Barriers to Post-Discharge Monitoring and Patient-Clinician Communication: A Qualitative Study

Utilization of mobile surgical units to address surgical needs in remote African communities: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Accessing surgical care is of profound significance that face remote African communities due to insufficient healthcare means and infrastructure. Deploying mobile surgical units (MSUs) have present a potential solution to underserved populations in rural Africa to address said issues. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the role of MSU utilization in remote African communities to meet surgical needs and evaluate how this has affected healthcare provision.

METHODS

To identify studies focusing on the dissemination of MSUs in remote African communities covered countries such as Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Nigeria, and Ethiopia, and we employed a plethora of electronic search databases including PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus and other relevant literature sources. Inclusion criteria were studies on MSUs in remote African communities, while exclusion criteria involved non- African or urban-focused studies.

RESULTS

This review highlights that the current literature depicts that application of MSUs bring a positive impact in providing timely and quality surgical care to remote African communities. Frequent interventions, such as minor surgeries, obstetric procedures, and major trauma control, have been performed on MSUs. In settings with shortages of human resources and clinical equipments, these units have improved patient outcomes, reduced healthcare disparities, and increased access to emergency surgical care. While challenges such as financial constraints and surgical sustainability have been noted, the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and the advantages of MSU deployment often help mitigate these obstacles.

CONCLUSION

A lack of surgical care for individuals living in remote African domiciles may be addressed via MSU application. Through delivering fundamental surgical services directly to underserved populations, MSUs may potentially prevent disabilities, save countless lives, and enhance overall health outcomes in African remote communities. To guarantee the long-term feasibility and sustainability of MSU programs in Africa, however, more funding must be allocated to infrastructure, supplies, and relevant education.

Patient-Centeredness in the Perioperative Period-A Rapid Review of Current Research

PURPOSE

The indication of surgery is a critical moment in a person's life implying different needs, feelings, or fears. The aim of the current literature review was to elucidate the prevailing utilization of the concepts 'patient-centeredness' and 'person-centeredness' within the perioperative period.

DESIGN

A rapid review design.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus (Elsevier), American Psychological Association PsychInfo (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ovid), and Cochrane Library in December 2022. Rayyan software was used to assess the articles. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to evaluate the quality of the included articles. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across the articles.

FINDINGS

The electronic database searches identified 1,967 articles. A total of 12 articles were assessed in full text against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, a total of seven articles were included. The articles originated from six countries, employed disparate methodological approaches, and featured a heterogeneous array of participants representing various health care settings. Patient-centeredness held the mantle as the most prominently used concept across the seven articles, whereas person-centeredness emerged as the least frequently explored concept. One theme was identified across the articles; Preparedness. This was related to shared decision-making and information pre, peri- and postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid review suggests that patient preparedness, particularly through shared decision-making and providing information, is a recurring theme in the limited studies on patient- or centeredness in the perioperative context. The fact that only one single study focuses on person-centered care underscores the pressing need for a comprehensive re-evaluation of modern perioperative care.

Patient participation in surgical wound care in acute care settings: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections can significantly impact postoperative recovery. Patient participation, which involves patients actively engaging in wound care, has been linked to improved healing and reduced wound complications. However, there is limited synthesis of the literature that explores the patient's role and participation in the context of surgical wound care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' perceptions of how they participate in surgical wound care, within 30 days post-operation.

DESIGN

An integrative review guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363669).

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Complete), and EMBASE (Elsevier) databases in October 2023, supplemented by forward and backward citation searching.

REVIEW METHODS

Based on a priori eligibility criteria, two authors independently screened articles to select relevant studies. The quality of the included research articles was critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A descriptive and thematic synthesis was used to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

Of the 4701 records screened for titles and abstracts, 25 studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs were included. Three key themes were identified. In theme 1, 'I am healing: how my wound shapes me and my journey,' physical symptoms, psychological factors and previous experiences significantly influenced patients' engagement in wound care. Theme 2, 'Taking charge of my healing: my active engagement in wound care' described how patient participation in surgical wound care goes beyond clinical procedures and can include the use of technology and holistic self-care. Finally, theme 3, 'Navigating the path to recovery: How others shape my experience' showed that effective communication is crucial for promoting participation, yet issues like inadequate information can leave patients unprepared for wound management.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights opportunities to personalise and prioritise a patient-oriented approach to surgical wound care. Clinicians and educators should adopt an individualised approach by tailoring patient participation based on patient factors (i.e. physical symptoms) and adopt patient-centred communication approaches. Researchers should focus on exploring approaches to self-care and technology, as these approaches may enhance patient participation in wound care.

Divergent Trends in Postoperative Length of Stay and Postdischarge Complications over Time

BACKGROUND

There is a push toward shorter length of stay (LOS) after surgery by hospitals, payers, and policymakers. However, the extent to which these changes have shifted the occurrence of complications to the postdischarge setting is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate changes in LOS and postdischarge complications over time and (2) assess factors associated with postdischarge complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent surgery across five specialties (colorectal, esophageal, hepatopancreatobiliary [HPB], gynecology, and urology) were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) procedure-targeted database (2014-2019). Trends in the proportion of postdischarge complications within 30 days of surgery and predictors of postdischarge complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 538,172 patients evaluated, median LOS decreased from 3 (2014) to 2 days (2019) (p < 0.001). Overall, 12.2% of patients experienced a 30-day complication, with 50.4% occurring postdischarge. with the highest in hysterectomy (80.9%), prostatectomy (74.6%), and cystectomy (54.6%). The overall postoperative complication decreased, but the proportion of postdischarge complications increased from 44.6% (2014) to 56.4% (2019) (p < 0.001), including surgical site infection (superficial/deep/organ space/wound dehiscence), other infection (pneumonia/urinary tract infection/sepsis), cardiovascular (myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest/stroke), and venous thromboembolism. Factors associated with an increased odds of postdischarge complications included Hispanic or other race, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, dependent functional status, increased body mass index, higher wound class, inpatient complication, longer operation, and procedure type (HPB/colorectal/hysterectomy/esophagectomy, vs. prostatectomy) (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive retrospective analysis across five representative surgical specialties highlighted that although LOS has decreased over time, the proportion of postdischarge complications has increased over time. Focusing on the development of a comprehensive, proactive, postdischarge monitoring system to better identify and manage postdischarge complications is necessary.

