ROTEM as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma

Is ROTEM Diagnostic in Trauma Care Associated with Lower Mortality Rates in Bleeding Patients?—A Retrospective Analysis of 7461 Patients Derived from the TraumaRegister DGU®

Introduction: Death from uncontrolled trauma haemorrhage and subsequent trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is potentially preventable. Point-of-care devices such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM^®) are advocated to detect haemostatic derangements more rapidly than conventional laboratory diagnostics. Regarding reductions in RBC transfusion, the use of ROTEM has been described as being efficient and associated with positive outcomes in several studies. Objective: The effect of ROTEM use was assessed on three different outcome variables: (i) administration of haemostatics, (ii) rate of RBC transfusions and (iii) mortality in severely injured patients. Methods and Material: A retrospective analysis of a large data set of severely injured patients collected into the TraumaRegister DGU^® between 2009 and 2016 was conducted. The data of 7461 patients corresponded to the inclusion criteria and were subdivided into ROTEM-using and ROTEM-non-using groups. Both groups were analysed regarding (i) administration of haemostatics, (ii) rate of RBC transfusions and (iii) mortality. Results: A lower mortality rate in ROTEM-using groups was observed (p = 0.043). Furthermore, more patients received haemostatic medication when ROTEM was used. In ROTEM-using groups, there was a statistically relevant higher application of massive transfusion. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, the use of ROTEM was associated with reduced mortality and an increased application of haemostatics and RBC transfusions. Prospective evidence is needed for further evidence-based recommendations.

Coagulopathy and its effect on treatment and mortality in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The role of coagulopathy in patients with traumatic brain injury has remained elusive. In the present study, we aim to assess the prevalence of coagulopathy in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, their clinical features, and the effect of coagulopathy on treatment and mortality.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective single-center cohort of consecutive patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage treated at Helsinki University Hospital between 01 January and 31 December 2010. We compared clinical and radiological parameters in patients with and without coagulopathy defined as drug- or disease-induced, i.e., antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication at a therapeutic dose, thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100 E9/L), international normalized ratio > 1.2, or thromboplastin time < 60%. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Logistic regression analysis allowed to assess for factors associated with coagulopathy and mortality.

RESULTS

Of our 505 patients (median age 61 years, 65.5% male), 206 (40.8%) had coagulopathy. Compared to non-coagulopathy patients, coagulopathy patients had larger hemorrhage volumes (mean 140.0 mL vs. 98.4 mL, p < 0.001) and higher 30-day mortality (18.9% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.003). In multivariable analysis, older age, lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, larger hemorrhage volume, and conservative treatment were independently associated with mortality. Surgical treatment was associated with lower mortality in both patients with and without coagulopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Coagulopathy was more frequent in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage presenting larger hemorrhage volumes compared to non-coagulopathy patients but was not independently associated with higher 30-day mortality. Hematoma evacuation, in turn, was associated with lower mortality irrespective of coagulopathy.

"TEG talk": expanding clinical roles for thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry

Viscoelastic assays (VEAs) that include thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry add value to the investigation of coagulopathies and goal-directed management of bleeding by providing a complete picture of clot formation, strength, and lysis in whole blood that includes the contribution of platelets, fibrinogen, and coagulation factors. Conventional coagulation assays have several limitations, such as their lack of correlation with bleeding and hypercoagulability; their inability to reflect the contribution of platelets, factor XIII, and plasmin during clot formation and lysis; and their slow turnaround times. VEA-guided transfusion algorithms may reduce allogeneic blood exposure during and after cardiac surgery and in the emergency management of trauma-induced coagulopathy and hemorrhage. However, the popularity of VEAs for other indications is driven largely by extrapolation of evidence from cardiac surgery, by the drawbacks of conventional coagulation assays, and by institution-specific preferences. Robust diagnostic studies validating and standardizing diagnostic cutoffs for VEA parameters and randomized trials comparing VEA-guided algorithms with standard care on clinical outcomes are urgently needed. Lack of such studies represents the biggest barrier to defining the role and impact of VEA in clinical care.