The 3D Sagittal Profile of Thoracic Versus Lumbar Major Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Severe (>100 Degrees) Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis - A Comparison of Surgical Approaches

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVE

Severe curves >100° in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are rare and require careful operative planning. The aim of this study was to assess baseline, perioperative, and 2-year differences between anterior release with posterior instrumentation (AP), posterior instrumentation with posterior column osteotomies (P), and posterior instrumentation with 3-column vertebral osteotomies (VCR).

METHODS

Two scoliosis datasets were queried for primary cases of severe thoracic AIS (≥100°) with 2-year follow-up. Pre- and 2-year postoperative radiographic measures (2D and estimated 3D kyphosis), clinical measurements, and SRS-22 outcomes were compared between three approaches.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included: 16 AP (26%), 38 P (62%), 7 VCR (11%). Average age was 14.4 ± 2.0 years; 75.4% were female. Preoperative thoracic curve magnitude (AP: 112°, P: 115°, VCR: 126°, P = 0.09) and T5-T12 kyphosis (AP: 38°, P: 59°, VCR: 70°, P = 0.057) were similar between groups. Estimated 3D kyphosis was less in AP vs P (-12° vs 4°, P = 0.016). Main thoracic curves corrected to 36° in AP vs 49° and 48° for P and VCR, respectively (P = 0.02). Change in estimated 3D kyphosis was greater in AP vs P and VCR (34° vs 13°, P = 0.009; 34° vs 7°, P = 0.046). One incomplete spinal cord injury had residual deficits (P; 1/61, 1.6%). All SRS-22 domains improved postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

All approaches obtained satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction, but AP had smaller residual coronal deformity and greater kyphosis restoration than the other approaches. This information may help inform the decision of whether to include an anterior release for large thoracic AIS curves.

Using Photogrammetry to Analyze Anatomical Changes in the Nipple in Juvenile and Adolescent Scoliosis Patients

BACKGROUND

The need for an objective set of anterior trunk measurements, such as nipple and clavicular shoulder joints, is essential to quantify the anterior asymmetry present in scoliosis. This study aims to characterize breast asymmetry (BA) in young individuals with scoliosis using photogrammetry.

METHODS

Digital photographs of the anterior trunk of the 51 scoliosis patients aged 4-20 years were taken from an anterior perspective. These images were then transferred to a computer. Ten parameters were measured using the ImageJ software. The positions of patients' nipples were classified into 6 types based on ratios on the x-axis.

RESULTS

The majority of patients had a right breast that was larger, intensifying the apparent BA due to trunk rotation. The apical vertebra level in patients was found at T8 in 23.6% and T9 in 45.1%. In 92.5% of the patients, the right breast was consistently larger. The lengths between the lateral boundaries and nipples of the right and left breasts and between the medial boundary and nipple of the right breast were statistically significantly higher in males than in females (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found when comparing the values of the lengths between the medial boundaries and nipples of the right and left breasts, the difference in length between the right and left acromioclavicular joint lines, and the angles of the nipple and acromioclavicular joint with the degrees of scoliosis in juvenile and adolescents (p < 0.05). Pearson regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between BA differences and the Cobb angle with a correlation coefficient of 0.901. Factors related to breast aesthetics, like differences in the height of nipples and the distance from the sternal notch to the nipple, represent 30% of the overall score.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that there is a significant correlation between the severity of scoliosis and BA differences. Augmentation mammaplasty for BA not only decreased the breast difference but also leveled the nipple disparities. Photogrammetry is considered to be an alternative to other methods and is believed to contribute to the follow-up of BA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Minimum Data Set: Towards Standardization of Data Elements in History and Physical Examination

INTRODUCTION

Nonoperative care represents a cornerstone of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) management, although no consensus exists for a minimal data set. We aimed to determine a consensus in critical data points to obtain during clinical AIS visits.

