Neurologic Comorbidities Predict Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity

An evidence based conceptual framework for the multifactorial understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis

Introduction

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a debilitating pathology that arises from a variety of etiologies. Spinal fusion surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those who do not achieve symptom relief with conservative interventions. Fusion surgery can be complicated by a secondary deformity termed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

Research question

This scoping review evaluates the modern body of literature analyzing risk factors for PJK development and organizes these factors according to a multifactorial framework based on mechanical, tissue or demographic components.

Materials and methods

An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed and Embase back to the year 2010. Articles were assessed for quality. All risk factors that were evaluated and those that significantly predicted the development of PJK were compiled. The frequency that a risk factor was predictive compared to the number of times it was evaluated was calculated.

Results

150 articles were reviewed. 57.3% of papers were of low quality. 76% of risk factors analyzed were focusing on the mechanical contribution to development of PJK versus only 5% were focusing on the tissue-based contribution. Risk factors that were most frequently predictive compared to how often they were analyzed were Hounsfield Units of vertebrae, UIV disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle cross sectional area and fatty infiltration, ligament augmentation, instrument characteristics, postoperative hip and lower extremity radiographic metrics, and postoperative teriparatide supplementation.

Discussion and conclusion

This review finds a multifactorial framework accounting for mechanical, patient and tissue-based risk factors will improve the understanding of PJK development.

Alteration of the Sitting and Standing Movement in Adult Spinal Deformity

Adults with spinal deformity (ASD) are known to have spinal malalignment affecting their quality of life and daily life activities. While walking kinematics were shown to be altered in ASD, other functional activities are yet to be evaluated such as sitting and standing, which are essential for patients’ autonomy and quality of life perception. In this cross-sectional study, 93 ASD subjects (50 ± 20 years; 71 F) age and sex matched to 31 controls (45 ± 15 years; 18 F) underwent biplanar radiographic imaging with subsequent calculation of standing radiographic spinopelvic parameters. All subjects filled HRQOL questionnaires such as SF36 and ODI. ASD were further divided into 34 ASD-sag (with PT > 25° and/or SVA >5 cm and/or PI-LL >10°), 32 ASD-hyperTK (with only TK >60°), and 27 ASD-front (with only frontal malalignment: Cobb >20°). All subjects underwent 3D motion analysis during the sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit movements. The range of motion (ROM) and mean values of pelvis, lower limbs, thorax, head, and spinal segments were calculated on the kinematic waveforms. Kinematics were compared between groups and correlations to radiographic and HRQOL scores were computed. During sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit movements, ASD-sag had decreased pelvic anteversion (12.2 vs 15.2°), hip flexion (53.0 vs 62.2°), sagittal mobility in knees (87.1 vs 93.9°), and lumbar mobility (L1L3-L3L5: −9.1 vs −6.8°, all p < 0.05) compared with controls. ASD-hyperTK showed increased dynamic lordosis (L1L3–L3L5: −9.1 vs −6.8°), segmental thoracic kyphosis (T2T10–T10L1: 32.0 vs 17.2°, C7T2–T2T10: 30.4 vs 17.7°), and thoracolumbar extension (T10L1–L1L3: −12.4 vs −5.5°, all p < 0.05) compared with controls. They also had increased mobility at the thoracolumbar and upper-thoracic spine. Both ASD-sag and ASD-hyperTK maintained a flexed trunk, an extended head along with an increased trunk and head sagittal ROM. Kinematic alterations were correlated to radiographic parameters and HRQOL scores. Even after controlling for demographic factors, dynamic trunk flexion was determined by TK and PI-LL mismatch (adj. R² = 0.44). Lumbar sagittal ROM was determined by PI-LL mismatch (adj. R² = 0.13). In conclusion, the type of spinal deformity in ASD seems to determine the strategy used for sitting and standing. Future studies should evaluate whether surgical correction of the deformity could restore sitting and standing kinematics and ultimately improve quality of life.

Degenerative Adult Cervical Kyphosis With Secondary Diagnosis Codes Are Associated With Higher Cost and Complications After Spinal Fusion: A Medicare Database Study

BACKGROUND

Adult cervical deformity (ACD) is a potentially debilitating condition resulting from kyphosis, scoliosis, or both, of the cervical spine. Conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson's disease, and neuromuscular diseases are particularly known to cause severe deformities. We describe the 90-day cost and complications associated with spinal fusion for ACD using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding terminology and study if secondary diagnoses associated with potential for severe deformity affect the cost and complication profile of ACD surgery.

METHODS

Medicare data were used to study hospital costs and complications within 90 days after primary cervical fusion for ACD in 2 cohorts matched by demographics and comorbidity burden: (1) patients with diagnoses of secondary pathology (SP) known to cause severe deformity and (2) without SP. Univariate and multiple-variable analyses to study incidence of complications, readmission, and costs within 90 days were done.

RESULTS

A total of 2900 patients in matched cohorts of 1450 each were included. The mean index hospital payment ($26 545 ± $25 968 versus $22 991 ± $21 599) and length of stay (4.8 ± 5.6 versus 3.9 ± 4.5 days) was significantly (P < .01) higher in ACD patients with SP. On adjusted analysis, the risk of procedure-related complications was higher (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.83) in patients with SP than those without SP, but not readmission (OR = 1.04, 95% CI, 0.82-1.32) or refusion (OR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.45-2.0) within 90 days. The cost profile of complications, readmission, and refusion has been given.

