1
|
Wilson K, Umana E, McCleary D, Waterfield T, Woolfall K. Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child 2024:archdischild-2023-326727. [PMID: 38986575 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Febrile infants under 3 months of age are at higher risk of invasive bacterial illness (IBI) when compared with older children. Increasingly sequential assessment based on age, clinical appearance and biomarkers is used to determine the risk of IBI, and appropriateness of invasive procedures such as lumbar puncture. The purpose of this qualitative study is to report parents and clinicians' opinions on communication of risks and benefits of sequential assessment and tailored treatment. METHODS 18 parents enrolled in the Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcomes study and seven clinicians from England, Wales and Northern Ireland were purposively selected to participate in virtual qualitative interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Tailored treatment plans were widely supported. Confidence in the clinician was central to parents' attitude towards management recommendations. Parents' decision-making preferences change throughout their child's clinical journey, with an initial preference for clinician-led decisions evolving towards collaborative decision-making as their stress and anxiety reduce. There were widespread differences in preferences for how risk was discussed. Parents self-reported poor retention of information and felt communication adjuncts helped their understanding. Clinicians were generally positive about the use of clinical decision aids as a communication tool, rather than relying on them for decision-making. DISCUSSION Parents want to feel informed, but their desire to be involved in shared decision-making evolves over time.Clinicians appear to use their clinical judgement to provide individualised information, evolving their communication in response to perceived parental needs.Poor information retention highlights the need for repetition of information and use of communication adjuncts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05259683.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Wilson
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK
- Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
| | - Etimbuk Umana
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK
| | - David McCleary
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK
| | - Thomas Waterfield
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Belfast, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dijkman EM, ter Brake WWM, Drossaert CHC, Doggen CJM. Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 12:11. [PMID: 38200917 PMCID: PMC10778720 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Assessment of (digital) health literacy in the hospital can raise staff awareness and facilitate tailored communication, leading to improved health outcomes. Assessment tools should ideally address multiple domains of health literacy, fit to the complex hospital context and have a short administration time, to enable routine assessment. This review aims to create an overview of tools for measuring (digital) health literacy in hospitals. A search in Scopus, PubMed, WoS and CINAHL, following PRISMA guidelines, generated 7252 hits; 251 studies were included in which 44 assessment tools were used. Most tools (57%) were self-reported and 27% reported an administration time of <5 min. Almost all tools addressed the domain 'understanding' (98%), followed by 'access' (52%), 'apply' (50%), 'appraise' (32%), 'numeracy' (18%), and 'digital' (18%). Only four tools were frequently used: the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy for Adults ((S)TOFHLA), the Brief Health Literacy Screener (BHLS), and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). While the NVS and BHLS have a low administration time, they cover only two domains. HLQ covers the most domains: access, understanding, appraise, and apply. None of these four most frequently used tools measured digital skills. This review can guide health professionals in choosing an instrument that is feasible in their daily practice, and measures the required domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M. Dijkman
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter W. M. ter Brake
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
| | | | - Carine J. M. Doggen
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
- Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dowse R, Okeyo S, Sikhondze S, Khumalo N. Pharmaceutical indication pictograms for low literacy viewers: Health literacy and comprehension. Health SA 2023; 28:2192. [PMID: 37927939 PMCID: PMC10623492 DOI: 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Poor comprehension of pharmaceutical pictograms used on medicine labels or leaflets can compromise understanding of medicine-taking information, potentially causing negative health outcomes. Aim The aim was to assess association of health literacy (HL) with comprehension of pictograms displaying indication and side effect information in a lower literacy, limited English proficiency (LEP) population. Setting Community centre, Makhanda, South Africa. Methods This was a quantitative cross-sectional study using simple random probability sampling. Ninety isiXhosa-speaking adults with a maximum of 12 years schooling, attending primary healthcare clinics were interviewed using structured interviews. Health literacy was assessed using the Health Literacy Test for Limited Literacy populations. Comprehension of 10 locally developed pictograms was evaluated. Results The mean pictogram comprehension score was 7.9/10, with 8/10 pictograms complying with the International Organization for Standardization criterion of 66.7% correct comprehension. Only 15.6% of participants had adequate HL. A significant association of HL with pictogram comprehension was established (p = 0.002). Pictogram misinterpretation was higher in those with lower HL; adequate HL was associated with superior comprehension. Pictogram comprehension was negatively associated with age (p < 0.006), and positively associated with education (p < 0.001) and English proficiency (p < 0.001). Conclusion Higher HL was associated with better pictogram comprehension. Low HL, LEP and low education levels are regarded as potential indicators for possible pictogram misinterpretation. Contribution This study observed the potential for misinterpretation of medication pictograms. Health professionals should be aware that low HL, limited schooling and limited English proficiency could signal difficulty in fully comprehending pictogram content.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ros Dowse