METHODS

A REDCap-based survey was distributed to Pediatric Orthopedic Society of America (POSNA), Pediatric Spine Study Group (PSSG), and International Society on Scoliosis Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT). Respondents ranked the importance of data points in history, physical examination, and bracing during AIS visits.  Results: One hundred eighty-one responses were received (26% response rate), of which 86% were physicians and 14% were allied health professionals. About 80% of respondents worked at pediatric hospitals or pediatric spaces within adult hospitals, and 82% were academic, with the majority (57%) seeing 150+ unique AIS patients annually. Most respondents recommended six-month follow-up for patients under observation (60%) and bracing (54%). Most respondents (75%) considered family history and pain important (69%), with the majority (69%) asking about pain at every visit. Across all time points, Adam's forward bend test, shoulder level, sagittal contour, trunk shift, and curve stiffness were all considered critically important (>60%). At the first visit, scapular prominence, leg lengths, motor and neurological examination, gait, and iliac crest height were also viewed as critical. At the preoperative visit, motor strength and scapular prominence should also be documented. About 39% of respondents use heat sensors to monitor bracing compliance, and average brace wear since the prior visit was considered the most important (85%) compliance data point.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes recommendations for a 19-item minimum data set for clinical AIS evaluation, including history, physical exam, and bracing, to allow for future multicenter registry-based studies.

Imaging study of coccygeal morphology in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The correlation between scoliosis and sagittal curvature of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine have already been reported in previous studies. However, as a part of the spine, the change in coccygeal morphology in AIS patients has not yet been studied. In this study, a retrospective analysis was performed on 400 patients who were divided into a non-scoliotic group (206 patients) and an AIS group (194 patients). The Postacchini coccygeal radiological classification that was modified by Nathan was used to observe and compare the sagittal coccygeal morphology between the two groups. The results showed that the non-scoliotic group had the highest percentage (52.4%) of patients with type I and the lowest (3.4%) proportion of patients with type V; moreover, the AIS group had the highest percentage (69.1%) of patients with type I and the lowest (1.5%) proportion of patients with type V. The coccygeal morphology was significantly different between the non-scoliotic group and the AIS group (P = 0.001). No significant differences in coccygeal morphology were found between the males and females in the two groups (mild and moderate scoliosis and different segmental scoliosis). In addition, a significant correlation between coccygeal morphology and scoliosis (P = 0.035) was found. In conclusion, coccygeal morphology significantly differs between AIS patients and non-scoliotic adolescents. There was a smaller proportion of patients with a type I coccyx and a larger proportion of patients with a type II or type III coccyx in the AIS group than in the non-scoliotic group. In other words, the presence of a more pronounced coccygeal curve in AIS patients may be caused by an incorrect sitting position and an imbalance in the contraction of the pelvic muscles. It should be further studied whether correcting the sitting position and muscular imbalances could change coccygeal morphology and subsequently affect the development of AIS.

Patient and surgical predictors of 3D correction in posterior spinal fusion: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Restoration of three-dimensional (3D) alignment is critical in correcting patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using posterior spinal fusion (PSF). However, current studies mostly rely on 2D radiographs, resulting in inaccurate assessment of surgical correction and underlying predictive factors. While 3D reconstruction of biplanar radiographs is a reliable and accurate tool for quantifying spinal deformity, no study has reviewed the current literature on its use in evaluating surgical prognosis.

PURPOSE

To summarize the current evidence on patient and surgical factors affecting sagittal alignment and curve correction after PSF based on 3D parameters derived from reconstruction of biplanar radiographs.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted by three independent investigators on Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information on predictors of postoperative alignment and correction after PSF. Search items included "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis," "stereoradiography," "three-dimensional," "surgical," and "correction." The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined to include clinical studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. 989 publications were identified, with 444 unique articles subjected to full-text screening. Ultimately, 41 articles were included.

