Goals of Care Discussions for the Imminently Dying Trauma Patient

The Role of Structured Goals of Care Discussions in Critically Ill Thoracic Surgery Patients

Objective: The American College of Surgeons recommends structured family meetings (FM) for high-risk surgical patients. We hypothesized that goals of care discussions (GOCD) in the form of an FM, multidisciplinary family meeting (MDFM), or palliative care consult (PCC) would be underutilized in imminently dying thoracic surgery patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review at a tertiary academic medical center was performed on all inpatient mortalities and discharges to hospice after any thoracic surgery operation. The utilization of GOCDs was compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay, comatose status and ventilator dependence during initial GOCD, and timing of code status change. Results: In total, 56 patients met inclusion criteria: 44 of 56 (78.6%) died and 12 of 56 (21.4%) were discharged to hospice. Most patients had a FM (79.5% mortality vs 100% hospice, P = .29) and few had an MDFM (25.0% mortality vs 25.0% hospice, P = 1.00). Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC (66.7% vs 31.2%, P = .03) and less likely to be comatose (16.7% vs 59.1%, P = .009) or ventilator dependent during initial GOCD (16.7% vs 70.5%, P = .001). Among patients who died and were DNR-CC (do not resuscitate-comfort care; 37 of 44), 75.7% died the same day of code status change and 67.6% died within 48 h of initial GOCD. Discussion: Although FMs were common, MDFMs were infrequent. Patients discharged to hospice were more likely to have a PCC. Most deaths occurred shortly after initial GOCD and most code status changes occurred on day-of-death. This data suggest an opportunity to improve GOCDs in critically ill thoracic surgery patients.

Clinical Outcomes After Early Palliative Care Evaluations in Geriatric Trauma Intensive Care

INTRODUCTION

Older trauma patients are at risk for worse outcomes compared to younger patients. We hypothesized that early initiation of palliative care (EPC) evaluations, within 72 h of trauma intensive care unit (ICU) admission, would be associated with reduced invasive procedures without a change in hospital mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was performed of all trauma patients aged ≥65 y admitted to the trauma (ICU) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Patients who received formal palliative care assessments were included. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were evaluated. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included code status change, tracheostomy or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement, use and length of mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality, and withdrawal of life-sustaining care.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion. One hundred and six had EPC while 119 had late palliative care. EPC was associated with decreased ICU LOS (3 versus 9 d, P < 0.001), hospital LOS (3 versus 11 d, P < 0.001), and days on mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001), and fewer tracheostomy (P = 0.007) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (P = 0.049). There was no difference in withdrawal of life-sustaining care (P = 0.581) or in-hospital mortality (P = 0.172). Pre-existing code status or code status clarification early in admission was associated with EPC (P = 0.003) and decreased interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

EPC is associated with decreased LOS and fewer invasive procedures without a change in hospital mortality. Early discussions regarding code status are helpful in decreasing hospital costs and futile interventions. Further investigation is required to standardize palliative care in this population.

Goals of Care Discussions in Orthopaedic Surgery: Geriatric Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Due to the severity of hip fracture complications in the geriatric population, including major morbidity and mortality, it is crucial to establish treatment goals and manage expectations as a patient-centered multidisciplinary team. Goals of care (GOC) are personalized treatment programs designed to align with the individual patient's values and preferences. There is a paucity of literature on the topic of GOC discussions, especially regarding orthopaedic injuries. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an account of GOC discussions related to geriatric hip fractures.

METHODS

We reviewed articles published on GOC between 1978 and 2024. The articles were identified by searching PubMed and Google Scholar. We utilized the search terms GOC discussions and hip fracture, with additional descriptors including arthroplasty and geriatric.

RESULTS

There were 11 articles that met the selection criteria and were published between 1978 and 2024. Five articles were published on GOC discussions in orthopaedic surgery, while the remaining 6 articles were published in non-orthopaedic fields. There was one systematic review, 2 narrative reviews, 6 observational studies, and 2 descriptive studies. Supplemental commentary from non-orthopaedic specialties and the fields of law and medical ethics was included to assist in highlighting barriers to GOC discussions and to explore potential strategies to enhance GOC discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

Goals of care discussions provide a framework for treatment decisions based on an individual patient's values and cultural beliefs; however, these conversations may be limited by perceived time constraints, patient health care literacy, and physicians' misconceptions of what is most important to discuss. While no clear consensus was identified regarding strategies for improving GOC discussions in geriatric patients who have hip fractures, the authors recommend standardized training programs, expedited family meetings, multidisciplinary team involvement, assistive technology such as Outcome Prioritization Tool, and the incorporation of GOC discussions into institutional hip fracture pathways.

