Do Medicare Accountable Care Organizations Reduce Disparities After Spinal Fracture?

Addressing social determinants of health in orthopaedics: A systematic review of strategies and solutions

BACKGROUND

Barriers stemming from Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) are known to contribute to higher rates of complications, poor patient adherence to treatment plans, and suboptimal outcomes following orthopaedic care. While SDOH's impact has been characterized, interventions to address SDOH-related inequities in orthopaedics have not yet been optimized.

PURPOSE

The objective of the present systematic review was to identify and synthesize current peer-reviewed literature focused interventions to address SDOH-related inequities to develop optimal mitigation strategies that improve outcomes for orthopaedic patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, OVID, and CINAHL identified articles that referenced SDOH and an intervention to address inequities.

RESULTS

After screening 419 studies, 19 met inclusion criteria. Studies commonly looked at the impact of insurance policy change on the rate of the population with active insurance and associated use of elective surgery. Nine studies found that policy changes generally increased the rate of insured patients, though inequities remained for younger and racial minority patients. The relative paucity of literature in conjunction with methodological differences among studies highlights the need for further development and validation of effective interventions to address SDOH-related inequities in orthopaedics.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance expansion was the focus of the majority of included articles, finding that expansion is associated with higher rates of insured patients undergoing elective and emergent procedures, however, gaps remain for young patients and racial minorities. Further research is needed to determine effective healthcare team, healthcare system, and policy-level interventions that overcome SDOH-related barriers to optimal care and outcomes for orthopaedic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-II.

Racial Disparities in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize previous studies evaluating racial disparities in spine surgery.

METHODS

We queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for literature on racial disparities in spine surgery. Our review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses guidelines and protocol. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes, mortality, surgical management, readmissions, and length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 1753 publications were assessed. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies compared Whites (Ws) and African Americans (AAs) groups; 14 studies reported adverse outcomes for AAs. When compared with Ws, AA patients had higher odds of postoperative complications including mortality, cerebrospinal fluid leak, nervous system complications, bleeding, infection, in-hospital complications, adverse discharge disposition, and delay in diagnosis. Further, AAs were found to have increased odds of readmission and longer length of stay. Finally, AAs were found to have higher odds of nonoperative treatment for spinal cord injury, were more likely to undergo posterior approach in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and were less likely to receive cervical disk arthroplasty compared with Ws for similar indications.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review of spine literature found that when compared with W patients, AA patients had worse health outcomes. Further investigation of root causes of these racial disparities in spine surgery is warranted.

Evaluating Inpatient Hospital Charges Associated With Trauma Service Patients Participating in an Accountable Care Organization

Background

The Medicare Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Program has created a vehicle for providers who practice cost containment and exceed quality for the Medicare population. The success of ACO's nationwide have been well documented. However, there is little research evaluating if there is a cost saving benefit in trauma care with respect to participating in an ACO. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate inpatient hospital charges associated with trauma service utilization of patients participating in the ACO compared to non-ACO patients.

Methods

This case-control retrospective study includes a comparison of inpatients charges of ACO patients (cases) and general trauma patients (controls) presenting to our trauma center in Staten Island, New York from January 1st, 2019 to December 31st, 2021. A 1:1 matching of case to control was performed based on age, sex, race, and injury severity score. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS, with P < .05 as significant.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included in the ACO cohort and 80 matched in the General Trauma cohort. Patient demographics were similar. Comorbidities were similar with the exception of a higher in incidence of hypertension (75.0% vs 47.5%, P < .001) and cardiac disease (35.0% vs 17.5%, P = .012) in the ACO cohort. Both the ACO and general trauma cohort had similar Injury Severity Scores, number of visits and lenght of stay. Both charge total ($76 148.93 vs $70 916.82, P = .630) receipt total ($15 080.26 vs $14 180, P = .662) charges were similar between ACO and General Trauma patients.

Conclusion

In spite of increased incidence of hypertension and cardiac disease in ACO trauma patients, mean Injury Severity Score, number of visits, length of hospital stay, ICU admission rate and charge total was similar compared to general trauma patients presenting to our Level 1 Adult Trauma Center.

Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to systematically review the literature on racial/ethnic, insurance, and socioeconomic disparities in adult spine surgery in the United States and analyze potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

We conducted a database search of literature published between January 1990 and July 2020 using PRISMA guidelines for all studies investigating a disparity in any aspect of adult spine surgery care analyzed based on race/ethnicity, insurance status/payer, or socioeconomic status (SES).

RESULTS

Of 2679 articles identified through database searching, 775 were identified for full-text independent review by 3 authors, from which a final list of 60 studies were analyzed. Forty-three studies analyzed disparities based on patient race/ethnicity, 32 based on insurance status, and 8 based on SES. Five studies assessed disparities in access to care, 15 examined surgical treatment, 35 investigated in-hospital outcomes, and 25 explored after-discharge outcomes. Minority patients were less likely to undergo surgery but more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume provider and experience postoperative complications. White and privately insured patients generally had shorter hospital length of stay, were more likely to undergo favorable/routine discharge, and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality. After discharge, white patients reported better outcomes than did black patients. Thirty-three studies (55%) reported no disparities within at least 1 examined metric.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive systematic review underscores ongoing potential for health care disparities among adult patients in spinal surgery. We show a need for continued efforts to promote equity and cultural competency within neurologic surgery.