Influence of Sequential Ponte Osteotomies on the Human Thoracic Spine With a Rib Cage

How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review

The vast majority of previous experimental studies on the thoracic spine were performed without the entire rib cage, while significant contributive aspects regarding stability and motion behavior were shown in several other studies. The aim of this literature review was to pool and increase evidence on the effect of the rib cage on human thoracic spinal biomechanical characteristics by collating and interrelating previous experimental findings in order to support interpretations of in vitro and in silico studies disregarding the rib cage to create comparability and reproducibility for all studies including the rib cage and provide combined comparative data for future biomechanical studies on the thoracic spine. After a systematic literature search corresponding to PRISMA guidelines, eleven studies were included and quantitatively evaluated in this review. The combined data exhibited that the rib cage increases the thoracic spinal stability in all motion planes, primarily in axial rotation and predominantly in the upper thorax half, reducing thoracic spinal range of motion, neutral zone, and intradiscal pressure, while increasing thoracic spinal neutral and elastic zone stiffness, compression resistance, and, in a neutral position, the intradiscal pressure. In particular, the costosternal connection was found to be the primary stabilizer and an essential determinant for the kinematics of the overall thoracic spine, while the costotransverse and costovertebral joints predominantly reinforce the stability of the single thoracic spinal segments but do not alter thoracic spinal kinematics. Neutral zone and neutral zone stiffness were more affected by rib cage removal than the range of motion and elastic zone stiffness, thus also representing the essential parameters for destabilization of the thoracic spine. As a result, the rib cage and thoracic spine form a biomechanical entity that should not be separated. Therefore, usage of entire human non-degenerated thoracic spine and rib cage specimens together with pure moment application and sagittal curvature determination is recommended for future in vitro testing in order to ensure comparability, reproducibility, and quasi-physiological validity.

Impact of multilevel facetectomy on segmental spinal flexibility in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to intraoperatively assess the effects of multilevel facetectomy on segmental spinal flexibility in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent posterior thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curve correction were evaluated. Compressive or distractive loaded force of 50N was applied on the handle of a compressor or distractor connected to the necks of pedicle screws inserted at T7 to T11. Segmental spinal flexibility rates were calculated based on the distance between screw heads under the loaded and unloaded conditions. In addition, the flexibility rates were obtained before and after multilevel facetectomy.

FINDINGS

Absolute flexibility rates of all segments significantly increased after multilevel facetectomy under both compressive and distractive forces (P < 0.01). The absolute change in the flexibility rate was significantly higher at the concave side than at the convex side under both compressive (P < 0.01) and distractive loaded forces (P = 0.046). No significant correlation was found between change in the flexibility rates and preoperative Cobb angle or preoperative curve flexibility.

INTERPRETATION

From a biomechanical point of view, multilevel facetectomy provides proper spinal flexibility to improve the correction rate of posterior adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. The effects are higher at the concave side than at the convex side.

Increasing loads and diminishing returns: a biomechanical study of direct vertebral rotation

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical simulation of DVR and pure-moment testing on thoracic spines.

OBJECTIVES

Characterize load-deformation response of thoracic spines under DVR maneuvers until failure, and compare to pure-moment testing of same spines. Despite reports of surgical complications, few studies exist on increase in ROM under DVR torque. Biomechanical models predicting increases from surgical releases have consistently used "pure-moments", a standard established for non-destructive measurement of ROM. Yet, DVR torque is not accurately modeled using pure moments and, moreover, magnitudes of torque applied during DVR maneuvers may be substantially higher than pure-moment testing.

METHODS

Cadaveric thoracic spines (N = 11) were imaged, then prepared. Polyaxial pedicle screws were implanted at T7-T10 after surgical releases. Bilateral facetectomies and Ponte osteotomies were completed at T10-T11. A custom apparatus, mounted into an 8-dof MTS load frame, was used to attach to pedicle screws, allowing simulation of surgical DVR maneuvers. Motions of vertebrae were measured using optical motion tracking. Torque was increased until rupture of the T10-T11 disc or fracture at the pedicle screw sites at any level. The torque-rotation behavior was compared to its behavior under pure-moment testing performed prior to the DVR maneuver.