Meeting the Needs of Family Members of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

While the needs of family members have previously been studied, the needs of families of trauma patients have received less attention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the needs of family members of trauma patients in the emergency department.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey study was conducted over 4 months (February-May 2022) with family members of trauma patients admitted to the emergency department of a state hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. The validated Critical Care Family Needs Inventory - Emergency Department survey was administered face-to-face to a convenience sample of consenting family members.

RESULTS

A total of 248 family members participated, representing 84 patients. The mean age of the participants was 33 (8.18) years, with a gender distribution of 50% women. On average, 76.5% of the family members' needs were met. The most important needs reported as mean (SD) were as follows: communication, 3.52 (0.68); participation in care, 3.52 (0.68); comfort, 3.36 (0.65); and support needs, 3.21 (0.72). These needs were met to varying degrees: communication 85%, participation in care 81.2%, comfort 75.4%, and support needs 65.2%.

CONCLUSION

The study findings indicate that the needs of family members of emergency department trauma patients are not fully met. Families report needing communication the most and comfort the least.

Pediatric Death and Family Organ Donation: Bereavement Support Services in One Pediatric Health System

Health care providers need to support families and provide resources when facing their child's death and potential organ donation. Aims of this retrospective chart review in a tertiary health care system were: (1) describe characteristics of pediatric organ donors compared to those who were not; (2) determine differences between services utilized by families who selected organ donation versus those who did not. From 2017 to 2023 of 288 pediatric deaths, 76 were organ donors and 212 did not donate. Organ donors' mean age at admission was 6.3 ± 5.8 years. Thirty-four (44.7%) participated in Honor Walks. Significant differences existed between organ donors and non-organ donors in patients who were diagnosed with SIDS (3.9% vs 13.2%; P = .025). This study provides additional data to help further our understanding of bereavement support services for families making difficult decisions regarding organ donation.

Initiating advance care planning at admission: a brief intervention to increase goals of care discussions in geriatric trauma patients in an urban level I trauma center

Objectives

The burden of geriatric trauma continues to rise. Older trauma patients experience higher morbidity and mortality and thus benefit from early goals of care (GOC) discussions and advance care planning (ACP). The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) recommends holding a family meeting within 72 hours of admission when treating geriatric trauma patients. At our level I trauma center, we sought to increase early GOC discussions by implementing a new history and physical (H&P) note template for geriatric trauma patients.

Methods

Patients (aged >65 years) admitted to the trauma surgery service (≥24 hours) were included in the study. The intervention was a change in the H&P note template to include confirmation of code status or previous ACP and identification of a healthcare proxy. Primary outcomes were the rates of recognizing a pre-existing Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) status/advanced directives at admission and of documentation of a GOC discussion within 72 hours. Outcomes from a 3-month period (March-May) during the pre-intervention (2021) and post-intervention (2022) periods were compared.

Results

The pre-intervention and post-intervention groups had 107 and 150 patients, respectively. We observed an increase in recognition of pre-existing DNR code status at time of admission from 50% to 95% (p=0.003) and documentation of a GOC discussion within 72 hours from 17% to 83% (p<0.0001). We also observed a trend showing that new DNR orders were placed more frequently in the post-intervention period (9% vs 17%, p=0.098). The in-hospital mortality was not significantly different.

Conclusions

The importance of GOC discussions and ACP documentation for geriatric trauma patients is evident, but its completion can be challenging. Our intervention of a new H&P note template increased GOC discussions, and this implementation may be feasible in other trauma centers to comply with the ACS-TQIP Geriatric Trauma Management Guidelines.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Inpatient Neurology Deaths and Factors Associated With Discharge to Hospice

Background and Purpose

The Neurology Mortality Review Committee at our institution identified variability in location of death for patients on our inpatient neurology services. Hospice may increase the number of patients dying in their preferred locations. This study aimed to characterize patients who die on inpatient neurology services and explore barriers to discharge to hospice.

