1
|
Vallurupalli M, Shah ND, Vyas RM. Optimizing Readability of Patient-Facing Hand Surgery Education Materials Using Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5. J Hand Surg Am 2024:S0363-5023(24)00234-X. [PMID: 38970600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health recommend that readability of patient education materials should not exceed an eighth grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials often remain above the recommended average reading level. Current online calculators provide readability scores; however, they lack the ability to provide text-specific feedback, which may streamline the process of simplifying patient materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing hand surgery education materials through reading level analysis and simplification. METHODS The readability of 18 patient-facing hand surgery education materials was compared by a traditional online calculator for reading level and ChatGPT 3.5. The original excerpts were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the same calculators. RESULTS The readability scores for the original excerpts from the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were similar. The simplified excerpts' scores were lower than the originals, with a mean of 7.28, less than the maximum recommended 8. CONCLUSIONS The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for the purpose of simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing hand surgery materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable with traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE By confirming ChatGPT3.5's ability to assess and simplify patient education materials, this study offers a practical solution for potentially improving patient comprehension, engagement, and health outcomes in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Medha Vallurupalli
- Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Nikhil D Shah
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Raj M Vyas
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA; Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gu JZ, Baird GL, Escamilla Guevara A, Sohn YJ, Lydston M, Doyle C, Tevis SEA, Miles RC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of English language online patient education materials in breast cancer: Is readability the only story? Breast 2024; 75:103722. [PMID: 38603836 PMCID: PMC11019273 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online patient education materials (OPEMs) are an increasingly popular resource for women seeking information about breast cancer. The AMA recommends written patient material to be at or below a 6th grade level to meet the general public's health literacy. Metrics such as quality, understandability, and actionability also heavily influence the usability of health information, and thus should be evaluated alongside readability. PURPOSE A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine: 1) Average readability scores and reporting methodologies of breast cancer readability studies; and 2) Inclusion frequency of additional health literacy-associated metrics. MATERIALS AND METHODS A registered systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase.com, CENTRAL via Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov in June 2022 in adherence with the PRISMA 2020 statement. Eligible studies performed readability analyses on English-language breast cancer-related OPEMs. Study characteristics, readability data, and reporting of non-readability health literacy metrics were extracted. Meta-analysis estimates were derived from generalized linear mixed modeling. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 30 studies yielding 4462 OPEMs. Overall, average readability was 11.81 (95% CI [11.14, 12.49]), with a significant difference (p < 0.001) when grouped by OPEM categories. Commercial organizations had the highest average readability at 12.2 [11.3,13.0]; non-profit organizations had one of the lowest at 11.3 [10.6,12.0]. Readability also varied by index, with New Fog, Lexile, and FORCAST having the lowest average scores (9.4 [8.6, 10.3], 10.4 [10.0, 10.8], and 10.7 [10.2, 11.1], respectively). Only 57% of studies calculated average readability with more than two indices. Only 60% of studies assessed other OPEM metrics associated with health literacy. CONCLUSION Average readability of breast cancer OPEMs is nearly double the AMA's recommended 6th grade level. Readability and other health literacy-associated metrics are inconsistently reported in the current literature. Standardization of future readability studies, with a focus on holistic evaluation of patient materials, may aid shared decision-making and be critical to increased screening rates and breast cancer awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joey Z Gu
- Department of Medicine, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Grayson L Baird
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Lifespan Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Young-Jin Sohn
- Harvard Medical School Center for Primary Care, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melis Lydston
- Treadwell Virtual Library, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Doyle
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Sarah E A Tevis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Randy C Miles
