Resource Utilization for Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Transferred to a Comprehensive Stroke Center

Lifetime economic potential of mobile stroke units in acute stroke care: A model-based analysis of the drivers of cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To simulate patient-level costs, analyze the economic potential of telemedicine-based mobile stroke units for acute prehospital stroke care, and identify major determinants of cost-effectiveness, based on two recent prospective trials from the United States and Germany.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was developed to simulate lifetime costs and outcomes of mobile stroke unit. The model compares diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke mimic patients by conventional care or by mobile stroke units. The treatment outcomes were derived from the B_PROUD and the BEST-mobile stroke unit trials and further input parameters were derived from recent literature. Uncertainty was addressed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A lifetime horizon based on the US healthcare system was adopted to evaluate different cost thresholds for mobile stroke unit and the resulting cost-effectiveness. Willingness-to-pay thresholds were set at 1x and 3x gross domestic product per capita, as recommended by the World Health Organization.

RESULTS

In the base case scenario, mobile stroke unit care yielded an incremental gain of 0.591 quality-adjusted life years per dispatch. Mobile stroke unit was highly cost-effective up to a maximum average cost of 43,067 US dollars per patient. Sensitivity analyses revealed that MSU cost-effectiveness is mainly affected by reduction of long-term disability costs. Also, among other parameters, the rate of stroke mimics patients diagnosed by MSU plays an important role.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that mobile stroke unit can possibly be operated on an excellent level of cost-effectiveness in urban areas in North America with number of stroke mimic patients and long-term stroke survivor costs as major determinants of lifetime cost-effectiveness.

Using the ICH score during acute telestroke consults to triage transfer to tertiary centers

OBJECTIVE

Constrained resources at tertiary centers indicate a need for re-exploration of the practice of routinely transferring all community hospital patients with complex conditions such as hemorrhagic stroke (ICH). We addressed the clinical question of whether information available during acute care telestroke consults could identify ICH patients not requiring specialty services or neurosurgical intervention who could safely remain at the local center for care.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis abstracting clinical factors to identify ICH patients associated with need for tertiary care or neurosurgical intervention.

SETTING

The Duke Telestroke Network (DTN) in Central NC and Southern Virginia.

PATIENTS

All DTN transferred ICH patients January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

We defined neurosurgical intervention as craniotomy, digital subtraction angiography, or external ventricular drain placement.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We identified 116 transferred ICH patients. Sixty-two were female, the median Glasgow coma score (GCS) was 13, and the median ICU and hospital length of stay were 2 and 7 days respectively. Thirty of the patients were offered and 27 ultimately received neurosurgical intervention. Using inclusion/exclusion criteria from two ICH surgical trials would have increased the intervention group to 35 patients (30%). Components of the ICH score differentiated surgical from non-surgical patients; patients with an ICH score of <2 and GCS ≥13 received no interventions. Nearly 50% of patients could receive medical management locally.

CONCLUSIONS

Coupling the ICH score and GCS can provide triage guidance identifying patients for retention at the referring center. This retained population is distinct from patients eligible for current or novel surgical interventions. This approach provides a framework for assessment of transfers across specialty areas and furthers the value of telehealth networks.

Systematic Review of Resource Use and Costs in the Hospital Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

While clinical guidelines provide a framework for hospital management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), variation in the resource use and costs of these services exists. We sought to perform a systematic literature review to assess the evidence on hospital resource use and costs associated with management of adult patients with ICH, as well as identify factors that impact variation in such hospital resource use and costs, regarding clinical characteristics and delivery of services.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1946 to present. Articles were assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study design, ICH sample size, population, setting, objective, hospital characteristics, hospital resource use and cost data, and main study findings were abstracted.

RESULTS

In total, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pertinent clinical characteristics that increased hospital resource use included presence of comorbidities and baseline ICH severity. Aspects of service delivery that greatly impacted hospital resource consumption included intensive care unit length of stay and performance of surgical procedures and intensive care procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital resource use and costs for patients with ICH were high and differed widely across studies. Making concrete conclusions on hospital resources and costs for ICH care was constrained, given methodologic and patient variation in the studies. Future research should evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of ICH treatment interventions and use specific economic evaluation guidelines and common data elements to mitigate study variation.

National Trends in Transfer of Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Analysis of 12-Year Nationwide Data

OBJECTIVES

The guidelines of the American Hospital Association encourage transferring intracerebral hemorrhage patients from community hospitals to centers with stroke expertise. However, research on the differences in outcomes between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations have been largely limited to small single-center studies. In this study, we explored the national trends in transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations, as well as evaluated the differences, in terms of demographic characteristics, co-morbidity, resource utilization, and outcomes, between transferred intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations and directly admitted hospitalizations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From the National Inpatient Sample (2004 - 2016), we assessed the linear trends in the proportion of interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage hospitalizations. We constructed a series of multivariate logistic regression models to explore the association of transfer status with inpatient mortality and discharge disposition, controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. We used survey design variables to report nationally weighted estimates.

