Node-extranodal soft tissue stage based on extranodal metastasis is associated with poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer

Correlation Analysis Between Tumor Deposit and Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The mechanism underlying the formation of gastric tumor deposits (TDs) is unclear. We aimed to explore the risk factors for the formation and prognostic value of TDs.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 781 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients from four medical institutions in China, from June 2014 to June 2018. The risk factors for TD formation and prognostic value were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that TD positivity was closely related to tumor diameter, Borrmann classification, differentiation degree, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, and nerve and vascular invasion (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 1.836, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.165-2.894, p = 0.009) and vascular invasion (OR 2.152, 95% CI 1.349-3.433, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for TD positivity. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that TD positivity (OR 1.533, 95% CI 1.101-2.134, p = 0.011), tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (OR 1.831, 95% CI 1.319-2.541, p < 0.001), pT4a stage (OR 1.652, 95% CI 1.144-2.386, p = 0.007), and vascular invasion (OR 1.458, 95% CI 1.059-2.008, p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for GC prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival of the TD-positive group showed significant effects among patients in the pT4a and pN3b stages (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs are closely related to tumor diameter and vascular invasion in LAGC patients, and TD positivity is an independent prognostic factor for LAGC patients, especially those at pT4a and pN3b stages.

Construction and validation of a prognostic model for gastric cancer patients with tumor deposits

Background

Tumor deposits (TD) was a significant risk factor impacting the prognosis of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC), yet it was not currently incorporated into TNM staging systems. The objective of this research was to develop a predictive model for assessing the prognosis of patients with TD-positive GC.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 4,972 patients treated for GC with D2 radical gastrectomy at Wannan Medical College's Yijishan Hospital between January 2012 and December 2021. The patients were categorized based on the number of TD (L1: 1, L2: 2-3, L3: ≥4) and the anatomical location of TD (Q1: single area, Q2: multiple areas). In a 3:1 ratio, patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: training or validation.

Results

The study included a total of 575 patients who were divided into the training group (n = 432) and validation group (n = 143). Survival analysis showed that the number and anatomical location of TD had a significant impact on the prognosis of patients with TD-positive GC. Univariate analysis of the training group data revealed that tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, histological grade, number and distribution of TD, neural invasion, and postoperative chemotherapy were associated with prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified poor histological grade, T4 stage, N3 stage, number of TD, neural invasion, and postoperative chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors for GC patients with TD. A nomogram was developed using these variables, demonstrating well predictive ability for 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in the validation set. The DCA curve shows that the constructed model shows a large positive net gain compared to the eighth edition Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system.

Conclusion

The prognostic model developed for patients with TD-positive GC has a higher clinical utility compared to the eighth edition of TNM staging.

Examined lymph node count for gastric cancer patients after curative surgery

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most common form of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC). The status and stage of LN metastasis are important indicators that reflect the progress of GC. The number of LN metastases is still the most effective index to evaluate the prognosis of patients in all stages of LN metastasis. Examined LN (ELN) count refers to the number of LNs harvested from specimens by curative gastrectomy for pathological examination. This review summarizes the factors that influence ELN count, including individual and tumor factors, intraoperative dissection factors, postoperative sorting factors, and pathological examination factors. Different ELN counts will lead to prognosis-related stage migration. Fine LN sorting and regional LN sorting are the two most important LN sorting technologies. The most direct and effective way to harvest a large number of LNs is for surgeons to perform in vitro fine LN sorting.

Partial omentectomy maybe practicable for T3 or shallower gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Total omentectomy is often performed with gastrectomy as radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, it remains controversial whether GC patients can benefit from omentectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical significance of tumor deposits (TDs) in different anatomical subregions of perigastric omentum in GC patients undergoing gastrectomy with total omentectomy.

METHODS

From October 2011 to December 2013, 1253 patients who underwent gastrectomy with total omentectomy for GC were retrospective reviewed. The TDs in different anatomical subregions of perigastric omentum were examined.

