In-House Anesthesia and Interventional Radiology Technologist Support Optimize Mechanical Thrombectomy Workflow after Hours

Nighttime Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Are Associated With Poor Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA) is associated with poor outcomes. Although immediate treatment of RIAs is preferred, optimal treatment timing is multifactorial and may be a complicating factor for achieving the best outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients with RIAs as a function of treatment time of day. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines how treatment time of day influences treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included all patients who were treated, either surgically or endovascularly, for RIAs within 24 hours after admission. Exclusion criteria were blister, mycotic or giant aneurysms, or incomplete records. The modified Rankin Scale was used to evaluate treatment outcomes using multivariate analysis. Nighttime treatment was defined when greater than 50% of the procedure was performed between 10 pm and 7 am, with other times classified as daytime treatment. Off-hours treatment was defined when more than 50% of the procedure was performed between 7 pm and 7 am, with other times classified as on-hours.

RESULTS

This study included 493 patients, with 84.2% (415) treated during the daytime, 15.8% (78) during the nighttime, 67.5% (333) during on-hours, and 32.5% (160) during off-hours. These groups did not differ according to age, sex, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies and Fisher scales, aneurysm size, location, and surgical or endovascular treatment. Outcomes were favorable (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) for 72.0% (299) of patients treated during the daytime and 60.0% (46) of patients treated during the nighttime. Aneurysm treatment during the nighttime (OR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.28-0.91], P = .023) but not during off-hours (OR: 0.76 [0.50-1.14], P = .18) was independently associated with unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Nighttime treatment was associated with poorer outcomes. Further studies are needed to evaluate outcomes if treatment is postponed to daytime hours.

Direct to angiosuite strategy versus standard workflow triage for endovascular therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reducing stroke workflow times when performing endovascular thrombectomy is associated with improvement in clinical outcomes. We compared outcomes among large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke patients following the direct to angiosuite (DTAS) strategy versus standard workflow (SW) when undergoing endovascular therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare rates of functional outcomes, reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and stroke workflow metrics. We included observational studies and clinical trials that compared the DTAS strategy versus SW, and at least one outcome of interest was assessed. Clinical, methodological and statistical heterogeneity were measured, and a random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

12 studies were included in the systematic review and 8 in the meta-analysis (n=2890). The DTAS strategy was associated with significant higher odds of good functional outcome at 90 days (47.3% vs 34.9%; OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.14) and a significant average reduction of door-to-puncture (mean differences (MD) -35.09, 95% CI -49.76 to -20.41) and door-to-reperfusion times (MD -32.88, 95% CI -50.75 to -15.01). We found no differences in sICH (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.20), mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.67) or successful reperfusion rates (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.29). Moreover, the DTAS strategy was associated with greater odds of dramatic clinical improvement at 24 hours (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.79).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing the DTAS strategy had a significant reduction in door-to-puncture and door-to-reperfusion times. This resulted in an increased rate of early neurological and 90-day functional recovery without compromising safety in LVO patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

Does Weekends Effect Exist in Asia? Analysis of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in A Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Discussing the quality measurements based on interrupted time series in ischemic stroke, delays are often attributed to weekends effect. This study compared the metrics and outcomes of emergent endovascular thrombectomy (EST) during working hours versus non-working hours in the emergency department of an Asian medical center.

METHODS

A total of 297 patients who underwent EST between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively included, with 52.5% of patients presenting during working hours and 47.5% presenting during nights, weekends, or holidays.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes were more in non-working hours than in working hours (53.9% vs. 41.0%; p=0.026). It took longer during nonworking hours than working hours in door-to -image times (13 min vs. 12 min; p=0.04) and door-to-groin puncture times (median: 112 min vs. 104 min; p=0.042). Significant statistical differences were not observed between the two groups in neurological outcomes, including successful reperfusion and complications such as intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. However, the change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in 24 hours was better in the working-hour group than in the nonworking-hour group (4 vs. 2; p=0.058).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that nonworking-hour effects truly exist in patients who received EST. Although delays in door-to-groin puncture times were noticed during nonworking hours, significant differences in neurological functions and mortality were not observed between working and non-working hours. Nevertheless, methods to improve the process during non-working hours should be explored in the future.

