Therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with traumatic brain injury

The risk of hemorrhagic complications after anticoagulation therapy in trauma patients: A multicenter evaluation

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in trauma patients during the postinjury period presents a challenge given the increased risk of hemorrhage. Guidelines regarding whether and when to initiate ACT are lacking, and as a result, practice patterns vary widely. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of hemorrhagic complications in patients who received ACT during their hospitalization, identify risk factors, and characterize the required interventions.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all trauma admissions at two Level I trauma centers between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patients with preexisting ACT use or those who developed a new indication for ACT were included for analysis. Demographic and outcome data were collected for those who received ACT during their admission. Comparisons were then made between the complications and no complications groups. A subgroup analysis was performed for all patients started on ACT within 14 days of injury.

RESULTS

A total of 812 patients were identified as having an indication for ACT, and 442 patients received ACT during the postinjury period. The overall incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 12.7%. Of those who sustained hemorrhagic complications, 18 required procedural intervention. On regression analysis, male sex, severe injuries, and the need for hemorrhage control surgery on arrival were all found to be associated with hemorrhagic complications after the initiation of ACT. Waiting 7 days to 14 days from the time of injury to initiate ACT reduced the odds of complications by 46% and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of ACT in trauma during the postinjury period is not without risk. Waiting 7 days to 14 days postinjury might greatly reduce the risk of hemorrhagic complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management Study; Level IV.

Impact of antithrombotic therapy on acute and delayed intracranial haemorrhage and evaluation of the need of short-term hospitalisation based on CT findings after mild traumatic brain injury: experience from an oral and maxillofacial surgery unit

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to compare the prevalence of acute and delayed intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in patients on antithrombotic medication referred to a clinic for oral and plastic maxillofacial surgery. The secondary aim was to evaluate the need for short-term hospitalisation based on initial radiological and clinical findings.

METHODS

This was an observational retrospective single-centre study of all patients on antithrombotic medication who were admitted to our department of oral and plastic maxillofacial surgery with mTBI over a 5 year period. Demographic and anamnesis data, injury characteristics, antithrombotic medication, radiological findings, treatment, and outcome were analysed. Patients were divided into the following four groups based on their antithrombotic medication: (1) single antiplatelet users, (2) vitamin K antagonist users, (3) direct oral anticoagulant users, and (4) double antithrombotic users. All patients underwent an emergency cranial CT (CT0) at admission. Based on clinical and radiological evaluation, different treatment protocols were applied. Patients with positive CT0 findings and patients with secondary neurological deterioration received a control CT (CT1) before discharge. Acute and delayed ICH and patient's outcome during hospitalisation were evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 696 patients (mean age, 71.6 years) on antithrombotic medication who presented at our department with mTBI were included in the analysis. Most injuries were caused by a ground-level fall (76.9%). Thirty-six patients (5.1%) developed an acute traumatic ICH, and 47 intracerebral lesions were detected by radiology-most of these in patients taking acetylsalicylic acid. No association was detected between ICH and antithrombotic medication (p = 0.4353). In total, 258 (37.1%) patients were admitted for 48 h in-hospital observation. The prevalence of delayed ICH was 0.1%, and the mortality rate was 0.1%. Multivariable analysis identified a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of < 15, loss of consciousness, amnesia, headache, dizziness, and nausea as clinical characteristics significantly associated with an increased risk of acute ICH, whereas age, sex, and trauma mechanism were not associated with ICH prevalence. Of the 39 patients who underwent a control CT1, most had a decreasing or at least constant intracranial lesion; in three patients, intracranial bleeding increased but was not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION

According to our experience, antithrombotic therapy does not increase the rate of ICH after mTBI. A GCS of < 15, loss of consciousness, amnesia, headache, dizziness, and nausea are indicators of higher ICH risk. A second CT scan is more effective in patients with secondary neurological deterioration. Initial CT findings were not clinically relevant and should not indicate in-hospital observation.

