WOUND Study: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Split-Skin Grafting for Lower Limb Skin Cancer

Application of negative pressure wound therapy after skin grafting in the treatment of skin cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Skin cancer is a common malignant tumor in dermatology. A large area must be excised to ensure a negative incisal margin on huge frontotemporal skin cancer, and it is difficult to treat the wound. In the past, treatment with skin grafting and pressure dressing was easy to cause complications such as wound infections, subcutaneous effusion, skin necrosis, and contracture. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been applied to treat huge frontotemporal skin cancer.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report the case of a 92-year-old woman with huge frontotemporal skin cancer. The patient presented to the surgery department complaining of ruptured bleeding and pain in a right frontal mass. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as highly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent skin cancer surgery and skin grafting, after which NPWT was used. She did not experience a relapse during the three-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

NPWT is of great clinical value in the postoperative treatment of skin cancer. It is not only inexpensive but also can effectively reduce the risk of surgical effusion, infection, and flap necrosis.

Dressing to prevent surgical site infection in adult patients with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To identify the most effective dressing for application to surgical wounds with primary closure to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in adult patients with cancer undergoing elective surgeries.

METHODS

This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, with online searches conducted in the CINHAL, Cochrane Central, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Livivo, and Web of Science databases. An additional search was conducted in gray literature using Google Scholar. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Development and Evaluation, and the results were synthesized in a descriptive manner and using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized clinical trials were conducted to compare different types of dressing-silver dressing with absorbent dressing (n = 3), mupirocin dressing with paraffin/no dressing (n = 1), honey-based dressing with absorbent dressing (n = 1), vitamin E and silicone-containing dressing with absorbent dressing (n = 1), and negative pressure wound therapy with absorbent dressing (n = 4)-and compare the usage duration of absorbent dressing (n = 1). Nine trials presented a low risk of bias, and two were classified as having uncertain bias. Compared with absorbent dressing, silver dressing did not reduce the risk of developing any type of SSI in 894 clinical trial participants (risk relative RR: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.44, 1.17] p = 0.18). Compared with absorbent dressing, negative pressure wound therapy did not reduce the risk of developing any type of SSI in the 1041 participants of two clinical trials (RR 0.68; 95% CI [0.31, 1.26] p = 0.22). The certainty of evidence of the three meta-analyses was considered low or very low for the prevention of SSI. We believe that this low certainty of evidence can be improved by conducting new studies in the future.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence regarding which dressing is the most effective in preventing SSI in adult patients with cancer.

"Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Yields Lower Wound Complication and Surgical Site Infection Rates Compared to Standard Surgical Dressings (SSDs) after Resection of a Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"

BACKGROUND

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) offers many advantages over Standard Surgical Dressings (SSDs) in the treatment of open wounds including accelerated wound healing (72.3% vs 30.8%), cost savings (up to $1,607), and reduced complication rates (35% vs 53%).2-4 Contraindicated by device manufacturers in malignancy-resected wounds for hypothesized risk of tumor recurrence, NPWT is still applied post-operatively due to limited clinical support. A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to compare NPWT outcomes with SSDs on open wounds with our null hypotheses stating there would be no outcome differences.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on NPWT and SSDs on malignancy-resected wounds was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases. Meta-analysis compared group outcomes, including malignancy recurrence, wound complication, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates, with random effects model.

RESULTS

1,634 studies were identified and 27 met eligibility criteria, including 4 randomized control trials (RCTs), 4 prospective cohort studies, and 19 retrospective reviews. Eighty-one percent of papers (n = 22) recommended NPWT use in malignancy-resected wounds. Meta-analysis determined NPWT yielded significantly lower overall SSI (P = 0.004) and wound complication rates (P = 0.01) than SSDs; however, there were no statistically significant differences found for other outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates favorable outcomes of NPWT over SSDs for malignancy-resected wounds without an increased risk of malignancy recurrence. However, with limited RCTs (detailing only incisional wounds for limited malignancies and anatomic regions), additional high-power RCTs are recommended.

Health utilities for non-melanoma skin cancers and pre-cancerous lesions: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are common and consume many healthcare resources. A health utility is a single preference-based value for assessing health-related quality of life, which can be used in economic evaluations. There are scarce data on health utilities for NMSCs.