RESULTS

Strong predictors of better curve correction included preoperative normokyphosis (TK > 15°), a corresponding rod contour, intraoperative vertebral rotation and translation, and upper and lower instrumented vertebrae selected based on sagittal and axial inflection points. For example, for Lenke 1 patients with junctional vertebrae above L1, fusion to NV-1 (1 level above the neutral vertebra) achieved optimal curve correction while preserving motion segments. Pre-op coronal Cobb angle and axial rotation, distal junctional kyphosis, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and type of instrument were identified as predictors with moderate evidence. For Lenke 1C patients, > 50% LIV rotation was found to increase spontaneous lumbar curve correction. Pre-op thoracolumbar apical translation and lumbar lordosis, Ponte osteotomies, and rod material were found to be predictors with low evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Rod contouring and UIV/LIV selection should be based on preoperative 3D TK in order to achieve normal postoperative alignment. Specifically, Lenke 1 patients with high-lying rotations should be fused distally at NV-1, while hypokyphotic patients with large lumbar curves and truncal shift should be fused at NV to improve lumbar alignment. Lenke 1C curves should be corrected using > 50% LIV rotation counterclockwise to the lumbar rotation. Further investigation should compare surgical correction between pedicle-screw and hybrid constructs using matched cohorts. DJK and overbending rods are potential predictors of postoperative alignment.

Updated Criteria for Fusion Level Selection in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Including Use of Three-Dimensional Analysis

The development of new technologies and an enhanced understanding of the three-dimensional deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has led to advances in surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Posterior spinal approaches with pedicle screw constructs are now standard of care because they allow for powerful rotation maneuvers with three-column deformity correction. Selective fusion of the main curve while allowing for spontaneous correction of compensatory curves should be attempted whenever possible in the interest of limiting fusion size and preserving spinal mobility. Recent research provides updated criteria to determine optimal candidates for selective fusion. These criteria must be weighed against patient goals and patient-specific factors to limit complications and maximize chances of successful deformity correction.

The relationship between minor coronal asymmetry of the spine and measures of spinal sagittal shape in adolescents without visible scoliosis

The purpose of this work is to identify what features of overall spinal sagittal shape are associated with coronal asymmetry in those without scoliosis. Using a longitudinal analysis of Integrated Shape Imaging System 2 (ISIS2) surface topography images of those without scoliosis, measures of coronal asymmetry, along with measures of spinal sagittal shape (kyphosis, lordosis and sagittal imbalance, which is a measure of the position of the top of the thoracic spine relative to the sacrum) were analysed using linear mixed effect models (LMEM), which is a method of analysing the components of a complex model (such as that describing overall spinal shape), to ascertain the relative relationships between the parameters. Data was also analysed when subdivided for the anatomical level of coronal asymmetry (thoracic or thoracolumbar/lumbar pattern). There were 784 measures from 196 children. Kyphosis had little effect on coronal asymmetry for males and females, lordosis increased with coronal asymmetry in females only and sagittal imbalance increased with coronal asymmetry in males only. The results of the LMEM modelling were that the parameters related to coronal asymmetry were lordosis and sagittal imbalance. In thoracic coronal asymmetry, whilst lordosis was predominant, kyphosis played more of a role. In thoracolumbar/lumbar coronal asymmetry, lordosis and sagittal imbalance were the larger coefficients. Coronal asymmetry of the spine in those without scoliosis is related to features of spinal sagittal shape, particularly lordosis and sagittal imbalance. This knowledge adds to the understanding of the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Statistical modelling of how the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine is affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and how scoliosis surgery changes that

