Using Local Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Repair Reduces Complications in Older Patients

Trans rectus sheath extra-peritoneal procedure (TREPP) for inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia with sedation in the outpatient clinic: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) is an open procedure in which the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and is therefore associated with less chronic post-operative inguinal pain. TREPP is primarily performed under general or spinal anesthesia, however, it is also possible to perform under sedation and local anesthesia with potentially advantages. This retrospective feasibility pilot study investigates the safety and efficiency of TREPP under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic in comparison with Lichtenstein.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, all patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic operation theatre were assessed. 34 patients in the TREPP group and 213 patients in the Lichtenstein group were included. Outcomes were complications, operating time, theatre time, and early inguinal hernia recurrence within 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

No significant differences in complications such as wound infection, hematoma, seroma, urine retention and early recurrence between TREPP and Lichtenstein were found. Post-operative pain at 8 weeks was not significantly higher after Lichtenstein (8.8% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.22). Operating time (21.0 (IQR: 16.0-27.3) minutes vs. 39.0 (IQR: 31.5-45.0) minutes, P < 0.001) and theatre time (37.5 (IQR: 30.8-42.5) minutes vs. 54.0 (IQR: 46.0-62.0) minutes, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter for TREPP.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study showed that TREPP appears to be feasible to perform safely under local anesthesia with comparable complication rates and substantially shorter operation time than Lichtenstein. These results justify further research with a larger study population and a longer period of follow up in order to provide firm conclusions.

New Frontiers in Wide-Awake Surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Explain the most important benefits of wide-awake surgery to patients. 2. Tumesce large parts of the body with minimal pain local anesthesia injection technique to eliminate the need for sedation for many operations. 3. Apply tourniquet-free surgery to upper and lower limb operations to avoid the sedation required to tolerate tourniquet pain. 4. Move many procedures out of the main operating room to minor procedure rooms with no increase in infection rates to decrease unnecessary cost and solid waste in surgery.

SUMMARY

Three disruptive innovations are changing the landscape of surgery: (1) minimally painful injection of large-volume, low-concentration tumescent local anesthesia eliminates the need for sedation for many procedures over the entire body; (2) epinephrine vasoconstriction in tumescent local anesthesia is a good alternative to the tourniquet and proximal nerve blocks in extremity surgery (sedation for tourniquet pain is no longer required for many procedures); and (3) evidence-based sterility and the elimination of sedation enable many larger procedures to move out of the main operating room into minor procedure rooms with no increase in infection rates. This continuing medical education article explores some of the new frontiers in which these changes affect surgery all over the body.

Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Open Inguinal Hernia Repair and Rives-Stoppa Repair: A Comprehensive Review

Inguinal hernias present a significant healthcare burden globally, necessitating effective surgical management. This comprehensive review evaluates two primary surgical techniques for managing bilateral inguinal hernias: bilateral open inguinal hernia and Rives-Stoppa repair. This review aims to provide insights into optimal surgical approaches through a comparative analysis of these techniques, including examining advantages, disadvantages, outcomes, and factors influencing technique selection. Bilateral open inguinal hernia repair offers simplicity and familiarity, while Rives-Stoppa repair may provide advantages such as reduced recurrence rates and postoperative complications. The findings underscore the importance of considering patient-specific factors, surgeon expertise, and hospital resources when selecting the optimal approach. Further research is warranted to conduct long-term comparative studies and explore innovations in surgical techniques and materials, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and advancing inguinal hernia repair practices.

Comparison of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic TAPP versus conventional laparoscopic TAPP in the elderly: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

To analyze and compare the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP(SILS-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic TAPP(CL-TAPP) in the treatment of senile inguinal hernia.

METHODS

From January 2019 to June 2021, a total of 221 elderly patients (≥60 years old) with inguinal hernia received SILS-TAPP and CL-TAPP in General Surgery Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University. The perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and follow-up of the two groups were compared to explore the feasibility and superiority of SILS-TAPP in the treatment of inguinal hernia in the elderly.

