Just Stick a Scope in: Laparoscopic Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement in the Pediatric Reoperative Abdomen

Laparoscopic-Assisted Peritoneal Access in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The most common treatment of hydrocephalus is ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting. Peritoneal access is commonly conducted through an open laparotomy, but laparoscopic peritoneal access is gaining popularity. Many studies have reported the benefits of minimally invasive laparoscopic peritoneal access, but there is no consensus on its use. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare open laparotomy vs laparoscopic peritoneal access in VP shunting.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using 3 databases. Twelve studies included only adults, 3 included only pediatric patients, and 3 included both adults and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

Compared with open laparotomy, laparoscopic peritoneal access was associated with a reduction in distal shunt failure (6.1% vs 2.2%, P = .01), operative time (69.4 vs 56.3 minutes, P < .001), and length of stay (LOS) (9.6 vs 7.3 days, P < .001). There were no differences in proximal shunt failure, total shunt failure, intraoperative complications, or infection rate. In the pediatric population, laparoscopic access was associated with a reduced LOS (7.8 vs 5.9 days, P < .001). Heterogeneity was high but explained by the varying study populations and techniques.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic peritoneal access for VP shunt insertion is associated with improved outcomes, including reduced distal shunt failure, reduced operative time, and reduced hospital LOS, when compared with open laparotomy and should be considered for shunt insertion. Additional studies are necessary to further determine the benefit of laparoscopic access, especially in the pediatric population.

Influence of distal insertion technique, valve selection, and patient demographics on shunt survival in ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion: A retrospective analysis of an Australian case series

BACKGROUND

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion is a means of diverting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for management of hydrocephalus. Revision rates, operating time, and length of stay (LOS) following laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter have been mixed. There are limited data on the role of adhesiolysis during VP shunt insertion. Valve characteristics have also been shown to influence patient outcomes. There is a paucity of Australian data reporting on the effect of these variables on shunt outcomes. We aimed to study patient demographics, indications, and surgical and instrument variables in the Australian context.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-centre analysis of VP shunts inserted in adults via an open or laparoscopic technique. Data on patient demographics and surgery characteristics were collected from the hospital medical records and the Australasian Shunt Registry. The primary outcome was shunt revision rate and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, operating time and LOS, and shunt survivability.

RESULTS

Fifty-six participants were eligible for analysis. The overall revision rate was 14.3 %, which was lower than the national average. The distal catheter revision rate was 0 %. Laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter was shown to significantly reduce operating time (70.4 min in the open group and 50.7 min in the laparoscopic group, p < 0.001). This was demonstrated across different aetiologies, and when controlling for age and valve-type (p < 0.05). The revision rate of non-programmable was higher than programmable valves (42.9 % versus 2.9 %, respectively). There were no differences between previous abdominal surgery, LOS, complication, or revision rate between open and laparoscopic insertion. VP shunt survivability was greater in the laparoscopic group (90-day shunt survival of 96.7 % and 92 % in the laparoscopy and open groups, respectively; p > 0.05). We did not find any significant difference in operating time or length of stay for age, sex, or previous abdominal surgery, even when accounting for surgical technique. Indication and shunt survivability varied widely between age groups. The use of laparoscopic insertion increased over time, though surgeons did not crossover techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall distal revision rate of VP shunts is low. Laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter reduces operating time and may improve shunt survivability. Larger studies are needed to confirm differences in shunt survivability in open versus laparoscopic distal catheter insertion, between age groups, clinical indications, and valve type on patient outcomes.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement

OBJECTIVE

Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement requires a concurrent abdominal procedure. For peritoneal access laparoscopic or open approach may be utilized. Our aim was to compare patient/procedure characteristics and outcomes by peritoneal approach for VP shunts in children.

METHODS

NSQIP-Pediatric procedure targeted cerebral spinal fluid shunt Participant Use Data Files from 2016 to 2020 were queried. Patients were grouped into laparoscopic vs open abdominal approach. Patient demographics, procedure characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

7742 NSQIP-Pediatric patients underwent VP shunt placement. Patients undergoing laparoscopic approach were older and required less preoperative support. Mean operative time was longer with laparoscopy (mean(SD): 74.2(48.1) vs. 64.6(39) minutes, p ​< ​0.0001) but had shorter hospital LOS. There was no difference in SSI, readmissions, or reoperation rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing laparoscopy for distal VP shunts are older with less support needs preoperatively. While laparoscopic approach had a shorter hospital LOS, there was no demonstratable difference in SSI, readmissions or reoperations between approaches. Further studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Early Anal Protrusion of Distal Ventriculoperitoneal Catheter Due to Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt is one of the most commonly used therapeutic methods for hydrocephalus. And the incidence across the world of VP shunt complications varies from 20% to 45%. One of the rare complications is the catheter perforation of the abdominal viscera and its extrusion through the anal cavity. For the first time in the literature, this report addresses the presentation of iatrogenic perforation of the colon while inserting the peritoneal catheter of VP shunt.

Here, we present the case of a 15-year-old boy who is known to have cerebral palsy and congenital hydrocephalus with a VP shunt since birth. He presented to the ER with a history of headache and episodes of vomiting and was diagnosed with VP shunt dysfunction. The patient was taken for an emergency operation for shunt revision and a new shunt was placed. Then the next day he developed signs and symptoms of peritonitis with the distal part of the catheter protruding from the anal cavity, the patient was taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy, the distal catheter was removed and replaced with external ventricular drainage, intra-operatively it was shown that the catheter was inserted directly into the colon causing bowel perforation, This report raises important questions about the nature of VP shunt bowel perforation and discusses management options.