The relationship between the sagittal shape of the cervical spine and that of the thoracolumbar spine is established in the normal spine. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is recognised as a change in the shape of the spine in both the coronal and sagittal planes. The effects of AIS on the alignment of the cervical spine, including the effects of surgery, has been less well studied. The objective of this study was to identify, using regression analysis, the significant relationships between the alignment of the thoracolumbar spine, in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS. This study used coronal and sagittal radiographic measures from a group with AIS, both pre and post-operatively, which were analysed using multiple linear regression methods to identify significant parameters that explain the sagittal shape of the cervical spine. There were 51 pairs of pre and post-operative radiographs analysed, 40 of which were Lenke 1 curves and 11 Lenke 3 curves. Posterior spinal fusion was performed for all. The significant parameters pre-operatively were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and SVA with an R2 value of 78%. Post-operatively, the significant parameters were T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis and thoracolumbar scoliosis with an R2 of 63%. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in AIS is related to the shape of key parameters in the rest of the spine. Changes in the cervical sagittal shape occur to compensate for changes in shape to the rest of the spine that occur as a consequence of surgery. This has implications for the understanding of how the compensatory mechanisms of the spine are used to maintain a horizontal gaze, along with prediction of the effects of surgery on the shape of the spine.

The Sagittal Plane in Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Sagittal balance is widely recognized as the primary determinant of optimal outcomes in adult spinal deformity. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), coronal correction risks being obtained at the expense of sagittal malalignment after posterior spinal fusion. Apical lordosis, often underestimated on two-dimensional imaging, is the primary deforming factor in AIS. Failure to restore thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during posterior spinal fusion contributes to problematic early surgical complications, including proximal or distal junctional kyphosis and failure. Although adolescent patients often compensate for sagittal imbalance in the short-term and mid-term, late sequelae of iatrogenic sagittal imbalance include flatback syndrome, disk degeneration, cervical kyphosis, and late decompensation. Objective criteria using spinopelvic parameters and preoperative three-dimensional planning can guide sagittal plane correction during PSF for AIS. Technical caveats can help avoid sagittal plane complications, including instrumentation level selection, anchor type, and anatomic protection of adjacent levels. Other surgical techniques to optimize restoration of thoracic kyphosis include higher implant density, stiffer rod material, Ponte osteotomies, and deformity correction technique.

Assessment of changes in the sagittal plane of the spine in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the moire method

BACKGROUND

The gold standard in the clinical assessment of the extent of scoliosis is the Cobb method but the analysis also covers the changes that occur within the spine and trunk in relation to the transverse and sagittal planes.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to estimate changes in the sagittal plane of the spine in girls with right-sided thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

The study involved 29 girls with scoliosis (13.6 ± 0.6 years) and 36 healthy girls as the comparison group. The tests included an interview, clinical examination (with the use of Adam's test and the Cobb angle), and examination of shape of the spine surface with the use of the photogrammetric method and the projection moire effect.

RESULTS

Lower values of the thoracic kyphosis parameters were found in the scoliosis group. Significant differences were noted for the parameters of the lumbosacral section α (p= 0.02), thoracolumbar section β (p< 0.001), the upper thoracic section γ (p< 0.001), thoracolumbar and upper thoracic section β+γ (p< 0.001) and the total size of α+β+γ (p< 0.001) curvatures.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that with an increase in the angular value of the thoracic curvature, the thoracic kyphosis decreased.

The kyphosis–lordosis difference parameter and its utility in understanding the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Objective

The relationship of sagittal spinal shape in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is recognised. What is not clear is the relationship between the sagittal shape of those without scoliosis and the potential development of AIS, including the greater prevalence in females. The use of a new parameter, the kyphosis–lordosis (KL) difference, was developed to explore this further.

Results

The KL difference was calculated for 117 males and 79 females over seven years with 831 measures made. For females, the KL difference, between the ages of 9 and 12 ½ years, decreases from 5° to nearly 0° until starting to climb again from the age of 14 years, back to 5° by the age of 16 ½ years. For males, there is a gradual decline from 9° at age 9 years to 5° at age 17 years. Both age and sex were statistically significant in the development of the parameter. When comparing to previously published data around the true, de-rotated, sagittal shape of the scoliotic spine, the KL difference has utility in explaining the female predominance in the prevalence of AIS. This adds to the weight of evidence behind understanding why AIS develops.

Assessment of the axial plane deformity in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its relationship to the frontal and sagittal planes

PURPOSE

Investigate the axial plane deformity in the scoliotic segment and its relationship to the deformity in the frontal and sagittal planes.