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| | - Sam Okeyo
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| | - Simise Sikhondze
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| | - Nosihle Khumalo
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abidi S, Talegaonkar S, Notani S, Pradhan V, Pokharkar V, Popli H, Walsh J, Salunke S. Stepping into small shoes: Gaining user perspective on appropriate administration devices for paediatric medication in India. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2023; 191:247-258. [PMID: 37689319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
A cross sectional pan-India study about use of administration devices for paediatric oral and inhalation medicines was conducted with a diverse pool of participants of various age groups. Via 634 respondents from more than 15 states in India, this study has identified the administration devices commonly used by parents/caregivers for children 0 to 18 years and by children over 10 years. It has provided insights on device ease of use, challenges faced and recommendations to facilitate the correct use of administration devices for paediatric oral and inhalation medicines. Ethics approval (DPSRU-BREC/2020/A/008)) was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University. The survey was completed by parents only (n = 514) and jointly by both parents and children (n = 120). The mean age of the child was 7.2 ± 4.96 years. 72% of the respondents reported that an oral medicine had been taken recently, 6.3% reported that an inhaled medicine had been taken and the remaining 21.9% reported that both an oral and inhaled medicine had been taken. The use of measuring cup was most prevalent followed by household spoons. The mean of the score for ease of use was found to be highest 4.6 ± 0.50 for oral syringe and lowest (3.8 ± 0.76) for measuring cups. The majority of them found the oral device easy to use. Difficulties were reported mostly for measuring cups and household spoons and were related to a lack of user instructions and measuring difficulties. The respondents who found the device easy to use had mostly received clear instructions from healthcare professionals. Compared to oral devices, there were very limited responses for inhalation devices (n = 175/634). Nebulisers with facemasks were most frequently used followed by manually actuated Metered dose inhalers with and without spacer. The mean of the ease-of-use score for dry powder inhalers was found to be highest (4.2 ± 0.37) followed by mist inhalers (4.0 ± 0) and manually actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers (4.0 ± 0.71). The nebulisers with facemask were reported to be difficult to use by most of the respondents despite receiving clear instructions from healthcare professionals. The study findings add evidence to the understudied area of user experiences and perspectives on administration devices for oral and inhalation medicines in India. It highlights a need for initiatives to improve the usability, availability, and affordability of administration devices for children in India. Awareness on the importance of proper use of devices needs to be raised and sustained about the existence of affordable administration devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Abidi
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), MB Road, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Sushama Talegaonkar
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), MB Road, New Delhi 110017, India; Society for Paediatric Medicines and Healthcare Initiative (PMHI), Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga East, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Soniya Notani
- European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI), University College London School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom
| | - Varsha Pradhan
- Society for Paediatric Medicines and Healthcare Initiative (PMHI), Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga East, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Varsha Pokharkar
- Society for Paediatric Medicines and Healthcare Initiative (PMHI), Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga East, Mumbai 400019, India; Department of Pharmaceutics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune, India
| | - Harvinder Popli
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University (DPSRU), MB Road, New Delhi 110017, India; Society for Paediatric Medicines and Healthcare Initiative (PMHI), Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga East, Mumbai 400019, India
| | - Jennifer Walsh
- European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI), University College London School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom; Jenny Walsh Consulting Ltd., BioCity Nottingham, Pennyfoot Street, Nottingham NG11GF, United Kingdom
| | - Smita Salunke
- European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI), University College London School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hovey SW, Cho HJ, Kain C, Sauer HE, Smith CJ, Thomas CA. Pharmacist-Led Discharge Transitions of Care Interventions for Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2023; 28:180-191. [PMID: 37303760 PMCID: PMC10249976 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.3.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Transitions of care (TOC) before, during, and after hospital discharge are an opportune setting to optimize medication management. The quality standards for pediatric care transitions, however, are lacking, leading to reduced health outcomes in children. This narrative review characterizes the pediatric populations that would benefit from focused, TOC interventions. Different types of medication-focused TOC interventions during hospital discharge are described, including medication reconciliation, education, access, and adherence tools. Various TOC intervention delivery models following hospital discharge are also reviewed. The goal of this narrative review is to help pediatric pharmacists and pharmacy leaders better understand TOC interventions and integrate them into the hospital discharge process for children and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara W. Hovey