OBJECTIVES

Using a systematic review approach, we synthesized the current data on NMSC-related health utilities.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies of NMSC-related health utilities was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted based on the protocol and a quality assessment was performed for each study.

RESULTS

The protocol resulted in 16 studies, involving 121 621 participants. Mean utility values across the studies ranged from 0.56 to 1 for undifferentiated NMSC, 0.84 to 1 for actinic keratosis, 0.45 to 1 for squamous cell carcinoma, and 0.67 to 1 for basal cell carcinoma. There was considerable variability in utilities by type of cancer, stage of diagnosis, time to treatment, treatment modality, and quality of life instrument or method. Utility values were predominantly based on the EuroQol 5-dimension instrument and ranged from 0.45 to 0.96, while other measurement methods produced values ranging from 0.67 to 1. Lower utility values were observed for advanced cancers and for the time period during and immediately after treatment, after which values gradually returned to pre-treatment levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Most utility values clustered around relatively high values of 0.8 to 1, suggesting small decrements in quality of life associated with most NMSCs and their precursors. Variability in utilities indicates that careful characterization is required for measures to be used in economic evaluations.

Cost-effectiveness of adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy in paediatric burn care: evidence from the SONATA in C randomised controlled trial

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes for children with burns by accelerating wound re-epithelialisation. Its effects on healthcare costs, however, remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NPWT from a healthcare provider perspective using evidence from the SONATA in C randomised controlled trial, in which 101 children with small-area burns were allocated to either standard care (silver-impregnated dressings) or standard care in combination with adjunctive NPWT. The primary outcome, time to re-epithelialisation, was assessed through a blinded photographic review. Resource usage and costs were prospectively recorded for each participant for up to 6 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and dominance probabilities were estimated and uncertainty quantified using bootstrap resampling. Mean costs per participant—including dressings, labour, medication, scar management, and theatre operations—were lower in the NPWT group (AUD $903.69) relative to the control group (AUD $1669.01). There was an 89% probability that NPWT was dominant, yielding both faster re-epithelialisation and lower overall costs. Findings remained robust to sensitivity analyses employing alternative theatre costs and time-to-re-epithelialisation estimates for grafted patients. In conclusion, adjunctive NPWT is likely to be a cost-effective and dominant treatment for small-area paediatric burns (ANZCTR.org.au:ACTRN12618000256279).

Oncologic feasibility for negative pressure wound therapy application in surgical wounds: A meta-analysis

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) decreases postoperative complications of various surgeries. However, the use of NPWT for oncological surgical wounds remains controversial. To evaluate the association of NPWT with oncologic recurrence in surgical wounds without residual malignancy, we analysed studies that compared NPWT with conventional non‐pressure dressings for cancer surgical wounds without residual tumour by August 12, 2020. We compared tumour recurrence rates and postoperative complications between the two procedures. The six studies included 118 patients who received NPWT, and 149 patients who received conventional non‐pressure wound care. The overall quality of the included studies was high based on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale score of 7.5. Tumour recurrence after NPWT was not significantly different compared with conventional non‐negative pressure wound care (9.3% versus 11.4%, P = 0.40). There was no significant heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 3%). Although NTWT was associated with a lower complication rate compared with the control group, the result was non‐significant (P = 0.15). Application of NPWT in oncologic resection wounds without residual malignancy revealed no difference in local recurrence and may reduce the risk of postoperative complications compared with conventional non‐negative pressure dressings. NPWT can be considered an alternative method for reconstruction in challenging cases.

A prospective, phase II study on the safety and efficacy of negative pressure closure for the stabilization of split-thickness skin graft in large or muscle-exposing defects: The NPSG study

