Towards a Rationale of Platelet Aggregation Monitoring in Stroke Prophylaxis?

Role of CYP2C19 alleles in the management of recurrent ischemic stroke

Purpose of review

CYP2C19 is the primary enzyme involved in the activation of clopidogrel, an antiplatelet agent used for secondary stroke prevention. An individual's CYP2C19 alleles are used to understand their CYP2C19-clopidogrel metabolizer phenotype. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene result in altered metabolism of this prodrug.

Recent findings

Three ischemic stroke cases were treated with clopidogrel. Despite confirming adequate drug exposure, medication adherence, and ruling out drug-drug interactions, all had recurrent ischemic stroke. Each case had a CYP2C19 *2/*17 genotype, categorizing them as intermediate clopidogrel metabolizers. Even with the gain-of-function allele, the loss-of-function allele resulted in lack of prodrug activation, leading to decreased efficacy in platelet inhibition.

Summary

These cases illustrate the importance of a thoughtful approach to secondary stroke prevention and demonstrate the utility of pharmacogenomic testing in clopidogrel hyporesponders. Recognition of the importance of CYP2C19 genotyping has the potential to enable better selection of appropriate secondary prevention strategies.

Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel

The existence of poor biological response to clopidogrel has been shown in some patients. Despite the increasing number of studies, this phenomenon remains difficult to quantify. We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel and investigate the factors known to modulate this. An exhaustive search was performed. Altogether 171 publications were identified, providing data for a total of 45,664 subjects. The estimated prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel ranged from 15.9% to 49.5% according to the platelet function assay employed. The assays most frequently used were light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay and the Verify -now® assay. For all these assays, higher cut-off values were associated with a lower prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel. However, when choosing a fixed cut-off point for each assay, the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel was highly variable suggesting that other factors could modulate poor biological response to clopidogrel. Finally, none of the studied factors could apparently explain the variability of poor biological response to clopidogrel. This meta-analysis shows that the prevalence of poor biological response depends on the assay employed, the cut-off value and on various unidentified additional factors.

Platelet Function Testing in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The measurement of platelet reactivity in patients with stroke undergoing antiplatelet therapies is not commonly performed in clinical practice. We assessed the prevalence of therapy responsiveness in patients with stroke and further investigated differences between patients on prevention therapy at stroke onset and patients naive to antiplatelet medications. We also sought differences in responsiveness between etiological subtypes and correlations between Clopidogrel responsiveness and genetic polymorphisms.

METHODS

A total of 624 stroke patients on antiplatelet therapy were included. Two different groups were identified: "non-naive patients", and "naive patients". Platelet function was measured with multiple electrode aggregometry, and genotyping assays were used to determine CYP2C19 polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Aspirin (ASA) responsiveness was significantly more frequent in naive patients compared with non-naive patients (94.9% versus 82.6%, P < .0010). A better responsiveness to ASA compared with Clopidogrel or combination therapy was found in the entire population (P < .0010), in non-naive patients (P < .0253), and in naive patients (P < .0010). Multivariate analysis revealed a strong effect of Clopidogrel as a possible "risk factor" for unresponsiveness (odds ratio 3.652, P < .0001). No difference between etiological subgroups and no correlations between responsiveness and CYP2C19 polymorphisms were found.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, platelet function testing could be potentially useful in monitoring the biological effect of antiplatelet agents. A substantial proportion of patients with stroke on ASA were "resistant", and the treatment with Clopidogrel was accompanied by even higher rates of unresponsiveness. Longitudinal studies are needed to assess whether aggregometry might supply individualized prognostic information and whether it can be considered a valid tool for future prevention strategies.

