|
1
|
Piñar-Gutiérrez A, González-Gracia L, Vázquez Gutiérrez R, García-Rey S, Jiménez-Sánchez A, González-Navarro I, Tatay-Domínguez D, Garrancho-Domínguez P, Remón-Ruiz PJ, Martínez-Ortega AJ, Serrano-Aguayo P, Giménez-Andreu MD, García-Fernández FJ, Bozada-García JM, Nacarino-Mejías V, López-Iglesias Á, Pereira-Cunill JL, García-Luna PP. Percutaneous Gastrostomies: Associated Complications in PUSH vs. PULL Techniques over 12 Years in a Referral Centre. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1836. [PMID: 38610601 PMCID: PMC11012573 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To compare complications associated with percutaneous gastrostomies performed using PUSH and PULL techniques, whether endoscopic (PEG) or radiological (PRG), in a tertiary-level hospital. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Adult patients who underwent percutaneous PULL or PUSH gastrostomy using PEG or PRG techniques at the Virgen del Rocio University Hospital and subsequently followed up in the Nutrition Unit between 2009-2020 were included. X2 tests or Fisher's test were used for the comparison of proportions when necessary. Univariate analysis was conducted to study risk factors for PRG-associated complications. Results: n = 423 (PULL = 181; PUSH = 242). The PULL technique was associated with a higher percentage of total complications (37.6% vs. 23.8%; p = 0.005), exudate (18.2% vs. 11.2%; p = 0.039), and irritation (3.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.006). In the total sample, there were 5 (1.1%) cases of peritonitis, 3 (0.7%) gastrocolic fistulas, and 1 (0.2%) death due to complications associated with gastrostomy. Gender, age, and different indications were not risk factors for a higher number of complications. The most common indications were neurological diseases (35.9%), head and neck cancer (29%), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (17.2%). Conclusions: The PULL technique was associated with more total complications than the PUSH technique, but both were shown to be safe techniques, as the majority of complications were minor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Piñar-Gutiérrez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Lucía González-Gracia
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Rocío Vázquez Gutiérrez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Silvia García-Rey
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Andrés Jiménez-Sánchez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Irene González-Navarro
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Dolores Tatay-Domínguez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Pilar Garrancho-Domínguez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Pablo J. Remón-Ruiz
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Antonio J. Martínez-Ortega
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Pilar Serrano-Aguayo
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - María Dolores Giménez-Andreu
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | | | | | | | - Álvaro López-Iglesias
- Unidad de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - José Luis Pereira-Cunill
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| | - Pedro Pablo García-Luna
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain (L.G.-G.); (R.V.G.); (S.G.-R.); (I.G.-N.); (D.T.-D.); (P.G.-D.); (P.J.R.-R.); (A.J.M.-O.); (P.S.-A.); (M.D.G.-A.); (P.P.G.-L.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Farrugia E, Semciw AI, Bailey S, Cooke Z, Tuck C. Proportion of unplanned tube replacements and complications following gastrostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Diet 2024; 81:63-78. [PMID: 37614051 DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Gastrostomy feeding represents a vital component of supportive care provided to people with swallowing or feeding difficulties; however, the rate of specific long-term complications is currently unknown in the adult population. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of specific long-term gastrostomy-related complications and unplanned replacements in adults. METHODS A prospective systematic review of Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases was performed. Key complications of hypergranulation, infection and displacement among studies relevant to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes, radiologically inserted gastrostomy tubes and balloon replacement tubes were critically appraised by two independent reviewers. Results were synthesised quantitatively in a meta-analysis using random effects where the population and condition were sufficiently homogeneous. RESULTS In total, 453 studies were identified, of which 17 met inclusion criteria. 8.5% of adults with a gastrostomy were found to have had an infection ≥42 days after initial tube insertion (p < 0.01), while 13% had hypergranulation (p < 0.01). Displacement occurred in 10.8% of adults (p < 0.01), with age (p < 0.001) and sex (p < 0.001) presenting as a risk factor (R2 = 75%) following meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS Approximately 1 in 10 people with a gastrostomy will experience a complication related to either hypergranulation, infection or dislodgement. Age, in combination with sex, may provide a guide for risk of displacement among adult female cohorts, though further studies reporting prevalence of gastrostomy-related complications along with participant demographics are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Farrugia
- Allied Health, Northern Health, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam Ivan Semciw
- Allied Health, Northern Health, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shanelle Bailey
- Allied Health, Northern Health, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zoe Cooke
