Task-Based Mirror Therapy Augmenting Motor Recovery in Poststroke Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of mirror therapy on upper limb motor function of patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate and review the effects of mirror therapy on upper limb function, including improvements in shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand function, as well as coordination between the upper extremities, in patients with stroke.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science, were searched from database inception to 15 October 2024, as well as manual searching of Google Scholar, for relevant trials.

REVIEW METHODS

The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool with five domains. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the pooled mean difference of dichotomous variables using the 95% confidence interval. The variance in effect estimation in a forest plot for each trial was then quantified using I2.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, representing 633 patients with stroke, were included in this study. Mirror therapy significantly improved upper limb motor function (mean difference [MD] = 1.79; 95% CI = 0.04-3.54; p = 0.04) and hand function (MD = 1.48; 95% CI = 0.17-2.78; p = 0.03) in patients with stroke. Subgroup analyses of overall upper limb function showed that mirror therapy was effective in improving function when delivered more than 5 times a week (MD = 2.75; 95% CI = 1.02-4.48) over a period of ≤ 4 weeks (MD = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.19-5.33). The results of the methodology assessment using RoB-2 on all the trials included in the analysis showed that 16 trials were considered to have some concerns.

CONCLUSION

Mirror therapy appears to be beneficial for improving upper limb motor function after stroke. More trials are needed to determine the effects of mirror therapy on shoulder/elbow/forearm, wrist, and hand function and coordination between upper extremities after stroke.

The Role of Mirror Therapy in the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb's Motor Deficits After Stroke: Narrative Review

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide and poses a tremendous socioeconomic burden upon individuals, countries and healthcare systems. It causes debilitating symptoms and thus interferes with many aspects of the patient's life, including physical functioning, cognition, emotional status, activities of daily living, social reintegration and quality of life. Post-stroke patients frequently experience functional motor disabilities of the upper limb, which restrict autonomy and self-efficacy and cause limitations in engagement with activities and social participation, as well as difficulties in performing important occupations. It is therefore not surprising that motor impairment or loss of motor function of the upper limb is one of the most devastating sequelae of stroke. On these grounds, achieving optimal functioning of the upper limb after stroke remains a fundamental goal of stroke rehabilitation. Mirror therapy (MT) represents one of the several rehabilitation techniques used for restoring the upper limb's motor function after a stroke. However, conflicting results about the role of MT in the rehabilitation of the upper limb's motor deficits have been reported in the literature. Accordingly, the aim of this narrative review is to summarize existing evidence regarding the effects of MT on the upper limb's motor function in post-stroke patients and to further explore its role when applied in different phases of stroke.

A scoping review of mind-body therapies for people with persistent pain after stroke

PURPOSE

Persistent pain post-stroke is common; however, non-medical management options remain under-researched. This scoping review sought to identify and summarise existing literature regarding mind-body therapies for people with persistent pain post-stroke, examine pain and pain-related biopsychosocial outcomes, and identify areas for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review followed PRISMA and JBI guidelines; the protocol was registered on Open Science Framework. Five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from 1992 until 19th August 2024. Primary studies of any design evaluating mind-body therapies in adults with persistent pain post-stroke, published in English in peer-reviewed journals, were eligible. Findings were narratively summarised by study, sample, and mind-body therapy characteristics.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies comprising 458 adults with various post-stroke pain presentations were included. Only 10 studies specifically targeted stroke pain; the remainder primarily incorporated pre-post measures of pain in a heterogenous stroke sample (with and without pain). Studies varied in their levels of evidence, sample characteristics, mind-body therapies, and biopsychosocial outcome measurement. Nonetheless, improvements in pain and pain-related biopsychosocial outcomes were consistently reported.

CONCLUSION

Limited, lower-quality research suggests improved pain and biopsychosocial outcomes. However, further rigorous research exploring feasibility, safety, efficacy, optimal dosage, format, and setting is recommended.

Shaping corticospinal pathways in virtual reality: effects of task complexity and sensory feedback during mirror therapy in neurologically intact individuals

BACKGROUND

Restoration of limb function for individuals with unilateral weakness typically requires volitional muscle control, which is often not present for individuals with severe impairment. Mirror therapy-interventions using a mirror box to reflect the less-impaired limb onto the more-impaired limb-can facilitate corticospinal excitability, leading to enhanced recovery in severely impaired clinical populations. However, the mirror box applies limitations on mirror therapy, namely that all movements appear bilateral and are confined to a small area, impeding integration of complex activities and multisensory feedback (e.g., visuo-tactile stimulation). These limitations can be addressed with virtual reality, but the resulting effect on corticospinal excitability is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Examine how virtual reality-based unilateral mirroring, complex activities during mirroring, and visuo-tactile stimulation prior to mirroring affect corticospinal excitability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with no known neurological conditions (n = 17) donned a virtual reality system (NeuRRoVR) that displayed a first-person perspective of a virtual avatar that matched their motions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials in the nondominant hand muscles were used to evaluate corticospinal excitability in four conditions: resting, mirroring, mirroring with prior visuo-tactile stimulation (mirroring + TACT), and control. During mirroring, the movements of each participant's dominant limb were reflected onto the nondominant limb of the virtual avatar, and the avatar's dominant limb was kept immobile (i.e., unilateral mirroring). The mirroring + TACT condition was the same as the mirroring condition, except that mirroring was preceded by visuo-tactile stimulation of the nondominant limb. During the control condition, unilateral mirroring was disabled. During all conditions, participants performed simple (flex/extend fingers) and complex (stack virtual blocks) activities.

RESULTS

We found that unilateral mirroring increased corticospinal excitability compared to no mirroring (p < 0.001), complex activities increased excitability compared to simple activities during mirroring (p < 0.001), and visuo-tactile stimulation prior to mirroring decreased excitability (p = 0.032). We also found that these features did not interact with each other.

DISCUSSIONS

The findings of this study shed light onto the neurological mechanisms of mirror therapy and demonstrate the unique ways in which virtual reality can augment mirror therapy. The findings have important implications for rehabilitation for design of virtual reality systems for clinical populations.

360° immersive virtual reality-based mirror therapy for upper extremity function and satisfaction among stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide; therefore, an effective rehabilitation strategy is fundamental. Mirror therapy (MT) has been a popular approach for upper extremity rehabilitation, but it presents some limitations. Recent advancements in virtual reality (VR) technology have introduced immersive VR-based MT, potentially overcoming these limitations and enhancing rehabilitation outcomes.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel 360° immersive virtual reality-based MT (360MT) in upper extremity rehabilitation for stroke patients, comparing it to traditional MT (TMT) and conventional physical therapy control group (CG).

DESIGN

A prospective, active control, assessor blinded, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial.

POPULATION

Forty-five participants with chronic stroke within six months of onset.

METHODS

The participants were randomly allocated to 360MT, TMT, or CG groups. Outcome measures included Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Box and Block Test (BBT), and Manual Function Test (MFT). Additionally, patient experience and satisfaction in the groups of 360MT and TMT were assessed through questionnaires and interviews.

RESULTS

Results revealed that the 360MT group showed significantly greater improvements in FMA-UE, MFT and BBT compared to TMT (P<0.05) and CG (P<0.001) groups. Patient experience and satisfaction were more favorable in the 360MT group, with participants reporting higher engagement and motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

360MT appears to be a promising approach for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke patients, providing better outcomes and higher patient satisfaction. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and strengthen the evidence base for 360MT in stroke rehabilitation.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

360MT demonstrated notably enhanced upper extremity rehabilitation outcomes as well as better patient satisfaction among chronic stroke patients within six months of onset compared to traditional MT and conventional physical therapy. This novel approach not only fostered functional improvements but also elevated levels of engagement and motivation among participants, suggesting a promising future application in stroke rehabilitation framework.

