Transversus abdominis plane blocks: pilot of feasibility and the learning curve

Surgical transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine at cesarean: a pilot randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Postcesarean pain control is challenging. In addition to intrathecal morphine, recent studies have shown that liposomal bupivacaine administered via conventional transversus abdominis plane block reduces postcesarean opioid use. However, whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via a surgical approach also reduces opioid use is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of liposomal bupivacaine via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) reduces the cumulative dose of opioids administered in the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery among participants who also receive intrathecal morphine.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a pilot single-blind randomized controlled trial of 60 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery at a community tertiary referral hospital staffed by academic physicians. Immediately before fascial closure during cesarean delivery, a total of 80 mL of dilute bupivacaine plus liposomal bupivacaine or dilute bupivacaine alone was administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block (40 mL on each side). The primary outcome was a median cumulative opioid dose received within the first 48 hours after cesarean delivery measured in morphine milligram equivalents. In addition, opioid use at other time points, pain scores, and participant satisfaction were assessed. A sample size of 60 was determined to be adequate to inform a potential future adequately powered randomized trial. The primary outcome of morphine milligram equivalents and pain scores were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Between October 11, 2021, and August 29, 2022, 60 participants were randomized and analyzed: 31 were allocated to liposomal bupivacaine plus regular bupivacaine (intervention group), and 29 were allocated to regular bupivacaine alone (control group). Participants allocated to the intervention group used a median cumulative dose of 2 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids (interquartile range, 0-24) in the first 48 hours compared with 8 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartile range, 0-40) among participants allocated to the control group (P=.236). The percentage of participants who used ≤15 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids was 61% in the intervention arm and 41% in the control arm (P=.123), and the percentage who used zero opioids was 45% in the intervention arm and 34% in the control arm (P=.399). The total number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge was fewer in the intervention arm than in the control arm (P=.029). Patient satisfaction with the intervention group and control group was similar.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study suggests that liposomal bupivacaine administered via surgical transversus abdominis plane block is worth critical evaluation as an adjunctive analgesic modality in an adequately powered randomized trial.

Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus No TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a randomized double-blind controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective modality for the control of immediate postoperative pain. The present randomized trial aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (USTAP) and laparoscopic subcostal TAP (LSTAP) block as compared to standard care without TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial on patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were equally randomized to one of three groups: USTAP, LSTAP, and control group (no TAP block). The main outcome measures were pain scores and analgesic consumption within the first 24 h postoperatively, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to ambulation, time to first flatus, and adverse effects of TAP block.

RESULTS

The trial included 110 patients (90% females) with a mean age of 40.9 ± 11.7 years. Both USTAP and LSTAP block groups were associated with significantly lower pain scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, lower cumulative dose of paracetamol, less PONV, and shorter time to flatus than the control group. USTAP and LSTAP block were associated with similar pain scores at all time points, similar analgesic requirements, a similar incidence of PONV, and comparable time to first ambulation and time to first flatus. No adverse effects related to TAP block were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

TAP block is a safe and effective method for pain control and improving recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both USTAP and LSTAP blocks were equally effective in terms of pain relief, analgesic requirements, PONV, return of bowel function, and time to ambulation.

Role of Handedness in Conducting an Ultrasound-Guided Procedure: A Comparative Study

Objective:

Sonography is widely used by clinicians to provide imaging assistance in guiding invasive procedures. Many sonography users tend to prefer their dominant hand to operate the needle and their nondominant hand on the ultrasound transducer. The aim was this study was to determine whether the dominant hand guiding the needle achieves a faster time to target during ultrasound-guided procedures compared with the nondominant hand.

Materials and Methods:

Forty novice sonography users, medical students, were randomized to participate in the study. Twenty medical students used a Sonosite® ultrasound equipment system and the other 20 used a Mindray® ultrasound equipment system. Following a video education training session, an informed consent was obtained from each participant. In each equipment group, participants were randomly allocated to either a right-handed needle and a left-handed transducer preference or a left-handed needle and right-handed transducer preference group. A total of ten participants were in each group. A timer was started when the ultrasound transducer came in contact with the phantom model and stopped when the needle reached the target. This simulated task was repeated ten times by the participants. The hand arrangement for the needle and transducer was then switched and the task repeated another ten times by each participant.