A majority of trauma-related deep venous thromboses resolve prior to discharge

Post-traumatic DVTs present unique challenges in patient populations with specific high-risk injury patterns. Duplex ultrasound (US) can be used to assess evolution of DVTs and may guide treatment for high-risk patients. We hypothesized that many DVTs resolve during the initial admission. Weekly duplex US are ordered on all trauma inpatients regardless of prior DVT at our facility. We reviewed US and outcomes data on all patients with lower extremity DVTs at our Level I trauma center from January 2012-December 2021. 392 patients were diagnosed with lower extremity DVT by US. 261 (67%) patients received follow-up US with a mean time to repeat US of 6 days. Of these, 91 (35%) patients experienced DVT resolution prior to the first follow-up US, and 141 (54%) patients experienced resolution prior to discharge. Mean time to resolution was 10 days. Over 50% of DVTs resolve before discharge and are detected by US. Further studies and post-discharge follow-up are needed to determine if patients with resolved DVTs can be managed without therapeutic anticoagulation.

Anticoagulant Management and Outcomes in Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Complicated by Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Chart Review

BACKGROUND

 There are limited data on anticoagulant management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) after spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

 We reviewed retrospectively all cases diagnosed with VTE during hospitalization for spontaneous ICH at our center during 15 years. Anticoagulation management outcomes were (1) timing after ICH of anticoagulant initiation for VTE treatment, (2) use of immediate therapeutic dosing or stepwise dose escalation, and (3) the proportion achieving therapeutic dose. Primary clinical effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE. Primary safety outcome was expanding ICH.

RESULTS

 We analyzed 103 cases with VTE after 11 days (median; interquartile range [IQR]: 7-22) from the diagnosis of ICH. Forty patients (39%) achieved therapeutic anticoagulation 21.5 days (median; IQR: 14-34 days) from the ICH. Of those, 14 (35%; 14% of total) received immediately therapeutic dose and 26 (65%; 25% of total) had stepwise escalation. Anticoagulation was more aggressive in patients with VTE >14 days after admission versus those with earlier VTE diagnosis. Twenty-two patients (21%) experienced recurrent/progressive VTE-less frequently among patients with treatment escalation within 7 days or with no escalation than with escalation >7 days from the VTE. There were 19 deaths 6 days (median; IQR: 3.5-15) after the index VTE, with significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate among patients without escalation in anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

 Prompt therapeutic anticoagulation for acute VTE seems safe when occurring more than 14 days after spontaneous ICH. For VTE occurring earlier, it might also be safe with therapeutic anticoagulation, but stepwise dose escalation to therapeutic within a 7-day period might be preferable.

Cerebral infarction following administration of andexanet alfa for anticoagulant reversal in a patient with traumatic acute subdural hematoma

Background

Anticoagulants prevent thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism but increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications. If severe bleeding occurs with anticoagulant use, discontinuation and rapid reversal are essential. However, the optimal timing for resuming anticoagulants after using reversal agents remains unclear. Here, we report early cerebral infarction following the use of andexanet alfa (AA), a specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors, in a patient with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH). The possible causes of thromboembolic complication and the optimal timing for anticoagulant resumption are discussed.

Case Description

An 84-year-old woman receiving rivaroxaban for AF presented with impaired consciousness after a head injury. Computed tomography (CT) revealed right ASDH. The patient was administered AA and underwent craniotomy. Although the hematoma was entirely removed, she developed multiple cerebral infarctions 10 h after the surgery. These infarctions were considered cardiogenic cerebral embolisms and rivaroxaban was therefore resumed on the same day. This case indicates the possibility of early cerebral infarction after using a specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors.

Conclusion

Most studies suggest that the safest time for resuming anticoagulants after using reversal agents is between 7 and 12 days. The present case showed that embolic complications may develop much earlier than expected. Early readministration of anticoagulant may allow for adequate prevention of the acute thrombotic syndromes.