Task-based and Magnified Mirror Therapy for Unilateral Spatial Neglect among post-stroke subjects: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a commonly occurring neurocognitive disability after a stroke. The neglect may affect the motor recovery of the upper and lower limbs and functional performances. Mirror therapy, a simple and economical approach has the potential to reduce the USN and related impairments.

AIM

The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of task-based and magnified mirror therapy on the USN and on the motor recovery of the post-stroke subjects. The secondary objective is to investigate the effectiveness of the intervention on the function and disability of the subjects.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled, assessor-blinded trial, 86 post-stroke subjects will be recruited from the neuro-rehabilitation laboratory of a rehabilitation institute, located in northern India. The participants,aged20 to 80 years, with 1 to 36 months of stroke onset, hemiparesis, and the USN, will be considered eligible for the study. In addition to the conventional rehabilitation, the experimental group(n = 43) will receive 40 sessions (8 weeks) of Task-based and MAGnified Mirror Therapy for Unilateral Spatial Neglect (T-MAGUSN). The control group (n = 43) will undergo a dose-matched conventional program only. The participants will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 4-week follow-up using primary (Line Bisection Test, Letter Cancellation Test, and Fugl-Myer Assessment) and secondary (Catherine Bergego Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulation Classification, Modified Rankin Scale) outcome measures.

DISCUSSION

This proposed study will lead to the development of a novel rehabilitation protocol for the management of USN, aiming to enhance motor and functional recovery. The investigation will consider both the upper and lower limbs for the intervention, reducing the impact of cognitive disability in stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) as CTRI/2023/05/053184 (www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=74659).

Mirror neuron activity depending on the content and stage of the observed action: a TMS study

Background/aim

The firing rate of the mirror neuron system in monkeys decreases systematically with more repetitions. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the activity of the mirror neuron system varies based on the observed movement and the contents of the action, as well as whether there is inhibition in the mirror neuron system when humans observe repeated actions. If inhibition is present, the second question of the study is whether it is related to the organization of the observed action.

Materials and methods

Fourteen healthy volunteers participated in the study. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to the left primary motor cortex and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous and abductor pollicis brevis muscles while the participants were watching videos specially prepared for the study.

Results

There were no significant changes in MEP amplitudes compared to baseline MEPs while observing aimless action. However, while participants watched the repeated action video, the mean MEP amplitude increased at the beginning of the movement, but neither facilitation nor inhibition was detected when the participants watched the phase of grasping the object of the action compared to the baseline MEP amplitude. On the other hand, while participants were watching different activities, an increased MEP amplitude was observed at the beginning of the movement and in the grasping of the object of the action. Additionally, there was no significant reduction in MEP amplitude during any movement stages while observing the repeated action video.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that the activation of the mirror neuron system in humans depends on the content and stages of the observed movement. Additionally, there was no inhibition or systematic reduction in MEP amplitudes while watching a repeated action.

Comparison of Different Rehabilitation Techniques of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine in the Treatment of Motor Dysfunction After Stroke Based on Frequency Method: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of different traditional Chinese and western medicine rehabilitation techniques on motor dysfunction after stroke using a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 2022. We independently searched and screened randomized controlled trials of rehabilitation techniques for poststroke motor dysfunction treatment, evaluated the quality, and analyzed the data using Stata 14.0.

RESULTS

Seventy-four randomized controlled trials involving nine rehabilitation techniques and 5128 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed the following orders regarding improvement of the total scores of Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, and Berg Balance Scale: biofeedback therapy > mirror therapy > repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation > acupuncture therapy > transcranial direct current stimulation > Taichi > common therapy, virtual reality > transcranial direct current stimulation > repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation > mirror therapy > common therapy, and acupuncture therapy > virtual reality > neuromuscular electrical stimulation > mirror therapy > common therapy > transcranial direct current stimulation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biofeedback therapy had the best comprehensive effect, while virtual reality was the best intervention for improving the index of action research arm test and Fugl-Meyer Assessment-lower extremity. Acupuncture therapy improved lower limb balance function.

Relationship between Corticospinal Excitability While Gazing at the Mirror and Motor Imagery Ability

Mirror therapy (MT) helps stroke survivors recover motor function. Previous studies have reported that an individual's motor imagery ability is related to the areas of brain activity during motor imagery and the effectiveness of motor imagery training. However, the relationship between MT and motor imagery ability and between corticospinal tract excitability during mirror gazing, an important component of MT, and motor imagery ability is unclear. This study determined whether the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude while gazing at the mirror relates to participants' motor imagery abilities. Twenty-four healthy right-handed adults (seven males) were recruited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was performed while gazing at the mirror, and MEP of the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand were measured. Motor imagery ability was measured using the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ), which assesses the vividness of motor imagery ability. Additionally, a mental chronometry (MC) task was used to assess time aspects. The results showed a significant moderate correlation between changes in MEP amplitude values while gazing at the mirror, as compared with resting conditions, and assessment scores of KVIQ. This study shows that corticospinal excitability because of mirror gazing may be related to the vividness of motor imagery ability.

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict Hypoalbuminemia among Patients with Stroke in the Neurocritical Care Unit

This study aimed to investigate hypoalbuminemia-related factors in patients with stroke in the neurocritical care unit (NCU) and to establish a nomogram model for hypoalbuminemia prediction. Data from 902 patients hospitalized for stroke in the NCU who had normal albumin levels on admission from March 2018 to December 2020 were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors associated with hypoalbuminemia. A novel nomogram prediction model for hypoalbuminemia was constructed, and it was validated in an independent set (n = 233). The nomogram incorporated seven risk factors, including age, high comorbidity, mechanical ventilation, feeding routes, total protein, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels, and its area under the curve for predicting hypoalbuminemia in the developmental set and validation set were 0.856 and 0.870, respectively. The novel nomogram facilitates risk prediction of hypoalbuminemia among patients with stroke in the NCU, which might be useful for selecting treatment strategies and management.

Home mirror therapy: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing unimanual and bimanual mirror therapy for improved arm and hand function post-stroke

PURPOSE

To compare home-based unimanual mirror therapy (UMT) and bimanual mirror therapy (BMT) for upper limb recovery in subacute/chronic stroke individuals with moderate-to-severe arm impairment.

METHOD

Twenty-two participants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: UMT, BMT or traditional occupational therapy (TOT) home-based programs. The intervention was 6-weeks and consisted of OT 2 days a week, weekly sessions with the research OT, and 30-minutes of the home-based program 5 days a week, according to group allocation. The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), ABILHAND, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), grip strength, and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) were used for outcome measures.

RESULTS

All groups significantly improved over time on all outcome measures and adhered to the prescribed dosage regardless of group (p<0.05). While there were no between-group differences, effect size and 95% confidence interval data suggest a clinical significance in favor of UMT as compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All participants, regardless of home-based program, adhered to the prescribed dosage and significantly improved over time. Despite no between-group differences, effect size and 95% confidence interval data suggest that UMT may be more beneficial for individuals with moderate-to-severe arm impairment as compared to BMT or TOT. ClinicalTrials.gov: #NCT02780440Implications for RehabilitationHome-based unimanual mirror therapy (UMT), bimanual mirror therapy (BMT), and traditional occupational therapy (TOT), when administered in conjunction with outpatient OT, are helpful for improving upper limb recovery post-stroke.Home-based UMT may be more beneficial than BMT or TOT for improvement in upper limb motor function and activities of daily living of patients with moderate to severe arm impairment post-stroke.