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Denver Health Hospital and Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vallurupalli M, Shah ND, Vyas RM. Validation of ChatGPT 3.5 as a Tool to Optimize Readability of Patient-facing Craniofacial Education Materials. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5575. [PMID: 38313589 PMCID: PMC10836906 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Background To address patient health literacy, the American Medical Association recommends that readability of patient education materials should not exceed a sixth grade reading level; the National Institutes of Health recommend no greater than an eigth-grade reading level. However, patient-facing materials in plastic surgery often remain at an above-recommended average reading level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ChatGPT 3.5 as a tool for optimizing patient-facing craniofacial education materials. Methods Eighteen patient-facing craniofacial education materials were evaluated for readability by a traditional calculator and ChatGPT 3.5. The resulting scores were compared. The original excerpts were then inputted to ChatGPT 3.5 and simplified by the artificial intelligence tool. The simplified excerpts were scored by the calculators. Results The difference in scores for the original excerpts between the online calculator and ChatGPT 3.5 were not significant (P = 0.441). Additionally, the simplified excerpts' scores were significantly lower than the originals (P < 0.001), and the mean of the simplified excerpts was 7.78, less than the maximum recommended 8. Conclusions The use of ChatGPT 3.5 for simplification and readability analysis of patient-facing craniofacial materials is efficient and may help facilitate the conveyance of important health information. ChatGPT 3.5 rendered readability scores comparable to traditional readability calculators, in addition to excerpt-specific feedback. It was also able to simplify materials to the recommended grade levels. With human oversight, we validate this tool for readability analysis and simplification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Medha Vallurupalli
- From the Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, Calif
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Calif
| | - Nikhil D. Shah
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Calif
| | - Raj M. Vyas
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Calif
- CHOC Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Orange, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee E, Yesantharao P, Long C, He W, Landford W, Xun H, Sacks JM, Cooney CM, Broderick KP. Diversity in online resources for breast reconstruction: What do patients see? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 89:154-163. [PMID: 38199217 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online resources are commonly used by patients to obtain information on breast reconstruction. Despite the key role of these resources in patient decision-making, their visual content has not yet been evaluated. This study sought to 1) characterize the presence and content of visual aids in online patient education breast reconstruction resources and 2) determine if the women represented in these visual aids reflect the breast reconstruction patient population in the United States. METHODS The top 10 Google websites and the first 400 Google Images containing photographs/graphics depicting human skin for the search phrase "breast reconstruction" were analyzed. Images were categorized by content as "Before/After," "Surgical/Anatomical," "Step-by-Step," or "Breast-Centric Stock Images." Image subjects were classified by skin tone into "White" or "Non-White" using the Fitzpatrick scale and by body type into "Lean" or "Full-Figured." RESULTS In total, 471 images were analyzed. These were predominantly "Before/After" images (43.9%), followed by "Breast-Centric Stock Images" (27.4%), "Surgical/Anatomical" (24.2%), and "Step-by-Step" (4.5%). The majority of all images depicted "White" skin types (90.7%) and "Lean" body types (73.0%). "Before/After" images were more likely to show "Full-Figured" women than the other content categories (p < 0.0001) and had the highest percentage of "Non-White" skin types (35.3%). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that breast reconstruction online resources are not reflective of the patient population seeking reconstruction. Improving the diversity of online image resources can both better represent our diverse patient population as well as better align patient expectations with postoperative outcomes, likely improving patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Pooja Yesantharao
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Chao Long
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Waverley He
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Wilmina Landford
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Helen Xun
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Justin M Sacks
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Carisa M Cooney
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristen P Broderick
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang S, Yu L, Zhang C, Xu M, Tian Q, Cui X, Liu Y, Yu S, Cao M, Zhang W. Effects of decision aids on breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:1025-1044. [PMID: 35460127 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate the effects of decision aids for women facing breast reconstruction decision on decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and depression. BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction decision is not good or bad and should be guided by clinical evidence and patient preferences. Decision aids can increase the patient's decision-making enthusiasm and ability, improve the quality of decision and promote shared decision-making between patients and medical staff. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Eight databases were conducted from the establishment of the database until October 2021. The PRISMA checklist was selected for analysis in this paper. The meta-analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.3. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The result is decision conflict, decision regret, knowledge and other secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. RESULTS A total of twelve randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that decision aids could significantly reduce decision conflict and decision regret, improve knowledge, satisfaction and depression and had no influence on anxiety. CONCLUSIONS The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis reviewed the positive effect of decision aids on the decision-making of women facing postmastectomy breast reconstruction. In the future, more well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the effects of decision aids on the decision-making of breast reconstruction and nurses should be encouraged to take part in the development of decision aids in accordance with strict standards and apply them to breast cancer patients considering postmastectomy breast reconstruction. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Our study provides evidence for the effectiveness of decision aids on breast reconstruction and points to the important role of healthcare providers in the use of decision aids and in facilitating shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Yang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lin Yu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chunmiao Zhang
- The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Mengmeng Xu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qi Tian
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xuan Cui
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yantong Liu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Shuanghan Yu
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Minglu Cao
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raman S, Powell LE, Andersen ES, Nigro LC. One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction. EPLASTY 2022; 22:e44. [PMID: 36212604 PMCID: PMC9516762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A myriad of patient education modalities for breast reconstruction exist, although the optimal tools for patient education remain undetermined. The aim of this study is to determine patient preferences for breast reconstruction education modalities based on demographic variables. METHODS A prospective observational study at a tertiary care university health system was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. A questionnaire was administered to breast reconstruction patients to collect information on demographics, research sources used before the initial appointment, and preferred education modalities. Differences based on age were analyzed using an independent samples t test, whereas a Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences based on ethnicity and education level. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS The most preferred patient education tools overall were books/written materials and videos. Younger patients were significantly more likely than older patients to have referenced additional physician sources (P = .0174) and to seek out information on the institution's website (P = .0465). Those with a college degree were significantly more likely to have performed research prior to the initial appointment (P = .0206). White patients were significantly more likely than nonwhite patients to talk to friends/family as a research source (P = .0150). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of age, education, or ethnicity, most patients prefer books/written materials and video presentations for education on breast reconstruction. Providers should strive to include written and video options to meet the needs of this diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Raman
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lauren E Powell
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Emily S Andersen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA
| | - Lauren C Nigro
- Breast Reconstruction & Restoration Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10:e4247. [PMID: 35433155 PMCID: PMC9007188 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Health literacy of plastic surgery patients may affect surgical decision-making and perioperative outcomes. In addition to consulting a plastic surgeon, patients often refer to online-based resources to learn about surgical options. The aim of this scoping review was to identify evidence detailing the state of health literacy of plastic surgery patients and available resources to highlight areas of improvement for clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kang R, Saunders CH, Carpenter-Song EA, Moore KO, Trooboff SW, Columbo JA, Goodney PP, Wong SL, Joga Ivatury S. A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Patient Education Materials for Colorectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1249-1258. [PMID: 34516444 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient education materials are created by professional organizations to inform patients about their disease and its treatment. However, it remains unclear if these materials are appropriate for patients. OBJECTIVE This study aims to broadly evaluate the education materials for patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN Patient education materials from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were assessed quantitatively by using 1) the Flesch-Kincaid readability formula and 2) the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool. The Patient Education Material Assessment Tool scores materials in 2 domains: understandability and actionability. These materials were further evaluated qualitatively via an exploratory focus group with patients and their caregivers (n = 5) and semi-structured interviews with board-certified/eligible colorectal surgeons (n = 10). SETTING This study was conducted at academic centers and a regional professional society meeting. PARTICIPANTS The mean patient age was 63. Most surgeons (8/10) practiced in an academic setting, and 4/10 were female. