Impact of PET/CT for Restaging Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Predictive Role of FDG PET-CT in Localised Rectal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Rectal carcinoma (RC) has high incidence and rate of recurrence. Currently, routine 18- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) is not recommend for routine monitoring for post RC treatment. We examined the utility of FDG PET-CT for the prognostication of patients with RC and what FDG PET-CT metrics are of value.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane (Central) were comprehensively searched till 19 May 2024. A modified Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess for study bias. We presented our systematic review alongside pooled hazard ratios (HR) for maximum standardised uptake values (SUV) as a predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eleven papers including 771 patients were included in our systematic review. Considering the current evidence, there is potential to consider percentage change in SUVmax, TLG, MTV, and lymph node highest peak SUV as possible predictors of outcome for localised non metastatic rectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled meta-analysis of three homogenous parameters examines the relationship of SUVMax and survival, and did not demonstrate correlation with survival outcomes. The overall pooled hazard ratio for pretreatment SUVMax to DFS was 0.69, CI (0.29-1.63). The overall pooled HR for post treatment SUVMax to DFS was 0.88, CI (0.43-1.81), and posttreatment SUVMax to OS was 1.73, CI (0.34-8.66). Post treatment FDG PET-CT may have a role to play in the prognostic evaluation of RC patients; however, further data is required.

Predicting treatment response and survival in rectal cancer: insights from 18 FDG-PET/MRI post-neoadjuvant therapy

INTRODUCTION

Accurate identification of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is essential. 18-FDG PET/MRI provides metabolic information that complements the morphological assessment of standard MRI, potentially enhancing the differentiation between fibrotic and tumorous tissues post-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of 18-FDG PET/MRI in assessing treatment response compared to standard MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from 2018 to 2021. Patients with LARC undergoing RCT were included and staged at diagnosis and restaged 8-12 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment using 18-FDG PET/MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of PET/MRI and standard MRI in detecting pCR and tumor regression grade (TRG) confirmed via histopathological examination. Quantitative analysis assessed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV). A secondary outcome included survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for radiological and pathological prognostic markers.

RESULTS

Among 33 patients, pCR was observed in 45% (14/33). PET/MRI demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.88, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, for detecting pCR, compared to 0.82, 0.50, and 0.67 for standard MRI (p < 0.001). PET/MRI accurately identified TRG stages in 72% of cases, compared to 50% for standard MRI. Post-SUV, post-ADC, and delta-ADC were the most precise PET/MRI predictors for pCR, with AUC values of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.55, respectively. Patients with mrEMVI and mrTRG showed worse disease-free survival (DFS).

CONCLUSION

18-FDG PET/MRI emerges as a promising imaging tool for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, with superior diagnostic accuracy compared to standard MRI. Radiological findings, such as EMVI, can identify high-risk patients, offering valuable prognostic insights.

Outcomes of Postchemoradiotherapy Watch-and-Wait Strategy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A 20-Year, Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is a nonsurgical alternative for patients with rectal cancer exhibiting an excellent response to chemoradiotherapy. Studies on the WW strategy have primarily investigated 5-year oncological outcomes; few have focused on longer-term outcomes or the optimal patient selection approach for this therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who had achieved complete response after chemoradiotherapy. Patients who achieved pathological complete response were categorized into a control group (n = 95) and those who achieved clinical complete response and were managed using the WW strategy were categorized into a case group (n = 33). Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for the between-group comparison of survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 89 months. Compared with the control group, the case group exhibited improved long-term sphincter preservation, particularly for low-lying tumors (p = 0.032), and inferior nonlocal-regrowth disease-free survival (p = 0.007). Within the case group, patients achieving a complete response by positron emission tomography exhibited 5-year survival rates similar to those achieving a complete endoscopic response.

CONCLUSION

The WW strategy is associated with improved sphincter preservation but worse nonlocal-regrowth disease-free survival. The potential of PET in patient selection for this strategy deserves further investigation.

Predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response with functional imaging and liquid biomarkers in locally advanced rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Non-invasive predictive quantitative biomarkers are required to guide treatment individualization in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in order to maximise therapeutic outcomes and minimise treatment toxicity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and blood biomarkers have the potential to predict chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in LARC.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the value of functional imaging (MRI and PET) and liquid biomarkers (circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor nucleic acid (ctNA)) in the prediction of CRT response in LARC. Selected imaging and liquid biomarker studies are presented and the current status of the most promising imaging (apparent diffusion co-efficient (ADC), K^trans, SUV_max, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and liquid biomarkers (circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor nucleic acid (ctNA)) is discussed. The potential applications of imaging and liquid biomarkers for treatment stratification and a pathway to clinical translation are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Functional imaging and liquid biomarkers provide novel ways of predicting CRT response. The clinical and technical validation of the most promising imaging and liquid biopsy biomarkers in multi-centre studies with harmonised acquisition techniques is required. This will enable clinical trials to investigate treatment escalation or de-escalation pathways in rectal cancer.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging of Colorectal Cancer: 2021 Update

Preoperative imaging of rectal carcinoma involves accurate assessment of the primary tumor as well as distant metastatic disease. Preoperative imaging of nonrectal colon cancer is most beneficial in identifying distant metastases, regardless of primary T or N stage. Surgical treatment remains the definitive treatment for colon cancer, while organ-sparing approach may be considered in some rectal cancer patients based on imaging obtained before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: how certain is radiology?]