Timing of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after recent traumatic and vascular brain Injury

Currently, there is no consensus guideline for initiating anticoagulation in patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury. Initiating anticoagulation for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) can vary significantly from 72 hours to 30 weeks due to the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes using modified Rankin Score (mRS) in a patient population with early (≤ 3 days) versus late (> 3 days) initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation from the time VTE was diagnosed. This retrospective study included patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury who developed either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Use of anticoagulation prior to admission, diagnosis with VTE on admission, or patients with a non-brain injury were exclusion criteria. Secondary outcomes measured were all-cause mortality, length of stay, and reasons for early interruption of anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was started early in 76 (74%) patients compared to late initiation in 27 (26%) patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mRS score 0-3 versus 4-6 was similar in patients who received early anticoagulation versus those who received it later. However, there was a trend favoring better outcomes in the early group [mRS 4-6; 78% vs. 93%; p = 0.085] and in subgroup analysis of patients with VTE diagnosed 4-7 days [mRS 4-6; 26% vs. 56%; p = 0.006] compared to the late group. In univariate and multivariable logistic regression, only age was associated with a significant worse outcome (median, IQR) 36 years (24-50) vs. 58 years (44-65) OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12); p < 0.001. In this study, early initiation of anticoagulation did not worsen clinical outcomes.

Early start of thromboprophylaxis does not increase risk of intracranial hematoma progression in multiply injured patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk during the clinical course. Data on the safety of an early initiation of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in severely injured patients with concomitant severe TBI is sparse.

METHODS

Admissions to our level-1-trauma center between January 2015 and December 2018 were screened. Patients suffering from severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the head ≥3) and at least one further AIS ≥ 3 in any other body region were included. Demographic data, thromboembolic events, and progression of the intracranial hemorrhage were extracted from the patient's charts. According to the first application of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (VTEp), patients were categorized either to the early, the late (later than 24 h) or the no therapy group.

RESULTS

In 79 patients (early: n = 35, late: n = 29, no therapy: n = 15) the Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 36.7 ± 12.7 points (AIS_head 4.1 ± 0.8). No differences were found regarding the progression of the intracranial hemorrhage after initiation of the VTE prophylaxis (adj. p = 0.8). The VTE rate was low (n = 1, 1.6%).

CONCLUSION

In severely injured patients with severe TBI, the early administration of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis did not result in a higher rate of intracranial hematoma progression.

Complications and Transfusions on Therapeutic Anticoagulation After Trauma

INTRODUCTION

Trauma patients who develop indications for therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC) present a challenge due to concern for bleeding. Transfusion requirement has been described as a common complication of TAC after trauma but its clinical relevance is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Determine risk factors for and clinical outcomes associated with transfusion requirement on TAC after trauma.

METHODS

All trauma patients admitted to an academic urban level I trauma center from January 2010 to August 2020 who received TAC were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data included injury characteristics; TAC indication and timing; transfusions; and interventions. Patients who required transfusion after TAC were compared to those who did not.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included. The most common reasons for TAC were deep vein thrombosis (67.1%) and pulmonary embolism (31.7%). Two (2.4%) patients developed gastrointestinal bleeding. One (1.2%) underwent endoscopic intervention. Two patients (4.9%) had intracranial hemorrhage progression. Blood transfusion after TAC initiation was required in 43.9% of patients. Patients who were transfused started TAC more quickly after traumatic injury (5.5 vs 10.0 days, P = .03), had fewer hospital-free days (54 vs 64 days, P < .01), ICU-free days (8.5 vs 16.5 days, P = .01), and higher mortality (13.9% vs 2.1%, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Transfusions are common after starting TAC in trauma patients. Requiring transfusion after starting TAC was associated with shorter time from injury to starting TAC, higher mortality, and fewer ICU and hospital-free days.

Early bilateral pulmonary embolism in a polytrauma patient: About a case report

Introduction

and importance: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in polytrauma patients, associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity. Generally pulmonary embolism (PE) is most common between the fifth and seventh days following a significant trauma, and it is uncommon before the fourth day. Their management remains a challenge to physicians given the nature and risk of blood loss from the accompanying injuries must be considered while using anticoagulant therapy.

Case presentation

Here we present a case of acute pulmonary embolism in a previously healthy young woman that developed two days after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and varying degrees of additional blunt thoracic trauma. An angio CT scan was used to make the diagnosis, and the patient was given anticoagulant medication with close monitoring and satisfactory outcomes.