Feasibility and psychophysical effects of immersive virtual reality-based mirror therapy

Background

Virtual reality (VR) has been used as a technological medium to deliver mirror therapy interventions with people after stroke in numerous applications with promising results. The recent emergence of affordable, off-the-shelf head-mounted displays (like the Oculus Rift or HTC Vive) has opened the possibility for novel and cost-effective approaches for immersive mirror therapy interventions. We have developed one such system, ART-VR, which allows people after stroke to carry out a clinically-validated mirror therapy protocol in an immersive virtual environment and within a clinical setting.

Methods

A case cohort of 11 people with upper limb paresis following first time stroke at an in-patient rehabilitation facility received three interventions over a one week period. Participants carried out the BeST mirror therapy protocol using our immersive VR system as an adjunct therapy to their standard rehabilitation program. Our clinical feasibility study investigated intervention outcomes, virtual reality acceptance and user experience.

Results

The results show that the combination of an immersive VR system and mirror therapy protocol is feasible for clinical use. 9 out of 11 participants showed some improvement of their affected hand after the intervention. The vast majority of the participants (9/11) reported experiencing some psycho-physical effects, such as tingling or paraesthesia, in the affected limb during the intervention.

Conclusions

Our findings show that immersive VR-based mirror therapy is feasible and shows effects comparable to those of conventional mirror therapy.

Trial Registration Trial was registered with the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN34011164) on December 3, 2021, retrospectively

Effectiveness of robot-assisted virtual reality mirror therapy for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: study protocol for a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Upper limb motor dysfunction is a common sequela of stroke, and its clinical efficacy needs to be improved. This protocol describes a trial to verify the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted virtual reality mirror therapy (RAVRMT) in improving upper limb motor dysfunction in stroke patients, and to explore the central mechanism by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Methods

This trial will be a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled clinical study. Thirty-two eligible patients will be randomly divided into 2 groups according to the ratio of 1:1, namely virtual reality mirror therapy (VRMT) group and robot-assisted virtual reality mirror therapy (RAVRMT) group. The interventions will be performed once a day for 4 weeks. Primary outcome is Fugl–Meyer motor function assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), secondary outcomes are the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL), the pain visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) and fMRI. Adverse events will be recorded, and severe adverse events will be used as criteria to discontinue the intervention.

Discussion

Combined application of robot-assisted therapy and virtual reality mirror therapy could theoretically activate mirror neuron system and reward circuits to a greater extent, but further high-quality research is needed. The results of this trial will determine whether RAVRMT could better improve upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke and explore its central mechanism using fMRI.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2200061721; 01 July 2022).

Enhancing Mirror Therapy via Scaling and Shared Control: A Novel Open-Source Virtual Reality Platform for Stroke Rehabilitation

Mirror therapy is increasingly used in stroke rehabilitation to improve functional movements of the affected limb. However, the extent of mirroring in conventional mirror therapy is typically fixed (1:1) and cannot be tailored based on the patient's impairment level. Further, the movements of the affected limb are not actively incorporated in the therapeutic process. To address these issues, we developed an immersive VR system using HTC Vive and Leap Motion, which communicates with our free and open-source software environment programmed using SteamVR and the Unity 3D gaming engine. The mirror therapy VR environment was incorporated with two novel features: (1) scalable mirroring and (2) shared control. In the scalable mirroring, mirror movements were programmed to be scalable between 0 and 1, where 0 represents no movements, 0.5 represents 50% mirroring, and 1 represents 100% mirroring. In shared control, the contribution of the mirroring limb to the movements was programmed to be scalable between 0 to 1, where 0 represents 100% contribution from the mirroring limb (i.e., no mirroring), 0.5 represents 50% of movements from the mirrored limb and 50% of movements from the mirroring limb, and 1 represents full mirroring (i.e., no shared movements). Validation experiments showed that these features worked appropriately. The proposed VR-based mirror therapy is the first fully developed system that is freely available to the rehabilitation science community. The scalable and shared control features can diversify mirror therapy and potentially augment the outcomes of rehabilitation, although this needs to be verified through future experiments.

Effect and mechanism of mirror therapy on lower limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke: A fMRI study

BACKGROUND

Mirror therapy has been gradually adopted for lower limb rehabilitation, but its efficacy and neural mechanism are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the effect and neural mechanism of mirror therapy on lower limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke by using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).

METHODS

A single-blind and randomized controlled pilot study was conducted. 32 patients with ischemic stroke were included in this study and randomly divided into two groups - the control group (CT, n = 16) and the mirror therapy group (MT, n = 16). Both the CT and MT groups received medication and routine rehabilitation training. In addition, mirror therapy was added to the MT group 5 times a week for 30 minutes each time over a period of 3 weeks. Patients' motor functions, functional connectivity (FC), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) were analyzed both before and immediately after the treatment.

RESULTS

Patients' motor functions showed significant improvement in both groups compared to those before treatment (p <  0.01). Moreover, the MT group showed significantly better improvement than the CT group after the treatment (p <  0.05). FC, ReHo and fALFF indicated enhanced neuronal activities in motor function-related brain regions in the MT group compared to the CT group.

CONCLUSION

Mirror therapy promotes the recovery of lower limb motor functions in patients with ischemic stroke. Through the comparative rs-fMRI analysis, it is found that the mirror therapy promotes the functional reorganization of the injured brain.

Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Impairment in Stroke: A Narrative Review on the Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Economic Statistics of Stroke and State of the Art Therapies

Stroke has been one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and is still a social health issue. Keeping in view the importance of physical rehabilitation of stroke patients, an analytical review has been compiled in which different therapies have been reviewed for their effectiveness, such as functional electric stimulation (FES), noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) including transcranial direct current stimulation (t-DCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (t-MS), invasive epidural cortical stimulation, virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation, task-oriented therapy, robot-assisted training, tele rehabilitation, and cerebral plasticity for the rehabilitation of upper extremity motor impairment. New therapeutic rehabilitation techniques are also being investigated, such as VR. This literature review mainly focuses on the randomized controlled studies, reviews, and statistical meta-analyses associated with motor rehabilitation after stroke. Moreover, with the increasing prevalence rate and the adverse socio-economic consequences of stroke, a statistical analysis covering its economic factors such as treatment, medication and post-stroke care services, and risk factors (modifiable and non-modifiable) have also been discussed. This review suggests that if the prevalence rate of the disease remains persistent, a considerable increase in the stroke population is expected by 2025, causing a substantial economic burden on society, as the survival rate of stroke is high compared to other diseases. Compared to all the other therapies, VR has now emerged as the modern approach towards rehabilitation motor activity of impaired limbs. A range of randomized controlled studies and experimental trials were reviewed to analyse the effectiveness of VR as a rehabilitative treatment with considerable satisfactory results. However, more clinical controlled trials are required to establish a strong evidence base for VR to be widely accepted as a preferred rehabilitation therapy for stroke.

Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Scoping Review of Upper Limb Recovery and Brain Activities

BACKGROUND

Mirror therapy (MT) has been used as a treatment for various neurological disorders. Recent application of electroencephalogram (EEG) to the MT study allows researchers to gain insight into the changes in brain activity during the therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review is aimed at mapping existing evidence and identifying knowledge gaps about the effects of MT on upper limb recovery and its application for individuals with chronic stroke.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A scoping review through a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases. Twenty articles published between 2010 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria. The efficacy of MT on upper limb recovery and brain activity during MT were discussed according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

RESULTS

A majority of the studies indicated positive effects of MT on upper limb recovery from the body structure/functional domain. All studies used EEG to indicate brain activation during MT.

