A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy

Postoperative narcotic utilization in single incision laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal appendectomy (SILEA): a single-institution retrospective review

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic appendectomy for pediatric acute appendicitis is commonly performed by pediatric surgeons. A single incision approach has been investigated, but the lack of technical uniformity has resulted in conflicting data. We hypothesized that an initial single incision laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal appendectomy (SILEA) approach is associated with similar complication rates as compared to the standard three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (TILA).

METHODS

Approximately 1300 laparoscopic appendectomies were retrospectively reviewed for acute appendicitis over a 5 year period. Patients were split into TILA or SILEA cohorts. Propensity score matching identified 102 matched cases in both cohorts. Case and control cohort comparisons were then analyzed.

RESULTS

Successful SILEA was associated with no difference in post-operative complication rate. SILEA was associated with decreased postoperative narcotic dosage and shorter operative time than TILA.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial SILEA approach is safe and associated with similar complication rates as TILA. Based on this data, the authors advocate adoption of the an initial SILEA approach for uncomplicated, freely mobile, acute appendicitis with seamless conversion to TILA if the appendix is not amendable to SILEA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Surgical Site Infection Following Single-Port Appendectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common postoperative complications after appendectomy leading to recurrent surgery, prolonged hospital stay, and the use of antibiotics. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have been published on the effect of open versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) reporting faster postoperative recovery and less postoperative pain for CLA. A development from CLA has been the single-port appendectomy (SPA), associated with a better cosmesis but seemingly having a higher risk of wound infections. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to investigate whether reduced port or SPA alters the ratio of SSIs.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for suitable articles. All articles published between January 1, 2002, and March 23, 2022, were included. Articles regarding children below the age of 18 were excluded as well as manuscripts that investigated solemnly open appendectomies. Articles were screened for inclusion criteria by two independent authors. Incidence of SSI was the primary outcome. Duration of operation and length of hospital stay were defined as secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 25 studies were found through a database search describing 5484 patients. A total of 2749 patients received SPA and 2735 received CLA. There was no statistical difference in the rate of SSI (P = 0.98). A total of 22 studies including 4699 patients reported the duration of operation (2223 SPA and 2476 CLA). There was a significantly shorter operation time seen in CLA. The length of hospital stay was reported in 23 studies (4735 patients: 2235 SPA and 2500 CLA). A shorter hospital stay was seen in the SPA group (P < 0.00001). Separately performed analysis of randomized controlled trials could not confirm this effect (P = 0.29).

Discussion

SPA is an equally safe procedure considering SSI compared to CLA and does not lead to an increased risk of SSI. A longer operation time for SPA and a minor difference in the length of stay does lead to the use of SPA in selected patients only.

Intra-/Extracorporeal Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There are two approaches to single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA): intracorporeal (Intra) and extracorporeal (Extra). However, the differences in the efficacy between these procedures remain unclear. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and usefulness of these techniques with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in children. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases. Studies comparing outcomes of "Intra-SILA and CLA" or "Extra-SILA and CLA" in children aged <18 years were included. Operative time, hospitalization duration, wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, conversion to open, additional ports, and narcotic doses were evaluated. Results: Overall, 20 studies (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], one prospective non-RCT, and 13 retrospective cohort studies) (Intra-SILA: 322, CLA: 791 cases; Extra-SILA: 1318, CLA: 1313 cases) were included. Compared with CLA, Extra-SILA was associated with a shorter operative time (mean difference, -9.79 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -18.34 to -1.24) and lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (3.3% versus 4.6%, odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82) and a higher rate of additional port (13.6% versus 0%, OR, 43.93; 95% CI, 14.79 to 130.50). Meanwhile, the outcomes of Intra-SILA were comparable with those of CLA. However, the participants in the Intra-SILA group received significantly lower doses of narcotics than those in the CLA group. Conclusion: Although the evidence was insufficient, both Intra- and Extra-SILA were comparable to CLA with respect to safety. Extra-SILA seems to have an advantage of a shorter operative time, but additional ports may be required.