Predictive value of high residual platelet reactivity by flow cytometry for outcomes of ischemic stroke patients on clopidogrel therapy

High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) assessed by multiple tests has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, the clinical impact of HRPR assessed by flow cytometry is unknown. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive value of HRPR measured by flow cytometry for clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patients during clopidogrel therapy. Overall, 198 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke taking clopidogrel underwent platelet function testing on flow cytometer including adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (PAg) and platelet activation markers (CD62P, CD63, and PAC-1). Poor outcome was defined as poor prognosis and ischemic events during 12-month follow-up. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, residual platelet reactivity assessed by flow cytometry was able to distinguish between patients with and without poor outcomes, when platelet inhibition was evaluated with ADP-PAg (area under the curve [AUC], .77; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69-.84; P < .001), CD62P (AUC, .73; 95% CI, .64-.81; P < .001), CD63 (AUC, .72; 95% CI, .64-.80; P < .001), and PAC-1 (AUC, .70; 95% CI, .62-.78; P < .001). The prevalence of HRPR was 25.8% for ADP-PAg, 32.8% for CD62P, 41.4% for CD63, and 56.1% for PAC-1. The multiple logical regression analysis demonstrated that HRPR was an independent predictor of poor outcomes (ADP-PAg: odds ratio [OR] 13.03, 95% CI 5.66-29.98, P < .001; CD62P: OR 8.55, 95% CI 3.94-18.57, P < .001; CD63: OR 8.74, 95% CI 3.89-19.64, P < .001; PAC-1: OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.98-9.08). In conclusion, HRPR, assessed by flow cytometry, is able to detect ischemic stroke patients at increased risk of 12-month poor outcomes on clopidogrel treatment.

Gender-specific inhibition of platelet aggregation following omega-3 fatty acid supplementation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Increased platelet aggregation is a major risk factor for heart attacks, stroke and thrombosis. Long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCn-3PUFA; eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA; docosahexaenoic acid, DHA) reduce platelet aggregation; however studies in the published literature involving EPA and/or DHA supplementation have yielded equivocal results. Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that inhibition of platelet aggregation by LCn-3PUFA is gender specific. We examined the acute effects of dietary supplementation with EPA or DHA rich oils on platelet aggregation in healthy male and females.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A blinded placebo controlled trial involving 15 male and 15 female subjects. Platelet aggregation was measured at 0, 2, 5 and 24 h post-supplementation with a single dose of either a placebo or EPA or DHA rich oil capsules. The relationship between LCn-3PUFA and platelet activity at each time point was examined according to gender vs. treatment. EPA was significantly the most effective in reducing platelet aggregation in males at 2, 5 and 24 h post-supplementation (-11%, -10.6%, -20.5% respectively) whereas DHA was not effective relative to placebo. In contrast, in females, DHA significantly reduced platelet aggregation at 24 h (-13.7%) while EPA was not effective. An inverse relationship between testosterone levels and platelet aggregation following EPA supplementation was observed.

CONCLUSION

Interactions between sex hormones and omega-3 fatty acids exist to differentially reduce platelet aggregation. For healthy individuals, males may benefit more from EPA supplementation while females are more responsive to DHA.

Succinate reverses in-vitro platelet inhibition by acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y receptor antagonists

High on-treatment platelet reactivity has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving anti-platelet agents, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain incompletely understood. Succinate, a citric acid cycle intermediate, is released into the circulation under conditions of mitochondrial dysfunction due to hypoxic organ damage, including sepsis, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Because the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for succinate, SUCNR1 (GPR91), is present on human platelets, we hypothesized that succinate-mediated platelet stimulation may counteract the pharmacological effects of cyclooxygenase-1 and ADP receptor antagonists. To test this hypothesis in a controlled in-vitro study, washed platelets from healthy donors were treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or small-molecule P2Y(1) or P2Y(12) inhibitors and subsequently analyzed by light transmittance aggregometry using arachidonic acid (AA), ADP and succinate as platelet agonists. Aggregation in response to succinate alone was highly variable with only 29% of donors showing a (mostly delayed) platelet response. In contrast, succinate reproducibly and concentration-dependently (10-1000 µM) enhanced platelet aggregation in response to low concentrations of exogenous ADP. Furthermore, while succinate alone had no effect in the presence of platelet inhibitors, responsiveness of platelets to ADP after pretreatment with P2Y(1) or P2Y(12) antagonists was fully restored, when platelets were co-stimulated with 100 µM succinate. Similarly, succinate completely (at 1000 µM) or partially (at 100 µM) reversed the inhibitory effect of ASA on AA-induced platelet aggregation. In contrast, succinate failed to restore platelet responsiveness in the presence of both ASA and the P2Y(12) antagonist, suggesting that concomitant signaling via different GPCRs was required. Essentially identical results were obtained, when flow cytometric analysis of surface CD62P expression was used as a different readout for platelet activation. In summary, extracellular succinate may have a co-stimulatory role in platelet aggregation and, by (partially) antagonizing the effects of platelet inhibitors, may contribute to the inter-individual variability frequently observed in platelet function testing.

