Antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric patients with leukemia

Comparative effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis during induction chemotherapy in children with acute leukaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are common during induction therapy in children and adolescents with acute leukaemia and may cause infection-related mortality.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic antibiotics in paediatric patients with acute leukaemia receiving induction chemotherapy.

METHODS

From three English databases and four Chinese databases, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that compared prophylactic antibiotics to placebo, no prophylaxis, or that compared one antibiotic versus another in paediatric patients with acute leukaemia undergoing induction chemotherapy. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

FINDINGS

Two RCTs and ten cohort studies were finally included. For children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, antibiotic prophylaxis, including levofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, or other antibiotics, probably reduced bacteraemia (risk ratio (RR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-0.60; moderate certainty) without significantly increasing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) or invasive fungal infection. Levofloxacin reduced the CDI rate (RR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.62; high certainty). Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis probably reduced infection-related mortality (RR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01-0.97; moderate certainty). In children with acute myeloid leukaemia, ciprofloxacin plus vancomycin may reduce febrile neutropenia (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.94; low certainty). Individual studies indicated that prophylaxis increased antibiotic exposure but reduced non-preventive antibiotic exposure.

CONCLUSION

In children with acute leukaemia undergoing induction therapy, antibiotic prophylaxis may improve the bacterial infection and mortality.

Advances in nanobiotechnology-propelled multidrug resistance circumvention of cancer

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is one of the main reasons for the failure of tumor chemotherapy and has a negative influence on the therapeutic effect. MDR is primarily attributable to two mechanisms: the activation of efflux pumps for drugs, which can transport intracellular drug molecules from cells, and other mechanisms not related to efflux pumps, e.g., apoptosis prevention, strengthened DNA repair, and strong oxidation resistance. Nanodrug-delivery systems have recently attracted much attention, showing some unparalleled advantages such as drug targeting and reduced drug efflux, drug toxicity and side effects in reversing MDR. Notably, in drug-delivery platforms based on nanotechnology, multiple therapeutic strategies are integrated into one system, which can compensate for the limitations of individual strategies. In this review, the mechanisms of tumor MDR as well as common vectors and nanocarrier-combined therapy strategies to reverse MDR were summarized to promote the understanding of the latest progress in improving the efficiency of chemotherapy and synergistic strategies. In particular, the adoption of nanotechnology has been highlighted and the principles underlying this phenomenon have been elucidated, which may provide guidance for the development of more effective anticancer strategies.

Effect of Antibacterial Prophylaxis on Febrile Neutropenic Episodes and Bacterial Bloodstream Infections in Dutch Pediatric Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Two-Center Retrospective Study

Bloodstream infections (BSIs), especially those caused by Gram-negative rods (GNR) and viridans group streptococci (VGS), are common and potentially life-threatening complications of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment. Limited literature is available on prophylactic regimens. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of different antibacterial prophylaxis regimens on the incidence of febrile neutropenic (FN) episodes and bacterial BSIs. Medical records of children (0−18 years) diagnosed with de novo AML and treated at two Dutch centers from May 1998 to March 2021 were studied. Data were analyzed per chemotherapy course and consecutive neutropenic period. A total of 82 patients had 316 evaluable courses: 92 were given with single-agent ciprofloxacin, 138 with penicillin plus ciprofloxacin, and 51 with teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin. The remaining 35 courses with various other prophylaxis regimens were not statistically compared. During courses with teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin, significantly fewer FN episodes (43 vs. 90% and 75%; p < 0.0001) and bacterial BSIs (4 vs. 63% and 33%; p < 0.0001) occurred than with single-agent ciprofloxacin and penicillin plus ciprofloxacin, respectively. GNR and VGS BSIs did not occur with teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin and no bacterial BSI-related pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions were required, whereas, with single-agent ciprofloxacin and penicillin plus ciprofloxacin, GNR BSIs occurred in 8 and 1% (p = 0.004), VGS BSIs in 24 and 14% (p = 0.0005), and BSI-related PICU admissions were required in 8 and 2% of the courses (p = 0.029), respectively. Teicoplanin plus ciprofloxacin as antibacterial prophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of FN episodes and bacterial BSIs. This may be a good prophylactic regimen for pediatric AML patients during treatment.