METHODS

Two hundred subjects with AIS (Cobb ≥ 20°) underwent low dose biplanar X-rays with 3D reconstruction of the spine and pelvis. All structural curves were considered and were distributed as follows: 142 thoracic (T), 70 thoracolumbar (TL), and 47 lumbar curves (L). Common 3D spino-pelvic and scoliosis parameters were collected such as: frontal Cobb; torsion index (TI); hypokyphosis/lordosis index (HI). Parameters were compared between each type of curvature and correlations were investigated between the 3 planes.

RESULTS

Frontal Cobb was higher in all T (45 ± 19°) and TL (41 ± 15°) curves compared to L curves (35 ± 14°, p = 0.004). TI was higher in T curves when compared to TL and L curves (TI: 15 ± 8°, 9 ± 6°, 7 ± 5°, p < 0.001). HI was similar between curve types. T curves showed significant correlations between the 3 planes: Cobb vs. TI (r = 0.76), Cobb vs. HI (r = - 0.54) and HI vs. TI (r = - 0.42). The axial plane deformity was related to the frontal deformity and the type of curvature (adjusted-R² = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

Beside showing the most severe deformity frontally and axially compared to TL and L curves, the T curves showed strong correlations between the 3 planes of the deformity. Moreover, this study showed that the axial plane deformity cannot be fully determined by the frontal and sagittal deformities, which highlights the importance of 3D assessment in the setting of AIS.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Role of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Selection

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine (1) the independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction surgery; and (2) whether the level of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) affects postoperative shoulder balance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PSI is an important outcome of AIS correction surgery as it influences a patient's appearance and satisfaction. However, risk factors for PSI remain controversial and there are currently no studies evaluating the effect of sagittal spinopelvic parameters on PSI. Previous studies on the relationship between the level of UIV and PSI have also reported conflicting results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine AIS patients undergoing correction surgery at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters were measured on anteroposterior and lateral x-rays preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively. At 1 year follow-up, patients were divided into 2 groups based on their radiographic shoulder height (RSH): (1) PSI group (RSH ≥20 mm) and (2) non-PSI group (RSH <20 mm).

RESULTS

On multivariate regression analysis, a lower postoperative main thoracic curve (MTC) [odds ratio (OR): 0.702, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.519-0.949, P=0.022], greater percentage correction of MTC (OR: 1.526, 95% CI: 1.049-2.220, P=0.027) and higher postoperative sacral slope (OR: 1.364, 95% CI: 1.014-1.834, P=0.040) were identified as independent risk factors of PSI. When preoperative, postoperative, and absolute change in shoulder parameters were compared across the level of UIV, no significant differences were found regardless of the radiographic shoulder parameter analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower postoperative MTC, greater percentage correction of MTC and higher postoperative sacral slope were independent risk factors of PSI. Shoulder balance and symmetry were not affected by the level of UIV selected. Relative curve correction is a more important consideration than UIV to avoid PSI after AIS correction surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Thoracic Kyphosis and Lumbar Lordosis Distribution After Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction Using Posterior Hybrid Versus Screw Instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate kyphosis and lordosis distribution, inflexion points, and the relationship with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) comparing hybrid instrumentation (in situ contouring, derotation) versus screw instrumentation (thoracic cantilever reduction, lumbar in situ contouring, and derotation).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The combination of reduction techniques aims at restoring the levels of lumbar apex and thoracolumbar inflexion point according to Roussouly alignment types. This approach could minimize the PJK risk after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study assessed coronal curve correction, thoracolumbar and spinopelvic sagittal parameters in 86 skeletally mature adolescents and young adults 2.2 years after AIS correction, comparing a hybrid group (HG, n=34) to a screw group (SG, n=52). Segmental kyphosis and lordosis distribution, number of vertebrae included in curves, thoracic and lumbar apex, thoracolumbar inflexion point and Roussouly types were modeled using KEOPS software.