Antiplatelet resistance in stroke

Although the exact prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in ischemic stroke is not known, estimates about the two most widely used antiplatelet agents - aspirin and clopidogrel - suggest that the resistance rate is high, irrespective of the definition used and parameters measured. Inadequate antiplatelet responsiveness correlates with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic vascular events in patients with stroke and acute coronary syndrome. It is not currently known whether tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function test results translates into a more effective strategy to prevent secondary vascular events after stroke. Large-scale clinical trials using a universally accepted definition and standardized measurement techniques for antiplatelet resistance are needed to demonstrate whether a 'platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment' strategy translates into improved stroke care. This article gives an overview of the clinical importance of laboratory antiplatelet resistance, describes the challenges for platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment and discusses practical issues about the management of patients with aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance.

Association of recurrent cerebral infarction with adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation in patients treated with ticlopidine and/or aspirin

Although the platelet aggregation test is the most common method for evaluating response to antiplatelet therapy, little is known about the association of recurrent cerebral infarction with platelet aggregation in the presence of various different antiplatelet drugs. We prospectively evaluated adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation and followed the incidence of recurrent infarction in patients categorized into 3 groups based on treatment; aspirin (n = 144), ticlopidine (n = 100), and aspirin + ticlopidine (n = 96). The patients in each treatment group were stratified into quartiles according to platelet aggregation, and the association of recurrent infarction with platelet aggregation was investigated. ADP-induced platelet aggregation values were significantly lower in the ticlopidine group and the aspirin + ticlopidine group compared with the aspirin group (P < .001), and collagen-induced platelet aggregation values were significantly lower in the aspirin group and the aspirin + ticlopidine group compared with the ticlopidine group (P < .001). In the aspirin group, the recurrence rate was somewhat higher in the higher aggregation quartiles than in the lower aggregation quartiles of 2 μg/mL collagen, the differences were not statistically significantly (P = .243). In the ticlopidine group, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the lower aggregation quartiles compared with the higher aggregation quartiles of 1 μmol/L ADP (P = .025). No tendencies were found in the aspirin + ticlopidine group. Although the study is limited by its small sample size, the results suggest a possible difference between aspirin therapy and ticlopidine therapy in the pattern of association of recurrent infarction with platelet aggregation.

Effect of maximum OTC doses of naproxen sodium or acetaminophen on low-dose aspirin inhibition of serum thromboxane B2

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the platelet inhibitory effects of low-dose enteric-coated aspirin (EC-ASA) when used concomitantly with maximum over-the-counter (OTC) doses of naproxen sodium (NAPSO) or acetaminophen to determine whether NAPSO and acetaminophen interfere with the anti-platelet effect of aspirin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Phase I, randomized, open-label, multi-dose, three-period, parallel group, pharmacodynamic trial conducted in healthy male and female volunteers (n = 47 randomized subjects and n = 37 evaluable subjects), mean age 40.2 years. All subjects received 5 days of EC-ASA 81 mg once daily followed by 5 days of EC-ASA 81 mg once daily alone or co-administered with either NAPSO 220 mg three times daily or acetaminophen 1 g four times daily.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Inhibition of serum thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)), as a marker of platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibition, measured on Day 11.

RESULTS

Mean inhibition of TXB(2) on Day 11 was >99% for subjects taking EC-ASA alone as well as for those who received EC-ASA co-administered with NAPSO or acetaminophen. For subjects taking EC-ASA monotherapy, mean serum TXB(2) inhibition was 99.7% (range 99.0-100%), for those taking EC-ASA with acetaminophen it was 99.6% (range 98.3-99.9%), and for those taking EC-ASA with NAPSO, mean serum TXB(2) inhibition was 99.7% (range 99.2-100%).

STUDY LIMITATION

Small sample size and open-label trial design.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-platelet effect of EC-ASA 81 mg once daily was maintained following its co-administration with maximum OTC doses of NAPSO or acetaminophen.