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes measured were reading grade level and domain scores for the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Themes were generated through data interpretation and data reduction. RESULTS Materials ranged from 7th to 11th grade reading level. National Comprehensive Cancer Network materials scored highest for understandability (92.2% ± 6.1%, mean ± SD), followed by National Cancer Institute (84.0% ± 6.6%) and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (82.2% ± 6.3%) materials. Actionability scores varied; the National Comprehensive Cancer Network materials scored 82.5% ± 1.7%, whereas the National Cancer Institute and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons materials scored 23.3% ± 6.7% and 50.0% ± 8.2%. Critical gaps were identified in the content of these materials. Patients wanted more information about self-care, both emotional and physical. Specifically, patients sought details about postoperative bowel function. Whereas surgeons wanted information about the typical hospital course and recovery, all wanted materials to be customizable. LIMITATIONS A limited number of materials were reviewed, and patient focus groups were exploratory. CONCLUSIONS Commonly available printed education materials for colorectal cancer are written at a high reading grade level, vary in their usability, and neglect important details about postoperative recovery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B535. EVALUACIN DE MTODOS MIXTOS DE MATERIALES EDUCATIVOS PARA PACIENTES SOBRE CNCER COLORECTAL ANTECEDENTES:Los materiales educativos para pacientes son creados por organizaciones profesionales para informar a los pacientes sobre su enfermedad y su tratamiento. Sin embargo, no está claro si estos materiales son apropiados para los pacientes.OBJETIVO:Evaluar ampliamente los materiales para el cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO:Los materiales educativos para pacientes de la Red Nacional Integral del Cáncer (NCCN), el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer (NCI) y la Sociedad Americana de Cirujanos de Colon y Recto (ASCRS) se evaluaron cuantitativamente utilizando (1) la fórmula de legibilidad de Flesch-Kincaid y (2) la herramienta de evaluación de material educativo para pacientes. La Herramienta de evaluación de materiales educativos para pacientes califica los materiales en dos dominios: comprensibilidad y viabilidad. Estos materiales fueron evaluados cualitativamente a través de un grupo de enfoque exploratorio con pacientes y sus cuidadores (n = 5) y entrevistas semiestructuradas con cirujanos colorrectales certificados o elegibles para certificación por el consejo (n = 10).ESCENARIO:Centros académicos y un encuentro regional de una sociedad profesional.PACIENTES:La edad media de los pacientes fue de 63 años. La mayoría de los cirujanos (8/10) practicaban en un entorno académico, y 4/10 eran mujeres.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Nivel de grado de lectura y puntajes de dominios para la Herramienta de evaluación de materiales educativos para pacientes. Los datos cualitativos se registraron, transcribieron y codificaron. Los temas se generaron mediante la interpretación y la reducción de datos.RESULTADOS:Los materiales variaron desde el nivel de lectura del 7° al 11° grado. Los materiales de la NCCN obtuvieron la puntuación más alta en comprensibilidad (92.2 ± 6.1%, media ± DE), seguidos por los materiales de NCI (84.0 ± 6.6%) y ASCRS (82.2 ± 6.3%). Los puntajes de viabilidad variaron; Los materiales de NCCN obtuvieron una puntuación de 82.5 ± 1.7%, mientras que los materiales de NCI y ASCRS obtuvieron una puntuación de 23.3 ± 6.7% y 50.0 ± 8.2%, respectivamente. Se identificaron lagunas críticas en el contenido de estos materiales. Los pacientes querían más información sobre el autocuidado, tanto emocional como físico. Específicamente, los pacientes buscaron detalles sobre la función intestinal posoperatoria. Mientras que los cirujanos querían información sobre el curso hospitalario típico y la recuperación, y todos querían que los materiales fueran personalizables.LIMITACIONES:Se revisó una cantidad limitada de materiales y los grupos de enfoque de pacientes fueron exploratorios.CONCLUSIONES:Los materiales educativos impresos comúnmente disponibles para el cáncer colorrectal están escritos a un alto nivel de grado de lectura, varían en su usabilidad y omiten detalles importantes sobre la recuperación postoperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B535.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravinder Kang
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vermont
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Elizabeth A Carpenter-Song
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Department of Anthropology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Kayla O Moore
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Spencer W Trooboff
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vermont
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Jesse A Columbo
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vermont
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vermont
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Srinivas Joga Ivatury