Methods

This retrospective study was completed at a single, quaternary care medical center that is a Level I Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center. Patients discharged by an inpatient neurology service between 6/2019-1/2021 were identified and electronic medical record review was performed on patients who died in the hospital and who were discharged to hospice.

Results

69 inpatient deaths and 74 discharges to hospice occurred during the study period. Of the 69 deaths, 54 occurred following withdrawal of life sustaining treatment (WLST), of which 14 had a referral to hospice placed. There were 88 "hospice-referred" patients and 40 "hospice-eligible" patients. Hospice-referred patients were less likely to require the intensive care unit than hospice-eligible patients. Hospice-referred patients had their code status changed to Do Not Intubate earlier and were more likely to have advanced directives available.

Conclusion

Our data highlight opportunities for further research to improve discharge to hospice including interhospital transfers, advanced directives, earlier goals of care discussions, palliative care consultations, and increased hospice bed availability. Importantly, it highlights the limitations of using in-hospital mortality as a quality indicator in this patient population.

The 2023-2026 Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Research Agenda

The Hospice and Palliative Nursing Association established the triannual research agenda to ( a ) provide focus for researchers to conduct meaningful scientific and quality improvement initiatives and inform evidence-based practice, ( b ) guide organizational funding, and ( c ) illustrate to other stakeholders the importance of nursing research foci. HPNA Research Agendas are developed to give direction for future research to continue advancing expert care in serious illness and ensure equitable delivery of hospice and palliative care.

Are we waiting for the sky to fall? Predictors of withdrawal of life-sustaining support in older trauma patients: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the impact of advanced care planning for injured geriatric patients. We hypothesized that patients with advance directives limiting care (ADLC) compared with those without ADLC are more likely to undergo withdrawal of life-sustaining support (WLSS).

METHODS

This is a propensity-matched analysis utilizing American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program patients 65 years or older who presented between 2017 and 2018. Patients with and without ADLC on admission were compared. The primary outcome was WLSS and days prior to WLSS. Additional factors examined included hospital length of stay (LOS), unplanned operations, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and in-hospital cardiac arrests. Prior to matching, logistic regression model assessed factors associated with WLSS. Patients with and without ADLC were matched 1:1 via a propensity score using patient and injury factors as covariates, and matched pair analysis compared differences in WLSS between patients with and without ADLC.

RESULTS

There were 597,840 patients included: 44,001 patients with an ADLC (7.36%) compared with 553,839 with no ADLC (92.64%). Patients with an ADLC underwent WLSS more often than those with no ADLC (7.68% vs. 2.48%, p < 0.001). In a 1:1 propensity-matched analysis, patients with ADLC were more likely to undergo WLSS (odds ratio [OR], 2.38' 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-2.55), although stronger predictors of WLSS included severity of injury (Injury Severity Score, 25+; OR, 23.84; 95% CI, 21.55-26.36), unplanned intensive care unit admissions (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.89-3.75), and in-hospital cardiac arrests (OR, 4.97; 95% CI, 4.02-6.15).

CONCLUSION

A small proportion of the geriatric trauma population had ADLC on admission. While ADLC was predictive of WLSS, adverse events were more strongly associated with WLSS. To ensure patient-centered care and reduce futile interventions, surgeons should delineate goals of care early regardless of ADLC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Adherence to the TQIP Palliative Care Guidelines Among Patients With Serious Illness at a Level I Trauma Center in the US

Importance

The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) guidelines encourage trauma service clinicians to deliver palliative care in parallel with life-sustaining treatment and recommend goals of care (GOC) discussions within 72 hours of admission for patients with serious illness.

Objective

To measure adherence to TQIP guidelines-recommended GOC discussions for trauma patients with serious illness, treated at a level I trauma center in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included 674 adults admitted to a trauma service center for 3 or more days between December 2019 and June 2020. The medical records of 486 patients who met the criteria for serious illness using a consensus definition adapted to the National Trauma Data Bank were reviewed for the presence of a GOC discussion. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on admission before or after the guidelines were incorporated into the institutional practice guidelines on March 1, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were GOC completion within 72 hours of admission and during the overall hospitalization. Patient and clinical factors associated with GOC completion were assessed. Other palliative care processes measured included palliative care consultation, prior advance care planning document, and do-not-resuscitate code status. Additional end-of-life processes (ie, comfort care and inpatient hospice) were measured in a subset with inpatient mortality.