Results:

Handedness was observed over multiple attempts and “time to target” was recorded for groups with both hand preferences and varied ultrasound equipment systems. The most significant finding was that the difference in time was statistically significant between the groups, when comparing the first and fifth procedural attempts.

Conclusion:

In this novice group of users, despite training for ultrasound-guided procedures using phantom models, irrespective of the ultrasound equipment system, or hand preference, there was no difference in the time to target.

Peripheral nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural in patients with an epigastric incision

BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidurals are commonly recommended in enhanced recovery protocols, though they may cause hypotension and urinary retention. Peripheral nerve blocks using liposomal bupivacaine are a potential alternative, though they have not been extensively studied in major cancer operations with an epigastric incision.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data following the transition from thoracic epidural to liposomal peripheral nerve blocks in patients undergoing major oncologic surgery. Patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks were compared to those receiving thoracic epidural. Outcome variables included postoperative opioid use (milligram morphine equivalents [MME]), severe pain, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Forty-seven of 102 patients studied (46%) received peripheral nerve blocks. Opioid use was higher in the peripheral nerve block group during the 0-24 h (116 vs. 94 MME, p = 0.04) and 24-48 h postoperative period (94 vs. 23 MME, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in severe pain, hypotension, urinary retention, or ileus. Peripheral nerve blocks were associated with earlier ambulation (1 vs. 2 days, p = 0.04), though other milestones were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal peripheral nerve blocks were associated with increased opioid use compared to thoracic epidural. On the basis of our results, thoracic epidural might be preferred in surgical oncology patients with an epigastric incision.

Real-World Data on Liposomal Bupivacaine and Inpatient Hospital Costs After Colorectal Surgery

INTRODUCTION

This study compared costs of care among colorectal surgery patients who received liposomal bupivacaine versus those who did not (control) from a health institution perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This pharmacoeconomic evaluation was conducted among adults undergoing open or minimally invasive colorectal resection at an academic medical center from May 2016 to February 2018. Healthcare resource utilization was derived from the electronic health record. Total cost of care (2018 USD) was analyzed using a generalized linear model adjusted for American Society of Anesthesiologists score, enhanced recovery after surgery management, open surgery, opioid use before surgery, height, cancer, and age. The primary analysis used public costs. A sensitivity analysis used internal costs from the hospital to maximize internal validity.

RESULTS

Of 486 included patients, 286 (59%) received liposomal bupivacaine. Total cost of care using public costs included perioperative local anesthetics (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: $392 ± 74 liposomal bupivacaine versus $8 ± 13 control), analgesics within 48 h after surgery (mean ± SD: $132 ± 99 liposomal bupivacaine versus $117 ± 127 control), postoperative ileus management (mean ± SD: $5 ± 51 liposomal bupivacaine versus $65 ± 284 control), and hospital length of stay (mean ± SD: $4459 ± 3576 liposomal bupivacaine versus $7769 ± 7082 control). Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with an adjusted absolute difference in total cost of care of -$1435 (95% confidence interval -$2401 to -$470; P = 0.004) using public costs and -$1345 (95% confidence interval -$2215 to -$476; P = 0.002) using internal costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of liposomal bupivacaine in colorectal surgery was associated with a significant reduction in total cost of care that was predominately driven by reduced costs for hospital stay and postoperative ileus management despite higher medication costs.

Opioid-Sparing Effect of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Intravenous Acetaminophen in Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the opioid-sparing effect of liposomal bupivacaine and intravenous acetaminophen in colorectal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective, 2 × 2 factorial cohort conducted at an academic medical center from May 2016 to February 2018. Patients undergoing open or minimally invasive colorectal resection were included. Exclusion criteria were age <18 y, surgery after second hospital day, ostomy, and allergy to acetaminophen, opioids, or bupivacaine. Intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine and intravenous acetaminophen administration within 18 h after surgery were evaluated. The primary outcome was intravenous morphine milligram equivalents administered within 24 h after surgery. A linear regression model adjusted for American Society of Anesthesiologists score, enhanced recovery after surgery management, open surgery, opioid use before surgery, and height was used for the primary analysis.

