Blood Utilization and Thresholds for Mortality Following Major Trauma

The Magic Number 63 - Redefining the Geriatric Age for Massive Transfusion in Trauma

INTRODUCTION

The arbitrary geriatric age cutoff of 65 may not accurately define older adults at higher risk of mortality following massive transfusion (MT). We sought to redefine a new geriatric age threshold for MT and understand its association with outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 2013-2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all adults who received ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) within 24 h of admission. A bootstrap analysis using multiple logistic regression established transfusion futility thresholds (TTs), where additional pRBCs no longer improved mortality for various age cutoffs. The age cutoff at which the TT for those relatively older and relatively younger was statistically significant was used to define the new "geriatric" age for MT. Outcomes were then compared between the newly defined geriatric and nongeriatric patients.

RESULTS

The difference in TT first became significant when the age cutoff was 63 y. The TT for patients aged ≥63 y (new geriatric, n = 2870) versus <63 y (nongeriatric, n = 17,302) was 34 and 40 units of pRBCs, respectively (P = 0.04). Although geriatric patients had a higher Glasgow coma scale score (9 versus 6, P < 0.01) and lower abbreviated injury score-abdomen (3 versus 4, P < 0.01) than the nongeriatric, they suffered higher overall mortality (62% versus 45%, P < 0.01). A lower percentage of geriatric patients were discharged to home (7% versus 35%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The new geriatric age for MT is 63 y, with a TT of 34 units. Despite suffering less severe injuries, physiologically "geriatric" patients have worse outcomes following MT.

Markers of Futile Resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Review of the Evidence and a Proposal for Futility Time-Outs during Massive Transfusion

The reduction in the blood supply following the 2019 coronavirus pandemic has been exacerbated by the increased use of balanced resuscitation with blood components including whole blood in urban trauma centers. This reduction of the blood supply has diminished the ability of blood banks to maintain a constant supply to meet the demands associated with periodic surges of urban trauma resuscitation. This scarcity has highlighted the need for increased vigilance through blood product stewardship, particularly among severely bleeding trauma patients (SBTPs). This stewardship can be enhanced by the identification of reliable clinical and laboratory parameters which accurately indicate when massive transfusion is futile. Consequently, there has been a recent attempt to develop scoring systems in the prehospital and emergency department settings which include clinical, laboratory, and physiologic parameters and blood products per hour transfused as predictors of futile resuscitation. Defining futility in SBTPs, however, remains unclear, and there is only nascent literature which defines those criteria which reliably predict futility in SBTPs. The purpose of this review is to provide a focused examination of the literature in order to define reliable parameters of futility in SBTPs. The knowledge of these reliable parameters of futility may help define a foundation for drawing conclusions which will provide a clear roadmap for traumatologists when confronted with SBTPs who are candidates for the declaration of futility. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the definition of futile resuscitation for patients with trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock, and we propose a concise roadmap for clinicians to help them use well-defined clinical, laboratory, and viscoelastic parameters which can define futility.

Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock

This review explores the concept of futility timeouts and the use of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an independent predictor of the futility of resuscitation efforts in severely bleeding trauma patients. The national blood supply shortage has been exacerbated by the lingering influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of blood donors available, as well as by the adoption of balanced hemostatic resuscitation protocols (such as the increasing use of 1:1:1 packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) with and without early whole blood resuscitation. This has underscored the urgent need for reliable predictors of futile resuscitation (FR). As a result, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory bedside markers have emerged which can accurately predict FR in patients with severe trauma-induced hemorrhage, such as the Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria. However, the STOP criteria do not include markers for TBI severity or transfusion cut points despite these patients requiring large quantities of blood components in the STOP criteria validation cohort. Yet, guidelines for neuroprognosticating patients with TBI can require up to 72 h, which makes them less useful in the minutes and hours following initial presentation. We examine the impact of TBI on bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on those with coagulopathies associated with TBI. This review categorizes TBI into isolated TBI (iTBI), hemorrhagic isolated TBI (hiTBI), and polytraumatic TBI (ptTBI). Through an analysis of bedside parameters (such as the proposed STOP criteria), coagulation assays, markers for TBI severity, and transfusion cut points as markers of futilty, we suggest amendments to current guidelines and the development of more precise algorithms that incorporate prognostic indicators of severe TBI as an independent parameter for the early prediction of FR so as to optimize blood product allocation.

Association between transfusion volume and survival outcome following trauma: Insight into the limit of transfusion from an analysis of nationwide trauma registry in Japan

BACKGROUND

Whether and how the transfusion volume should be limited in resuscitation after trauma remains unclear. We investigated the association between transfusion volume and survival outcome following trauma.