CONCLUSION

MT is a promising intervention for improving upper limb function for individuals with chronic stroke. This review also highlights the need to incorporate EEG into the MT study to capture brain activity and understand the mechanism underlying the therapy.

Comparing the effectiveness of bimanual and unimanual mirror therapy in unilateral neglect after stroke: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Unilateral neglect in stroke patients is a major obstacle to rehabilitation, which is a great challenge for therapists.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of bimanual mirror therapy (BMT) and unimanual mirror therapy (UMT), the two protocols of mirror therapy, for the reduction of the symptoms of unilateral neglect in stroke patients.

METHODS

Twenty-eight individuals were randomly assigned to the UMT or BMT groups. Both groups received mirror therapy for 30 minutes per day, 5 days a week, for a period of 4 weeks. The Star Cancelation Test (SCT), Line Bisection Test (LBT), Picture Scanning test (PST), and Korean Catherine Bergego Scale (K-CBS) were used to measure the change in unilateral neglect, and the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) was used to evaluate activities of daily living (ADL).

RESULTS

The results of SCT, LBT, PST, and K-CBS showed significant decreases in unilateral neglect in both groups (p <  0.05). K-MBI improved significantly in both groups (p <  0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups in the unilateral neglect tests (p <  0.05), but no significant difference in ADL evaluation (p >  0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mirror therapy protocols can be applied to treat unilateral neglect in stroke patients. However, BMT may be more beneficial for reducing the symptoms of unilateral neglect.

Postural Difference between the Interventions Reflecting the Concept of Mirror Therapy in Healthy Subjects

(1) Background: Mirror therapy is one of the promising interventions for the upper limb rehabilitation of stroke patients. Postural asymmetry during mirror therapy was pointed out as a possibility to influence stroke patients’ rehabilitation negatively. However, it is still difficult to find studies on the postural changes in mirror therapy concept interventions. This study compared three methods of postural differences as follows: traditional mirror therapy (mirror); displaying the real-time movement of the unaffected side on the screen above the affected side (screen); and playing a pre-recorded movement of the unaffected side on a tablet placed on a movable box where the affected hand is put inside (movable). (2) Methods: to observe a kinematic difference, we recruited 16 healthy volunteers to go through three different interventions (mirror, screen, movable). The motion capture system made observations on the postures before and during interventions, then compared and analyzed. (3) Results: while using the mirror, the sitting posture was observed to become asymmetric, and the following unique posture was observed where the target hand went further from the trunk while performing tasks. In addition, the shoulder of the target side came forward, and the difference between both elbow flexion angles was also observed. On the other hand, the screen or movable device did not cause a significant change in the sitting posture, and no additional postural differences were observed either. (4) Conclusions: mirror therapy showed a tendency to cause lateral flexion opposite the target hand, thus, creating additional postural change. However, developed methods controlled spine tilt, and enabled the keeping of the midline while sitting during the intervention.

Mirror therapy in upper limb motor recovery and activities of daily living, and its neural correlates in stroke individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Available literature indicates that 30-66% of stroke survivors present persistent upper limb impairment. Considering the importance of upper limb function for activities of daily living, it is necessary to investigate neurorehabilitation therapies that could improve the upper limb function. Among stroke complementary therapies, mirror therapy has shown promising results. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to review and synthesize clinical evidence on the use of mirror therapy on motor recovery of the upper limb and activities of daily living, and its neural correlates in stroke patients. The literature search was carried out in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Twenty-nine studies met all the inclusion criteria. Two meta-analyses were conducted to compare mirror therapy with sham therapy on two general measures, upper limb assessment and activities of daily living. Results suggest that mirror therapy was better than sham therapy, mainly in the subacute phase, but the meta-analyses were nonsignificant. In addition, mirror therapy and cortical reorganization showed potential neural correlates, such as the primary motor cortex, precuneus, and posterior cingulate cortex.

Associated Mirror Therapy Enhances Motor Recovery of the Upper Extremity and Daily Function after Stroke: A Randomized Control Study

Bimanual cooperation plays a vital role in functions of the upper extremity and daily activities. Based on the principle of bilateral movement, mirror therapy could provide bimanual cooperation training. However, conventional mirror therapy could not achieve the isolation of the mirror. A novel paradigm mirror therapy called associated mirror therapy (AMT) was proposed to achieve bimanual cooperation task-based mirror visual feedback isolating from the mirror. The study was aimed at exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of AMT on stroke patients. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Thirty-six eligible patients were equally assigned into the experimental group (EG) receiving AMT and the control group (CG) receiving bimanual training without mirroring for five days/week, lasting four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb subscale (FMA-UL) for upper extremity motor impairment was used as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the Box and Block Test (BBT) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for motor and daily function. All patients participated in trials throughout without adverse events or side effects. The scores of FMA-UL and FIM improved significantly in both groups following the intervention. Compared to CG, the scores of FMA-UL and FIM were improved more significantly in EG after the intervention. The BBT scores were improved significantly for EG following the intervention, but no differences were found in the BBT scores of CG after the intervention. However, no differences in BBT scores were observed between the two groups. In summary, our study suggested that AMT was a feasible and practical approach to enhance the motor recovery of paretic arms and daily function in stroke patients. Furthermore, AMT may improve manual dexterity for poststroke rehabilitation.

A Comparative Efficacy Study of Robotic Priming of Bilateral Approach in Stroke Rehabilitation

Background: Stroke survivors can remain impaired in body functions, activity, and participation. A novel rehabilitation regimen is required to obtain scientific evidence and to help clinicians determine effective interventions for stroke. Mirror therapy (MT) and bilateral upper limb training (BULT) are based on the tenet of bilateral movement practice; however, the additional effect of bilateral robotic priming combined with these two therapies is unclear. Objectives: This study examined the effects of two hybrid therapies, robotic priming combined with MT and robotic priming combined with BULT, in stroke survivors. Methodology: The study randomized 31 participants to groups that received robotic priming combined with MT (n = 15) or robotic priming combined with BULT (n = 16). Outcome measures included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA), the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), and accelerometer data. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant within-group improvements in most outcome measures. Significant between-group differences and medium-to-large effect sizes were found in favor of the group that received robotic priming combined with MT based on the FMA distal part subscale scores, FMA total scores, and accelerometer data. Conclusion: Robotic priming combined with MT may have beneficial effects for patients in the improvements of overall and distal arm motor impairment as well as affected arm use in real life. Additional follow-up, a larger sample size, and consideration of the effect of lesion location or different levels of cognitive impairment are warranted to validate our findings in future studies. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03773653.

Occupational Therapy for Reducing Disabilities in Persons with Disabilities in India: A Systematic Review

Background

The current evidence for occupational therapy practice, teaching, and research is replicated and implemented significantly from high-income countries in India. Therefore, a systematic review and an evaluation of existing evidence for occupational therapy (OT) to reduce disabilities including impairments, activity limitations, and participation restriction in persons with disabilities (PWD) in India are warranted.

Objectives

The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of OT interventions for reducing disabilities in PWD in India.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, and Web of Science. A hand search was also carried out in selected Indian journals, OT-specific databases, and repositories, such as Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, OT Seekers, World Federation of Occupational Therapy Bulletin, Asia Pacific Occupational Therapists Regional Group, and clinical trials registers. The search was restricted to published studies conducted in India during 2000–2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of an occupational therapy intervention delivered by OTs for PWD, where the effects of the intervention were evaluated using any relevant disability outcome measure. Studies without access to full text were excluded. Two review authors independently completed screening, and one author reviewed the full text of the screened studies. Another pair of authors extracted data from included studies for prespecified disability outcomes, and two authors assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.

