Clinical pharmacists as medication therapy experts in diabetic clinics in Saudi Arabia - Not just a perception but a need

Quality of diabetes care among patients with schizophrenia. A mixed-methods study

Objectives

Patients with schizophrenia are at high risk of developing diabetes. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of diabetes in patients with schizophrenia and assess their quality of diabetes care. We further aimed to explore the factors affecting diabetes care in patients with schizophrenia.

Research design and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for patients presenting with schizophrenia from October 2017 to October 2018. Thereafter, we conducted semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore healthcare providers' attitudes and perspectives toward diabetes care in patients with schizophrenia at a tertiary hospital for mental health services in Saudi Arabia.

Results

The prevalence of diabetes in patients with schizophrenia was 3.7%. The rates of annual testing for quality indicators of diabetes were 8.6% for HgbA1c and 31.4% for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Screenings for albuminuria and examinations of the eyes and feet were not conducted. Documentation of smoking status was done infrequently (8.6%). The in-depth interviews uncovered issues with managing diabetes in patients with schizophrenia. We identified four themes: the consequences of poor quality diabetic care provided to patients with schizophrenia; problems with the identification of diabetes in patients with schizophrenia; challenges in the management of patients with both diabetes and schizophrenia; and opportunities to improve the quality of diabetes care provided to patients with schizophrenia.

Conclusions

This study identified areas that need a considerable amount of work to be undertaken in Saudi Arabia to help patients with schizophrenia. There are numerous opportunities for improving the quality of Type 2 diabetes care such as the involvement of pharmacists to effectively manage diabetes and expanding community-based health services to include mental health, which could accelerate improved care services.

Pharmacist led intervention towards management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and assessment of patient satisfaction of care - A prospective, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus, a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia is due to impaired insulin secretion and deficiency. Though effective current drug therapies are available for diabetes, yet glycaemic maintenance remains a challenge without medication adherence. This necessitates a holistic approach to improve clinical outcomes for a better patient health care.

METHODS

A prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study was conducted among 97 type 2 diabetic patients for 6 months. The primary outcome measures included patient satisfaction of care assessment by diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ) and medication adherence by medication adherence rating scale (MARS). Secondary outcomes included assessment of knowledge, attitude, and perception and laboratory parameters. The collected data was analyzed using paired and unpaired T-test.

RESULTS

Of 97 patients randomized to group A (n = 49) and group B (n = 48), there were 3 and 1 drop-out in group A and B, respectively. The mean age of patients was found to be 56.82 ± 4.06 years. At the 6^thmonth follow up, significant improvement of glycaemic parameters was observed in group A vs B. Mean MARS and DTSQ scores also improved in group A vs. B (P-value <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-provided counselling improves patient compliance, quality of life and satisfaction of care in diabetic patients.

Cardiovascular disease risk prevention services by pharmacists in Saudi Arabia: what do policymakers and opinion leaders think?

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an emerging contributor to national morbidity and mortality in Saudi Arabia. CVD risk prevention services are limited, particularly with an over-utilised public health sector and an under-utilised and under-resourced primary care sector. Globally, there is evidence that community pharmacists can play a key role in CVD prevention within primary care. However, the perspectives of policymakers and opinion leaders are critical to successful translation of evidence into practice. Thus, the aim was to engage policymakers and professional leaders in discussions about implementing high-quality CVD risk prevention services in community pharmacy.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. All transcripts were thematically analysed.

Results

A total of 23 participants (87% male) from government and non-government sectors were interviewed. Of these, almost 65% had pharmacy qualifications. Limited provision of CVD risks preventative services in primary care was acknowledged by most participants and building community pharmacists’ capacity to assist in preventive health services was viewed favourably as one way of improving the status quo. The data yielded four key themes: (1) future pharmacy CVD health service models; (2) demonstrable outcomes; (3) professional engagement and advocacy; and (4) implementability. CVD health services roles (health screening, primary and secondary prevention services), pragmatic factors and tiered models of care (minimal, medium, and comprehensive pharmacist involvement) were discussed. The need for humanistic, clinical, and cost effectiveness outcomes to be demonstrated and active involvement of professional bodies were deemed important for such services to be sustainable. Professional pharmacy governance to develop pharmacy careers and workforce, pharmacy curricular reform and ongoing education were posed as key success factors for novel pharmacy roles. Practice policies, standards, and guidelines were seen as required to adhere to stringent quality control for future pharmacy services provision. Participant’s implementation vision for such services included scalability, affordability, access, adoption and health system reform. Most discussions focused on the need for structural improvement with limited input regarding processes or outcomes required to establish such models.

Conclusions

Most participants favoured pharmacy-based CVD risk prevention services, despite the variability in proposed service models. However, prior to developing such services, support structures at the health system and health professional level are needed as well as building public support and acceptability for pharmacy services.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40545-021-00319-6.

Effect of pharmaceutical care interventions on glycemic control in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Diabetes is a chronic lifelong condition, and adherence to medications and self-monitoring of blood glucose are challenging for diabetic patients. The dramatic increase in the prevalence of diabetes is largely due to the incidence of type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIc) besides high-income countries (HIc). We aimed to evaluate whether pharmacist care (PC) service model in LMIc and HIc could improve clinical outcomes in diabetic patients by performing a meta-analysis.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest Dissertations Unlimited Published Literature database were searched to find publications pertaining to pharmacist-led intervention in patients with diabetes. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) randomized controlled trials, 2) confirmed diabetic patients (type 1 or type 2), 3) pharmaceutical care intervention by clinical pharmacist or/and multidisciplinary team, and 4) reporting HbA1c at baseline and end of study or the mean change in these values.

Results

A total of 37 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The overall result was significant and in favor of PC intervention on HbA1c change (standard difference in mean values [SDM]: 0.379, 95% CI: 0.208–0.550, P<0.001). The stratified meta-analysis showed that PC was significant in both HIc (n=20; SDM: 0.351, 95% CI: 0.207–0.495) and LMIc (n=15; SDM: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.071–0.780). More than 6 months is needed to obtain adequate effects on clinical diabetes parameters.

Conclusion

Our study presented that an adequate duration of pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care was effective in improving HbA1c in patients with diabetes in both LMIc and HIc.