Needs analysis for educating community pharmacists to interface with prehospital stroke chain of survival

Time Window for Acute Stroke Management: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Community Healthcare Practitioners in Primary Care

Introduction

Time-to-treatment window is critical for managing acute ischaemic stroke. The community healthcare practitioners (CHPs) who deliver frontline care in the health system play an important role in stroke prevention and treatment.

Methods

A multi-stage sampling design was adopted in Guangdong province, China. A total of 997 CHPs who participated in the survey were divided into two groups (the awareness group vs the unawareness group) according to their knowledge on the time window for stroke management. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with the awareness of “time window”.

Results

Overall, less than half (49.1%) of CHPs were aware of the time window for stroke management. The proportion of CHPs who were able to recognise stroke symptoms were higher in the awareness group (42.7%) than that in the unawareness group (38.8%). Most CHPs (82.9%) in the awareness group had the knowledge about the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis in treating acute cerebral infarction, whereas this was perceived by only less than half (43.6%) of CHPs in the unawareness group. Factors associated with the knowledge of time window for stroke management included participation in cerebrovascular disease management training (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=4.203, 95% CI: 1.707–10.348, p=0.002), awareness of the time frame for CT initiation (aOR=5.214, 95% CI: 1.803–15.078, p=0.002) and for urokinase thrombolysis administration (aOR=11.927, 95% CI: 4.393–32.382, p<0.001), accurate perceptions about the target for blood pressure lowering (aOR=4.181, 95% CI: 1.713–10.207, p=0.002) and blood glucose control (aOR=2.446, 95% CI: 1.019–5.869, p=0.045), and the familiarity with prehospital stroke management principles (aOR=3.593, 95% CI: 1.383–9.332, p=0.009).

Conclusion

The CHPs need to enhance their ability to address the acute ischaemic stroke onset promptly to provide effective treatment within the beneficial “time window”. This may help improve the stroke chain of survival with better multidisciplinary decision support systems that enable optimal stroke care delivery.

Stroke patients' support: evaluation of knowledge, practices and training needs of French community pharmacists

Background Stroke represents a major Public Health issue in industrialized countries because of its frequency and severity. In secondary stroke prevention, treatment efficacy is correlated to medication adherence. However, it remains suboptimal in stroke patients. Community pharmacists, in light of their positioning in the care pathway and proximity to patients, can play an essential role in patient support and improving treatment adherence. However, it is currently unknown whether pharmacists are ready to perform this task. Objective Evaluate knowledge, practices and training needs for community pharmacists in therapeutic stroke management to improve long term care for stroke patients. Setting Community pharmacies in the Rhone Alpes region (France). Method We conducted a cross sectional study via a standardized self-assessment questionnaire consisting of 40 questions divided into three parts. The latter was designed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed electronically to community pharmacists of the Rhône-Alpes region (France). Main outcome measure (a) global knowledge score on the pathology, risk factors and clinical care management, (b) description of the support practices for stroke patients, (c) training needs for pharmacists. Results The 104 participants presented a moderate level of knowledge (global score: 12/20 ± 3). Topics best mastered were: pathophysiology, target blood pressure and place of antiplatelets in the therapeutic strategy. Knowledge items that needed improvement were: warning signs correctly identified by 44% of participants, time delay for thrombolysis for which 14% answered correctly, target glycated hemoglobin levels were correct for 41%, and the 3 recommended antihypertensive drug classes were only identified by 5% of participants. Patient education received from pharmacists concerned dosage (89%), treatment adherence (88%), benefits (66%) and administration modalities of medicines (64%), management of risk factors (75% for diet, 73% for physical activity, 70% for smoking and 53% for alcohol). All pharmacists wanted additional training on risk factors and clinical management guidelines. Conclusion Based on this small study, the fragmented knowledge and varied practices promote the need for further training for pharmacists to optimize support of stroke patients. This study promotes the elaboration of training systems adapted to pharmacists' needs. This will help support the development of a targeted pharmaceutical care approach for stroke patients.