Investigating the "Weekend Effect" on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVES

With growing evidence of its efficacy for patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke, the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has increased. The "weekend effect," whereby patients presenting during weekends/off hours have worse clinical outcomes than those presenting during normal working hours, is a critical area of study in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our objective was to evaluate whether a "weekend effect" exists in patients undergoing EVT.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the 2016-2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data included patients ≥18 years with documented diagnosis of ischemic stroke (ICD-10 codes I63, I64, and H34.1), procedural code for EVT, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; the exposure variable was weekend vs. weekday treatment. The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were favorable discharge, extended hospital stay (LOS), and cost. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine predictors for outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 6052 AIS patients who received EVT (mean age 68.7±14.8 years; 50.8% female; 70.8% White; median (IQR) admission NIHSS 16 (10-21). The primary outcome of in-hospital death occurred in 560 (11.1%); the secondary outcome of favorable discharge occurred in 1039 (20.6%). The mean LOS was 7.8±8.6 days. There were no significant differences in the outcomes or cost based on admission timing. In the mixed-effects models, we found no effect of weekend vs. weekday admission on in-hospital death, favorable discharge, or extended LOS.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that the "weekend effect" does not impact outcomes or cost for patients who undergo EVT for LVO.

Off-hour effect is not significant in endovascular treatment for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in a multicentre registry

Background and purpose

Whether the off-hour effect has an impact on workflow and outcomes of endovascular treatment (EVT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (AC-LVO) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients who presented or were treated during off-hour versus on-hour in a multi-center registry.

Methods

AC-LVO patients from 21 centres were categorised into the off-hour group and the on-hour group. Off-hour (weekends, holidays, and 18:00–7:59 on weekdays) and on-hour (8:00–17:59 on weekdays except for holidays) were defined according to arrival and groin-puncture time points, respectively. Subgroup comparisons between patients both arrived and treated during off-hour (true off-hour) and on-hour (true on-hour) were performed. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary outcomes included favourable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 90 days), EVT-related time metrics, and other clinical outcomes. Ordinary and binary logistic regression and linear regression were taken to adjust for confounding factors.

Results

Of all 698 patients enrolled, 435 (62.3%) and 456 (65.3%) patients were categorised into the off-hour arrival and off-hour puncture group, respectively. Shorter onset to door time (adjusted ß coefficient: −21.56; 95% CI −39.96 to −3.16; p=0.022) was noted in the off-hour arrival group. Ordinal and dichotomous mRS scores at 90 days were comparable between the off-hour group and the on-hour group regardless of off-hour definitions. Other time metrics and outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Of 595 patients both presented and were treated during off-hour or on-hour, 394 patients were categorised into the true off-hour group and 201 into the true on-hour group. Time metrics and clinical outcomes were similar between the true off-hour and the true on-hour group.

Conclusions

The off-hour effect was not significant regarding clinical outcomes and in-hospital workflow in AC-LVO patients receiving EVT in this Chinese multicentre registry.

Off-hour effect on time metrics and clinical outcomes in endovascular treatment for large vessel occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate on the off-hour effect on endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO).

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to compare time metrics and clinical outcomes of acute LVO patients who presented/were treated during off-hour with those during working hours.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

Structured searches on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted through 23 February 2021. The primary outcomes were onset to door (OTD), door to imaging, door to puncture (DTP), puncture to recanalization, procedural time, successful recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), mortality in hospital, good prognosis (90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2), and 90-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were imaging to puncture (ITP), onset to puncture (OTP), onset to recanalization (OTR), door to recanalization (DTR) time, mRS 0-2 at discharge, and consecutive 90-day mRS score. The odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the outcomes were calculated using random-effect models. Heterogenicity and publication bias were analyzed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted as appropriate. Nineteen studies published between 2014 and 2021 with a total of 14,185 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Patients in the off-hour group were significantly younger than those in the on-hour group and with comparable stroke severity and intravenous thrombolysis rate. The off-hour group had longer OTD (WMD [95% CI], 12.83 [1.84-23.82] min), DTP (WMD [95% CI], 11.45 [5.93-16.97] min), ITP (WMD [95% CI], 10.39 [4.61-16.17] min), OTP (WMD [95% CI], 25.30 [13.11-37.50] min), OTR (WMD [95% CI], 25.16 [10.28-40.04] min), and DTR (WMD [95% CI], 18.02 [10.01-26.03] min) time. Significantly lower successful recanalization rate (OR [95% CI], 0.85 [0.76-0.95]; p = 0.004; I²= 0%) was detected in the off-hour group. No significant difference was noted regarding SICH and prognosis. But a trend toward lower OR of good prognosis was witnessed in the off-hour group (OR [95% CI], 0.92 [0.84-1.01]; p = 0.084; I²= 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who presented/were treated during off-hour were associated with excessive delays before the initiation of EVT, lower successful reperfusion rate, and a trend toward worse prognosis when compared with working hours. Optimizing the workflows of EVT during off-hour is needed.