Results

Of 674 patients meeting the review criteria, 486 (72.1%) met at least 1 definition of serious illness (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [21.3] years; mean [SD] Injury Severity Score, 16.9 [12.3]). Of these patients, 328 (67.5%) were male and 266 (54.7%) were White. Among the seriously ill patients, 92 (18.9%) had evidence of GOC completion within 72 hours of admission and 124 (25.5%) during the overall hospitalization. No differences were observed between patients admitted before and after institutional guideline publication in GOC completion within 72 hours (19.0% [47 of 248 patients] vs 18.9% [45 of 238]; P = .99) or during the overall hospitalization (26.2% [65 of 248 patients] vs 24.8% [59 of 238]; P = .72). After adjusting for age, GOC completion was found to be associated with the presence of mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR], 6.42; 95% CI, 3.49-11.81) and meeting multiple serious illness criteria (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.25-7.38).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that, despite the presence of national guidelines, GOC discussions for patients with serious illness were documented infrequently. This study suggests a need for system-level interventions to ensure best practices and may inform strategies to measure and improve trauma service quality in palliative care.

The Association of Norepinephrine Utilization With Mortality Risk in Trauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

While the pillars of trauma resuscitation are surgical hemostasis and blood product administration, norepinephrine (NE) can be used as an adjunct. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the maximum dose of NE, timing of NE administration, and mortality in trauma patients.

METHODS

Patients admitted between January 2013 and January 2021 treated with NE were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess whether maximum NE dose was independently associated with mortality. Optimal dosage rates for NE were determined via Youden Index. Subgroup analyses comparing those who received NE within versus after the first 24 h of admission were conducted.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-first trauma patients were included, with 217 (62%) surviving. Patients who died received an average maximum dose of 16.7 mcg/min compared to 9.1 mcg/min in survivors (P = 0.0003). Mortality rate increased with dosage (P < 0.0001), with doses greater than 20 mcg/min having 79% mortality. Those who received NE within the first 24 h had an inflection point in mortality at 16 mcg/min (Youden = 0.45) (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03-1.10). For patients who received NE after the first 24 h, an inflection point in mortality was at 10 mcg/min (Youden = 0.34) (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher maximum doses of NE were associated with increased mortality. Patients initiated on NE more than 24 h into their admission displayed an inflection point at a lower dose than those initiated later. This suggests that trauma patients initiated on NE after 24 h from injury may have a dire prognosis.

Retrospective Review of Trauma ICU Patients With and Without Palliative Care Intervention

BACKGROUND

Older trauma patients present with poor preinjury functional status and more comorbidities. Advances in care have increased the chance of survival from previously fatal injuries with many left debilitated with chronic critical illness and severe disability. Palliative care (PC) is ideally suited to address the goals of care and symptom management in this critically ill population. A retrospective chart review was done to identify the impact of PC consults on hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and surgical decisions.

STUDY DESIGN

A Level 1 Trauma Center Registry was used to identify adult patients who were provided PC consultation in a selected 3-year time period. These PC patients were matched with non-PC trauma patients on the basis of age, sex, race, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Injury Severity Score. Chi-square tests and Student's t-tests were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Any p value >0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

PC patients were less likely to receive a percutaneous endoscopic gastric tube or tracheostomy. PC patients spent less time on ventilator support, spent less time in the ICU, and had a shorter hospital stay. PC consultation was requested 16.48 days into the patient's hospital stay. Approximately 82% of consults were to assist with goals of care.

CONCLUSION

Specialist PC team involvement in the care of the trauma ICU patients may have a beneficial impact on hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and surgical care rendered. Earlier consultation during hospitalization may lead to higher rates of goal-directed care and improved patient satisfaction.

Palliative Care in the Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Settings: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

We aimed to conduct a narrative review of available literature to understand the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. The search included all studies published through January 9th, 2022. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist tools. Outcomes were summarized in tables and synthesized qualitatively.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included in this review. Key elements of successful palliative care include communication, shared decision-making, family involvement, pain control, establishing a patient's prognosis, and end-of-life management. Approaches to implementation based upon these key elements include best-case/worst-case scenarios, consultation trigger systems, and integrated institutional palliative care programs. Palliative care may reduce hospital length of stay, improve symptom management, and increase patient satisfaction, but the impact on mortality is unclear.