RESULTS

Of 1253 patients, TDs positivity was 11.2%. Tumor deposits in the omentum of greater curvature and in the omentum of lesser curvature were associated with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, advanced tumor node metastasis stages, and unfavorable survival. Besides, TDs in the proximal omentum of greater curvature and in the omentum of lesser curvature correlated with older patients and larger tumors. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that patients with TDs had worser overall survival (OS) than those without, regardless of TD positions. Patients with TDs in the omentum of greater curvature had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with TDs in the omentum of lesser curvature and patients with no TDs. Tumor deposits in the proximal omentum of greater curvature was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Moreover, only patients classified as pT4 had TDs in the distal omentum of greater curvature.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TDs in the omentum of greater curvature had the worst prognosis, followed by patients with TDs in the omentum of lesser curvature and patients with no TDs. In addition, partial omentectomy might be practicable for gastric cancer patients classified as T3 or shallower tumors.

Clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of tumor deposits in resected gastric cancer patients

Purpose

The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in the staging of gastric cancer is currently debatable. TDs are defined as tumoral nodules in perigastric adipose tissue with no evidence of lymphatic, vascular, or neural structures. Clinicopathological factors related to the presence of TDs are not well defined. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of TDs in resected gastric cancer patients.

Materials and methods

This prospective study included patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and treated with D2 radical gastrectomy from January 2019 to January 2020. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors related to the presence of TDs.

Results

A total of 111 patients were eligible and TDs were present in 31 of them (28%). In the univariate analysis, male gender (p = 0.027), tumor size ≥ 5cm (p = ≤0.001), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4a and pT4b) (p = ≤0.001), ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) (p = ≤0.001), and TNM stage III tumors (p = ≤0.001) were significantly associated with the presence of TDs. The multivariate analysis showed that a tumors size ≥5 cm (OR = 3.69, 95% CI: 1.17-11.6), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4a and pT4b) (OR = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.31-10.86) and ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) (OR = 3.21, 95%CI:1.06-9.7) were independent risk factors for the presence of TDs.

Conclusions

Larger tumors (tumor size ≥ 5cm), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4 and pT4b), and ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) were independent risk factors for the presence of TDs.

Extra-nodal metastasis should be classified separately from lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Extra-nodal metastasis (ENM) is defined as a tumor nodule without histological evidence of a lymph node structure. Although ENM has pathological features distinct from those of metastatic lymph nodes, both ENM and metastatic lymph nodes are considered within the same category in the pathological nodal (pN) classification. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic relevance of ENM in gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1207 Japanese patients who underwent curative gastrectomy at a single center between January 2009 and December 2013. All resected specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, processed, and stained using hematoxylin and eosin, and subsequently reviewed by two pathologists. Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Patients who were ENM-positive had significantly poorer overall survival; multivariable analysis revealed that independent prognostic factors were older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.60-5.20), higher pathological tumor classification (HR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.43-3.62), presence of metastatic lymph nodes (HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.0-2.36), and ENM-positive status (HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.48-3.66). ENM-positive patients had similar survival outcomes to those of ENM-negative patients with ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Japanese patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy, ENM was an independent prognostic factor with a prognostic significance different from that of lymph node metastasis. These results suggest that ENM and lymph node metastasis should be classified separately.

Clinical and pathological staging of gastric cancer: Current perspectives and implications

Accurate categorization of invasive depth and lymph node metastasis or optimization of TNM categories is fundamentally critical for prognostic assessment and decision making regarding subsequent therapies after surgery for gastric cancer. Improving the precision of the TNM staging is the ongoing goal. The evolution of the staging system indicates that there is no "ideal staging". Every update has criticized the lack of a standard approach for the stages to date. T staging depends on the accurate determination of the depth of infiltration based on pathological continuous sections. N staging is susceptible to the influence of lymph node detection, and insufficient lymph node detection can lead to N staging migration. M staging is required to improve the detection rate of peritoneal positive free cancer cells to determine the high risk factors of peritoneal metastasis. At present, the quality of standardized pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer requires improvement. Based on a review of the literature and experience from multiple gastric cancer centers, we present a new development in TNM staging and a way to improve clinical and pathological quality control of gastric cancer.