RESULTS

There was no difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups. The mean operation time (28.6 ± 4.2 min vs 28.2 ± 5.3 min) in the SILS-TAPP group was not significantly different from that in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ = 0.623), and there was no significant increase in hospital costs(Ρ = 0.748). The intraoperative blood loss (7.4 ± 3.4 ml), VAS score on the postoperative day (2.2 ± 0.7), mean time of resuming activity (8.2 ± 1.9 h) and mean postoperative hospital stay (0.8 ± 0.2 d) in the SILS-TAPP group were better than those in the CL-TAPP group (Ρ < 0. 05).There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of intraoperative (Ρ = 0.128) and postoperative complications (Ρ = 0.125) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery TAPP (SILS-TAPP) is feasible and effective in elderly patients, providing a new alternative surgical method for patients who can tolerate general anesthesia.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcome in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair Using Regional With General Versus General Anesthesia Alone: A Single Center Study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures. It has been performed under local, regional, or general anesthesia. We hypothesized that using regional plus general anesthesia rather than general anesthesia alone would improve outcomes in neonates and pediatric patients undergoing hernia repair.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study, including all pediatric patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair from 2015-2021. We divided patients into two groups. The first group was labeled "general anesthesia" (GA), while the second group was labeled "combined general and regional anesthesia" (GA+RA). We compared both groups in terms of demographic data, intraoperative outcome variables, and postoperative outcome variables.

RESULTS

 212 children fulfilled the study criteria, with 57 in the GA group and 155 in the GA+RA group. Demographic and preoperative data were comparable between both groups except for age, which was 60.3±49.4 months in the GA group versus 26.7±33.13 months in the GA+RA group (p<.0001). Outcome variables demonstrated statistically significant improvement in postoperative pain occurrence, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation in the GA+RA group in comparison to the GA group with P values of 0.031, 0.02, 0.005, and 0.02, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using regional and general anesthesia techniques rather than general anesthesia alone is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation. Further studies are still warranted to validate our conclusions.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Importance

Advocates of laparoscopic surgery argue that all inguinal hernias, including initial and unilateral ones, should be repaired laparoscopically. Prior work suggests outcomes of open repair are improved by using local rather than general anesthesia, but no prior studies have compared laparoscopic surgery with open repair under local anesthesia.

Objective

To evaluate postoperative outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair under general or local anesthesia compared with laparoscopic repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study identified 107 073 patients in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent unilateral initial inguinal hernia repair from 1998 to 2019. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022.

Exposures

Patients were divided into 3 groups for comparison: (1) open repair with local anesthesia (n = 22 333), (2) open repair with general anesthesia (n = 75 104), and (3) laparoscopic repair with general anesthesia (n = 9636).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Operative time and postoperative morbidity were compared using quantile regression and inverse probability propensity weighting. A 2-stage least-squares regression and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to quantify and address bias from unmeasured confounding in this observational study.

Results

Of 107 073 included patients, 106 529 (99.5%) were men, and the median (IQR) age was 63 (55-71) years. Compared with open repair with general anesthesia, laparoscopic repair was associated with a nonsignificant 0.15% (95% CI, -0.39 to 0.09; P = .22) reduction in postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in complications between laparoscopic surgery and open repair with local anesthesia (-0.05%; 95% CI, -0.34 to 0.28; P = .70). Operative time was similar for the laparoscopic and open general anesthesia groups (4.31 minutes; 95% CI, 0.45-8.57; P = .048), but operative times were significantly longer for laparoscopic compared with open repair under local anesthesia (10.42 minutes; 95% CI, 5.80-15.05; P < .001). Sensitivity analysis and 2-stage least-squares regression demonstrated that these findings were robust to bias from unmeasured confounding.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, laparoscopic and open repair with local anesthesia were reasonable options for patients with initial unilateral inguinal hernias, and the decision should be made considering both patient and surgeon factors.