Conclusion

Evidence suggests that early after trauma, a considerable number of trauma patients are hypercoagulable. In patients with unexplained dyspnea/hypoxia, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and explore PE early after injury. In the case of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral contusions, intraparenchymal haemorrhages, or subdural/extradural haemorrhages, the existence of post-traumatic PE adds to the problems.

•

Our aim was to investigate the (PE) in polytrauma patients: incidence, risk factors of early occurrence, management and outcomes.

•

Decision to anti-coagulate post traumatic PE is controversial, especially in polytrauma patients.

•

Anticoagulation decision is guided by interval repeat CT scan and clinical picture.

•

The presence of post traumatic PE poses further challenges in the management of traumatic brain injury patients with cerebral contusions, intraparenchymal haemorrhages or subdural/extradural haemorrhages.

When is it safe to resume anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

When to resume or initiate anticoagulation therapy following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is controversial. This summary describes the latest evidence to guide best practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following trauma, prophylactic, and therapeutic anticoagulation (TAC) have been widely encouraged to prevent major comorbidities such as pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Increased rebleeding risk and potentially catastrophic outcome from initiation of anticoagulation treatment in TBI are mainly influenced by institutional guidelines or physician preference in the absence of level I or II recommendations. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of TBI in the elderly population on anticoagulation for other medical conditions; this complicates the decision and timing to restart anticoagulation after the injury.

SUMMARY

Strategies and timing to start prophylactic and TAC differ significantly between institutions and physicians. Each TBI patient should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis on when to start anticoagulation. More investigation is required to guide best practice.

Between scylla and charybdis: risks of early therapeutic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after acute intracranial hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of hematoma expansion in patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) requiring therapeutic anticoagulation for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients at our institution between 2014 and 2019 who were therapeutically anticoagulated for venous thromboembolism within 4 weeks after ICH. We included subtypes of traumatic ICH and spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Our main outcome was the incidence of hematoma expansion within 14 days from initiating therapeutic anticoagulation. Hematoma expansion was defined as (1) radiographically proven expansion leading to cessation of therapeutic anticoagulation or (2) death due to hematoma expansion. Secondary outcomes included mortality due to hematoma expansion and characteristics associated with hematoma expansion.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met inclusion criteria (mean age: 54 years, 80% male, 76% Caucasian); 24% had undergone a neurosurgical procedure prior to therapeutic anticoagulation. Median time from ICH to therapeutic anticoagulation initiation was 9.5 days (IQR 4-17), 40% received therapeutic anticoagulation in <7 days after ICH. Six patients (12%) developed hematoma expansion, of whom two (4%) died. While not statistically significant, patients with hematoma expansion tended to be older (57.8 vs. 53.5 years), were anticoagulated sooner (4 vs. 10 days), presented with lower GCS (50% vs. 39% with GCS <8), higher hematoma volume (50% vs. 42% >30 cc), and higher SDH diameter (16 mm vs. 8.35 mm). There was a trend towards greater risk of hematoma expansion for patients undergoing endoscopic ICH evacuation (16% vs. 2%, p = 0.09); patients with hematoma expansion were more likely to present with hydrocephalus (67% vs. 16%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is among the first to explore characteristics associated with hematoma expansion in patients undergoing therapeutic anticoagulation after acute ICH. Larger studies in different ICH subtypes are needed to identify determinants of hematoma expansion in this high-acuity population.

Anticoagulation therapy in patients with traumatic brain injury: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND

