Risk factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality following isolated tricuspid valve replacement

Outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,316 patients from 35 studies

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is rapidly emerging as a therapeutic option amongst patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation. Historical data from surgical tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) studies may serve as a benchmark for the development of TTVR trials.

AIMS

The aim of the study was to investigate the early and late outcomes following isolated surgical TVR.

METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were searched to identify studies on isolated surgical TVR. The prespecified primary endpoint was operative mortality; secondary endpoints were early and late outcomes. Overall estimates of proportions and incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Multiple sensitivity analyses accounting for baseline characteristics, country and the operative period were applied.  Results: A total of 35 studies (5,316 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The operative period ranged from 1974 to 2019. The overall rate of operative mortality was 12% (95% CI: 9-15), with higher mortality for patients who were operated on before 1995, who had prior cardiac surgeries, or who had liver disease. The most frequent clinical events were pacemaker implantation (10% [95% CI: 6-16]), bleeding (12% [95% CI: 8-17]), acute kidney injury (15% [95% CI: 9-24]) and respiratory complications (15% [95% CI: 12-20]). At follow-up analysis of the bioprosthetic TVR, there was an incidence rate per 100 person-years of 6 (95% CI: 2-13) for death and 8 (95% CI: 5-13) for recurrence of significant tricuspid regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides an overview of the historical clinical outcomes following isolated surgical TVR. These findings can support the development of future clinical trials in the tricuspid space by providing thresholds for clinical outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Isolated Tricuspid Valve Repair After Left-Sided Valve Surgery: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve surgery was associated with terrible outcomes and high perioperative mortality for surgical treatment. In current years, minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve repair is increasingly performed in our institution to address tricuspid regurgitation.

Methods

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with previous left-sided valve surgery underwent minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve repair in our institution between November 2017 and December 2020. Twenty-nine patients(78.4%) were women and the mean age of patients was 58.4 ± 8.5 years. Follow-up was 100% complete with a mean follow-up time of 17.2 ± 9.5 months.

Results

Both the in-hospital and 30-day mortalities were 2.7%. The overall NYHA class had improved significantly during the follow-up (p < 0.001). The grade of TR had decreased before discharge (p < 0.001) and during the follow-up (p < 0.001) compared with the preoperative level although severe TR was recurrent in one patient.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve repair has acceptable early and midterm outcomes, may be the preferred surgical option to address tricuspid regurgitation after previous left-sided valve surgery when it is feasible.

Isolated reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve surgery: technique evolution

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the isolated replacement and repair of severe tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve surgery (LSVS) and to report the evolution of this surgical technique.

METHODS

From January 2005 to August 2018, 118 patients underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement (iTVR, n = 93) or repair (iTVr, n = 25) for severe tricuspid regurgitation after LSVS. The surgical protocol at our institution has significantly changed since 2015, implementing the right thoracotomy approach (95.5%) and peripheral cannulation strategy with the vacuum-assist single venous drainage technique (93.2%) with a concomitant enhancement in preoperative right heart function optimization. Patients were followed up for 32.5 ± 34.6 (1.6-158.7) months.

RESULTS

The operative mortality rate was 8.5% (8.6% in iTVR and 8.0% in iTVr, P = 0.924) with a significant decrease from 23.3% (2005-2014) to 3.4% (2015-2018) (P < 0.001), which was associated with preoperative New York Heart Association functional class IV [odds ratio (OR) 14.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.68-80.90; P = 0.002] and anaemia (OR 6.60, 95% CI 1.03-42.22; P = 0.046). After adjusting the logistic regression model, the vacuum-assist single venous drainage technique was also associated with lower operative mortality and composite adverse outcomes. The overall 1- and 5-year survival rates were 91.5% (95% CI 84.8-95.3%) and 77.9% (95% CI 60.0-88.3%), respectively, and no difference was found between the iTVR and iTVr groups (P = 0.813).

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated tricuspid valve reoperation for severe tricuspid regurgitation after LSVS is historically a high-risk procedure, but satisfactory results are achievable with advanced surgical techniques and improved perioperative management. Bioprosthetic iTVR is a reliable alternative for severe tricuspid regurgitation after LSVS.

Outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left-sided valve surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare early and long-term outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid surgery (RITS) after left-sided valve surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent RITS for severe tricuspid regurgitation after previous left-sided valve surgery from January 1999 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: RITS by median sternotomy (m-RITS; n = 78) and totally endoscopic approach (e-RITS; n = 95). Perioperative outcomes and follow-up results were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 19 (11%) in-hospital deaths (14.1% in m-RITS and 8.4% in e-RITS, p = .234) that decreased from 16.7% (1999-2014) to 6.9% (2015-2019) (p = .044). Tricuspid valve replacement (odds ratio [OR] = 4.989, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.133-29.790, p = .041) and NYHA function class IV (OR = 9.611, 95% CI: 2.102-43.954, p = .004) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 97.2% (95% CI: 94.5%-99.9%), 80.3% (95% CI: 71.7%-88.9%), 59.2% (95% CI: 43.5%-75.5%), and 49.3% (95% CI: 27.2%-71.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing RITS carry a high risk of early mortality. There was no significant difference in early mortality or long-term survival between the endoscopy and median sternotomy, whereas the endoscopy approach was associated with shorter intensive care unit stays and fewer reoperations. Repair resulted in lower surgical mortality than replacement with acceptable residual tricuspid regurgitation.