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yesantharao PS, Hunt MF, Bekheet F, Manahan MA. Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Online Education Tools: A Multimetric Analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:491-498. [PMID: 33443886 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In light of highly publicized media coverage on breast implant recalls and Food and Drug Administration hearings on breast implant safety, online searches of these topics have surged. It is thus critical to determine whether such searches are providing meaningful information for those who use them. Patient/laywomen-directed online education materials on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) must not only be comprehensible but also accurate, actionable, and culturally concordant, especially as more diverse populations turn to the internet for breast implant-related information. This study assessed the overall suitability of BIA-ALCL patient-directed educational text and video-based materials online. METHODS This was a cross-sectional, multimetric investigation of online text- and video-based patient-directed educational materials for BIA-ALCL using multiple validated measures. Two reviewers assessed each resource. Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact analyses were used as appropriate to compare text- and video-based online resources. RESULTS In total, 30 websites and 15 videos were evaluated, more than half (56%) of which were from academic/physician or governmental/nonprofit sources. Overall, website and video content, as well as quality, varied by source. Academic/physician or governmental/nonprofit sources tended to be more comprehensive and have higher-quality information than commercial/media outlet sources. Median actionability of websites was 38%, well below the threshold of 70% used in the literature to identify actionable resources. The median suitability score for BIA-ALCL websites was 57%, which is considered "adequate" based on published thresholds. The mean overall Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool score for websites was 2.4; Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool scores higher than 2.5 are generally regarded as culturally sensitive. In general, videos were more understandable than websites. Substantial interrater reliability across the validated tools used in this study was noted using Pearson correlation coefficients. CONCLUSIONS Online resources varied in content and quality by source. As BIA-ALCL becomes an increasingly salient topic among both providers and patients, it is important to empower women with accurate information about this implant-associated cancer. Of available resources, providers should refer patients or those seeking more information to websites from governmental/academic organizations (".gov" or ".org" domains) and videos from academic/physician or governmental sources, given that among high-quality resources, these were most clear/comprehensible. Overall, there is a need for improved online content on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja S Yesantharao
- From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Modified Framework for Advancing Research Toward Intervention. Ann Plast Surg 2019; 81:495-502. [PMID: 29851727 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000001503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the United States' population diversifies, eliminating disparities in health and healthcare has become increasingly important across all disciplines of medicine, including plastic and reconstructive surgery. This is evidenced by the growing body of literature in recent years focusing on disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. No study to date has evaluated whether this research is progressing appropriately to promote tangible evidence-based interventions to reduce these disparities. METHODS A systematic literature review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was performed to identify studies focusing on disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. A previously established public health framework for advancing health disparities research was used to inform analysis of the quality and progression of the included studies. This triphasic framework categorizes disparities research as follows: detecting (identifies and measures disparities in vulnerable populations), understanding (establishes determinants of disparities), or reducing (proposes and evaluates interventions for eliminating disparities). RESULTS Ninety-five studies were identified between 1979 and 2016, with 61 (64.2%) published after 2010. The majority of studies (51.6%) were retrospective cohort or case-control studies (American Society of Plastic Surgery level III evidence). Fifty-eight (63.7%), 31 (34.1%), and 2 (2.2%) studies provided detecting-, understanding- and reducing-phase disparities research, respectively. Non-plastic and reconstructive surgery journals accounted for 70.5% of all articles and for most higher phase research articles, publishing 83.9% and 100% of second and third phase studies, respectively. Disparity categories investigated included race/ethnicity, age, income, insurance status/type, geography, and education level, with race/ethnicity being the most common (73.7%). The most commonly measured outcome was percent of subpopulation receiving reconstruction (63, 66.3%), followed by reconstruction type (14, 16.7%). Patient-, provider-, system-, and research-level factors were all identified as potential targets for interventions to reduce disparities. CONCLUSIONS Despite a recent increase in literature focusing on postmastectomy breast reconstruction disparities, the majority focuses on identifying vulnerable populations with inadequate progression to second (understanding) and third (reducing) phases. Increasing research funding, availability of language-concordant and culturally concordant educational materials, and advocacy and sociopolitical awareness within the plastic surgery community is necessary to advance research on postmastectomy breast reconstruction and, ultimately, eliminate it.