The concept of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) means a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. In cases in which the TNT induced a complete clinical response (cCR), an organ preserving watch and wait therapy concept can now be provided more often; however, this increases the demand for imaging for the determination of cCR and in the subsequent follow-up. In this article, the performance of radiology in these scenarios will be evaluated and discussed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current standard for local assessment of the rectum with a high sensitivity for diagnosis and staging of rectal cancer, residual tumor and tumor recurrence. However, the certain exclusion of residual malignant tissue is still difficult, in particular the differentiation of residual scar tissue from vital residual tumor is only possible with low specificity and a moderate negative predictive value (NPV). The currently discussed criteria for the assessment of imaging have not yet been validated in large cohorts and are frequently subjective. An improvement of the diagnostic accuracy for identification of cCR in patients after TNT and for monitoring patients in watch and wait treatment concepts can certainly be achieved by the integration of MRI, endoscopy and endosonography as well as clinical parameters. This should enable for identification of patients with an incomplete response or local recurrence, in time for extended treatment to be initiated without relevant impact on the patient outcome.

A Nomogram for Predicting Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Semiquantitative Parameters Derived From Sequential PET/CT in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

We evaluated the predictive value of semiquantitative volumetric parameters derived from sequential PET/CT and developed a nomogram to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). From April 2008 to December 2013, among the patients who underwent nCRT, those who were taken sequential PET/CT before and after nCRT were included. MRI-based staging and semiquantitative parameters of PET/CT including standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were evaluated before and after nCRT. Multivariable analysis was performed to select significant predictors to construct a nomogram. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of the model were evaluated to determine its performance. Among 137 eligible patients, 17 (12.4%) had pCR. All post-PET/CT parameters showed significant differences between pCR and non-pCR groups. Patients were randomly assigned to a training group (91 patients) and a validation group (46 patients). In multivariable analysis with the training group, post-CEA, post-MRI T staging, post-SUV_max, and post-MTV were significantly associated with pCR. There was no significant pre-nCRT variable for predicting pCR. Using significant predictors, a nomogram was developed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of the nomogram were 0.882, 0.808, 0.848, and 0.884 with the training group and 0.857, 0.781, 0.783, and 0.828 with the validation group, respectively. This model showed the better performance than other predictive models that did not contain PET/CT parameters. A nomogram containing semiquantitative post-PET/CT could effectively select candidates for organ-sparing strategies.

T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient and 18F-FDG PET histogram analysis of rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Background

The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation among T2-weighted (T2w) images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images, histogram analysis and the pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT).

Methods

Patients with LARC were prospectively enrolled between February 2015 and August 2018 and underwent PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI included T2w and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-sequences. ADC maps and PET images were matched to the T2w images. Voxel-based standardized uptake values (SUVs,) ADC and T2w-signal-intensity values were collected from the volumes of interest (VOIs) and mean, skewness and kurtosis were calculated. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was applied to evaluate the correlation among the variables and tumor regression grade (TRG), T stage, N stage and fibrosis.

Results

Twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven LARC in the low or mid rectum were enrolled [17 males, mean age was 69 years (range 49–85 years)]. Seven patients experienced complete regression (TRG1). A significant positive correlation was found between SUV mean values (ρ = 0.480; p = 0.037) and TRG. No other significant correlations were found.

Conclusions

Histogram analysis of SUV values is a predictor of TRG in LARC.

How to measure tumour response in rectal cancer? An explanation of discrepancies and suggestions for improvement

Various methods categorize tumour response after neoadjuvant therapy, including down-staging and tumour regression grading. Response categories allow comparison of different treatments within clinical trials and predict outcome. A reproducible response categorization could identify subgroups with high or low risk for the most appropriate subsequent treatments, like watch and wait. Lack of standardization and interpretation difficulties currently limit the usability of these approaches. In this review we describe these difficulties for the evaluation of chemoradiation in rectal cancer. An alternative approach of tumour response is based on patterns of residual disease, including fragmentation. We summarise the evidence behind this alternative method of response categorisation, which explains a number of very relevant clinical discrepancies. These issues include differences between downstaging and tumour regression, high local regrowth in advanced tumours during watchful waiting procedures, the importance of resection margins, the limited value of post-treatment biopsies and the relatively poor outcome of patients with a near complete pathological response. Recognition of these patterns of response can allow meaningful development of novel biomarkers in the future.

Magnetic Resonance Guided Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: Expanding Opportunities for Non-Operative Management

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common in women worldwide, and the incidence is increasing among younger patients. 30% of these malignancies arise in the rectum. Patients with rectal cancer have historically been managed with preoperative radiation, followed by radical surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy, with permanent colostomies in up to 20% of patients. Beginning in the early 2000s, non-operative management (NOM) of rectal cancer emerged as a viable alternative to radical surgery in select patients. Efforts have been ongoing to optimize neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, thereby increasing the number of patients potentially eligible to forgo radical surgery. Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has recently emerged as a treatment modality capable of intensifying preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer patients. This technology may also predict which patients will achieve a complete response to preoperative therapy, thereby allowing for more appropriate selection of patients for NOM. The present work seeks to illustrate the potential role MRgRT could play in personalizing rectal cancer treatment thus expanding the role of NOM in rectal cancer.