METHODS

Using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2019-2021), we identified patients 18 years or older who received balanced blood transfusion within the first 24 hours of injury. We evaluated the association between the total number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused and survival at discharge using logistic regression analysis and generalized additive model. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 5,123 patients from 165 hospitals were eligible for analysis. The transfusion volume was significantly associated with survival rate. Compared with that of patients receiving 4 to 9 RBC units, the within-hospital odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for survival at discharge were 0.62 (0.55-0.75), 0.32 (0.25-0.40), and 0.15 (0.12-0.20) for those receiving 10 to 19, 20 to 29, and ≥30 U, respectively. The probability of survival decreased consistently without any discernible threshold; however, the survival rates remained >40% and >20% even in patients receiving 50 and 80 RBC units, respectively. Significant interactions were observed between the number of RBC units transfused and each subgroup for survival at discharge.

CONCLUSION

The probability of survival consistently diminished as the transfusion volume increased. The absence of a threshold and lack of exceedingly low probability of survival support massive transfusion when clinicians perceive ongoing transfusion as beneficial. The unique context of each clinical situation must be considered in decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Transfusion futility thresholds and mortality in geriatric trauma: Does frailty matter?

BACKGROUND

Data on massive transfusion (MT) in geriatric trauma patients is lacking. This study aims to determine geriatric transfusion futility thresholds (TT) and TT variations based on frailty.

METHODS

Patients from 2013 to 2018 TQIP database receiving MT were stratified by age and frailty. TTs and outcomes were compared between geriatric and younger adults and among geriatric adults based on frailty status.

RESULTS

The TT was lower for geriatric than younger adults (34 vs 39 units; p ​= ​0.03). There was no difference in TT between the non-frail, frail, and severely frail geriatric adults (37, 30 and 25 units, respectively, p ​> ​0.05). Geriatric adults had higher mortality than younger adults (63.1% vs 45.8%, p < 0.01). Non-frail geriatric adults had the highest mortality (69.4% vs 56.5% vs 56.2%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatric patients have a lower TT than younger adults, irrespective of frailty. This may help improve outcomes and optimize MT utilization.

The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated: An evaluation of futility cut points in massive transfusion

BACKGROUND

Following COVID and the subsequent blood shortage, several investigators evaluated futility cut points in massive transfusion. We hypothesized that early aggressive use of damage-control resuscitation, including whole blood (WB), would demonstrate that these cut points of futility were significantly underestimating potential survival among patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients admitted from November 2017 to October 2021 who received emergency-release blood products in prehospital or emergency department setting were included. Deaths within 30 minutes of arrival were excluded. Total blood products were defined as total red blood cell, plasma, and WB in the field and in the first 4 hours after arrival. Patients were first divided into those receiving ≤50 or >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours. We then evaluated patients by whether they received any WB or received only component therapy. Thirty-day survival was evaluated for all included patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2,299 patients met the inclusion criteria (2,043 in ≤50 U, 256 in >50 U groups). While there were no differences in age or sex, the >50 U group was more likely to sustain penetrating injury (47% vs. 30%, p < 0.05). Patients receiving >50 U of blood had lower field and arrival blood pressure and larger prehospital and emergency department resuscitation volumes ( p < 0.05). Patients in the >50 U group had lower survival than those in the ≤50 cohort (31% vs. 79%; p < 0.05). Patients who received WB (n = 1,291) had 43% increased odds of survival compared with those who received only component therapy (n = 1,008) (1.09-1.87, p = 0.009) and higher 30-day survival at transfusion volumes >50 U.

CONCLUSION

Patient survival rates in patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours of care are as high as 50% to 60%, with survival still at 15% to 25% after 100 U. While responsible blood stewardship is critical, futility should not be declared based on high transfusion volumes alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Predicting Futility in Severely Injured Patients: Using Arrival Lab Values and Physiology to Support Evidence-Based Resource Stewardship

BACKGROUND

The recent pandemic exposed a largely unrecognized threat to medical resources, including daily available blood products. Some of the most severely injured patients who arrive in extremis consume tremendous resources yet succumb shortly after arrival. We sought to identify cut points available early in the patient's resuscitation that predicted 100% mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

Cut points were developed from a previously collected data set of all level 1 trauma patients admitted January 2010 to December 2016. Objective values available on or shortly after arrival were evaluated. Once generated, we then validated these variables against (1) a prospective data set November 2017 to October 2021 of severely injured patients and (2) a multicenter, randomized trial of hemorrhagic shock patients. Analyses were conducted using STATA 17.0 (College Station, TX), generating positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The development data set consisted of 9,509 patients (17% mortality), with 2,137 (24%) and 680 (24%) in the two validation data sets. Several combinations of arrival vitals and labs had 100% PPV. Patients undergoing CPR in the field or on arrival (with subsequent return of spontaneous circulation) required lower fibrinolysis LY-30 (30%) than those with systolic blood pressures of ≤50 (30 to 50%), ≤70 (80 to 90%), and ≤90 mmHg (90%). Using a combination of these validated variables, the Suspension of Transfusions and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria were developed, with each element predicting 100% mortality, allowing physicians to cease further resuscitative efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of evidence-based STOP criteria provides cut points of futility to help guide early decisions for discontinuing aggressive treatment of severely injured patients arriving in extremis.