Collapse
|
12
|
Santos PJF, Daar DA, Badeau A, Leis A. Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture. J Hand Ther 2019; 31:472-479. [PMID: 28843342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Descriptive. BACKGROUND Dupuytren's contracture is a common disorder involving fibrosis of the palmar fascia. As patients are increasingly using online materials to gather health care information, it is imperative to assess the readability and appropriateness of this content. The recommended grade level for patient educational materials is seventh to eighth grade according to the National Institutes of Health. This study aims to assess the readability and content of online patient resources for Dupuytren's contracture. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Evaluate readability of online patient education materials for Dupuytren's contracture. METHODS The largest public search engine, Google, was queried using the term "Dupuytren's contracture surgery" on February 26, 2016. Location filters were disabled, and sponsored results were excluded to avoid any inadvertent search bias. The 10 most popular Web sites were identified, and all relevant patient-directed information within 1 click from the original site was downloaded and saved as plain text. Readability was analyzed using 6 established analyses (Readable.io, Added Bytes, Ltd, UK). RESULTS Analysis of 10 Web sites demonstrates an average grade level of at least 11th grade (Flesch-Kincaid grade level, 10.2; Gunning-Fog grade level, 13.1; Coleman-Liau grade level, 14.4; Simple Measure of Gobbledygook grade level, 10.0; automated readability grade level, 9.7; and average grade level, 11.5). Overall Flesch-Kincaid reading ease index was 46.4, which is difficult. No single article was at the recommended reading level. CONCLUSIONS Online materials available for treatment of Dupuytren's contracture are above recommended reading levels and do not include a comprehensive explanation of treatment options, which may negatively impact decision making in patients seeking treatment for this condition. Surgeons and hand therapists alike should be cognizant of available online patient materials and make efforts to develop and provide more appropriate materials. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Joy F Santos
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
| | - David A Daar
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Austin Badeau
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Amber Leis
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
|
15
|
Johnson AR, Doval AF, Granoff MD, Egeler SA, Bravo MG, Dowlatshahi AS, Lin SJ, Lee BT. A Comparative Multimetric Assessment of English and Spanish Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Materials. J Surg Res 2019; 238:64-71. [PMID: 30739070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spanish-speaking Hispanics living in the United States utilize the internet as a primary means to obtain health information. Accurate, accessible information is important for English speakers; however, it could have even greater utility for Spanish speakers who have lower health literacy levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare online English and Spanish carpal tunnel surgery materials provided by using a multimetric approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS A web search using the English term "carpal tunnel surgery" was performed. The first 10 institutional/organizational websites that provided carpal tunnel surgery information in English and Spanish were included. All relevant online materials were evaluated using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT), and Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook, Spanish (SOL) to assess understandability and actionability, cultural sensitivity, and readability, respectively. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in understandability or actionability scores between Spanish and English materials. Average cultural sensitivity scores for Spanish materials were significantly lower than English materials (P = 0.015). The average reading grade level of online English materials was greater than that for Spanish materials (P = 0.011). Both mean values were above the recommended sixth-grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS Online patient-directed information regarding carpal tunnel surgery exceeded the recommended reading grade level for both English and Spanish-speaking populations. Most Spanish materials were often direct translations and were not contoured to the elevated literacy needs of this demographic. Institutions must caution their authors to tailor their web material in a way that is sensitive to their target population to optimize understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Rose Johnson
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andres F Doval
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melisa D Granoff
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sabine A Egeler
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miguel G Bravo
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - A Samandar Dowlatshahi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samuel J Lin
