Image-guided prediction of pseudocyst formation in pediatric pancreatic trauma

CT and MRI findings in pancreatic trauma in children and correlation with outcome

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data on pancreatic trauma imaging in children.

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of pancreatic trauma in children and to correlate the imaging grade of pancreatic injury with management and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of children with pancreatic injury presenting between Jan. 1, 2000, and Dec. 31, 2016, was performed. Patient charts were reviewed to note demographics, the mechanism of injury, associated abdominal injuries, management and outcome. All imaging was rereviewed by two radiologists blinded to clinical and laboratory information, and pancreatic injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST).

RESULTS

Of 3,265 patients presented as trauma team activations during the study period, only 28 (0.86%) children (19 boys, 9 girls; mean age: 7.14 years; age range: 1-15 years) had pancreatic injury. Of the available 27 CTs of the abdomen, 26 were performed on the day of trauma. Associated injuries were seen in 25/27 children, most frequently in the liver and lung, 16 (59.2%) each. There were 5 (19%) Grade I, 9 (33%) Grade II, 8 (30%) Grade III and 3 (11%) Grade IV. No patients had Grade V injury. No pancreatic parenchymal injury was identified in 2 (7%) patients with isolated fluid around the pancreas and mesentery. The pancreatic duct was visible in all 10 children (days: 0-330, median days: 41 post-trauma) who had MRI. Eight of these children, who had Grade III/IV injuries on CT and confirmed pancreatic duct injury on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or surgery, showed either signal intensity difference in pancreatic parenchyma and/or caliber difference in the pancreatic duct proximal and distal to the injury site. Two patients died because of multiorgan injuries, 9 patients (mainly with Grade III and IV injuries) underwent surgery and/or ERCP, and 16 patients were managed conservatively. AAST grading of pancreatic injury on CT correlated with type of management (P=0.0001) with most of the Grade III and IV injuries treated with intervention and/or surgery while all of the Grade I and II injuries were treated conservatively.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic injury is rare in children but often associated with other organ injuries most frequently involving the liver and lung. CT grading of injury correlates with management and guides intervention and/or surgery versus conservative treatment. MRI is useful for assessing pancreatic duct injury by demonstrating the pancreatic duct directly and/or secondary changes like signal intensity difference in pancreatic parenchyma and caliber difference in the pancreatic duct.

Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group

PURPOSE

Determining the integrity of the pancreatic duct is important in high-grade pancreatic trauma to guide decision making for operative vs non-operative management. Computed tomography (CT) is generally an inadequate study for this purpose, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is sometimes obtained to gain additional information regarding the duct. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to directly compare the results from CT and MRCP for evaluating pancreatic duct disruption in children with these rare injuries.

METHODS

Retrospective study of data obtained from eleven pediatric trauma centers from 2010 to 2015. Children up to age 18 with suspected blunt pancreatic duct injury who had both CT and MRCP within 1 week of injury were included. Imaging findings of both studies were directly compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and McNemar's tests.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 21 patients (mean age 7.8 years). The duct was visualized more often on MRCP than CT (48 vs 5%, p < 0.05). Duct disruption was confirmed more often on MRCP than CT (24 vs 0%), suspected based on secondary findings equally (38 vs 38%), and more often indeterminate on CT (62 vs 38%). Overall, MRCP was not superior to CT for determining duct integrity (62 vs 38%, p = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

In children with blunt pancreatic injury, MRCP is more useful than CT for identifying the pancreatic duct but may not be superior for confirmation of duct integrity. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERCP) may be necessary to confirm duct disruption when considering pancreatic resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Proposed clinical pathway for nonoperative management of high-grade pediatric pancreatic injuries based on a multicenter analysis: A pediatric trauma society collaborative

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for nonoperative management (NOM) of high-grade pancreatic injuries in children have not been established, and wide practice variability exists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate common clinical strategies across multiple pediatric trauma centers to develop a consensus-based standard clinical pathway.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective review was conducted of children with high-grade (American Association of Surgeons for Trauma grade III-V) pancreatic injuries treated with NOM between 2010 and 2015. Data were collected on demographics, clinical management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were treated at 20 pediatric trauma centers. Median age was 9 years (range, 1-18 years). The majority (73%) of injuries were American Association of Surgeons for Trauma grade III, 24% were grade IV, and 3% were grade V. Median time from injury to presentation was 12 hours and median ISS was 16 (range, 4-66). All patients had computed tomography scan and serum pancreatic enzyme levels at presentation, but serial enzyme level monitoring was variable. Pancreatic enzyme levels did not correlate with injury grade or pseudocyst development. Parenteral nutrition was used in 68% and jejunal feeds in 31%. 3Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram was obtained in 25%. An organized peripancreatic fluid collection present for at least 7 days after injury was identified in 59% (42 of 71). Initial management of these included: observation 64%, percutaneous drain 24%, and endoscopic drainage 10% and needle aspiration 2%. Clear liquids were started at a median of 6 days (IQR, 3-13 days) and regular diet at a median of 8 days (IQR 4-20 days). Median hospitalization length was 13 days (IQR, 7-24 days). Injury grade did not account for prolonged time to initiating oral diet or hospital length; indicating that the variability in these outcomes was largely due to different surgeon preferences.