RESULTS

Among 786,999 hospitalizations, 137,340 (17.5%, 95% CI: 16.4-18.6) were transferred. Overall, interhospital transfers for intracerebral hemorrhage has been increasing over the 12-year period of this study. Patients in transferred hospitalizations were younger, more likely to be white, and more likely to have private insurance. Transferred hospitalizations were associated with significantly lower adjusted odds of inpatient mortality, compared to directly admitted hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

As the US healthcare system continues shifting towards value-based care, evidence on the short- and long-term outcomes of transfer of intracerebral hemorrhage patients will inform optimal management of intracerebral hemorrhage patients.

A Triage Model for Interhospital Transfers of Low Risk Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients

OBJECTIVES

Intracerebral hemorrhage comprises a large proportion of inter-hospital transfers to comprehensive stroke centers from centers without comprehensive stroke center resources despite lack of mortality benefit and low comprehensive stroke center resource utilization. The subset of patients who derive the most benefit from inter-hospital transfers is unclear. Here, we create a triage model to identify patients who can safely avoid transfer to a comprehensive stroke center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients transferred to our comprehensive stroke center from surrounding centers was used. Patients with early discharge from the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit without use of comprehensive stroke center resources were identified as low risk, non-utilizers. Variables associated with this designation were used to develop and validate a triage model.

RESULTS

The development and replication cohorts comprised 358 and 99 patients respectively, of whom 78 (22%) and 26 (26%) were low risk, non-utilizers. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale and baseline hemorrhage volume were associated with low risk, non-utilizers in multivariate analysis. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale >13, intracerebral hemorrhage volume <15ml, absence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and supratentorial location had an area under curve, specificity, and sensitivity of 0.72, 91.4%, 52.6%, respectively, for identifying low risk, non-utilizers, and 0.75, 84.9%, 65.4%, respectively, in the replication cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients with Glasgow Coma Scale >13, intracerebral hemorrhage volume <15 ml, absence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and supratentorial location might safely avoid inter-hospital transfer to a comprehensive stroke center. Validation in a prospective, multicenter cohort is warranted.

Interhospital Transfer of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery: The Experience of a New York City Hospital System

OBJECTIVE

The impact of interhospital transfer (IHT) on outcomes of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has not been well studied. We seek to describe the protocolized IHT and systems of care approach of a New York City hospital system, where ICH patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are transferred to a dedicated ICH center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutively admitted patients with spontaneous ICH. We gathered information on demographics, variables related to IHT, clinical and radiographic characteristics, and details about the clinical course and outpatient follow-up. We grouped patients into 2 cohorts: those admitted through IHT and those directly admitted through the emergency department. Primary outcome was good functional outcome at 6 months, defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-3.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 89 underwent IHT and 11 were directly admitted. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in 6-month functional outcome between the 2 cohorts. All transfers were managed by a system-wide transfer center and 24/7 hotline for neuroemergencies. An ICH-specific IHT protocol was followed, in which a neurointensivist provided recommendations for stabilizing patients for transfer. Average transfer time was 199.7 minutes and average distance travelled was 13.6 kilometers.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hospital system, a centralized approach to ICH management and a dedicated ICH center increased access to specialist services, including MIS. Most patients undergoing MIS were transferred from outside hospitals, which highlights the need for additional studies and descriptions of experiences to further elucidate the impact of and best protocols for the IHT of ICH patients.

Patterns of Admission and Outcomes for Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage in Catalonia, Spain

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available about the hospital types to which patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are admitted and treated. This could be important because some effective therapeutic measures can only be administered at comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs).

METHODS

Using the Acute Hospitals Discharge database, which provides population-based information, we identified ICH patients admitted to 7 CSCs and 53 non-CSCs (from January 2015 to December 2016) in Catalonia. CSCs were defined as centers with an emergency department ready to assess and treat code stroke patients around the clock, 24-hour availability of neurology, neurosurgery, and neuroradiology services, and admission to the stroke unit and/or intensive care unit. The database provided the demographics, admitting hospital, and interhospital transfers. Vital status was retrieved from the Central Registry of the Catalan Public Health Insurance.

RESULTS

A total of 3339 ICH patients were identified (mean age, 72.2 ± 14.6 years; 56.8% men). Of the 3339 patients, 45.7% were admitted to a CSC and 54.3% to a non-CSC. Transfer from a non-CSC to a CSC occurred for 1.97% of the patients. In-hospital mortality was similar between the CSCs and non-CSCs (30.2% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.09). The long-term mortality was also comparable between the CSC and non-CSC groups (45.4% vs. 47%; P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a considerable proportion of ICH patients remaining at a non-CSC for their entire hospitalization, the short- and long-term mortality were comparable between the 2 hospital types. More studies are required to determine whether outcomes other than mortality might be related to the admitting hospital type and whether the routing protocols for ICH patients should be modified.

Resource utilisation among patients transferred for intracerebral haemorrhage

Background

Patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are frequently transferred between hospitals for higher level of care. We aimed to identify factors associated with resource utilisation among patients with ICH admitted to a single academic hospital.