CONCLUSION

The core elements of palliative care have been identified and palliative care has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma and surgical critical care. However, the approaches for implementation still require development. The underutilization of palliative care for trauma patients reveals the need for refining criteria for use of palliative care and improvement in the education of surgical critical care teams to provide primary palliative care services.

Narrative review of palliative care in trauma and emergency general surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the goals of palliative care with regards to acute care surgery patients and review the literature regarding administration and implementation of palliative programs.

BACKGROUND

For patients who experience unexpected and sometimes catastrophic life changes related to trauma or emergency general surgery, palliative care is a crucial adjunct that can help ensure the provision of optimal symptom management, communication, and goal-concordant care provided.

METHODS

Palliative care is medical specialty with a philosophy of care focused on improving the quality of life for patients with serious injury or illness and their loved ones. Palliative care provides significant benefit across the entire spectrum of illness and injury, regardless of prognosis. We will discuss palliative care topics related to trauma and emergency general surgery patients, including symptom management, goal setting, end of life care, communication strategies, addressing implicit/explicit bias, trauma-specific and emergency general surgery-specific considerations, and implementation strategies to reduce barriers for utilization of palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Unfortunately, palliative care is often underutilized in the trauma and emergency general surgery population. Acute care surgeons should be familiar with principles of primary palliative care, as well as understand the added benefits that be provided by consultant palliative care specialists.

Making your geriatric and palliative programs a strength: TQIP guideline implementation and the VRC perspective

BACKGROUND

Older patients compose approximately 30% of trauma patients treated in the USA but make up nearly 50% of deaths from trauma. To help standardize and elevate care of these patients, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program's best practice guidelines for geriatric trauma management was published in 2013 and that for palliative care was published in 2017. Here, we discuss how palliative care and geriatrics quality metrics can be tracked and used for performance improvement and leveraged as a strength for trauma verification.

METHODS

We discuss the viewpoint of the ACS Verification, Review, and Consultation and three case studies, with practical tips and takeaways, of how these measures have been implemented at different institutions.

RESULTS

We describe the use of (1) targeted educational initiatives, (2) development of a consultation tool based on institutional resources, and (3) application of a nurse-led frailty screen.

DISCUSSION

Specialized care and attention to these vulnerable populations is recommended, but the implementation of these programs can take many shapes.Level of evidence V.

Implementation of a Surgical Intensivist Model Increases Palliative Care Consultation in the Care of Trauma ICU Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated patient outcomes of care before and after transitioning to a surgical intensivist-led trauma-intensive care unit (ICU) team. The intensivist team provided daily multidisciplinary rounds and continuity of care. Prior to an intensivist model, general surgeons cared for trauma patients admitted to the unit.

METHODS

Outcomes of 1,078 trauma patients, admitted to the ICU at a Level II trauma center, under care of general surgeons (1/2011-8/2012, n = 449) were retrospectively compared with care managed by a surgical intensivist team (1/2013-5/2015, n = 629) by Pearson Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests. A multivariable logistic regression technique was used to control for covariates. Demographics and injury severity were analyzed. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free and ICU-free days, and ICU readmission rate. Other data collected included palliative care consultation. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ICU mortality (P = 0.055), hospital LOS (P = 0.481), ventilator-free days (P = 0.174), or ICU readmission rate (P = 0.587). The surgical intensivist team consulted palliative care more frequently (4.0% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), while managing more trauma patients who were older than 65 years (P < 0.001) with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.048) and higher injury severity (P = 0.025) and abbreviated injury scale (P < 0.001) scores.

DISCUSSION

There were no differences in outcomes. However, incorporating palliative care consultation in the ICU is essential in the support of critically ill patients and their families. These data demonstrate that a surgical intensivist team utilized palliative care more often in the management of trauma patients admitted to the ICU.

Palliative care and aggressive interventions after falling: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify whether there is an opportunity for improvement to provide palliative care services after a serious fall. We hypothesized that (1) palliative care services would be utilized in less than 10% of patients over the age of 65 who fall and (2) more than 20% of patients would receive aggressive life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) prior to death.