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Tuck
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Piñar-Gutiérrez A, Serrano-Aguayo P, Gutiérrez RV, Rey SG, González-Navarro I, Tatay-Domínguez D, Garrancho-Domínguez P, Remón-Ruiz PJ, Martínez-Ortega AJ, Mejías VN, Iglesias-López Á, Socas M, Morales-Conde S, García-Fernández FJ, Bozada-García JM, Pereira-Cunill JL, García-Luna PP. Gastrostomies: experience and complications with three modalities in a tertiary centre over a 26-year period. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1191204. [PMID: 37915325 PMCID: PMC10616244 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1191204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To describe the complications associated with the different gastrostomy techniques [endoscopic (PEG), radiologic (PRG), and surgical (SG)] performed in the last 26 years in a terciary hospital. Methods Retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent gastrostomy at the Virgen del Rocío University Hospital between 1995 and 2021 were included. For PEG, the PULL technique was performed until 2018 and subsequently the PUSH technique predominantly. For PRG, a pigtail catheter was used until 2003, a balloon catheter between 2003 and 2009, and a balloon catheter with gastropexy between 2015 and 2021. For SG, the conventional technique (CSG) was performed until 2009 and since then the laparoscopic assisted percutaneous gastrostomy (PLAG) technique. Descriptive analysis was performed obtaining the median and quartiles of the quantitative variables [P50 (P25-P75)] and the frequency for the qualitative variables [n (%)].The comparison of complications between patients who underwent different techniques was performed with Fisher's test. Results n = 1,070 (PEG = 608, PRG = 344, SG = 118). The three most frequent indications were head and neck tumors, neurological diseases and gastroesophageal tumors. The percentage of patients who had any complication was 48.9% (PEG-PULL), 23.7% (PEG-PUSH), 38.5% (pigtail PRG), 39.2% (balloon PRG), 29.7% (balloon with gastropexy PRG), 87.3% (CSG), and 41.26% (PLAG). 2 (0.18%) patients died from gastrostomy-related complications. 18(1.68%) presented with peritonitis and 5 (0.4%) presented with gastrocolic fistula. The rest of the complications were minor. Conclusion Gastrostomy in any of its modalities is currently a safe procedure with a low rate of complications, most of which are minor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Piñar-Gutiérrez
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pilar Serrano-Aguayo
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Silvia García Rey
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Pablo J. Remón-Ruiz
- UGC Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | - María Socas
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
When Is It Safe to Feed After Surgical Feeding Tube Placement? A Survey of East Members. J Surg Res 2022; 275:218-224. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
|
5
|
Rajan A, Wangrattanapranee P, Kessler J, Kidambi TD, Tabibian JH. Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:286-303. [PMID: 35664365 PMCID: PMC9131834 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i4.286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrostomy tube placement is a procedure that achieves enteral access for nutrition, decompression, and medication administration. Preprocedural evaluation and selection of patients is necessary to provide optimal benefit and reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Appropriate indications, contraindications, ethical considerations, and comorbidities of patients referred for gastrostomy placement should be weighed and balanced. Additionally, endoscopist should consider either a transoral or transabdominal approach is appropriate, and radiologic or surgical gastrostomy tube placement is needed. However, medical history, physical examination, and imaging prior to the procedure should be considered to tailor the appropriate approach and reduce the risk of AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Rajan
- Department ofGastroenterology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, United States
- Department ofGastroenterology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | | | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department ofInterventional Radiology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - Trilokesh Dey Kidambi
- Department ofGastroenterology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, United States
| | - James H Tabibian
- Department ofGastroenterology, UCLA-Olive View Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Gkolfakis P, Arvanitakis M, Despott EJ, Ballarin A, Beyna T, Boeykens K, Elbe P, Gisbertz I, Hoyois A, Mosteanu O, Sanders DS, Schmidt PT, Schneider SM, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:178-195. [PMID: 33348410 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-8080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 - 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 - 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy and Centre for Gastroenterology, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asuncion Ballarin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kurt Boeykens
- Nutrition Support Team, AZ Nikolaas Hospital, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Peter Elbe
- Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands
| | - Alice Hoyois
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ofelia Mosteanu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital & University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stéphane M Schneider
- Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Nice, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|