Isolated tricuspid valve surgery; long-term outcomes based on Tehran Heart Center data bank report

Background

Given that isolated tricuspid valve (TV) repair or replacement is performed relatively rarely, we sought to evaluate the rate of long-term mortality and readmission following this surgery.

Methods

The current study was conducted in Tehran Heart Center on patients who underwent isolated TV repair or replacement between 2010 and 2018. Totally, 197 patients (repair = 150 vs replacement = 47) were included in our study and were then followed right after surgery for a median of 8 years to assess the incidence of postoperative events, readmission, and all-cause mortality.

Results

The final analysis was conducted on 197 patients at a mean age of 44.4 ± 13.8 years. Most of the patients were female (56.9%). Ejection fraction, TAPSE, and right ventricular function improved in both groups after TV surgery. Length of stay in the intensive care unit per hour and hospitalization per day were higher in the replacement group and compared to the repair group (158.34 vs. 55.11 and 18.21 vs. 9.34, respectively). In-hospital mortality occurred in 20 patients, of whom 15 had TV replacement. Readmission occurred in five (2.5%) patients,all were in the repair group.

Conclusions

The result of this single-center study showed that TV replacement is associated with a higher rate of postoperative events and all-cause mortality compared to TV repair. Whereas, repair group had a higher rate of readmission. Therefore, the overwhelming tendency is toward repair; nonetheless, no hesitation is permissible if a replacement is adjudged to confer a better outcome for the patient.

Beating versus arrested heart isolated tricuspid valve surgery: An 11-year experience in the current era

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Data about the beating heart (BH) technique for isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery compared to the arrested heart (AH) technique are sparse. We compared the outcomes of isolated TV surgery between BH and AH technique.

METHODS

We performed an observational analysis of our database of isolated TV surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether surgery was performed without (BH group) or with (AH group) aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were searched with multivariate analyses. We undertook further comparisons after propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

From January 2007 to December 2017, we performed 82 isolated TV surgery (BH group, n = 47, 57.3%; AH group, n = 35, 42.7%). The mean age was 59.1 years, 56.1% were female. BH group patients were older (61.8 vs. 55.4 years; p = .035), had greater impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate, 61.1 vs. 74.6 ml/min; p = .012), were more frequently operated for secondary TR (61.7 vs. 31.4%; p = .008), underwent more frequently a reoperation (53.2 vs. 28.6%; p = .042) and exhibited a higher surgical risk (EuroSCORE II, 3.92 vs. 2.50%; p = .013). In-hospital mortality was not different between both groups, either considering unmatched (BH = 10.6 vs. AH = 5.7%; OR = 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.36-10.77) or matched populations (BH = 10.6 vs. AH = 6.4%; OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.36-9.97). Age was the only predictor of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The BH technique showed comparable outcomes to the AH technique for isolated TV surgery despite a higher risk profile.

Simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery

Background

Redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, and its optimal timing remains controversial. Hence, here we reviewed the early and midterm results of simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk.

Methods

A total of 32 consecutive patients underwent a redo isolated tricuspid valve surgery using minimally invasive, beating-heart technique through a right lateral thoracotomy in our center between June 2016 and April 2020. The mean age of patients was 57.4 ± 8.3 years, and 18 patients (56.3%) were women. The mean preoperative EuroSCORE was 7.8 ± 1.4 (range: 6–11). Follow-up was 87.1% complete, with a mean duration of 26.3 ± 12.3 months.

Results

Both in-hospital and 30-day mortalities were 3.1%. Tricuspid valve replacement with bioprosthesis was performed in 30 patients (93.8%), and the remaining two patients (6.2%) underwent tricuspid repair (annuloplasty and leaflet reconstruction). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 81.5 ± 29.0 min. The overall in-hospital duration and intensive care unit (ICU) times were 13.6 ± 7.6 days and 4.1 ± 2.8 days, respectively. Postoperative complications included prolonged ventilation in six patients (18.8%), acute kidney injury in three patients (9.4%), and neurologic event, wound infection, or permanent third-degree atrioventricular block, in one patient (3.1%) each. A total of 96.9% patients were discharged uneventfully. Four patients were lost to follow-up; there were no midterm deaths in patients who were followed up.

Conclusions

Simplified, minimally invasive, beating-heart technique for redo tricuspid valve surgery is both feasible and safe, and the early and midterm results are excellent.