Surgical tray reduction for cost saving in pediatric surgical cases: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Standardization of surgical instrument trays and doctor preference cards (DPC) are known to reduce the cost of adult surgical cases. The practice in pediatric surgery may be more complex owing to a wide range of patient age, leading to difficulty with practice implementation and loss of potential financial savings, which underscore the importance of the review of this topic.

METHODS

A systematic review of pediatric surgical tray standardization and cost-effectiveness was performed. Original and review articles from 2000 to 2018 were extracted from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and an electronic search through Scopus. After screening by inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Five articles were included. On average, discontinuation of disposable instruments and standardization of equipment resulted in a removal of 40%-70% of surgical instruments per set. This yielded a cost savings of 20% (an average US $200), with no intraoperative complications or perceived safety issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of operating room (OR) doctor preference cards (DPC) and surgical instrument trays in pediatric surgical cases result in lower operative supply costs without impacting OR time or safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

A tiered approach to optimize pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Surgical management of appendicitis accounts for ~30% of total expenditure in the practice of pediatric surgery and is associated with high cost variation. We hypothesize that incorporating single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) and the resultant by-product dual-incision laparoscopy (DILS) into a historically three-incision laparoscopic (TILS) appendectomy practice affords equal outcomes at lower cost.

METHODS

Appendectomies performed at a large-volume tertiary care children's hospital from 1/2015-12/2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy technique and appendicitis severity were stratified against operative and admission direct variable (DV) costs. Secondary outcomes included perioperative time course and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 970 appendectomies were analyzed during the study period (61% acute, 39% complex appendicitis). SILS and DILS had significantly lower mean DV costs and OR times compared to TILS for both acute and complex appendicitis while maintaining equivalent outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SILS and DILS appendectomy techniques can be incorporated into pediatric surgical practice at lower cost than TILS appendectomy while maintaining equivalent outcomes. Further, the introduction of a tiered approach to laparoscopic appendectomy, in which all cases are started as SILS with additional incisions added based on operative difficulty, is estimated to save $74,580 annually in operative DV costs at a pediatric surgical center averaging 314 laparoscopic appendectomies per year.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children And Conversion to Multiport Appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) in the pediatric population has been well described. Our children's hospital has adopted this modality for nearly all appendectomies. From our center's experience, we hoped to identify factors that portend conversion from SILA to multiport appendectomy. We compared our cohort of conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) for outcomes including operative time, postop length of stay (LOS), complications, and readmission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent appendectomy from 2012 to 2017 at our children's hospital was performed. The type of appendectomy performed, if the case required conversion to multiple ports, and perforation status were recorded. Demographic data identified included age, sex, and body mass index. Outcomes analyzed were operative time, LOS, and postoperative complication/readmission rate.

RESULTS

Of 1001 appendectomies performed, 959 (95.9%) were initiated with plan for SILA, and 35 (3.5%) were initiated CLA. Of those initiated SILA, 884/959 (92.2%) were completed without additional port placement. Cases which were not able to be completed SILA were statistically significantly more likely to be male patients, have increased body mass index, or perforated appendicitis. When compared to cases initiated CLA, SILA remained statistically similar for readmission and LOS but had significantly faster operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

SILA appears to be a safe and efficient modality for the treatment of appendicitis in pediatric populations with no increased morbidity. Parents of children who are obese, males, or present with perforation should be counseled regarding the possibility of additional port placement or considered for initiating conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

In Pursuit of the Most Cost-Effective Pediatric Laparoscopic Appendectomy: The Effect of Disposable Instrument Choice on Operative Time and Surgeon-Controllable Cost

BACKGROUND

There is a movement toward cost savings in healthcare worldwide. Surgeons can affect two main cost variables in an operation (controllable cost): disposables and time. Our hypothesis is that increasing disposable costs do not change outcome or operative time, but simply increases controllable cost.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients younger than the age of 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies for nonperforated appendicitis from January 2013 to November 2016. Data obtained included demographic information in addition to intraoperative details, including disposables used and associated cost, resident participation, operative time, and final pathology. Patients were excluded if perforation was present as confirmed by operative findings or pathology (Kansas City definition). Patients were also excluded if concurrent procedures were performed during the appendectomy.