Electronic health record-integrated questionnaires in colorectal surgery patients as a new standard: Could preoperative bowel function be used to predict postoperative patient-reported outcomes?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported bowel function has been previously shown to correlate with quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after colorectal surgery. We examined the relationship between preoperative patient-reported bowel function and postoperative symptom reporting using an electronic health record-integrated symptom management (eSyM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent major abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer at a single institution were included. Preoperative bowel function was assessed prospectively using the validated colorectal functional outcome (COREFO) questionnaire. Patients with electronic portal access received automated eSyM questionnaires after discharge. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between COREFO scores and eSyM use.

RESULTS

169 patients underwent surgery between April 2020 and June 2022 (median age 64, 46.7% female). 148 completed COREFO questionnaires preoperatively; 54 (36.5%) had scores ≥15. Of the 108 patients with portal access, 67.6% used eSyM postoperatively. Among users, 72.3% (47/73) reported severe symptoms. Those with COREFO scores ≥15 were more likely to use eSyM (80.0% vs. 62.7%) though this difference was not significant (p = 0.079).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that eSyM utilization regardless of preoperative baseline bowel function was high in this cohort of colorectal surgery patients. This suggests that electronically captured PROs is an effective way for patients to communicate symptoms to their care teams in a postsurgical setting.

Evaluation of emergency department treat-and-release encounters after major gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) utilization after gastrointestinal cancer operations is poorly characterized. Our study objectives were to determine the incidence of, reasons for, and predictors of ED treat-and-release encounters after gastrointestinal cancer operations.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective esophageal, hepatobiliary, gastric, pancreatic, small intestinal, or colorectal operations for cancer were identified in the 2015-2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and State Emergency Department Databases for New York, Maryland, and Florida. The primary outcomes were the incidence of ED treat-and-release encounters and readmissions within 30 days of discharge.

RESULTS

Among 51 527 patients at 406 hospitals, 4047 (7.9%) had an ED treat-and-release encounter, and 5573 (10.8%) had an ED encounter with readmission. In total, 40.7% of ED encounters were treat-and-release encounters. ED treat-and-release encounters were most frequently for pain (12.0%), device/ostomy complaints (11.7%), or wound complaints (11.4%). ED treat-and-release encounters predictors included non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.37) and Medicare (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.40) or Medicaid (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.62-2.40) coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

ED treat-and-release encounters are common after major gastrointestinal operations, making up nearly half of postdischarge ED encounters. The reasons for ED treat-and-release encounters differ from those for ED encounters with readmissions.

Discharge process challenges of an academic vascular surgery service: A qualitative study

Vascular surgery patients have a high incidence of unplanned hospital readmissions and complications. Previous research has not fully examined specific elements of the hospital discharge process for vascular surgery patients to identify issues that may contribute to readmissions. The objective of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore challenges identified by healthcare providers and patients regarding the discharge process from an academic vascular surgery service. Data were collected from eight focus group interviews and analyzed for relevant themes. Patients and healthcare providers identified several challenges within the standard discharge process, including ineffective communication, insufficient time for discharge education, and limitations accessing providers with post-discharge concerns. These obstacles may be ameliorated in part by specialized coordinators, caregiver support, and use of adaptive strategies outside of the current discharge process. The discharge challenges described by study participants likely contribute to adverse post-hospitalization outcomes, including unplanned hospital readmissions. A multifaceted approach that incorporates standardized discharge processes, as well as informal problem-solving strategies, is recommended to improve hospital discharge and outcomes for vascular surgery patients.

Articulation of postsurgical patient discharges: coordinating care transitions from hospital to home

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery patients are at high risk for readmissions after hospital discharge- few of these readmissions are preventable by mitigating barriers underlying discharge care transitions. An in-depth evaluation of the nuances underpinning the discharge process and the use of tools to support the process, along with insights on patient and clinician experiences, can inform the design of evidence-based strategies to reduce preventable readmissions.

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives are 3-fold: elucidate perceived factors affecting the postsurgical discharge care transitions of cardiac surgery patients going home; highlight differences among clinician and patient perceptions of the postsurgical discharge experiences, and ascertain the impact of these transitions on patient recovery at home.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multi-stakeholder study using mixed methods, including general observations, patient shadowing, chart reviews, clinician interviews, and follow-up telephone patient and caregiver surveys/interviews. We followed thematic and content analyses.

FINDINGS

Participants included 49 patients, 6 caregivers, and 27 clinicians. We identified interdependencies between the predischarge preparation, discharge education, and postdischarge follow-up care phases that must be coordinated for effective discharge care transitions. We identified several factors that could lead to fragmented discharges, including limited preoperative preparation, ill-defined discharge education, and postoperative plans. To address these, clinicians often performed behind-the-scenes work, including offering informal preoperative preparation, tailoring discharge education, and personalizing postdischarge follow-up plans. As a result, majority of patients reported high satisfaction with care transitions and their positive impact on their home recovery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Articulation work by clinicians (ie, behind the scenes work) is critical for ensuring safety, care continuity, and overall patient experience during care transitions. We discuss key evidence-based considerations for re-engineering postsurgical discharge workflows and re-designing discharge interventions.