Results

We identified seven RCTs of occupational therapy interventions for PWD in India with 305 participants in total. All seven studies were very different in terms of their objective, participants, comparison, and outcomes. Allocation concealment and blinding and risk of bias were high in five trials. All the trials reported impairment outcomes with a statistically significant difference between the experimental arm and the control arm in terms of their primary outcomes except one. Given the sample size and the risk of bias in each of the included trials, the effect size has to be understood and interpreted with utmost caution.

Conclusion

Overall, this review establishes the paucity of evidence for occupational therapy for PWD in India. Building the capacity for rigorous and relevant scientific research in occupational therapy would enable bridging the gaps in evidence for occupational therapy in India.

Effect of NEuroplasticity-Principles-based SEnsory-Rehabilitation (NEPSER) on sensori-motor recovery in stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Up to 2/3rd of the stroke subjects may experience impairment in any of the somatosensory modalities such as light touch, proprioception, and stereognosis. The sensory recovery is strongly associated with the level of motor recovery. Very negligible sensory-based interventions have been developed and found to be evident in enhancing the sensory deficit and associated motor recovery. The possible factor for the ineffectiveness of these sensory interventions could be lack of the neuroscientific basis in formulation of the program. Thus, the objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a neuralplasticity-principles-based sensory-rehabilitation protocol on motor and sensory recovery, and disability of the post-stroke hemiparetic subjects.

Methods

We propose to recruit 122 poststroke subjects in a randomized controlled, assessor blinded trial to be conducted in a rehabilitation-institute. The key eligibility criteria is age between 20 to 80 years, hemiparesis (right or left), ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, 1 to 12 months poststroke, and impairment in any of the sensory modalities. The participants in the experimental group will receive NEuroplasticity-Principles-based SEnsory-Rehabilitation (NEPSER) protocol comprising active, repetitive, and meaningful training of the specific sensory modalities utilizing visuo-perceptual, cognitive, motor, and functional tasks will be imparted for 8 weeks, 5 sessions / week, each of 2 h. The control subjects will undergo only standard rehabilitation based on neurophysiological, biomechanical, and rehabilitative approaches. All the participants will be assessed for motor (Fugl-Meyer assessment, upper extremity section) and sensory recovery [Nottingham Sensory assessment (Erasmus MC modification of the revised version)] at baseline, 8-week, and 12-week follow-up. The Semmes weinstein monofilament, two-point discrimination test and modified rankin scale (disability) will be applied as secondary measures. A repeated-measures 2-way ANOVA will be used to estimate difference for the post intervention and follow-up scores between the groups.

Perspective

The proposed study will lead to development of a novel rehabilitation protocol that will not only enhance the sensory recovery but also the motor and functional recovery. This may reduce the impact of stroke disability and enhance the quality of life.

Trial registration

The trial has been registered under Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) as CTRI/2019/09/021442 on 30th September 2019.

Effects of home-based mirror therapy and cognitive therapeutic exercise on the improvement of the upper extremity functions in patients with severe hemiparesis after a stroke: a protocol for a pilot randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Neuroplasticity is defined as the capacity of the brain to reorganise new neuronal pathways. Mirror therapy (MT) and cognitive therapeutic exercise (CTE) are two neurorehabilitation techniques based on neuroplasticity and designed to improve the motor functions of the affected upper extremity in patients with severe hemiparesis after a stroke. Home-based interventions are an appropriate alternative to promote independence and autonomy. The objective of this study is to evaluate which of these techniques, MT and CTE, combined with task-oriented training, is more effective in functional recovery and movement patterns of the upper extremities in patients with severe hemiparesis after a stroke.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a home-based, single-blind, controlled, randomised clinical trial with three parallel arms, including 154 patients who had a stroke aged above 18 years. The primary outcome will be the functionality of the affected upper extremity measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Secondary variables will include cognitive performance, emotional state, quality of life and activities of daily living. During 6 weeks, one of the intervention groups will receive a treatment based on MT and the other one on CTE, both combined with task-oriented training. No additional interventions will be provided to the control group. To assess the progress of patients who had a stroke in the subacute phase, all variables will be evaluated at different visits: initial (just before starting treatment and 4 weeks post-stroke), post-intervention (6 weeks after initial) and follow-up (6 months).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (CEIm-2.134/2.019) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04163666). The results will be disseminated through open-access peer-reviewed journals, conference presentation, broadcast media and a presentation to stakeholders. These study results will provide relevant and novel information on effective neurorehabilitation strategies and improve the quality of intervention programmes aimed at patients after a stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04163666).

Synergistic Effect of Combined Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There is an increasing trend for researchers to combine mirror therapy with another rehabilitation therapy when treating the upper extremity of patients with stroke.

Objective: To evaluate the synergistic effect of combined mirror therapy (MT) on the upper extremity in patients with stroke and to judge efficacies of four combined mirror therapy subgroups [EMGBF group: electromyographic biofeedback (EMGBF) + MT; MG group: mesh glove (MG) + MT; AT group: acupuncture (AT) + MT; ES group: EMG-triggered electrical stimulation (ES) + MT].

Methods: CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, OVID LWW, and Cochrane were used. We searched these databases for randomized controlled trials published from January 2013 to August 2019, which presented results of combining mirror therapy with other rehabilitation therapies. Quality assessments were performed using the Cochrane Handbook criteria in order to accurately review interventions. The primary outcomes were measured by the Fugl–Meyer Assessment—upper extremity (FMA-UE).

Results: Ten trials, with a total of 444 patients whose upper limb functions were damaged after stroke, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, a remarkable effect of combined mirror therapy [all: weight mean difference in random effects model (WMD): 8.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.87, 10.26] on functional recovery of the upper limb was detected. However, a high value of heterogeneity (χ2 = 20.09, df = 9; I² = 55%) was found. The subgroup analysis (EMGBF group: WMD = 8.95, 95% CI 6.33, 11.58; ES group: WMD = 10.14, 95% CI: 5.67, 15.01) showed moderate improvement in functional recovery of the upper extremity in patients with stroke when mirror therapy was combined with conventional therapy. Furthermore, no difference in efficacy on upper extremity in patients with stroke was observed between the EMGBF group and the ES group.

Conclusion: Despite the heterogeneity, the results indicate that combining mirror therapy with another rehabilitation therapy on the upper extremity in patients with stroke is better than single rehabilitation therapy. However, more randomized controlled clinical trials and larger sample sizes are required for an in-depth meta-analysis.

Task-based mirror therapy enhances the upper limb motor function in subacute stroke patients: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

The improvement of the upper limb disability, which is mainly caused by stroke, is still one of the rehabilitation treatment challenges. However, the effectiveness of task-based mirror therapy (TBMT) on subacute stroke with moderate and severe upper limb impairment has not been deeply explored.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of TBMT, in comparison to occupational therapy, in moderate and severe upper limb impairment by analyzing the motor function and activities of daily living in subacute stroke patients.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Rehabilitative inpatient unit.

POPULATION

Thirty patients with moderate and severe-subacute stroke recruited from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University have been randomly divided into two groups; the task-based mirror therapy group (N.=15) and the control group (N.=15).

METHODS

The first group received TBMT while the control group only underwent only occupational therapy without a mirror utilization. Taking into consideration that both groups received conventional therapy. The intervention time was equal for both groups consisting of 25 minutes per day for 25 days. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Brunnstrom Assessment (BRS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were used to assess the outcomes for this study.