RESULTS

Global coronal and sagittal correction were similar in both groups. In the SG, lumbar lordosis (LL) decreased from 61.1 to 53.9 degrees (P<0.0001) and matched with pelvic incidence (r=0.69), whereas LL did not change in the HG. Postoperatively, the thoracolumbar inflexion point migrated cranially, resulting in a longer LL in both groups. Postoperative thoracolumbar inflexion point (P<0.0001) and the lumbar apex (P=0.0274) were more caudal in the SG compared with the HG. The PJK rate was 14.7% in the HG and 7.7% in the SG. In patients with PJK, lumbar apex and thoracolumbar inflexion point shifted cranially and were too high according to the Roussouly type.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid and screw instrumentation led to similar global AIS correction, but the use of cantilever reduction in the SG allowed setting the thoracolumbar inflexion point and the lumbar apex lower than in the HG. Cranial migration of these points was identified as PJK risk factor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Patterns of coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Thoracic scoliosis has been shown to be associated with hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the relationship of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters with different coronal curve patterns and their influence on patient-perceived quality of life is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between coronal and sagittal malalignment in patients with AIS and to determine their effects on SRS-22r scores.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1054 consecutive patients with AIS. The coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on standing radiographs. The coronal Cobb angle (mild: 10-20°; moderate: > 20-40°; severe: > 40°) and PI (low: < 35°; average: 35-50°; high: > 50°) were divided into 3 sub-groups for comparison. Relationship between coronal curve magnitudes and sagittal parameters was studied as was their association with SRS-22r scores.

RESULTS

Low PI had smaller SS (30.1 ± 8.3° vs 44.8 ± 7.7°; p < 0.001), PT (- 0.3 ± 8.1° vs 14.4 ± 7.5°; p < 0.001), and LL (42.0 ± 13.2° vs 55.1 ± 10.6°; p < 0.001), negative PI-LL mismatch (- 12.1 ± 13.1° vs 4.1 ± 10.5°; p < 0.001) as compared to large PI. There were no significant relationships with PI and TK (p = 0.905) or curve magnitude (p = 0.431). No differences in sagittal parameters were observed for mild, moderate or severe coronal Cobb angles. SRS-22r scores only correlated with coronal Cobb angle and larger Cobb angles were negatively correlated with the function, appearance and pain domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The sagittal profile for AIS is associated with the pelvic parameters especially PI but not with the coronal curve pattern. All patients have a similar TK regardless of coronal curve type. However, it appears that the coronal deformity is a greater influence on quality of life outcomes especially those > 40°.

Frontal and sagittal imbalance in patients with adolescent idiopathic deformity

The human spinal column underwent many significant changes over the 4.5 million years of our ancestral bipedalism. The main change, however, came with acquiring multiple curvatures in the sagittal plane. This alteration seems to have exposed a weakness in our body's keystone and made us susceptible to thus far unbeknown problems of the spine because it has been noted that idiopathic scoliosis has not been observed in other primates. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine causing an imbalance of the trunk as it increases in magnitude. A scoliotic curve comprises three components, the coronal, sagittal, and axial so that each curve can affect the global balance of the body differently. Patients with significant scoliotic deformities often find themselves at a biomechanical disadvantage when it comes to energy expenditure and keeping an upright stance. The pioneers of scoliosis research recognized the need for describing and quantifying deformity to better understand it, so they first translated clinical measurements to radiographs and built from there. The development of concepts like defining a curve by its end vertebrae and measuring its magnitude, assessing global spinal balance, describing the stable zone, and pinpointing the stable vertebra all followed suit. The importance of sagittal balance and restoring sagittal parameters during treatment was emphasized. In a quest to bring order to chaos, some tried to classify various scoliotic curve types. These classifications helped steer treatment decisions but were found lacking in many aspects. So far, a widely accepted three-dimensional classification of scoliosis still does not exist. This review aims to provide the reader with an overview of the development of balance and imbalance concepts in scoliosis.