CONCLUSION

High-grade pancreatic injuries in children are rare and significant variability exists in NOM strategies, which may affect outcomes and effective resource utilization. A standard clinical pathway is proposed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level V (case series).

Practice variability exists in the management of high-grade pediatric pancreatic trauma

PURPOSE

Management of high-grade pancreatic trauma in children is controversial, although recent evidence supports early operation. We sought to evaluate whether practice variability exists regarding the management of these rare and complex injuries.

METHODS

A study group of pediatric trauma centers within the Pediatric Trauma Society completed a survey following a query of their institutional database. Results are presented using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period (2012-2014), 123 pancreatic injuries (grades II-IV) were reported from 19 pediatric trauma centers (median 6, range 1-22). Sixty-two injuries involving injury to the pancreatic duct (clear/suspected) were reported (median 1, range 0-9). Of these, 49 % were managed with non-operative management (NOM) and 51 % with operative management. Surgeons at the majority (63 %) of institutions used both approaches. Of the operative cases, 21 % were laparoscopic. There was wide variability in clinical management of NOM patients: the most common feeding strategy was reported by 52 % of centers, percutaneous drainage of traumatic pseudocyst by 42 % and ERCP (early/after pseudocyst) by 72 %.

CONCLUSION

Wide practice variability exists among North American pediatric surgeons regarding both the initial approach to high-grade pancreatic injury and non-operative management. These results highlight the need for a prospective trial to determine the optimal strategy for these patients.

Management of Abdominal Solid Organ Injury After Blunt Trauma

Injury to the solid abdominal organs-liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas-is one of the most common injury patterns in pediatric blunt trauma. Pediatric trauma centers are becoming increasingly successful in managing these injuries without operative intervention. Well-validated guidelines have been established for liver and spleen injury management, and operative intervention is reserved for patients who show evidence of active bleeding after resuscitation. No such guidelines yet exist for the management of traumatic injury of the kidney or pancreas. Exploratory laparotomy remains the treatment of choice in patients suffering hemodynamic collapse, but interventional radiologic or endoscopic procedures are increasingly used to manage all but the most devastating solid organ injuries. [Pediatr Ann. 2016;45(7):e241-e246.].

Predicting pseudocyst formation following pancreatic trauma in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

There are insufficient data on pre-screening for pancreatic pseudocysts (PC) following pancreatic trauma. This study investigated the use of radiological and laboratory testing for predicting the development of pancreatic pseudocysts after trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical records of all pediatric patients presenting with pancreatic trauma between January 2003 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) scores of Grade 3-5 were enrolled. The patients were divided into groups that developed [Group 1 (n = 20)] and did not develop [Group 2 (n = 18)] PC. The patients were evaluated in terms of their baseline characteristics, additional injuries, Injury Severity Score (ISS), pancreatic injury site, blood amylase levels 2 h and 10-15 days after the trauma, clinical presentation, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay.

FINDINGS

We followed 38 patients. Of the patients in Group 1, 70 % had an injury to the tail of the pancreas. The ISS trauma scores and durations of hospitalization and ICU stay were significantly greater in Group 2 (p < 0.05). The mean blood amylase level on Day 1 was 607 U/L (range 183-801 U/L) in Group 1 and 314 U/L (range 25-631 U/L) in Group 2; the respective levels on Day 10 were 838 U/L (range 123-2951 U/L) and 83.2 U/L (range 35-164 U/L). The serum amylase levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in Group 1 than in Group 2 on Days 1 and 10. Four patients developed complications and two patients died.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic pseudocyst formation is more likely in patients with AAST Grade 3 pancreatic injury, also serum amylase levels ten times greater than normal 2 h after the trauma, and persistently elevated serum amylase levels 10-15 days following the trauma.