A hospital-based study on ischaemic stroke characteristics, management, and outcomes in Sarawak: Where do we stand?

Prognostic model of in-hospital ischemic stroke mortality based on an electronic health record cohort in Indonesia

Stroke patients rarely have satisfactory survival, which worsens further if comorbidities develop in such patients. Limited data availability from Southeast Asian countries, especially Indonesia, has impeded the disentanglement of post-stroke mortality determinants. This study aimed to investigate predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). This retrospective observational study used IS medical records from the National Brain Centre Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. A theoretically driven Cox's regression and Fine-Gray models were established by controlling for age and sex to calculate the hazard ratio of each plausible risk factor for predicting in-hospital stroke mortality and addressing competing risks if they existed. This study finally included 3,278 patients with IS, 917 (28%) of whom had cardiovascular disease and 376 (11.5%) suffered renal disease. Bivariate exploratory analysis revealed lower blood levels of triglycerides, low density lipoprotein, and total cholesterol associated with in-hospital-stroke mortality. The average age of patients with post-stroke mortality was 64.06 ± 11.32 years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.77 kg/m2 and a median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 12 and an IQR of 5. Cardiovascular disease was significantly associated with IS mortality risk. NIHSS score at admission (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.07), male sex (HR = 1.51[1.01-2.26] and uric acid level (HR = 1.02 [1.00-1.03]) predicted survivability. Comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease (HR = 2.16 [1.37-3.40], pneumonia (HR = 2.43 [1.42-4.15] and sepsis (HR = 2.07 [1.09-3.94, had higher hazards for post-stroke mortality. Contrarily, the factors contributing to a lower hazard of mortality were BMI (HR = 0.94 [0.89-0.99]) and GCS (HReye = 0.66 [0.48-0.89]. In summary, our study reported that male sex, NIHSS, uric acid level, cardiovascular diseases, pneumonia, sepsis. BMI, and GCS on admission were strong determinants of in-hospital mortality in patients with IS.

Association of underlying untreated cardiovascular risk factors with mortality and functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the prevalence of untreated pharmacologically modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (PMRF) among patients with ischaemic stroke and the association with in-hospital mortality and functional outcome.

METHODS

We analysed the data from ischaemic stroke cases admitted to Sarawak General Hospital between June 2013 and June 2021. We matched the underlying PMRFs with prior medications and categorised them as treated, untreated, or no PMRF. We calculated the prevalence and assessed the association between untreated PMRFs and in-hospital mortality or favourable functional outcome (FFO) at discharge, which was adjusted for age, sex, and other covariates in multivariable models.

RESULTS

We included 1963 patients [65.4% male, 59.8 (SD 13.4) years]; 43.8% who had at least one untreated PMRF had triple the odds of in-hospital mortality [adjusted OR (aOR) 2.86, (95%CI 1.44, 5.70)], whereas 30.2% who had all PMRFs treated showed no significant association. Untreated hypertension [aOR 2.19 (95%CI 1.21, 3.98)], treated [aOR 3.02 (95%CI 1.32, 6.92)], and untreated atrial fibrillation [aOR 1.89 (95%CI 1.18, 3.03)] were significantly associated with more in-hospital death, whereas treated prior stroke was associated with fewer in-hospital death [aOR 0.31 (95%CI 0.11, 0.84)]. Treated diabetes [aOR 0.66 (95%CI 0.49, 0.88)] and untreated prior stroke [aOR 0.53 (95%CI 0.33, 0.83)] were associated with fewer FFO.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of untreated underlying PMRFs was significantly associated with poorer outcomes among Malaysian patients with ischaemic stroke in Sarawak. Efforts are needed to promote early screening and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors to reduce the burdens and improve stroke outcomes in this region.

Stroke thrombolysis in a middle-income country: A case study exploring the determinants of its implementation

Introduction

Translation of evidence into clinical practice for use of intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke care has been slow, especially across low- and middle-income countries. In Malaysia where the average national uptake was poor among the public hospitals in 2018, one hospital intriguingly showed comparable thrombolysis rates to high-income countries. This study aimed to explore and provide in-depth understanding of factors and explanations for the high rates of intravenous stroke thrombolysis in this hospital.

Methods

This single case study sourced data using a multimethod approach: (1) semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, (2) surveys, and (3) review of medical records. The Tailored Implementation of Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework was used as a guide to understand the determinants of implementation. Twenty-nine participants comprising the Hospital Director, neurologists, emergency physicians, radiologists, pharmacists, nurses and medical assistants (MAs) were included. Thematic analyses were conducted inductively before triangulated with quantitative analyses and document reviews.

Results

Favorable factors contributing to the uptake included: (1) cohesiveness of team members which comprised of positive interprofessional team dynamics, shared personal beliefs and values, and passionate leadership, and (2) facilitative work process through simplification of workflow and understanding the rationale of the sense of urgency. Patient factors was a limiting factor. Almost two third of ischemic stroke patients arrived at the hospital outside the therapeutic window time, attributing patients' delayed presentation as a main barrier to the uptake of intravenous stroke thrombolysis. One other barrier was the availability of resources, although this was innovatively optimized to minimize its impact on the uptake of the therapy. As such, potential in-hospital delays accounted for only 3.8% of patients who missed the opportunity to receive thrombolysis.

Conclusions

Despite the ongoing challenges, the success in implementing intravenous stroke thrombolysis as standard of care was attributed to the cohesiveness of team members and having facilitative work processes. For countries of similar settings, plans to improve the uptake of intravenous stroke thrombolysis should consider the inclusion of interventions targeting on these modifiable factors.