1
|
Bhardwaj B, Revannasiddaiah S, Bhardwaj H, Balusu S, Shwaiki A. Molecular targeted therapy to improve radiotherapeutic outcomes for non-small cell lung carcinoma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2016; 4:50. [PMID: 26904572 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.10.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Effective treatments for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain elusive. The use of concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (RT) has improved outcomes, but a significant proportion of NSCLC patients are too frail to be able to tolerate an intense course of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The development of targeted therapies ignited new hope in enhancing radiotherapeutic outcomes. The use of targeted therapies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has offered slight but significant benefits in concurrent use with RT for certain patients in certain situations. However, despite theoretical promise, the use of anti-angiogenics, such as bevacizumab and endostatin, has not proven clinically safe or useful in combination with RT. However, many new targeted agents against new targets are being experimented for combined use with RT. It is hoped that these agents may provide a significant breakthrough in the radiotherapeutic management of NSCLC. The current review provides a brief discussion about the targets, the targeted therapies, the rationale for the use of targeted therapies in combination with RT, and a brief review of the existing data on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhaskar Bhardwaj
- 1 Department of Internal medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital, India ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA ; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Swaroop Revannasiddaiah
- 1 Department of Internal medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital, India ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA ; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Himanshu Bhardwaj
- 1 Department of Internal medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital, India ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA ; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Sree Balusu
- 1 Department of Internal medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital, India ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA ; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Ali Shwaiki
- 1 Department of Internal medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital, India ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA ; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA ; 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaloostian PE, Yurter A, Zadnik PL, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL. Current paradigms for metastatic spinal disease: an evidence-based review. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:248-62. [PMID: 24145995 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3324-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of metastatic spine disease is quite complex. Advances in research have allowed surgeons and physicians to better provide chemotherapeutic agents that have proven more efficacious. Additionally, the advancement of surgical techniques and radiosurgical implementation has altered drastically the treatment paradigm for metastatic spinal disease. Nevertheless, the physician-patient relationship, including extensive discussion with the neurosurgeon, medicine team, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and psychologists, are all critical in the evaluation process and in delivering the best possible care to our patients. The future remains bright for continued improvement in the surgical and nonsurgical management of our patients with metastatic spine disease. METHODS We include an evidence-based review of decision making strategies when attempting to determine most efficacious treatment options. Surgical treatments discussed include conventional debulking versus en bloc resection, conventional RT, and radiosurgical techniques, and minimally invasive approaches toward treating metastatic spinal disease. CONCLUSIONS Surgical oncology is a diverse field in medicine and has undergone a significant paradigm shift over the past few decades. This shift in both medical and surgical management of patients with primarily metastatic tumors has largely been due to the more complete understanding of tumor biology as well as due to advances in surgical approaches and instrumentation. Furthermore, radiation oncology has seen significant advances with stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiation therapy contributing to a decline in surgical treatment of metastatic spinal disease. We analyze the entire spectrum of treating patients with metastatic spinal disease, from methods of diagnosis to the variety of treatment options available in the published literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P E Kaloostian
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Serracino HS, Franklin WA, Aisner DL. Molecular Pathology of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Surg Pathol Clin 2012; 5:903-18. [PMID: 26838508 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2012.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
This review offers an overview of the molecular pathology of lung cancer, with a focus on analyses that are most commonly part of the current clinical testing paradigm. Molecular testing of lung cancer has proved integral to the success of new targeted therapies, and their use is now commonplace in treatment selection. Traditional pathologic evaluation, however, plays a major role in these advances and serves an equally critical role to aid in determining optimal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary S Serracino
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop B216, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Wilbur A Franklin
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop B216, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Dara L Aisner
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop B216, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|