RESULTS

After 25 sessions of treatment, the patients in both groups have shown-improvement in the activates of daily living, motor recovery, and motor function. No significant differences between the two groups were observed on BRS and MBI. However, interestingly, the results of the TBMT group were significantly better than the control group in FMA (P<0.05) and certain aspects of MAS (elbow flexion, wrist flexion, wrist extension, and fingers extension with P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the combination of conventional rehabilitation treatment and TBMT is an effective way to improve the functional recovery in the upper limb stroke patients.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

TBMT is a therapeutic technique that can be used in subacute stroke patients with moderate and severe upper limb impairment.

Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Current Perspectives

In contrast to varied therapy approaches, mirror therapy (MT) can be used even in completely plegic stroke survivors, as it uses visual stimuli for producing a desired response in the affected limb. MT has been studied to have effects not just on motor impairments but also on sensations, visuospatial neglect, and pain after stroke. This paper attempts to systematically review and present the current perspectives on mirror therapy and its application in stroke rehabilitation, and dosage, feasibility and acceptability in stroke rehabilitation. An electronic database search across Google, PubMed, Web of Science, etc., generated 3871 results. After screening them based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 28 studies in this review. The data collected were divided on the basis of application in stroke rehabilitation, modes of intervention delivery, and types of control and outcome assessment. We found that most studies intervened for upper limb motor impairments post stroke. Studies were equally distributed between intervention in chronic and acute phases post stroke with therapy durations lasting between 1 and 8 weeks. MT showed definitive motor and sensory improvements although the extent of improvements in sensory impairments and hemineglect is limited. MT proves to be an effective and feasible approach to rehabilitate post-stroke survivors in the acute, sub-acute, and chronic phases of stroke, although its long-term effects and impact on activities of daily living need to be analysed extensively.

Outcome measurement of hand function following mirror therapy for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

Mirror therapy is a treatment used to address hand function following a stroke. Measurement of outcomes using appropriate assessment tools is crucial; however, many assessment options exist.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study is to systematically review outcome measures that are used to assess hand function following mirror therapy after stroke and, in addition, to identify the psychometric and descriptive properties of the included measures and through the linking process determine if the outcome measures are representative of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

Following a comprehensive literature search, outcome measures used in the included studies were linked to the ICF and analyzed based on descriptive information and psychometric properties.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met inclusion criteria and included 24 different assessment tools to measure hand or upper limb function. Most outcome measures used in the selected studies (63%) were rated by the evaluating therapist. Thirteen outcome measures (54%) linked to the ICF body function category and 10 measures (42%) linked to activities and participation. One outcome measure was linked to not defined, and all other ICF categories were not represented. A majority of outcome measures have been assessed for validity, reliability, and responsiveness, but responsiveness was the least investigated psychometric property.

DISCUSSION

Current studies on mirror therapy after stroke are not consistent in the assessment tools used to determine hand function. Understanding of study outcomes requires analysis of the assessment tools. The outcome measures used in the included studies are not representative of personal and environmental factors, but tools linking to body functions and activities and participations provide important information on functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating a combination of measures that are psychometrically sound and reflective of the ICF should be considered for assessment of hand function after mirror therapy after stroke.

Cortical mapping of mirror visual feedback training for unilateral upper extremity: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

INTRODUCTION

Mirror therapy has been shown to be effective in promoting hemiplegic arm recovery in patients with stroke or unilateral cerebral palsy. This study aimed to explore the cortical mapping associated with mirror therapy in a group of healthy adults by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

METHODS

Fifteen right-handed healthy adults were recruited by means of convenience sampling. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used: movement complexity with two levels-task-based (T) and movement-based (M), and visual direction with two levels-mirror visual feedback task (MT) and covered mirror with normal visual feedback task (NoT) as the control, constituting four conditions, namely TMT, MMT, TNoT, and MNoT. The regions of interest were the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), the supplementary motor area (SMA), the superior parietal cortex (SPL), and the precuneus in both the contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres.

RESULTS

Our findings showed that in the ipsilateral hemisphere, MT induced a higher activation in the SMA and SPL than NoT. With regard to the activation of the ipsilateral SMC, only one channel was found showing superior effects of MT compared with NoT. In addition, MT can strengthen the functional connectivity between the SMC and SMA. In the contralateral hemisphere, both movement complexity and visual direction showed significant main effects in the SMC, while only movement complexity showed a significant main effect in the SMA and SPL. The precuneus of both sides was deactivated and showed no significant difference among the four conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiment implies that the modest activation of ipsilateral SMC during MT is likely to be associated with the enhanced activity of ipsilateral SMA and that the precuneus may not be an essential component of the MT-related neural network.

Alternative Motor Task-Based Pattern Training With a Digital Mirror Therapy System Enhances Sensorimotor Signal Rhythms Post-stroke

Mirror therapy (MT) facilitates motor learning and induces cortical reorganization and motor recovery from stroke. We applied the new digital mirror therapy (DMT) system to compare the cortical activation under the three visual feedback conditions: (1) no mirror visual feedback (NoMVF), (2) bilateral synchronized task-based mirror visual feedback training (BMVF), and (3) reciprocal task-based mirror visual feedback training (RMVF). During DMT, EEG recordings, including time-dependent event-related desynchronization (ERD) signal amplitude in both mu and beta bands, were obtained from the standard C3 (ispilesional hemisphere, IH), C4 (contralesional hemisphere, CH), and Cz scalp sites (supplementary motor area, SMA). The entire ERD curve was separated into three time-phases: P0 (-2 to 0 s), P1 (0 to 2 s), and P2 (2 to 4 s). Four-way and subsequent repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to examine the effects of group (stroke vs. control group), test condition (NoMVF, BMVF, and RMVF), time-phase (P0, P1, and P2), and brain area (IH, CH, SMA) on the ERD areas (%) in mu and beta bands. For the mu band, generally, ERD areas (%) were larger in the control than in the stroke group. The ERD areas (%) were largest under the RMVF condition, followed by BMVF and NoMVF conditions. Similar results were found in the beta bands. The main effects of group, time-phase, and test condition on the ERD areas (%) were significant for the three brain areas, except the main effect of group in the SMA (Cz) and CH (C4) brain area. The ERD areas (%) were larger in the control than in the stroke group. The ERD area (%) was significantly larger during P1 than during P0 and P2 (ps < 0.02), and during P2 than during P0 (ps < 0.01). The ERD area (%) under the RMVF condition was significantly larger than that under the BMVF condition and NoMVF condition (ps < 0.05). The present study suggests that cortical activation particularly in the SMA (Cz) of the brain increases in the RMVF condition in both healthy subjects and stroke patients. This result supports the hypothesis that stroke patients may benefit from RMVF training.

Effects of visual feedback training and visual targets on muscle activation, balancing, and walking ability in adults after hemiplegic stroke: a preliminary, randomized, controlled study

The aim of this randomized, controlled study was to investigate the effect of visual feedback through visual targets on muscle activity, balance, and gait in stroke patients. Patients were recruited from the inpatient unit of a rehabilitation hospital. Twenty-one patients who had experienced hemiplegic stroke were randomly assigned to two groups: an experimental group (visual feedback training with visual targets on gradual weight shifting), and a control group (visual feedback training on gradual weight shifting). All patients performed 30 minutes of comprehensive rehabilitation therapy followed by an additional 20 minutes of gradual weight shifting using visual feedback training with or without visual targets: three sets per day, five times a week, for 4 weeks. Significantly larger gains were identified in the experimental group compared to the control group due to gluteus medius muscle activation and the weight-bearing ability of the paretic side. Visual feedback training with visual targets during gradual weight bearing on the paretic side appears to improve the muscle activation and balancing abilities of hemiplegic stroke patients compared to visual feedback training alone.