METHODS

Using the 2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who were admitted to the hospital with a fall (ICD-10 W00-W19) and were hospitalized at least two days with valid discharge data. Palliative care services (Z51.5) or LSTs (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ventilation, reintubation, tracheostomy, feeding tube placement, vasopressors, transfusion, total parenteral nutrition, and hemodialysis) were identified with ICD-10 codes. We examined the use of palliative care or LSTs by discharge destination (home, facility, and death). Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with palliative care.

RESULTS

In total, 155,241 patients were identified (median 82 years old, interquartile range 74-88); 2.5% died in hospital, and 69.4% were transferred to a facility. Palliative care occurred in 4.5% of patients, and LST occurred in 15.1%. Patients who died were significantly more likely to have had palliative care (50.1% vs. 3.4% of home or facility discharges) and were more likely to have an LST [53.0% vs. 9.8% (home) vs. 15.9% (facility)]. Palliative care was associated with both death [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 19.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18.39-21.41, p < 0.001] and LST (AOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.27-1.46, p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Palliative care is associated with both death and LST, suggesting that physicians use palliative care as a last resort after aggressive measures have been exhausted. Patients who fall would likely benefit from the early use of palliative care to align future goals of care.

Critical Care Documentation for the Dying Trauma Patient: Are We Recognizing Our Own Efforts?

BACKGROUND

Missed documentation for critical care time (CCT) for dying patients may represent a missed opportunity for physicians to account for intensive care unit (ICU) services, including end-of-life care. We hypothesized that CCT would be poorly documented for dying trauma patients.

METHODS

Adult trauma ICU patients who died between December 2014 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Critical care time was not calculated for patients with comfort care code status. Critical care time on the day prior to death and day of death was collected. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with documented CCT.

RESULTS

Of 147 patients, 43% had no CCT on day prior to death and 55% had no CCT on day of death. 82% had a family meeting within 1 day of death. Family meetings were independently associated with documented CCT (OR 3.69, P = .008); palliative care consultation was associated with decreased documented CCT (OR .24, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care time is not documented in half of eligible trauma patients who are near death. Conscious (time spent in family meetings and injury acuity) and unconscious factors (anticipated poor outcomes) likely affect documentation.

Prioritizing Communication in the Provision of Palliative Care for the Trauma Patient

Purpose of Review

Communication skills in the ICU are an essential part of the care of trauma patients. The goal of this review is to summarize key aspects of our understanding of communication with injured patients in the ICU.

Recent Findings

The need to communicate effectively and empathetically with patients and identify primary goals of care is an essential part of trauma care in the ICU. The optimal design to support complex communication in the ICU will be dependent on institutional experience and resources. The best/worst/most likely model provides a structural model for communication.

Summary

We have an imperative to improve the communication for all patients, not just those at the end of their life. A structured approach is important as is involving family at all stages of care. Communication skills can and should be taught to trainees.

End-Of-Life (EOL) Comfort Care And Withdrawal Of Life Support (WLS) Of Severely Burned Patients: A Review Of The Literature

Ensuring burn patients get appropriate care without pursuing futile treatment has always constituted a challenging balance for burn surgeons. Patients with no prospect of cure who eventually die should potentially experience more comfortable and peaceful end-of-life (EoL) care. Recognizing that death for some patients is inevitable and can only be postponed but not avoided would open the way to a more humane comfort care for such patients. Though comfort EoL services are still not universal in burns intensive care units (ICU) and disparities still exist in access, and use of palliative care appears underutilized, its integration in the burns ICU has increased over the past decade with undeniable benefits. Palliative care consultations should be considered in select burn patients for whom survival is highly unlikely.

Palliative care for pediatric intensive care patients and families

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Children with medical or surgical critical illness or injury require skillful attention to physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs, whereas their families need support and guidance in facing life-threatening or life-changing events and gut-wrenching decisions. This article reviews current evidence and best practices for integrating palliative care into the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), with a focus on surgical patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Palliative care is best integrated in a tiered approach, with primary palliative care provided by the PICU and surgical providers for all patients and families, including basic symptom management, high-quality communication, and end-of-life care. Secondary and tertiary levels of care involve unit or team-based 'champions' with additional expertise, and subspecialty palliative care teams, respectively. PICU and surgical providers should be able to provide primary palliative care, to identify patients and families for whom a palliative care consult would be helpful, and should be comfortable introducing the concept of palliative care to families.

SUMMARY

This review provides a framework and tools to enable PICU and surgical providers to integrate palliative care best practices into patient and family care.