Fever after redo Nissen fundoplication with hiatal hernia repair

Immediate fever during anaesthesia recovery after surgical procedure with scoliosis: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Fever is a common clinical symptom in patients with postoperative scoliosis. However, there are rare reports of immediately fevers occurring following operative procedures.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 15-year-old female with a 1-year history of scoliosis was admitted to the hospital after a health examination. The patient was diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis and underwent a posterior idiopathic scoliosis procedure and correction for pedicle fixation. The clinical symptoms, including chills, fever, increased heart rate and increased blood pressure, were observed immediately following surgery during anaesthesia recovery. The patient was discharged from the hospital 12 days post-surgery. Over the 90-day follow-up, no chills, fever (≥38 °C), deep tissue infection, or surgery-related complications were reported. This remained consistent for the subsequent 3-year follow-up.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The patient was discharged 12 days after the operation, and no chills or fever (≥38 °C) occurred during the 90-day follow-up. Furthermore, there were no instances of deep tissue infection or any other surgery-related complications throughout the subsequent 3-year follow-up duration. A literature review has performed for this subject by systematic review. We identified only three reports that specifically examined postoperative fever as an observational measure among spine surgical patients. Unfortunately, none of these reports mentioned immediate postoperative fever.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available clinical data and research evidence, it is recommended to exercise caution when treating patients who experience postoperative chill and fever, as it may be caused by a combination of intraoperative hypothermia and anaesthesia inhibition. While these symptoms may be self-limiting in nature, close monitoring and appropriate management should be implemented to ensure patient safety and to identify any potential complications.

A retrospective controlled study of postoperative fever after posterior lumbar interbody fusion due to degenerative lumbar disease

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fever is a common feature of spinal surgery. When fever occurs postoperatively in patients, surgeons are eager to rule out an infection. There are many reports about postoperative fever and infection; however, only a few have described the relationship between degenerative spinal disease and postoperative fever. This study aimed to investigate the causes of postoperative fever in patients with degenerative lumbar disease undergoing posterior screw fixation and interbody fusion and compare patients with non-pathologic fever and infected febrile patients.

METHODS

From March 2015 to February 2016, 263 patients with degenerative lumbar disease underwent posterior lumbar screw fixation and interbody fusion surgery in our institution. We performed risk factor analysis by categorizing patients as afebrile and febrile. Comparisons were made between afebrile patients and patients with non-pathologic fever, and an analysis was performed between patients with non-pathologic fever and patients with febrile infection. We compared each group by examining the demographic factors before surgery, surgery features, drain duration, and postoperative transfusion. The postoperative day (POD) of fever onset, postoperative fever duration, and blood sample results in patients with fever were investigated.

RESULTS

The drain duration was found to be an important factor between the afebrile febrile groups and between the non-pathologic fever and afebrile groups. POD of fever occurred earlier in the non-pathologic group than in the infection group (p = 0.04), and the duration of fever was shorter in the non-pathologic fever group than in the infection group (p = 0.01). Higher procalcitonin levels were observed at POD 5 in the infection group than in the non-pathologic fever group. (p < 0.01) The accidental dural rupture rate was higher in the infected group (p = 0.02); this was thought to be caused by the long non-ambulatory period after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study identified risk factors and differences between infectious diseases associated with postoperative fever. A significant risk factor for postoperative non-pathological fever was a shorter catheter drainage period. Fever after 3 days, fever for more than 4 days and higher procalcitonin levels after surgery suggest infection.

Postoperative Non-Pathological Fever Following Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery : Is Laminoplasty a Better Preventive Method than Laminectomy?

Objective

To analyze the incidence and characteristics of delayed postoperative fever in posterior cervical fusion using cervical pedicle screws (CPS).

Methods

This study analyzed 119 patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion surgery using CPS. Delayed fever was defined as no fever for the first 3 postoperative days, followed by an ear temperature ≥38℃ on postoperative day 4 and subsequent days. Patient age, sex, diagnosis, laminectomy, surgical level, revision status, body mass index, underlying medical disease, surgical duration, and transfusion status were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Of 119 patients, seven were excluded due to surgical site infection, spondylitis, pneumonia, or surgical level that included the thoracic spine. Of the 112 included patients, 28 (25%) were febrile and 84 (75%) were afebrile. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that laminectomy was a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative non-pathological fever (odds ratio, 10.251; p=0.000). In contrast, trauma or tumor surgery and underlying medical disease were not significant risk factors for fever.

Conclusion

Patients who develop delayed fever 4 days after posterior cervical fusion surgery using CPS are more likely to have non-pathologic fever than surgical site infection. Laminectomy is a significant risk factor for non-pathologic fever.

Postoperative Nonpathologic Fever After Spinal Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factor Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although there are many postoperative febrile causes, surgical-site infection has always been considered as one of the major causes, but it should be excluded; we encountered many patients who showed delayed postoperative fever that was not related to wound infection after spinal surgery. We aimed to determine the incidence of delayed postoperative fever and its characteristics after spinal surgery, and to analyze the causal factors.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients who underwent any type of spinal surgery were analyzed. We determined febrile patients as those who did not show any fever until postoperative day 3, and those who showed a fever with an ear temperature of greater than 37.8°C at 4 days after surgery. We collected patient data including age, sex, coexistence of diabetes mellitus or hypertension, smoking history, location of surgical lesion (e.g., cervical, thoracic, lumbar spine), type of surgery, surgical approach, diagnosis, surgical level, presence of revision surgery, operative time, duration of administration of prophylactic antibiotics, and the presence of transfusion during the perioperative period, with a chart review.

RESULTS

There were 33 febrile patients and 217 afebrile patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed that surgical approach (i.e., posterior approach with anterior body removal and mesh graft insertion), trauma and tumor surgery compared with degenerative disease, and long duration of surgery were statistically significant risk factors for postoperative nonpathologic fever.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that most spinal surgeons should be aware that postoperative fever can be common without a wound infection, despite its appearance during the late acute or subacute period.

The Use of Biological Meshes in Diaphragmatic Defects - An Evidence-Based Review of the Literature

The widespread use of meshes for hiatal hernia repair has emerged in the era of laparoscopic surgery, although sporadic cases of mesh augmentation of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture have been reported. The indications for biologic meshes in diaphragmatic repair are ill defined. This systematic review aims to investigate the available evidence on the role of biologic meshes in diaphragmatic rupture and hiatal hernia repair. Limited data from sporadic case reports and case series have demonstrated that repair of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture with biologic mesh is safe technique in both the acute or chronic setting. High level evidence demonstrates short-term benefits of biologic mesh augmentation in hiatal hernia repair over primary repair, although adequate long-term data are not currently available. Long-term follow-up data suggest no benefit of hiatal hernia repair using porcine small intestine submucosa over suture repair. The effectiveness of different biologic mesh materials on hernia recurrence requires further investigation.