RESULTS

Under DVR maneuvers, failure of the T10-T11 discs accompanied in most cases by pedicle screw loosening, occurred at 13.7-54.7 Nm torque, increasing axial rotation by 1.4°-8.9°. In contrast, pure-moment testing (4 Nm) increased axial rotation by only 0.0°-0.9°.

CONCLUSIONS

DVR resulted in substantially greater correction potential increases compared to pure-moment testing even at the same torque. These results suggest increased flexibility obtained by osteotomies and facetectomies is underestimated using pure-moment testing, misrepresenting clinical expectations. The present study is an important and necessary step toward the establishment of a more accurate and ultimately surgically applied model.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Stabilizing effect of the rib cage on adjacent segment motion following thoracolumbar posterior fixation of the human thoracic cadaveric spine: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Although the rib cage provides substantial stability to the thoracic spine, few biomechanical studies have incorporated it into their testing model, and no studies have determined the influence of the rib cage on adjacent segment motion of long fusion constructs. The present biomechanical study aimed to determine the mechanical contribution of the intact rib cage during the testing of instrumented specimens.

METHODS

A cyclic loading (CL) protocol with instrumentation (T4-L2 pedicle screw-rod fixation) was conducted on five thoracic spines (C7-L2) with intact rib cages. Range of motion (±5 Nm pure moment) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was captured for intact ribs, partial ribs, and no ribs conditions. Comparisons at the supra-adjacent (T2-T3), adjacent (T3-T4), first instrumented (T4-T5), and second instrumented (T5-T6) levels were made between conditions (P ≤ 0.05).

FINDINGS

A trend of increased motion at the adjacent level was seen for partial ribs and no ribs in all 3 bending modes. This trend was also observed at the supra-adjacent level for both conditions. No significant changes in motion compared to the intact ribs condition were seen at the first and second instrumented levels (P > 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

The segment adjacent to long fusion constructs, which may appear more grossly unstable when tested in the disarticulated spine, is reinforced by the rib cage. In order to avoid overestimating adjacent level motion, when testing the effectiveness of surgical techniques of the thoracic spine, inclusion of the rib cage may be warranted to better reflect clinical circumstances.

The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults - A systematic review of in vivo studies

A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions. After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1-12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8-12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1-4) and middle (T4-8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4-8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6-12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.

The True Ponte Osteotomy: By the One Who Developed It

STUDY DESIGN

Technique and applications.

OBJECTIVES

To define the anatomy, biomechanics, indications, and surgical technique of the true Ponte osteotomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Ponte osteotomy, originally developed for thoracic kyphosis, was the first one to obtain posterior shortening of the thoracic spine, maintaining the anterior column load-sharing capacity. It has become a widely applied technique in various types of spine deformities and a frequent topic of presentations at meetings and in scientific articles. Several of them offer unquestionable evidence of an incorrect execution, with consequently distorted outcomes and erroneous conclusions. A clearing up became essential.

METHODS

Our original experience is based on a series of 240 patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis operated in the years 1969-2015, at first with a standard posterior Harrington technique and then by using the Ponte osteotomy with different instrumentations. A series of 78 of them, operated in the years 1987-1997, who had Ponte osteotomies at every level, is presented.

RESULTS

The average preoperative kyphosis has been corrected from 80° (range 61°-102°) to 31° (range 15°-50°) by a substantial posterior shortening.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of publications use the term Ponte osteotomy loosely for by far incomplete resections and mixing it up with Smith-Petersen's osteotomy. The true Ponte osteotomy is capable of producing marked flexibility in extension, flexion and rotation, justifying its wide use in thoracic deformities, mainly in scoliosis. An exact performance of the osteotomy with adequate bony resections, including the laminae, is an absolute condition to take full advantage of its properties.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.