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided triple nerve block (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral) versus unilateral subarachnoid block for inguinal hernia surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The present study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided triple nerve block (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral) versus unilateral subarachnoid block for adult male patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty ASA I-III adult male patients > 18 years old, scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia surgery were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 patients each. In Group A ( n = 30) the patients received ultrasound-guided nerve block (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral), and in Group B ( n = 30) the patients received unilateral subarachnoid block. The primary outcome was to assess postoperative analgesic efficacy (visual analogue scale [VAS] scores at rest and during coughing/ambulation). The secondary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesia with morphine, the total dose of morphine used as rescue analgesia, urinary retention, time to first micturition, time to first unassisted walking, and time to discharge from the surgical recovery room.

RESULTS

The mean pain scores at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during rest and during coughing/ambulation were significantly lower in Group A when compared to patients in Group B ( P < 0.001). There was no requirement for rescue analgesic opioids in Group A ( P < 0.001). Mean time to first micturition and mobilization occurred earlier in Group A, leading to early discharge from the recovery room ( P < 0.001). No major side effects were observed in any of the study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided triple nerve block technique can be used as a sole anaesthetic technique for inguinal hernia surgery because it not only provides optimal anaesthesia intra-operatively but also has a favourable analgesic and opioid-sparing efficacy in the early postoperative period with minimal adverse effects.

How to start an awake spine program: Protocol and illustrative cases

Surgical techniques and technology are steadily improving, thereby expanding the pool of patients amenable for spine surgery. The growing and aging population in the United States further contributes to the increase in spine surgery cases. Traditionally, spine surgery is performed under general anesthesia. However, awake spinal surgery has recently gained traction due to evidence of decreased perioperative risks, postoperative opioid consumption, and costs, specifically in lumbar spine procedures. Despite the potential for improving outcomes, awake spine surgery has received resistance and has yet to become adopted at many healthcare systems. We aim to provide the fundamental steps in facilitating the initiation of awake spine surgery programs. We also present case reports of two patients who underwent awake spine surgery and reported improved clinical outcomes.

•

Starting an Awake Spine program is feasible and may improve clinical outcomes.

•

Awake Spine Surgery is associated with reduced cardiopulmonary complications and opioid consumption.

•

Awake Spine Surgery is effective at reducing LOS, HAC, and cost of surgery.

•

Awake Spine Surgery increases the pool of patients eligible for spinal procedures.

Tension-free inguinal hernia repair with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in elderly high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is still being studied today because it is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the world and is used in people of all ages. Although many centers use spinal anesthetic to treat inguinal hernias, complications such as hypotension from peripheral vasodilation, delayed mobilization from paralysis, urine retention and post-spinal headache might occur. Regional blocks are a significant component of multimodal anaesthesia that promotes postoperative recovery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthetic block technique that is effective on the parietal peritoneum, skin, and anterior abdominal wall.

METHODS

This study aimed to show that TAP block administration may be done safely without the use of an extra anesthetic treatment, especially in older patients who may experience complications from general or spinal anesthesia. Without either general, spinal or epidural anesthetic, we conducted a tension-free - Lichtenstein - inguinal hernia repair operation with only TAP block application. This retrospective case-control study received ethics committee approval (decision number 21-5T/108). Between September and December 2019, patients who underwent elective Lichtenstein hernia repair in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

We think that inguinal hernia repair can be safely performed with only TAP block and that TAP block application has fewer anaesthesia-related complications such as postspinal headache and urinary retention compared with spinal anaesthesia, and that it can be used as an alternative to spinal anaesthesia in patients who cannot tolerate general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Even hernia surgery can be very challenging in patients with advanced age and comorbidities. We wanted to show the feasibility of the TAP block method as an alternative to anaesthesia in such patients.

Perioperative Pulmonary Support of the Elderly

Purpose of Review

With the projected increase in the geriatric patient population, it is of the utmost importance to understand and optimize conditions in the perioperative period to ensure the best surgical outcome. Age-associated changes in respiratory physiology affect the surgical management of geriatric patients. This review focuses on perioperative pulmonary management of elderly individuals.