- Department of Pharmacy Practice (SWH), University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL
| | - Hae Jin Cho
- Department of Pharmacotherapy (HJC), College of Pharmacy, The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX
| | - Courtney Kain
- Department of Pharmacy (CK), Nemours Children's Hospital, Wilmington, DE
| | - Hannah E. Sauer
- Department of Pharmacy (HES), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Christina J. Smith
- Department of Pharmacy (CJS), Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van den Berg LN, Chavannes NH, Aardoom JJ. Using Animated Videos to Promote the Accessibility and Understandability of Package Leaflets: Retrospective Observational Study Evaluating the First Year of Implementation. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e40914. [PMID: 37140968 DOI: 10.2196/40914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The medication package leaflet is the most used and trusted source of information in the home situation but is often incomprehensible for individuals, especially for those with limited health literacy. The platform "Watchyourmeds" comprises a web-based library with over 10,000 animated videos that explain the most essential information from the package leaflet in an unambiguous and simple manner to increase the accessibility and understandability of package leaflets. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate Watchyourmeds in the Netherlands from a user perspective during the first year of implementation by investigating (1) usage data, (2) self-reported user experiences, and (3) the preliminary and potential impact on medication knowledge. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study. The first aim was investigated by examining objective user data from 1815 pharmacies from the first year of implementation of Watchyourmeds. User experiences (second aim) were investigated by examining individuals' completed self-report questionnaires (n=4926) that they received after completing a video. The preliminary and potential impact on medication knowledge (third aim) was investigated by examining users' self-report questionnaire data (n=67) that assessed their medication knowledge about their prescribed medication. RESULTS Nearly 1.8 million videos have been distributed to users by over 1400 pharmacies, with monthly numbers increasing to 280,000 in the last month of the implementation year. Most users (4444/4805, 92.5%) indicated to have fully understood the information presented in the videos. Female users reported more often to have fully understood the information than male users (χ24=11.5, P=.02). Most users (3662/4805, 76.2%) said that they did not think any information was missing in the video. Users with a lower educational level stated more often (1104/1290, 85.6%) than those with a middle (984/1230, 80%) or higher (964/1229, 78.4%) educational level that they did not seem to be missing any information in the videos (χ212=70.6, P<.001). A total of 84% (4142/4926) of the users stated that they would like to use Watchyourmeds more often and for all their medication, or would like to use it most of the time. Male users and older users stated more often that they would use Watchyourmeds again for other medication than the female (χ23=25.0, P<.001) and younger users (χ23=38.1, P<.001), respectively. Almost 88% (4318/4926) of the users would recommend the web-based library to friends, family, or acquaintances. Regarding the third aim, results showed that 73.8% (293/397) of the questions assessing users' medication knowledge were answered correctly. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that a web-based library with animated videos is a valuable and acceptable addition to stand-alone package leaflets to increase the understanding and accessibility of medication information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselot N van den Berg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jiska J Aardoom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sirkas K, Juppo A, Miettinen M, Siven M. Could paper package leaflet be left out from hospital products? EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2022; 7:100176. [PMID: 36106157 PMCID: PMC9465427 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Package leaflet provides information about medicinal product to the user. Printed leaflet is familiar and available, however poorly legible, especially when containing multiple languages. It is resourceful to update, has potential to go missing or get damaged, and is environmentally burdensome. The pharmaceutical manufacturers in the Baltic countries have been granted permission to market selected hospital medicinal products without printed package leaflet. The industrial pilot project is expected to promote availability of medicinal products and patient safety via increased access to medicinal information. Objective Only few countries in Europe have derogated from Article 58 of Directive 2001/83/EC. Knowledge about the effects of removal of paper package leaflet from the medicinal product is limited, and related publications are scarce. Current interview study is identifying the obstacles during the implementation of the industrial project, investigating the potential environmental impact, and searching for further opportunities for the package leaflet in development of medicinal products. Methods Real-time person-to-person semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders were conducted, and transcripts were analysed by content analysis to identify themes. Results Results demonstrated general support for removing package leaflet from selected hospital products. Main difficulties of the industrial project regarded the need for clear communication and practical disadvantages of project setup. Main benefits included educational aspect of increasing awareness about product information and strengthened collaboration. Majority of participants felt doubtful about the impact of the industrial project on people's awareness of ecological issues and they admittedly lacked sufficient information on the environmental impact of pharmaceutical packaging. Conclusion The removal of paper leaflet could be extended to more products based on the positive feedback for the industrial pilot project. However, it is paramount that the format of electronic product information would need to be enhanced first to improve readability.
Collapse
|