Playing the Surgical Technologist Role by Surgery Residents Improves Their Technical and Nontechnical Skills

Instructional methods of attendings as exhibited during intraoperative takeovers: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

This pilot study examined intraoperative instructional techniques during "takeovers," defined as the act of an attending taking control of a case from a resident. This work describes what happens during takeovers and identifies possible reasons for takeovers.

METHODS

Intraoperative audio-video recordings during 25 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair procedures were collected. Participants included 2 postgraduate year-5 residents and 5 attendings. Postoperative evaluation forms were completed by attendings. Coding schemes for takeovers during hernia reduction and mesh placement steps were developed using conventional and directed content analysis in an iterative process by study team members, including individuals with expertise in education, surgery, and surgical education.

RESULTS

Takeovers occurred in 72% of cases. Frequency of takeovers was not related to case difficulty or differences in resident technical skill levels, nor did they decrease over the duration of the 2-month rotation. Takeovers most commonly occurred when a resident struggled to progress the case. They also occurred when anatomy was unclear or when the attending wanted to teach a specific skill. Differences were identified among attendings regarding frequency of takeovers. The majority of takeover behaviors were directed at instructing residents; however, attendings' teaching techniques did not vary by resident.

CONCLUSION

Attending teaching habits appear to be independent of resident skills and depend on the attending's teaching style rather than residents' learning needs. Findings highlight the need for faculty development to help surgical educators learn how to tailor instruction to individual trainees. Additionally, future research is needed to establish the effectiveness of instruction through takeovers in the operating room.

Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.