were female, and their AHI at baseline was 29.7±10.9/h. After OA treatment the AHI had reduced by 63.9±25.8%, with the reduction was similar between the patients with moderate OSA and those with severe OSA. Overall 31.1% of the patients achieved a normal AHI (<5/h), and 64.4% had an AHI of ≤10/h after the treatment. The body mass index (BMI) was the most reliable factor for predicting the percentage reduction in the AHI. The OAs also improved the sleep architecture and subjective sleep-related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The OAs were effective in patients with moderate or severe OSA. The OAs reduced the mean AHI to 63.9% of the baseline value, and this reduction was influenced by the BMI.