Several studies have demonstrated the usefulness of negative pressure closure (NPC) for the stabilization of skin grafts because it provides a uniform pressure to the graft. The results of our previous retrospective study also suggested the superiority of NPC over tie-over methods for the stabilization of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) in large or muscle-exposing defects. However, the usefulness of NPC for graft stabilization is yet to be fully established. This prospective, phase II clinical study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of NPC for the stabilization of STSG in large or muscle-exposing defects. Patients who would require STSG for reconstruction of defects in the trunk and extremities other than hands and feet measuring >10 cm in the longest diameter or with muscle exposure were enrolled. NPC was applied for skin graft stabilization. Seven patients who had received wide excision of malignant tumors and resulted in muscle-exposed skin defects were included. All patients underwent meshed STSG. The mean size of the defect was 94.5 cm² (range 63.6-164.9). The mean time from the skin graft harvesting to the NPC stabilization was 15.6 min (range 10.7-19.5). The mean survival rate of the skin graft at postoperative day 7 and 10 was 98.7% (range 97-100) and 96.5% (range 89.4-98.4), respectively. No adverse events associated with the procedure were observed. This prospective study provided further evidence of the safety and efficacy of NPC for STSG stabilization in patients with large or muscle-exposing skin defects.

Full-thickness Skin Graft Fixation Techniques: A Review of the Literature

Multiple techniques for skin graft fixation have been proposed, but the evidence underlying these techniques is unclear. This study aimed to review the literature for full-thickness graft fixation techniques. PubMed was electronically searched to identify relevant studies. The search strategy identified 91 relevant articles. These consisted of 2 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 10 observational cohort studies (8 retrospective, 2 prospective), and 79 descriptive studies (case series, case reports, or expert opinion articles). Both identified RCTs compared the tie-over dressing against a modified tie-over dressing. The tie-over dressing was also included in all identified observational studies, and comparisons were made against quilting/mattress suturing (4 studies, 181 grafts in total), simple pressure dressings (3 studies, 528 grafts), non-tie-over dressings non-specifically (1 study, 71 grafts), hydrocolloid dressings (1 study, 62 grafts), and double-tie over dressings (1 study, 43 grafts). No significant differences were found between fixation methods for graft take, haematoma rate, and infection rate. No studies have found a significant difference between tie-over dressings and alternative graft fixation technique, with the most evidence for simple pressure dressings and quilting/mattress suturing. However, the evidence base consists mostly of small, retrospective observational studies. This article describes the current evidence base and this should be considered when planning future reports in the field.

Preparation and biological evaluation of a novel agarose-grafting-hyaluronan scaffold for accelerated wound regeneration

At present, seeking an effective dressing for wound regeneration has drawn considerable interest. In this paper, a novel agarose-grafting-hyaluronan (Ag-g-HA) scaffold was synthesized for rapid wound healing. Elemental analysis results showed that the HA grafting rate of Ag-g-HA was ∼69%. Ag-g-HA remained bioactive to accelerate cell proliferation and stimulate secretion of TNF-α for macrophagocyte RAW 264.7, and collagen I and collagen III for fibroblast 3T3. An i n vivo study demonstrated that Ag-g-HA showed a faster repair cycle and a better skin histological structure for a full-thickness skin defect. The collagen I, collagen III and TNF-α secreted by mice for Ag-g-HA were similiar to HA. Ag-g-HA showed a similiar biological activity to HA but had a longer degradation time through its improved insolubility. These findings demonstrate that the Ag-g-HA scaffold accelerated wound healing, and could be a promising novel scaffold for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is commonly used to manage complex wounds in the pediatric population. With recently developed portable NPWT devices, providers have the opportunity to transition NPWT to the outpatient setting. However, there are no studies describing outpatient NPWT in pediatric patients. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to leverage a population-level analysis to advance our current knowledge about outpatient NPWT use in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims Database from 2006 to 2014 to identify children treated with NPWT. We compared patient characteristics, indications, complications before and after NPWT, health care utilization within 30 d of NPWT initiation, and health care cost profile of patients treated with NPWT primarily as outpatients versus inpatients. Outpatient NPWT was defined as patients with ≤50% of NPWT coded during an inpatient hospitalization, whereas inpatient NPWT was defined as patients with >50% of NPWT.

RESULTS

We identified 3184 patients (1621 inpatients and 1563 outpatients) aged 0-17 y, who were treated with NPWT from 2006 to 2014. Outpatient NPWT was implemented across multiple ages, comorbidities, and indications, with a low complication rate (2.4%). After controlling for hematologic comorbidity and indications, outpatient NPWT was associated with lower risk of complications (odds ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.86) and lower median total costs ($5602.03) compared with inpatient ($15,233.21) therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient NPWT management in pediatric patients was associated with low complication rates. Additional studies are necessary to determine the most overall cost-effective treatment setting for NPWT in the pediatric population.