Comparison Between Movement-Based and Task-Based Mirror Therapies on Improving Upper Limb Functions in Patients With Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: The aim of this trial was to compare the effect of movement-based mirror therapy (MMT) and task-based mirror therapy (TMT) on improving upper limb functions in patients with stroke. Methods: A total of 34 patients with sub-acute stroke with mildly to moderately impaired upper limb motor functions. The participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: MMT, TMT, and conventional treatment (CT). The MMT group underwent movement-based mirror therapy for around 30 min/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks, whereas the TMT group underwent dose-matched TMT. The CT group underwent only conventional rehabilitation. The MMT and TMT groups underwent CT in addition to their mirror therapy. Blinded assessments were administered at baseline and immediately after the intervention. Upper limb motor functions, measured using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and hand grip strength; upper limb spasticity, measured using the modified Ashworth scale (MAS); and activities of daily living, measured using the modified Barthel index (MBI). Results: A significant time-by-group interaction effect was noted in FMA-UE. Post-hoc analysis of change scores showed that MMT yielded a better effect on improving FMA-UE than the other two therapies, at a marginally significant level (P = 0.050 and 0.022, respectively). No significant interaction effect was noted in WMFT, hand grip strength, MAS, and MBI. Conclusion: Both MMT and TMT are effective in improving the upper limb function of patients with mild to moderate hemiplegia due to stroke. Nevertheless, MMT seems to be superior to TMT in improving hemiplegic upper extremity impairment. Further studies with larger stroke cohorts are expected to be inspired by this pilot trial. Trial registration number: No. ChiCTR1800019043 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx).

Paradoxes in rehabilitation

Paradoxical enhancement and paradoxical recovery of function after brain injury harmonize well with the concept of "ultrabilitation" and its focus on novel forms of flourishing in rehabilitation settings. I consider three sets of paradoxes which may impact on brain injury rehabilitation. Firstly, I consider post-traumatic growth after brain injury and its key determinants. Secondly, I review the role of illusions in rehabilitation and the paradox that some clinical conditions may be improved by invoking perceptual distortions. Thirdly, I consider paradoxical recovery profiles after brain injury, since knowledge of such paradoxical profiles may help inform attempts at rehabilitation of some patients. Finally, I consider how some of these paradoxes relate to components of ultrabilitation, and in addition to the nascent field of positive neuropsychology and the concept of resilience after brain injury.Implications for rehabilitationIllusions can sometimes be harnessed as a therapeutic tool in rehabilitation.There may be spontaneous, positive outcomes of an injury or illness, in the form of "post-traumatic growth", and these should be considered as part of a holistic therapeutic approach in rehabilitation.Some patients make an exceptional recovery from a severe brain insult, and lessons could be learned from such cases, such as disciplined use of compensatory strategies, which could have broader implications for neurorehabilitation.

A systematic review of physical rehabilitation interventions for stroke in low and lower-middle income countries

Purpose: Approximately 70% of strokes occur in low and middle income countries, yet the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation in these contexts remains undetermined. This systematic review identifies and summarises the current evidence supporting physical rehabilitation interventions post-stroke in low and lower-middle income countries.Methods: Five databases were comprehensively searched (April 2017) for randomised controlled trials, clinical controlled trials, and cohort studies testing rehabilitation interventions post-stroke in these countries. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Tool assessed quality of included studies.Results: Sixty-two studies (2115 participants) were included. Interventions addressed upper limb (n = 26), lower limb (n = 22), and other (n = 14) outcomes. Seven studies were rated as strong in quality, 16 moderate and 39 rated as weak. Overall, in addition to usual care, physical rehabilitation interventions improved outcomes for stroke survivors. Best evidence synthesis provides level I (b) evidence supporting constraint induced movement therapy and mirror therapy to improve upper limb functional outcomes. Level I (b) evidence supports multimodal interventions that include lower limb motor imagery to improve gait parameters. Level II (b) evidence supports sit-to-stand training to improve balance outcomes.Conclusions: Exercise-based and brain training interventions improved functional outcomes post-stroke in low and lower-middle income countries. Further high-quality studies including participation outcomes are required.Implications for RehabilitationLow-cost physical rehabilitation interventions requiring minimal resources can improve functional outcomes after stroke in low and lower-middle income countries.Exercise-based interventions can improve upper limb, lower limb, gait, and balance outcomes after stroke.Brain training paradigms such as mirror therapy and motor imagery, when included in therapy packages, can improve upper limb and gait outcomes.The proven efficacy for rehabilitation interventions in improving stroke outcomes in low and lower-middle income countries supports the need to strengthen the rehabilitation workforce in this context.

Mirror Illusion for Sensori-Motor Training in Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Poststroke, sensory deficits are not uncommon. In spite of the close association between the sensory and motor recovery, the deficits are usually underemphasized. Mirror therapy (MT), a neural-based approach for the motor deficit has not been explored for the sensory impairment. The objective of the present study was to develop and determine the effect of a MT program for sensori-motor impairment among poststroke subjects.

METHODS DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Functional therapy laboratory of Rehabilitation Institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-one chronic poststroke subjects (17 experimental and 14 controls), aged between 30 and 60years, with ≤ diminished light touch in the hand.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Semmes Weinstein Monofilament (cutaneous threshold), 2-Point discrimination test (touch discrimination) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment (hand motor recovery).

INTERVENTION

The experimental group received sensory stimulus such as tactile perception and motor tasks on the less-affected hand using mirror box. The control counterparts underwent only dose-matched conventional program. 30 sessions with a frequency of 5/week were imparted to the groups.

RESULTS

Post intervention, there was a significant (P < .004) increase up to 30% positive touch-response for the hand quadrants among the experimental group in comparison to only 13.5% rise for the same among the controls. The cutaneous threshold of the less-affected palm also improved significantly among the experimental subjects in comparison to the controls (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

MT may be considered as a promising regime for enhancing cutaneous sensibility in stroke. The mirror illusion induced by MT may be utilized for sensory and motor deficits as well as for the more-affected and less-affected hands.

Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke

BACKGROUND

Mirror therapy is used to improve motor function after stroke. During mirror therapy, a mirror is placed in the person's midsagittal plane, thus reflecting movements of the non-paretic side as if it were the affected side.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effectiveness of mirror therapy compared with no treatment, placebo or sham therapy, or other treatments for improving motor function and motor impairment after stroke. We also aimed to assess the effects of mirror therapy on activities of daily living, pain, and visuospatial neglect.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, PsycINFO and PEDro (last searched 16 August 2017). We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings, trials and research registers, checked reference lists, and contacted trialists, researchers and experts in our field of study.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and randomised cross-over trials comparing mirror therapy with any control intervention for people after stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials based on the inclusion criteria, documented the methodological quality, assessed risks of bias in the included studies, and extracted data. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We analysed the results as standardised mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) for continuous variables, and as odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 62 studies with a total of 1982 participants that compared mirror therapy with other interventions. Of these, 57 were randomised controlled trials and five randomised cross-over trials. Participants had a mean age of 59 years (30 to 73 years). Mirror therapy was provided three to seven times a week, between 15 and 60 minutes for each session for two to eight weeks (on average five times a week, 30 minutes a session for four weeks).When compared with all other interventions, we found moderate-quality evidence that mirror therapy has a significant positive effect on motor function (SMD 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.67; 1173 participants; 36 studies) and motor impairment (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.66; 1292 participants; 39 studies). However, effects on motor function are influenced by the type of control intervention. Additionally, based on moderate-quality evidence, mirror therapy may improve activities of daily living (SMD 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.65; 622 participants; 19 studies). We found low-quality evidence for a significant positive effect on pain (SMD -0.89, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.11; 248 participants; 6 studies) and no clear effect for improving visuospatial neglect (SMD 1.06, 95% CI -0.10 to 2.23; 175 participants; 5 studies). No adverse effects were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate evidence for the effectiveness of mirror therapy for improving upper extremity motor function, motor impairment, activities of daily living, and pain, at least as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation for people after stroke. Major limitations are small sample sizes and lack of reporting of methodological details, resulting in uncertain evidence quality.