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bernard T Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, Hamill JB, MacEachern MP, Lee CN, Wilkins EG. Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 2018; 39:5-20. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x18803879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. The decision-making process for women considering breast reconstruction following mastectomy is complex. Research suggests that fewer than half of women undergoing mastectomy have adequate knowledge and make treatment decisions that are concordant with their underlying values. This systematic review assesses the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative decision aids (DAs) to improve the patient decision-making process for breast reconstruction. Methods. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Databases published prior to January 4, 2018. Studies that assessed the impact of a DA on patient decision making for breast reconstruction were identified. The effect of preoperative DAs on decisional conflict in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was measured with inverse variance-weighted mean differences (mean difference [MD] ± 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results. Among 1299 unique articles identified, 1197 were excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts against selection criteria. Among the 17 studies included in this review, 11 assessed the efficacy of DAs for breast reconstruction and 6 additional studies described the development and usability of these DAs. Studies suggest that DAs reduce patient-reported decisional conflict (MD, –4.55 [95% CI, –8.65 to –0.45], P = 0.03 in the fixed-effects model and MD, –4.70 [95% CI, –10.75 to 1.34], P = 0.13 in the random-effects model). Preoperative DAs also improved patient satisfaction with information and perceived involvement in the decision-making process. Conclusions. The existing literature suggests that DAs reduce decisional conflict, improve self-reported satisfaction with information, and improve perceived involvement in the decision-making process for women considering breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah T. Hawley
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
- Center for Health Communications and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Mark P. MacEachern
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Clara N. Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Edwin G. Wilkins
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Tzeng YF, Gau BS. Suitability of asthma education materials for school-age children: Implications for health literacy. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:e921-e930. [PMID: 28793368 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To investigate the suitability of asthma education materials for school-age children with asthma and elucidate how these children used their health-literacy abilities to identify whether the materials can be accepted, comprehended and applied. BACKGROUND Effective asthma self-management education is influenced by the suitability of materials and an individual's health literacy. DESIGN A mixed-method research design was developed using quantitative and qualitative surveys. METHODS The suitability of the materials was assessed on the basis of the Chinese version of the Suitability Assessment of Materials by five experts. In addition, five school-age children (age: 8-12 years) were recruited and interviewed. RESULTS In total, 25 pieces of asthma education material for children were collected. On the basis of their type, the materials were categorised as nine brochures, 11 leaflets and five videos. Of the 25 materials, 17 were rated as superior materials, whereas eight were rated as adequate materials. The suitability scores of the video-based materials were significantly higher than those of the brochures and leaflets (p = .006). One print material was considered to have a reading level suitable for fifth-grade or younger children, whereas the remaining materials were considered suitable for sixth-grade or older children. The following six health-literacy domains were identified: recognising asthma through body knowledge, posing reflective questions, identifying self-care difficulties, receiving adult guidance, learning with enjoyment and addressing learning requirements. CONCLUSIONS The video-based materials had integrated content and were appealing to children. Cartoon animations, interactive computer games, and skill demonstrations may enhance learning stimulation and motivation and increase learning effects in children. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The present results may help healthcare providers to understand children's capacities to manage their disease, effectively address children's requirements and function as a key resource for children to strengthen their literacy in asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Fen Tzeng
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bih-Shya Gau
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Readability, complexity, and suitability of online resources for mastectomy and lumpectomy. J Surg Res 2017; 212:214-221. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Revised: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
20
|