RESULTS

We reviewed 918 patients and excluded 288 for a total of 690. Disposable cost, operative time, and complications were compared between cases with a resident present and those without. Residents did not increase the use of disposables, but did increase operative time and therefore the total controllable cost. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted technique was significantly faster with lower controllable cost when compared with all other methods. Using disposable trocars with an endostapler was the second fastest and second lowest controllable cost and retained a significant difference when compared with most other methods. Endoloop methods did not show overall controllable cost savings versus the vast majority of methods.

CONCLUSIONS

To maximize controllable cost savings, we recommend a transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy or a standard three-port laparoscopic appendectomy, with disposable trocars and the endostapler.

Quality of pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at a dedicated children's hospital and its referring institutions: a multifactorial evaluation

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients requiring transfer to a dedicated children's hospital from an outside institution may undergo CT imaging as part of their evaluation. Whether this imaging is performed prior to or after transfer has been shown to impact the radiation dose imparted to the patient. Other quality variables could also be affected by the pediatric experience and expertise of the scanning institution.

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in quality between abdominal CT scans and reports performed at a dedicated children's hospital, and those performed at referring institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at outside institutions were matched (for age, gender and indication) with 50 CT scans performed at a dedicated freestanding children's hospital. We analyzed the scans for technical parameters, report findings, correlation with final clinical diagnosis, and clinical utility. Technical evaluation included use of intravenous and oral contrast agents, anatomical coverage, number of scan phases and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for each scan. Outside institution scans were re-reported when the child was admitted to the children's hospital; they were also re-interpreted for this study by children's hospital radiologists who were provided with only the referral information given in the outside institution's report. Anonymized original outside institutional reports and children's hospital admission re-reports were analyzed by two emergency medicine physicians for ease of understanding, degree to which the clinical question was answered, and level of confidence in the report.

RESULTS

Mean SSDE was lower (8.68) for children's hospital scans, as compared to outside institution scans (13.29, P = 0.03). Concordance with final clinical diagnosis was significantly lower for original outside institution reports (38/48, 79%) than for both the admission and study children's hospital reports (48/50, 96%; P = 0.005). Children's hospital admission reports were rated higher than outside institution reports for completeness, ease of understanding, answering of clinical question, and level of confidence of the report (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric abdominal CT scans performed and interpreted at a dedicated children's hospital are associated with higher technical quality, lower radiation dose and a more clinically useful report than those performed at referring institutions.

Single-incision laparoscopy surgery: a systematic review

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is a modern surgical technique in which operations are performed far from their location through small incisions elsewhere in the body.

Objective

This systematic review is aimed to overview single-incision laparoscopy surgery.

Methods

This systematic review was carried out by searching studies in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and IranMedex databases. The initial search strategy identified about 87 references. In this study, 54 studies were accepted for further screening and met all our inclusion criteria [in English, full text, therapeutic effects of single-incision laparoscopy surgery and dated mainly from the year 1990 to 2016]. The search terms were “single-incision,” “surgery,” and “laparoscopy.”

Results

Single-incision laparoscopy surgery is widely used for surgical operations in cholecystectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, cholecystoduodenostomy, hepatobiliary disease, colon cancer, obesity, appendectomy, liver surgery, rectosigmoid cancer, vaginal hysterectomy, vaginoplasty, colorectal lung metastases, pyloroplasty, endoscopic surgery, hernia repair, nephrectomy, rectal cancer, colectomy and uterus-preserving repair, bile duct exploration, ileo-ileal resection, lymphadenectomy, incarcerated inguinal hernia, anastomosis, congenital anomaly, colectomy for cancer.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, single-incision laparoscopy surgery is a scarless surgery with minimal access. Although it possesses lots of benefits, including less incisional pain and scars, cosmesis, and the ability to convert to standard multiport laparoscopic surgery, it has some disadvantages, for example, less freedom of movement, fewer number of ports that can be used, and the proximity of the instruments to each other during the operation.