Methods

We used a prospectively collected registry of consecutive patients with primary ICH at an urban academic hospital between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015. The primary outcome was use of either intensive care unit (ICU) admission or surgical intervention. Logistic regression examined factors associated with the outcome, controlling for age, sex, Glasgow coma score (GCS) and ICH score.

Results

Of the 2008 patients included, 887 (44.2%) received ICU stay or surgical intervention. These patients were younger (71 vs 74 years, p<0.001), less often white (83.9% vs 89.3%, p<0.001), had lower baseline GCS (12 vs 14, p<0.001) and more frequently had intraventricular haemorrhage (58.6% vs 43.4%, p<0.001). Factors independently associated with ICU stay or surgical intervention were age >65 years (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.69), GCS <15 (1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.52) and ICH score >0 (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.91).

Conclusion

Among this cohort of primary patients with ICH, GCS of 15 and ICH score of 0 were associated with less frequent use of ICU or intervention. These results should be validated in a larger sample but may be valuable for hospitals considering which patients with ICH could safely remain at the referring facility.

Rationale and Design of a Statewide Cohort to examine efficient resource utilization for patients with Intracerebral hemorrhage (EnRICH)

Background

Intracerebral hemorrhage is a devastating disease with no specific treatment modalities. A significant proportion of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage are transferred to large stroke treatment centers, such as Comprehensive Stroke Centers, because of perceived need for higher level of care. However, evidence of improvement in patient-centered outcomes for these patients treated at larger stroke treatment centers as compared to community hospitals is lacking.

Methods / design

“Efficient Resource Utilization for Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage (EnRICH)” is a prospective, multisite, state-wide, cohort study designed to assess the impact of level of care on long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with primary / non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. The study is funded by the Texas state legislature via the Lone Star Stroke Research Consortium. It is being implemented via major hub hospitals in large metropolitan cities across the state of Texas. Each hub has an extensive network of “spoke” hospitals, which are connected to the hub via traditional clinical and administrative arrangements, or by telemedicine technologies. This infrastructure provides a unique opportunity to track outcomes for intracerebral hemorrhage patients managed across a health system at various levels of care. Eligible patients are enrolled during hospitalization and are followed for functional, quality of life, cognitive, resource utilization, and dependency outcomes at 30 and 90 days post discharge. As a secondary aim, an economic analysis of the incremental cost-effectiveness of treating intracerebral hemorrhage patients at higher levels of care will be conducted.

Discussion

Findings from EnRICH will provide much needed evidence of the effectiveness and efficiency of regionalized care for intracerebral hemorrhage patients. Such evidence is required to inform policy and streamline clinical decision-making.

Resistant Hypertension after Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Is Associated with More Medical Interventions and Longer Hospital Stays without Affecting Outcome

Background

Hypertension (HTN) is the most common cause of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aim of this study is to investigate the role of resistant HTN in patients with ICH.

Methods and results

We conducted a retrospective study of all consecutive ICH admissions at our medical center from November 2013 to October 2015. The clinical features of patients with resistant HTN (requiring four or more antihypertensive agents to keep systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg) were compared with those with responsive HTN (requiring three or fewer agents). Of the 152 patients with hypertensive ICH, 48 (31.6%) had resistant HTN. Resistant HTN was independently associated with higher body mass index and proteinuria. Compared to the responsive group, patients with resistant HTN had higher initial blood pressures and greater requirement for ventilator support, hematoma evacuation, hypertonic saline therapy, and nicardipine infusion. Resistant HTN increases length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) (4.2 vs 2.1 days; p = 0.007) and in the hospital (11.5 vs 7.0 days; p = 0.003). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the rate of systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg and duration of nicardipine infusion were independently associated with LOS in the ICU. There was no significant difference in hematoma expansion and functional outcome at hospital discharge between the two groups.

Conclusion

Resistant HTN in patients with ICH is associated with more medical interventions and longer LOS without effecting outcome at hospital discharge.

The Impact of Transferring Stroke Patients: An Analysis of National Administrative Data

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer is an important but resource-intensive pattern of care. The use for stroke patients is highly dependent upon health system structure. We examined the impact of hospital transfers for stroke care in Canada.

METHODS

We analyzed hospital administrative data within the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Database for the 3 fiscal years 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2013/14. Patients with clinical stroke syndrome (ischemic or hemorrhagic) were identified using International Classification of Diseases. Stroke centers were defined by Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada stroke report.

RESULTS

During the 3-year period,397 patients in Canada (excluding Quebec) were admitted to hospital for clinical stroke syndrome. Median age was 75 (interquartile range [IQR] 64-84) years; 50.6 % were male. Less than 5% (n=4030) of patients were transferred. Patients transferred to stroke centers were younger (p<0.001) and had shorter median length of stay (p<0.001). The highest probability of discharge home was associated with sole care at stroke center (43.8%). Transfer to stroke center from community hospital had the highest probability for discharge to rehabilitation facility (25%) and lowest to either long-term (2.1%) or complex community care (2.0%). Transferred patients had lower mortality at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Younger patients were transferred more frequently to stroke centers; older patients were more likely treated in community hospitals. Sole stroke center care was associated with high discharge rate to home; transfer to a stroke center was associated with high discharge rate to rehabilitation and lower mortality rates.