Effect of Mirror Therapy on Recovery of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Mirror therapy (MT) as a relatively new rehabilitation technique has been widely applied in stroke patients. A number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the effects of MT for stroke survivors. The main purpose of this network meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of MT on motor function, activities of daily living (ADL), and pain perception in stroke survivors. Several databases were searched to identify RCTs evaluating the effects of MT in stroke patients to perform this network meta-analysis. Thirty-seven RCTs (42 analyses, 1685 subjects) were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Standard meta-analysis showed that MT significantly improved of motor function according to the increased Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and decreased Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score. In addition, ADL was promoted by MT as the elevated Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and Motor Activity Log (MAL) score. Moreover, MT effectively relieved the pain of stroke patients as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was reduced. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions identified that the sources of heterogeneity might be different intervention arms and duration of interventions. Network meta-analysis showed that MT combined with electrical stimulation (ES) for less than 4 weeks along with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CT), and MT accompanied with CT for less than 4 weeks might be the most suitable interventions for improvement of motor function and ADL, respectively. Overall, MT could effectively improve motor function and ADL, as well as relieve pain for stroke survivors. The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42017081742).

Effects of motor imagery and action observation on hand grip strength, electromyographic activity and intramuscular oxygenation in the hand gripping gesture: A randomized controlled trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of motor imagery and action observation combined with a hand grip strength program on the forearm muscles. Sixty subjects were selected and randomized into three groups: motor imagery (n = 20), action observation (n = 20), or a control group (n = 20). Outcome measures included hand grip strength, electromyographical activity and intramuscular oxygenation. The hand grip strength significantly increased in the motor imagery (p < .001) and action observation (p < .001) groups compared with the control group, although there were no differences between the both groups (p = .30). In the electromyographical activity, intra-group significant differences were found in motor imagery (p = .002) and action observation (p = .003) groups, although there were no differences between the both groups (p = 1.00) Intramuscular oxygenation results did not show any statistically significant differences between any of the study groups (p > .05). Our results suggest that both motor imagery and action observation training, combined with a hand grip strength program, present a significant strength gain and significant change in the strength and electromyographical activity of the forearm muscles, however no change was found in intramuscular oxygenation.

Kinematic analysis of head, trunk, and pelvic motion during mirror therapy for stroke patients

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate mirror therapy (MT) condition by analyzing kinematic parameters according to mirror size and angle. [Subjects and Methods] Three hemiparesis stroke patients and five healthy adults participated in this cross-sectional study. Kinematic parameters during the MT were collected over a total of 5 trials for each subject (3 mirror angles × 3 mirror sizes). Center of pressure (COP) excursion data was collected by force plate, and other kinematic parameters by infra-red cameras. [Results] The larger the size and smaller the angle, the overall dependent variables decreased in all participants. Particularly, when virtual reality reflection equipment (VRRE) was used, the value of the flexion and the lateral tilt was the closest to the midline compared to all other independent variables. Moreover, it showed tendency of moving towards the affected side. Based on the results, MT for stroke patients has a disadvantage of shifting weight and leaning towards the unaffected side during therapy. [Conclusion] Therefore, it seems to be more effective in terms of clinics to apply VRRE to make up for the weak parts and provide more elaborate visual feedback.

The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability

Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the hypothesis that movements directed toward visual targets may enhance MVF modulation of motor cortex (M1) excitability ipsilateral to the trained hand compared to movements without visual targets. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 × 2 factorial design in which feedback (veridical, mirror) and presence of a visual target (target present, target absent) for a right index-finger flexion task were systematically manipulated in a virtual environment. To measure M1 excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the untrained first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at rest prior to and following each of four 2-min blocks of 30 movements (B1–B4). Targeted movement kinematics without visual feedback was measured before and after training to assess learning and transfer. FDI MEPs were decreased in B1 and B2 when movements were made with veridical feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were decreased in B2 and B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were increased in B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were present. Significant MEP changes were not present for the uninvolved ADM, suggesting a task-specific effect. Analysis of kinematics revealed learning occurred in visual target-directed conditions, but transfer was not sensitive to mirror feedback. Results are discussed with respect to current theoretical mechanisms underlying MVF-induced changes in ipsilateral excitability.

Systematic review of mirror therapy compared with conventional rehabilitation in upper extremity function in stroke survivors

BACKGROUND/AIM

Stroke is a leading cause of disability in developed countries. One of the most widespread techniques in clinical practice is mirror therapy (MT). To determine the effectiveness of MT over other methods of intervention in the recovery of upper limb function in people who have had a stroke.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted. The search string was established based on the last systematic review about MT that dated from 2009: "upper extremity" OR "upper limb "AND "mirror therapy" AND stroke. For this search Pubmed, Scopus and SciELO databases were used.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review. Recovery of the upper limb, upper limb function and gross manual dexterity were frequently measured in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In the primary variables in promoting recovery, MT alone showed better results in acute and chronic stroke patients in upper limb functioning than either conventional rehabilitation (CR) or CR plus MT. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015026869.

Efeitos da terapia espelho na recuperação motora e funcional do membro superior com paresia pós-AVC: uma revisão sistemática

RESUMO Após um acidente vascular cerebral (AVC), o membro superior pode apresentar déficits motores que podem levar a incapacidades funcionais. A terapia espelho (TE) é uma possibilidade terapêutica na reabilitação do membro superior (MS). Este estudo objetivou reunir evidências que pudessem mostrar quais são os efeitos da TE na recuperação motora e funcional do MS com paresia pós-AVC. Foi realizada uma busca eletrônica nas bases de dados SciELO, LILACS, PubMed, PEDro e ScienceDirect, utilizando como critérios de inclusão: ensaios clínicos, nos quais os indivíduos acima de 18 anos apresentassem AVC de qualquer etiologia e em qualquer tempo após a lesão encefálica, com sequela no MS; estudos publicados na íntegra em revistas indexadas nas bases supracitadas entre 2010 e 2015, nos idiomas inglês e português, que utilizassem a TE para reabilitação do MS de pacientes com AVC, apresentando como desfechos função motora e independência funcional. Os artigos resultantes foram avaliados pela escala PEDro quanto à qualidade metodológica. Treze ensaios clínicos avaliaram efeitos da TE no MS parético. Os testes mais utilizados foram escala de Fugl-Meyer e Medida de Independência Funcional. Nesses estudos, a TE foi eficaz na recuperação motora do MS e na independência funcional dos pacientes, especialmente nos quesitos transferências e autocuidados. Os artigos foram considerados de moderada a alta qualidade metodológica. Conclui-se que a TE promoveu melhora significativa da função motora e da independência funcional do MS parético pós-AVC independente do tempo decorrido após a lesão encefálica.