Impaired Handgrip Strength Does Not Predict Postoperative Morbidity in Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

Effect of perioperative branched chain amino acids supplementation in liver cancer patients undergoing surgical intervention: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Branched chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation has been associated with favourable outcomes in liver malignancies requiring definitive resection or liver transplantation. Currently, there are no updated systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of perioperative BCAA supplementation in patients undergoing surgery for liver cancer.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of perioperative BCAA supplementation in patients undergoing surgery for liver cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized control trials and observational studies was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate the effect of perioperative BCAA supplementation compared to standard in-hospital diet, in liver cancer patients undergoing surgery. Clinical outcomes were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed on relevant outcomes.

RESULTS

16 studies including 1389 patients were included. Perioperative BCAA administration was associated with reduced postoperative infection [risk ratio (RR) = 0.58 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.39 to 0.84, P = 0.005] and ascites [RR = 0.57 (95%CI: 0.38 to 0.85), P = 0.005]. There was also a reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -3.03 d (95%CI: -5.49 to -0.57), P = 0.02] and increase in body weight [WMD = 1.98 kg (95%CI: 0.35 to 3.61, P = 0.02]. No significant differences were found in mortality, cancer recurrence and overall survival. No significant safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative BCAA administration is efficacious in reducing postoperative infection, ascites, LOS, and increases body weight in liver cancer patients undergoing surgical resection.

Factors Influencing Postoperative Recovery Time of Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore the factors associated with prolonged enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) time in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective of patients with gastric cancer who received ERAS at our hospital between 01/2014 and 01/2022. The outcome was prolonged ERAS time. Factors associated with prolonged ERAS time of patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 663 patients, 182 (27.6%) patients had a prolonged ERAS time. The postoperative time to the first flatus time was 2.8 ± 1.2 days. There were 41 (6.2%) patients with intestinal obstruction, 25 (3.8%) with abdominal infection, and four (0.5%) with anastomotic leakage. The multivariable analysis showed that age >80 years (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.31-4.40, P = 0.048), laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.95, P = 0.035), intraoperative jejunostomy (OR = 334.60, 95% CI: 2.81-39,831.90, P = 0.017), postoperative time to the first flatus time (OR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.23-11.68, P = 0.021), total gastrectomy (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.94, P = 0.044), and patient compliance with ERAS (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0-0.09, P < 0.001) were independently associated with prolonged ERAS time.

CONCLUSIONS

Age >80 years, laparoscopic surgery, intraoperative jejunostomy, postoperative time to the first flatus time, total gastrectomy, and patient compliance with ERAS might be factors associated with prolonged ERAS time in gastric cancer patients.

Outcomes of an outpatient home-based prehabilitation program before pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Prehabilitation aims for preoperative optimisation to reduce postoperative complications. However, there is a paucity of data on its use in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Thus, this study aims to evaluate the outcomes of a home-based outpatient prehabilitation program (PP) versus no-PP in patients undergoing PD.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent PP versus no-PP before elective PD from January 2016 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria for PP were < 65 years or 65-74 years with FRAIL score < 3. No-PP included dietician, case manager and anesthesia review. PP included additional physiotherapy sessions, caregiver training and interim phone consultation. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate length of stay (LOS), morbidity, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (PP: n = 50 [70.4%]; no-PP: n = 21 [29.6%]) were included in this study. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-72 years). Majority (n = 58 [81.7%]) of patients underwent open surgery. Ductal adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (49.3%). Patient demographics were comparable between both groups. Overall median LOS was 11.0 days (IQR: 8.0-17.0 days). Compared to no-PP, PP was not independently associated with reduced intra-abdominal collections (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-6.11, p = 0.532), major morbidity (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.09-19.47; p = 0.845) or 30-day readmission (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 0.26-38.27; p = 0.365). There was one (1.4%) 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our outpatient PP with unsupervised exercise regimes did not improve postoperative outcomes following elective PD.

Impact of Preoperative Handgrip Strength on Postoperative Outcome after Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Patients

In this study, we investigated whether preoperative low-handgrip strength (HGS) defined by the Asian working group for sarcopenia could be a predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. A total of 327 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for c-stage I-III primary gastric cancer with pre-operative HGS records were included. The cut-off values of HGS were defined as 28 kg for males and 18 kg for females, with values below and above the cut-off defined as low-HGS and high-HGS, respectively. The primary outcome was infectious complications. We compared the postoperative outcomes of the groups after adjusting for the background using propensity score matching. Of the 327 patients, 246 (75.2%) and 81 (24.8%) were in the high and low-HGS groups, respectively. After adjusting for background, there were 57 patients in both groups. After matching, the low-HGS group had significantly more infectious complications (17.5% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis of infectious complications in the low-HGS group demonstrated chronic kidney disease and diabetes as independent risk factors (odds ratio 4.390, 95% confidence interval 1.120-17.20, p = 0.034). Preoperative low-HGS according to the Asian criteria was associated with infectious complications after gastrectomy. Chronic kidney disease and diabetes were independent risk factors for infectious complications among patients with low-HGS.

A randomized controlled trial on pain, grip strength, and functionality in lateral elbow pain: Mulligan vs muscle energy techniques

BACKGROUND

Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is one of the most common lesions of the upper extremity. The level of evidence from studies on LET treatment protocols is insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of mobilization with movement (MWM) and muscle energy technique (MET) on pain, grip strength, and functionality in patients diagnosed with LET.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with LET aged 30-55 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: MWM, MET, and control group. The control group received a 4-week home exercise program. In addition to the home exercise program in the MWM group, 12 sessions of MWM and 12 sessions of MET were performed in the MET group. Participants' pain, grip strength, and functionality were assessed before and after the study.

RESULTS

After the treatment period, greater improvement in pain, grip strength, finger strength, and functionality were observed in the MWM and MET groups than in the control group (p< 0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found between the MWM and MET groups (p> 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that MWM and MET, used in addition to home exercises, can be used to relieve pain and increase grip strength, finger strength, and functionality.

Perioperative steroid administration reduces overall complications in patients undergoing liver resection: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection (HR) results in an inflammatory response that can be modified by perioperative steroid administration. However, it remains to be determined if this response's attenuation translates to a reduction in complications.

AIM

To evaluate if perioperative administration of steroids reduces complications following HR.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to evaluate the effect of perioperative steroid (compared to placebo or no intervention) use in patients undergoing HR. Clinical outcomes were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

8 RCTs including 590 patients were included. Perioperative steroid administration was associated with significant reduction in postoperative complications [odds ratios: 0.58; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.35-0.97, P = 0.04]. There was also improvement in biochemical and inflammatory markers, including serum bilirubin on postoperative day 1 [MD: -0.27; 95%CI: (-0.47, -0.06), P = 0.01], C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 [MD: -4.89; 95%CI: (-5.83, -3.95), P < 0.001], and interleukin-6 on postoperative day 1 [MD: -54.84; 95%CI: (-63.91, -45.76), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Perioperative steroids administration in HR may reduce overall complications, postoperative bilirubin, and inflammation. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and duration and patient selection.