Impact of extranodal tumor deposits on prognosis and N stage in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Extranodal tumor deposits have been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in many malignancies and are also included in the tumor, node, and metastasis staging system for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively a total of 2,344 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (Hexi District, Tianjin, China) and the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University (Longhua District, Haikou, China). Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on extranodal tumor deposit status: a positive group, including those with extranodal tumor deposits, and a negative group composed of those with no extranodal tumor deposits. Clinicopathologic factors were correlated with extranodal tumor deposits, and their individual prognoses were analyzed. In addition, a pathologically modified node classification system was proposed by incorporating the extranodal tumor deposit status into the 8th ed of the N staging system. The superiority of prognostic prediction between the modified node classification and node stage was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 645 (27.5%) patients had extranodal tumor deposits. The presence of extranodal tumor deposits was associated with a larger tumor size, Borrmann type III and IV, a deeper depth of invasion, and an advanced node stage. In the multivariate analysis, extranodal tumor deposits were an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Gastric cancer patients with extranodal tumor deposits demonstrated a lesser 5-year overall survival than those with no extranodal tumor deposits (31.9% vs 61.4%, P < .001). With the strata analysis, statistically significant prognostic differences between the two groups were only observed in patients at the N0-N2 stage. The modified node classification was found to be more appropriate for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection than node stage, and the -2 log likelihood of the modified node classification (16,042.890) was smaller than the value of node stage (16,150.811).

CONCLUSION

Extranodal tumor deposits in gastric cancer patients indicate aggressive characteristics and a poorer prognosis of gastric cancer. We maintain that extranodal tumor deposits should be incorporated into the N staging system to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of patients with gastric cancer.

Tumour deposits are a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Tumour deposits (TDs) are clusters of cancer cells in the soft tissue that are discontinuous from the primary tumour. In this review we are exploring their relevance for prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A literature search was performed to identify studies providing data on TDs and prognosis in gastric cancer patients. Eight papers were included in the meta-analysis, which was carried out in terms of risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Of 7445 patients, 1551 had TDs (20.9%). TDs were associated with a decreased overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.9-4.3) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.3-2.1). TDs were also associated with known prognostic factors such as synchronous metastatic disease (RR = 9.5), invasion depth (RR = 1.8), lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.7), lymphatic invasion (RR = 1.7), vascular invasion (RR = 2.6) and poor differentiation (RR = 1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong indication that TDs are independent predictors of prognosis in patients with gastric cancer; hence, TDs should be included in the staging of gastric cancers.

Extra nodular metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for overall survival in node-positive patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause for cancer-related death in industrialized nations. Nodal involvement has been identified as a relevant prognostic feature in CRC. Extra nodal metastasis (ENM) describes the spread of malignant cells beyond the nodal capsule. ENM is thought to be an independent risk factor for poor survival. This study examined ENM as an independent risk factor for poor overall survival in patients with node-positive CRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from a prospectively maintained CRC database was retrospectively analyzed. Blinded slides of patients with stage III and IV CRC following radical surgical resection were re-examined for the presence of ENM. The effect of ENM on overall survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven cases with node-positive CRC (UICC stages III and IV) including 78 cases with ENM were included for analysis. ENM was seen in 60 patients with colon cancer (58.8%) and in 18 patients with rectal cancer (40%), p = 0.033. ENM-positive patients had a significantly higher odd for cancer-related death compared to ENM-negative patients ratio of [OR 0.44: 0.22-0.88, CI 95%, p = 0.021], p = 0.02. The median overall survival was significantly longer in patients without ENM, 51.0 ± 33 vs. 30.5 ± 42 months, p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

Extra nodal metastasis is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node-positive colorectal cancer. Extra nodal metastasis is associated with high odds of tumor-related mortality and poor overall survival.