RESULTS

Among 486 included patients, 193 received both liposomal bupivacaine and intravenous acetaminophen, 93 received liposomal bupivacaine only, 104 received intravenous acetaminophen only, and 96 did not receive either. On average, patients received 21 (SD = 31) morphine equivalents over 24 h. Intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a reduction of morphine equivalents (adjusted change -11, 95% CI -17 to -6), but intravenous acetaminophen was not (2, 95% CI -3 to 7). Intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a reduction of length of stay (adjusted change = -1.2 d, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.3), but intravenous acetaminophen was not (adjusted change = 1.5 d, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a significant reduction of opioid use within 24 h after colorectal surgery, but intravenous acetaminophen was not.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane block may improve analgesia after colorectal surgery; however, techniques remain unstandardized and results are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic and ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with no block in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at an urban teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention included 2:2:1 randomization to laparoscopic, ultrasound-guided, or no transversus abdominis plane block.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morphine use in the first 24 hours after surgery was measured.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 107 patients randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 41), ultrasound-guided (n = 45), or no transversus abdominis plane block (n = 21). Mean age was 50.4 years (SD ± 18 y), and 50 patients (47%) were men. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block was superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.007) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007), with median (interquartile range) total morphine used in the first 24 hours postoperatively of 17.6 mg (6.6-33.9 mg), 34.0 mg (16.4-44.4 mg), and 31.6 mg (18.4-44.4 mg). At 48 hours, laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block remained superior to ultrasound-guided (p = 0.03) and no transversus abdominis plane block (p = 0.007) with median (interquartile range) total morphine used at 48 hours postoperatively of 26.8 mg (15.5-45.8 mg), 44.0 mg (27.6-70.0 mg), and 60.8 mg (34.8-78.8 mg). Mean hospital stay was 5.1 ± 3.1 days without any intergroup differences. Overall complications were similar between groups.

LIMITATIONS

Treatment teams were not blinded and there was operator dependence of techniques and variable timing of the blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block is superior to ultrasound-guided and no transversus abdominis plane block in achieving pain control and minimizing opioid use in the first 24 hours after colorectal surgery. A large, multicenter, randomized trial is needed to confirm our findings. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A822.

A pragmatic approach to evaluating new techniques in regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine

Anesthesiologists set up regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine programs in order to improve the patient outcomes and experience. Given the increasing frequency and volume of newly described techniques, applying a pragmatic framework can guide clinicians on how to critically review and consider implementing the new techniques into clinical practice. A proposed framework should consider how a technique: increases access; enhances efficiency; decreases disparities and improves outcomes. Quantifying the relative contribution of these four factors using a point system, which will be specific to each practice, can generate an overall scorecard to help clinicians make decisions on whether or not to incorporate a new technique into clinical practice or replace an incumbent technique within a clinical pathway.

[Why and how to perform an ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: A step-by-step approach]

Used in clinical practice as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, the transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) is a relative novel procedure in which local anaesthetic agents are injected into the anatomic neurofascial space between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscle. It allows a significantly prolonged duration of analgesia during the early postoperative stage in abdominal surgery. This regional anesthesia technique provides analgesia to the skin, muscles of the anterior abdominal wall and parietal peritoneum in order to decrease the incision-related pain. Thus, it reduces postoperative opiate requirements and opioids-related side effects (nausea, vomiting, delayed resumption of intestinal transit, drowsiness, respiratory depression, urine retention). Additionally, the TAP block appears particularly interesting when neuraxial techniques or opioids are contraindicated. Moreover, the ultrasound-guided procedure provides a significant success rate of this block and additionally avoids major complications. We describe our technique of ultrasound-guided TAP block and discuss its indications, contraindication and potential complications.