Trauma care providers often face a dilemma regarding anticoagulation therapy initiation in patients with traumatic brain injury owing to the associated risks of traumatic brain injury progression. The aims of this study were the following: (1) to describe the current practice of anticoagulation therapy in traumatic brain injury patients and their outcomes and (2) to identify factors associated with the progression of traumatic brain injury after anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included computed tomography-proven traumatic brain injury patients who received anticoagulation therapy within 30 days of hospital admission. Our primary outcome was the incidence of clinically significant progression of traumatic brain injury after anticoagulation therapy initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were enrolled more than 22 months. Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism were the most common pre-injury and postinjury anticoagulation therapy indications, respectively. Overall, 16 patients (9.6%) experienced clinically significant traumatic brain injury progression after anticoagulation therapy, out of which 9 (5.4%) patients subsequently required neurosurgical interventions. Between patients with clinical progression of traumatic brain injury and patients who showed no such progression, there were no significant differences in the baseline demographics and severity of traumatic brain injury. However, anticoagulation therapy was initiated significantly earlier in patients of the deterioration group than those of the no-deterioration group (4.5 days vs 11 days, P = .015). In a multiple logistic regression model, patients who received anticoagulation therapy later after injury had significantly lower risk of clinically significant traumatic brain injury progression (odds ratio: 0.915 for each day, 95% confidence interval: 0.841-0.995, P = .037).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that early anticoagulation therapy is associated with higher risk of traumatic brain injury progression, thus a balance between bleeding and thromboembolic risks should be carefully evaluated in each case before initiating anticoagulation therapy.

Therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with traumatic brain injuries and pulmonary emboli

BACKGROUND

Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and concomitant pulmonary embolus (PE) have competing care needs and demand a careful balance of anticoagulation (AC) versus potential worsening of their ICH. The goal of this study is to determine the safety of therapeutic AC for PE in patients with ICH.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study of patients older than 16 years with concomitant ICH and PE occurring between June 2013 and December 2017. Early AC was defined as within 7 days of injury or less; late was defined as after 7 days. Primary outcomes included death, interventions for worsening ICH following AC, and pulmonary complications. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate for clinical and demographic factors associated with worsening traumatic brain injury (TBI), and recursive partitioning was used to differentiate risk in groups.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met criteria. Four did not receive any AC and were excluded. Nineteen (41.3%) received AC early (median, 4.1; interquartile range, 3.1-6) and 27 (58.7%) received AC late (median, 14; interquartile range, 9.7-19.5). There were four deaths in the early group, and none in the late cohort (21.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). Two deaths were due to PE and the others were from multi-system organ failure or unrecoverable underlying TBI. Three patients in the early group, and two in the late, had increased ICH on computed tomography (17.6% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.3). None required intervention.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study failed to find instances of clinically significant progression of TBI in 46 patients with computed tomography-proven ICH after undergoing AC for PE. Therapeutic AC is not associated with worse outcomes in patients with TBI, even if initiated early. However, two patients died from PE despite AC, underlining the severity of the disease. Intracranial hemorrhage should not preclude AC treatment for PE, even early after injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management, Level IV.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement

There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

Utility of Repeat Head CT in Patients on Preinjury Antithrombotic Medications

Presently, there are no standardized guidelines regarding the necessity or timing of repeat head imaging in patients on antithrombotics (antiplatelet agents, warfarin, or novel oral anticoagulants) with suspected traumatic brain injury. This is a two-year single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with suspected traumatic brain injury on antithrombotic medications. Patients with a stable or negative repeat head CT were compared with patients who developed a new bleed or demonstrated progression of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Of 110 patients, 55 patients (50%) had a positive initial CT, two patients (1.8%) developed a new bleed after initially normal head CT, and 21 patients (19.1%) demonstrated worsening ICH. Patients with worsening or delayed ICH had a higher median Injury Severity Score (14 vs 5, P < 0.001), higher head/neck and face Abbreviated Injury Severity scores (both P < 0.05), and were more likely to be receiving combination therapy with warfarin and clopidogrel (4.3% vs 0%, P = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, lower face and head/neck Abbreviated Injury Severity scores were associated with a decreased risk for delayed or worsening hemorrhage (odds ratio = 0.21 and 0.46, respectively, P < 0.05). Repeat head CT in patients on a preinjury antithrombotic has a low yield. The use of combination therapy may result in an increased risk for delayed hemorrhage or hemorrhage progression.

Does the Presence of Subdural Hemorrhage Increase the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage Expansion after the Initiation of Antithrombotic Medication?

Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) with a clinical indication for antithrombotic medication present a clinical dilemma, burdened by the task of weighing the risks of hemorrhage expansion against the risk of thrombosis. We sought to determine the effect of subdural hemorrhage on the risk of hemorrhage expansion after administration of antithrombotic medication. Medical records of 1626 trauma patients admitted with traumatic ICH between March 1, 2008, and March 31, 2013, to a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. The pharmacy database was queried to determine which patients were administered anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication during their hospitalization, leaving a sample of 97 patients that met inclusion criteria. Patients presenting with subdural hemorrhage were compared with patients without subdural hemorrhage. Demographic data, clinically significant expansion of hematoma, postinjury day of initiation, and mortality were analyzed. A total of 97 patients met inclusion criteria with 55 patients in the subdural hemorrhage group and 42 in the other ICH group. There were no significant differences in age, gender, injury severity score, admission Glasgow coma score, or mean hospital day of antithrombotic administration between the groups. Patients with subdural hemorrhage had a significantly higher rate of ICH expansion (9.1 vs 0%, P = 0.045). There was no difference in overall hospital mortality between the two groups. Incidence of ICH expansion was higher in patients with subdural hemorrhage. It may be prudent to use special caution when administering antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication in this group of patients after injury.

Antithrombotics in trauma: management strategies in the older patients

The ageing population has resulted in a change in the demographics of trauma, and older adult trauma now accounts for a growing number of trauma admissions. The management of older adult trauma can be particularly challenging, and exhibits differences to that of the younger age groups affected by trauma. Frailty syndromes are closely related with falls, which are the leading cause of major trauma in older adults. Comorbid disease and antithrombotic use are more common in the older population. Physiological changes that occur with ageing can alter the expected clinical presentation of older persons after injury and their susceptibility to injury. Following major trauma, definitive control of hemorrhage remains essential for improving outcomes. In the initial assessment of an injured patient, it is important to consider whether the patient is taking anticoagulants or antiplatelets and if measures to promote hemostasis such as reversal are indicated. After hemostasis is achieved and bleeding has stopped, longer-term decisions to recommence antithrombotic agents can be challenging, especially in older people. In this review, we discuss one aspect of management for the older trauma patients in greater detail, that is, acute and longer-term management of antithrombotic therapy. As we consider the health needs of an ageing population, rise in elderly trauma and increasing use of antithrombotic therapy, the need for research in this area becomes more pressing to establish best practice and evidence-based care.

Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management

Normal haemostasis depends on an intricate balance between mechanisms of bleeding and mechanisms of thrombosis, and this balance can be altered after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Impaired haemostasis could exacerbate the primary insult with risk of initiation or aggravation of bleeding; anticoagulant use at the time of injury can also contribute to bleeding risk after TBI. Many patients with TBI have abnormalities on conventional coagulation tests at admission to the emergency department, and the presence of coagulopathy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Further blood testing often reveals a range of changes affecting platelet numbers and function, procoagulant or anticoagulant factors, fibrinolysis, and interactions between the coagulation system and the vascular endothelium, brain tissue, inflammatory mechanisms, and blood flow dynamics. However, the degree to which these coagulation abnormalities affect TBI outcomes and whether they are modifiable risk factors are not known. Although the main challenge for management is to address the risk of hypocoagulopathy with prolonged bleeding and progression of haemorrhagic lesions, the risk of hypercoagulopathy with an increased prothrombotic tendency also warrants consideration.

Therapeutic Dilemmas Regarding Anticoagulation: An Experience in a Patient with Nephrotic Syndrome, Pulmonary Embolism, and Traumatic Brain Injury

Patients with active bleeding complications who concomitantly develop overt pulmonary embolism (PE) present distinct therapeutic dilemmas, since they are perceived to be at substantial risk for the progression of the embolism in the absence of treatment and for aggravation of the hemorrhagic lesions if treated with anticoagulants. A 76-year-old patient with nephrotic syndrome, which is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, concurrently developed acute PE and intracranial bleeding because of traumatic brain injury. In this case, we prioritized the treatment for PE with the intravenous unfractionated heparin followed by warfarinization. Despite the transient hemorrhagic progression of the brain contusion after the institution of anticoagulation, our patient recovered favorably from the disease without any signs of neurological compromise. Several conundrums regarding anticoagulation that emerged in this case are also discussed.