Prognostic significance and the role in TNM stage of extranodal metastasis within regional lymph nodes station in gastric carcinoma

The role of extranodal metastasis (ENM) in TNM stage in gastric carcinoma (GC) is controversial. This study was aimed to make a detailed investigation of the prognostic significance and the role in TNM stage of ENM in GC. The patients with primary GC, who underwent gastrectomy with curative intention in West China Hospital from January 2005 to December 2011, were retrospectively enrolled. The prognosis and clinicopathological traits were compared between ENM positive (ENMP) and negative (ENMN) groups in all patients, TNM I-II, III and IV stages, respectively. The significance of the number and the role in TNM stage of ENM were also assessed. In our study, 1457 patients were enrolled, with 1324 (90.9%) in ENMN group and 133 (9.1%) in ENMP group. ENMP group had significantly more advanced GC and worse prognosis (all p<0.05) than ENMN group in all patients, TNM I-II stages and TNM III stage. ENM>2 subgroup had remarkably larger tumor size (p=0.002) and more advanced N stage (p=0.016) than ENM=1-2 subgroup. The number of ENM was an independent prognostic factor in ENMP group (p=0.029). The prognosis of ENM>2 in TNM I-III stages was significantly worse than ENMN patients in TNM III stage. The C-index of TNM stage plus the number of ENM was significantly higher than that of current TNM stage alone (p=0.005). In conclusion, the patients in ENMP subgroup had more advanced GC and worse prognosis than those in ENMN subgroup. It might be more reasonable to categorize ENM>2 into TNM IV stage.

Prognostic significance and role in TNM stage of tumor deposits in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) are now observed in esophageal cancer (EC), but the role of TDs is seldom elucidated. This study aimed to research the prognostic significance and the role of TDs in EC. The patients with primary EC, who had undergone curative esophagectomy in West China Hospital from May 2005 to May 2011 were retrospectively enrolled.

METHODS

The prognosis and clinicopathological traits were compared between tumor deposits positive (TDP) and tumor deposits negative (TDN) groups in all patients and TNM 0-IV stages respectively.

RESULTS

In our study, 1,044 patients were enrolled, with 948 (90.8%) in TDN group and 96 (9.2%) in TDP group. TDP group had significantly more advanced EC and worse prognosis (all P<0.001) than TDN group in all patients, TNM II stage and TNM III stage. The prognosis of TDP group in TNM II stage was significantly worse than TDN patients in TNM III stage (P<0.001), and the worst prognosis was always found in patients with at least one TD regardless of the number of metastatic lymph node is.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in TDP subgroup had more advanced EC and worse prognosis than those in TDN subgroup. It might be more reasonable to be regarded as an indicator of stage migration in EC.

Evaluation of rational extent lymphadenectomy for local advanced gastric cancer

Based upon studies from randomized clinical trials, the extended (D2) lymph node dissection is now recommended as a standard procedure for local advanced gastric cancer worldwide. However, the rational extent lymphadenectomy for local advanced gastric cancer has remained a topic of debate in the past decades. Due to the limitation of low metastatic rate in para-aortic nodes (PAN) in JCOG9501, the clinical benefit of D2+ para-aortic nodal dissection (PAND) for patients with stage T4 and/or stage N3 disease, which is very common in China and other countries except Japan and Korea, cannot be determined. Furthermore, the role of splenectomy for complete resection of No.10 and No.11 nodes has been controversial, and however, the final results from the randomized trial of JCOG0110 have yet to be completed. Gastric cancer with the No.14 and No.13 lymph node metastasis is defined as M1 stage in the current version of the Japanese classification. We propose that D2+No.14v and +No.13 lymphadenectomy may be an option in a potentially curative gastrectomy for tumors with apparent metastasis to the No.6 nodes or infiltrate to duodenum. The examined lymph node and extranodal metastasis are significantly associated with the survival of gastric cancer patients.