Recent Findings

The physiological changes associated with aging include both physical and biochemical alterations that are detrimental to pulmonary function. There is an increased prevalence of chronic lung disease such as COPD and interstitial lung disease which can predispose patients to postoperative pulmonary complications. Additionally, elderly patients, especially those with chronic lung disease, are at risk for frailty. Screening tools have been developed to evaluate risk and aid in the judicious selection of patients for surgical procedures. The concept of "prehabilitation" has been developed to best prepare patients for surgery and may be more influential in the reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications than postoperative rehabilitation. Understanding the age-associated changes in metabolism of drugs has led to dose adjustments in the intraoperative and postoperative periods, reducing respiratory depression and lung protective ventilation and minimally invasive procedures have yielded reductions in postoperative pulmonary complications.

Summary

The perioperative management of the geriatric population can be divided into three key areas: preoperative risk mitigation, intraoperative considerations, and postoperative management. Preoperative considerations include patient selection and thorough history and physical, along with smoking cessation and prehabilitation in a subset of patients. Operative aspects include careful selection of anesthetic agents, lung protective ventilation, and choice of surgical procedure. Postoperative management should focus on selective use of agents that may contribute to respiratory depression and encouragement of rehabilitation.

Predictors of long-term mortality in octogenarian veterans following inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

While elective inguinal hernia repair (IHR) in octogenarians carries a low 30-day mortality rate, long-term outcomes are uncharted. If on average, veteran octogenarians are expected to succumb to pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease within a year of diagnosis, watchful waiting might be advisable. This study interrogated long-term mortality and its predictors following elective IHR in veteran octogenarians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 109 veterans (≥ 80 years of age), ten of which were nonagenarians who had an elective IHR. Data were dichotomized between deceased vs. non-deceased patients for univariable and multivariable analyses. Patient characteristics were also assessed in patients undergoing general (GA) vs. local (LA) anesthesia and corrected for unilateral repair and age. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated in corrected and uncorrected cohorts receiving GA vs. LA.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis, 46 (45.0%) octogenarians were deceased. The average time to death following IHR was 3.7 ± 2.9 years [range (37 days-12.4 years)]. Univariable analysis showed renal disease (19.9% vs. 5.3%), operative time (67.9 ± 29.0 vs. 56.1 ± 14.4 min) and use of GA (73.0% vs. 34.8%) associated with long-term mortality (all p < 0.01). Renal disease [odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) 4.1 (1.2-13.8)] and use of GA [5.0 (2.0-10.0)] were independent predictors of mortality. Patients undergoing LA (n = 62) were older, were more likely to have cardiac disease, and had a higher ASA compared to patients receiving GA (n = 47). After correcting for age, cardiac disease and higher ASA remained more common in patients submitting to LA. Long-term mortality was significantly higher in both matched and unmatched octogenarians undergoing GA.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarian veterans with a high burden of comorbid conditions are unlikely to experience short-term mortality because of their pre-existing conditions. Inguinal hernia repair should be offered to octogenarian veterans, but GA should be avoided whenever possible.

Results of Shouldice hernia repair after 18 years of follow-up in all the patients

PURPOSE

Evaluate the long-term efficacy of the Shouldice technique performed by non-specialized surgeons and also to reflex on the quality parameters necessary to safely assess hernia recurrence rates.

METHODS

During 3 years, a prospective study was conducted in 243 adult men who underwent surgery for primary inguinal hernias by 13 junior surgeons with an interest in hernia surgery. Using local anesthesia, a classic 4 step Shouldice repair, with polypropylene or polyester, was performed. All patients were followed for 18 years. The follow-up met the nine quality criteria proposed by the authors.

RESULTS

At 18 years, 80.2% of patients were followed and only 6.5% were lost. There were 7 recurrences in the first 10 years, 5 of them secondary to a direct hernia, and the same after 18 years. The recurrence rate was 2.88%. Tolerance of the local anesthesia was excellent in 91.4%of patients and, after 3 years, the pain was considered moderate or severe in 4 patients (1.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to incorporate more demanding criteria in the assessment of recurrence, to give more valid results. The Shouldice technique remains a useful technique today not only in patients under 30 years of age, and in the absence of risk factors, but also in cases of intolerance, patient rejection or absence of mesh. In addition, it provides the clinical and economic advantages of being possible to perform it under local anesthesia.