CONCLUSIONS

ACD patients with secondary diagnosis codes such as inflammatory arthropathy or neuromuscular pathology incur higher 90-day costs due to the inherent requirement of bigger fusions and higher risk of peri-operative complications, but with similar risk of readmission and refusion as those without SP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With evolving health care reforms and payment models, knowledge of conditions associated with higher expenditure after elective spine surgical procedures will be beneficial to providers and payors for appropriate risk stratification.

Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis after internal fixation for adult spinal deformity: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

To investigate the factors associated with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). A systematic search was performed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was pooled for continuous variables, and the odds ratio (OR) was calculated for dichotomous variables. The PJK group had higher values for age (WMD = 2.53, 95%CI = 1.38 ~ 3.68, P < 0.001), female gender (OR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.29 ~ 1.87, P < 0.001), and diagnosed osteoporosis (OR = 1.58, 95%CI = 1.11 ~ 2.26, P = 0.01). Preoperatively, significant differences were detected in sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (WMD = 19.29, 95%CI = 16.60 ~ 21.98, P < 0.001), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) (WMD = 2.71, 95%CI = 0.25 ~ 5.18, P = 0.03), pelvic tilt (PT) (WMD = 2.64, 95%CI = 1.38 ~ 3.90, P < 0.001), lumbar lordosis (LL) (WMD = - 1.76, 95%CI = - 2.73 ~ -0.79, P < 0.001), and sacral slope (SS) (WMD = - 2.80, 95%CI = - 5.57 ~ -0.04, P = 0.001). At follow-up, the following were higher in the PJK group: thoracic kyphosis (TK) (WMD = 5.51, 95%CI = 2.23 ~ 8.80, P < 0.001), proximal junctional angle (PJA) (WMD = 9.07, 95%CI = 4.21 ~ 13.92, P < 0.001), and PT (WMD = 1.51, 95%CI = 0.31 ~ 2.72, P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in SS (P = 0.49), and SVA (P = 0.11) between groups. Fusion to S1 or pelvis significantly increased the risk of PJK (OR = 2.08, P < 0.001). Ligament augmentation reduced the risk of PJK (OR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.21 ~ 0.53, P < 0.001) better than the use of laminar hook (OR = 0.46, P < 0.001). Although no difference was detected for preoperative SRS-22 score (P = 0.056), a lower score (WMD = - 0.24, 95%CI = - 0.35 ~ -0.14, P < 0.001) was detected in PJK group at follow-up. The elderly female ASD patients were more susceptible to PJK, especially for those with osteoporosis, high preoperative SVA, low LL, large PT, and LIV extended to pelvis. The use of laminar hook and ligament reinforcement at the proximal end might prevent PJK.

Revision after spinal stenosis surgery

PURPOSE

To make a literature review on spinal stenosis recurrence after a first surgery and edit rules to avoid this complication.

METHODS

We conducted two separate PUBMED searches to evaluate the revision post-stenosis and degenerative scoliosis surgery using the terms: lumbar vertebrae/surgery, spinal stenosis, spine, scoliosis and reoperation. The resulting papers were categorized into three groups: (1) those that evaluated reoperation post-simple decompression; (2) those that evaluated spinal decompression and fusion for short (3 levels or less) or long (more than 3 levels) segment spinal fusion; and (3) those diagnosing the stenosis during the surgery.

RESULTS

(1) We found 11 relevant papers that only looked at revision spine surgery post-laminectomy for spinal stenosis. (2) We found 20 papers looked at reoperation post-laminectomy and fusion amongst which there were two papers specifically comparing long-segment (> 3 level) and short-segment (3 or less levels) fusions. (3) In the unspecified group, we found only one article. Fifteen articles were excluded as they were not specifically looking at our objective criteria for revision surgery. In regard to revision post-adult deformity surgery, we found 18 relevant articles.

CONCLUSIONS

After this literature review and analysis of post-operative stenosis, it seems important to provide some advice to avoid revision surgeries more or less induced by the surgery. It looks interesting when performing simple decompression without fusion in the lumbar spine to analyse the risk of instability induced by the decompression and facet resection but also by a global balance analysis. Regarding pre-operative stenosis in a previously operated area, different causes may be evocated, like screw or cage malpositionning but also insufficient decompression which is a common cause. Intraoperatively, the use of neuromonitoring and intraoperative CT scan with navigation are useful tool in complex cases to avoid persisting stenosis. Pre-op analysis and planning are key parameters to decrease post-op problems. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Berg balance scale for assessing dynamic stability and balance in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population

Background

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition in individuals over the age of 65; leading to impaired standing balance and abnormal gait patterns. This functional impairment may be due to the fixed sagittal or coronal malalignment; associated spinal stenosis or deconditioning. The Berg balance scale (BBS) was developed to measure balance by assessing the performance of functional tasks. The purpose of this study is to determine if BBS is a useful metric for evaluating functional status in ASD patients.

Methods

ASD patients who required fusion from the thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled and asked to complete the BBS prior to and six months after surgery. BBS were obtained by a certified physical therapist. Standard demographic; radiographic and surgical data were collected. The Oswestry disability index (ODI), EuroQOL-5D and numeric rating scales (0 to 10) for back and leg pain were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

Results

Of 21 patients enrolled; 19 completed pre- and post-surgery BBS. The mean age was 59.8±13.3 years with 14 females. There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome scores and radiographic parameters after surgery; but no difference in BBS. Only one patient had a BBS score low enough to be considered a medium fall risk. There was no difference in the pre-op BBS scores in the four patients that had revision surgery compared to those that did not.

Conclusions

In this small pilot study; BBS did not appear to be associated with measures of clinical and radiographic improvement in ASD patients. The test was also potentially problematic in that it has a ceiling effect and required significant time with a trained physical therapist for administration. Continued effort to identify a viable measure of balance dysfunction in ASD patients is warranted.