Tran BNN, Singh M, Lee BT, Rudd R, Singhal D. Readability, complexity, and suitability analysis of online lymphedema resources. J Surg Res 2017; 213:251-260. [PMID: 28601323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 72% of Americans use online health information to assist in health care decision-making. Previous studies of lymphedema literature have focused only on reading level of patient-oriented materials online. Findings indicate they are too advanced for most patients to comprehend. This, more comprehensive study, expands the previous analysis to include critical elements of health materials beyond readability using assessment tools to report on the complexity and density of data as well as text design, vocabulary, and organization. METHODS The top 10 highest ranked websites on lymphedema were identified using the most popular search engine (Google). Website content was analyzed for readability, complexity, and suitability using Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, PMOSE/iKIRSCH, and Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), respectively. PMOSE/iKIRSCH and SAM were performed by two independent raters. Fleiss' kappa score was calculated to ensure inter-rater reliability. RESULTS Online lymphedema literature had a reading grade level of 14.0 (SMOG). Overall complexity score was 6.7 (PMOSE/iKIRSCH) corresponding to "low" complexity and requiring a 8th-12th grade education. Fleiss' kappa score was 80% (P = 0.04, "substantial" agreement). Overall suitability score was 45% (SAM) correlating to the lowest level of "adequate" suitability. Fleiss' kappa score was 76% (P = 0.06, "substantial" agreement). CONCLUSIONS Online resources for lymphedema are above the recommended levels for readability and complexity. The suitability level is barely adequate for the intended audience. Overall, these materials are too sophisticated for the average American adult, whose literacy skills are well documented. Further efforts to revise these materials are needed to improve patient comprehension and understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao Ngoc N Tran
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mansher Singh
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bernard T Lee
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Rima Rudd
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dhruv Singhal
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
What Are Your Patients Reading Online About Soft-tissue Fillers? An Analysis of Internet Information. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2016; 4:e824. [PMID: 27536503 PMCID: PMC4977152 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000000840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Soft-tissue fillers are increasingly being used for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. They generally offer minimal downtime and reliable results. However, significant complications are reported and patients need to be aware of these as part of informed consent. The Internet serves as a vital resource to inform patients of the risks and benefits of this procedure. Methods: Three independent reviewers performed a structured analysis of 65 Websites providing information on soft-tissue fillers. Validated instruments were used to analyze each site across multiple domains, including readability, accessibility, reliability, usability, quality, and accuracy. Associations between the endpoints and Website characteristics were assessed using linear regression and proportional odds modeling. Results: The majority of Websites were physician private practice sites (36.9%) and authored by board-certified plastic surgeons or dermatologists (35.4%) or nonphysicians (27.7%). Sites had a mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level of 11.9 ± 2.6, which is well above the recommended average of 6 to 7 grade level. Physician private practice sites had the lowest scores across all domains with a notable lack of information on complications. Conversely, Websites of professional societies focused in plastic surgery and dermatology, as well as academic centers scored highest overall. Conclusions: As the use of soft-tissue fillers is rising, patients should be guided toward appropriate sources of information such as Websites sponsored by professional societies. Medical professionals should be aware that patients may be accessing poor information online and strive to improve the overall quality of information available on soft-tissue fillers.
Collapse
|
22
|
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer. J Surg Res 2016; 206:90-97. [PMID: 27916381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients seeking health information commonly use the Internet as the first source for material. Studies show that well-informed patients have increased involvement, satisfaction, and healthcare outcomes. As one-third of Americans have only basic or below basic health literacy, the National Institutes of Health and American Medical Association recommend patient-directed health resources be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study evaluates the readability of commonly accessed online resources on lung cancer. METHODS A search for "lung cancer" was performed using Google and Bing, and the top 10 websites were identified. Location services were disabled, and sponsored sites were excluded. Relevant articles (n = 109) with patient-directed content available directly from the main sites were downloaded. Readability was assessed using 10 established methods and analyzed with articles grouped by parent website. RESULTS The average reading grade level across all sites was 11.2, with a range from 8.8 (New Fog Count) to 12.2 (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook). The average Flesch Reading Ease score was 52, corresponding with fairly difficult to read text. The readability varied when compared by individual website, ranging in grade level from 9.2 to 15.2. Only 10 articles (9%) were written below a sixth-grade level and these tended to discuss simpler topics. CONCLUSIONS Patient-directed online information about lung cancer exceeds the recommended sixth-grade reading level. Readability varies between individual websites, allowing physicians to direct patients according to level of health literacy. Modifications to existing materials can significantly improve readability while maintaining content for patients with low health literacy.
Collapse
|