Comparison of surgical residency applicants from U.S. medical schools with U.S.-born and foreign-born international medical school graduates

Disparities in cataract surgical training at the University of Toronto based on sex and medical school graduate type

OBJECTIVE

To compare sex and medical school graduate type differences in cataract surgical training volumes at Canada's largest residency program, the University of Toronto (UoT).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmology residents completing cataract surgical training from 2015 to 2020.

METHODS

Data collected from surgical logbooks at the main cataract surgical teaching site at UoT were analyzed from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2020. Data collected included stage of resident training and degree of participation for each case. The main outcome measure was mean number of complete cataract cases as a function of resident sex, medical school graduate type, and level of training.

RESULTS

Thirty-five (19, 54.3% female) residents completed cataract surgical training during the study period. There were 24 (68.6%) Canadian medical graduates (CMGs) and 11 (31.4%) international medical graduates (IMGs). Female residents performed a lower mean number of complete cataract cases compared to males (464.2 versus 504.8, respectively). IMGs completed on average 110.0 (22.8%) fewer cataract cases compared to CMGs. Compared to all residents, female IMGs had the lowest number of complete cataract cases (mean of 380.8 versus 465.7, respectively). The greatest difference occurred between male CMGs and female IMGs, with male CMGs performing 153.8 (40.4%) more complete cases (534.6 vs 380.8, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The greatest difference in surgical volumes occurred between CMGs and IMGs. Female IMGs had the lowest complete cataract case volumes compared to all residents. Our study highlights novel medical school graduate type disparities in cataract surgical training warranting further exploration.

International medical graduates in orthopaedic surgery: An opportunity to improve diversity and inclusion?

Background/aims

Racial and ethnic minorities are under-represented in orthopaedic surgery despite efforts to promote diversity and inclusion in the specialty. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of international medical graduates (IMGs) in the surgical workforce and future residency pipeline. We further analyze IMG applicant qualifications relative to their US-based counterparts to assess the viability of recruiting IMG candidates as one strategy to advance diversity and inclusion in orthopaedic surgery.

Methods

Physician workforce data from the American Medical Association and residency match data from the National Resident Match Program were analyzed for Orthopaedic Surgery. Trends in the proportion of IMG applicants were compared with those from other specialties. Qualifications of applicants were compared including board exam scores, number of abstracts/publications, and additional graduate degrees.

Results

In 2020, orthopaedic surgery had the lowest percentage of IMGs relative to otolaryngology (5.8 %, p < 0.001), neurosurgery (12.1 %, p < 0.001), obstetrics & gynecology (14.0 %, p < 0.001), and general surgery (19.1 %, p < 0.001). From 1986 to 2021, IMG Graduates who matched into orthopaedic surgery increased from 1 (0.3 %) to 8 (0.9 %). Compared to other surgical specialties, orthopaedic surgery had among the lowest annual rates of incoming IMG residents. In 2021, most respondents to the orthopaedic surgery residency program directors survey reported never selecting IMG applicants for interview (74 % for non-US IMG applicants and 53 % for US IMG applicants). From 2020 to 2021, non-US IMG applicants (17 %) and US IMG applicants (26 %) had lower match rates than DO Senior (74 %) and MD Senior (80 %) applicants (p < 0.001). In 2020, matched non-US IMGs had similar board scores as matched US MD Senior applicants, but more abstracts/publications.

Conclusion

The recruitment of IMGs into orthopaedic surgery residency remains limited and lower than other surgical specialties. IMGs have similar board scores and more abstracts/publications, thus representing a potential pipeline for workforce diversity. More research is needed to understand the special needs of IMGs in the orthopaedic surgery match.

International Medical Graduates Matching Into U.S. General Surgery Residency: 30-Year Match Trends

INTRODUCTION

International medical graduates (IMGs) make up a small but important percentage of the U.S. surgical workforce. Detailed and contemporary studies on IMGs matching into U.S. general surgery residency positions are lacking. Our objective was to study these trends over a 30-y period.

METHODS

We utilized the National Resident Matching Program reports from 1994 to 2023 to analyze the trends of U.S. M.D. seniors, D.O. seniors, and U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen IMGs matching into first-year categorical and preliminary general surgery residency positions. The percent of positions filled were calculated and trended over time using linear regression, where β coefficient estimated the percentage of annual change in matched positions, and the R2 coefficient measured the amount of variance explained (perfect regression R2 = 1.0).

RESULTS

Over the last 30 y, IMG match percentages have increased for both categorical (β = 0.218%, R2 = 0.49, P < 0.001) and preliminary (β = 0.705%, R2 = 0.76, P < 0.001) general surgery positions, with a greater increase in preliminary positions (β = 0.705%). The percentage of positions filled by M.D. U.S. seniors in categorical positions has steadily decreased over the 30-y period (β = -0.625%, R2 = 0.79, P < 0.001), and this decrease has largely occurred with a concurrent greater increase in U.S. D.O. seniors match percentage rates (β = 0.430%, R2 = 0.64, P < 0.001), rather than IMGs (β = 0.218%). Allopathic M.D. U.S. seniors preliminary match percentages have steadily decreased at the steepest rate (β = -0.927%, R2 = 0.80, P < 0.001). In categorical positions, non-U.S. citizen IMGs' match percentages (β = 0.069%, R2 = 0.204, P = 0.012) increased at a slightly slower rate than U.S. citizen IMGs (β = 0.149%, R2 = 0.607, P < 0.001). In preliminary positions, non-U.S. citizen IMGs' match percentages (β = 0.33%, R2 = 0.478, P < 0.001) increased at a similar rate as U.S. citizen IMGs (β = 0.375%, R2 = 0.823, P < 0.0.001). In the 2023 National Resident Matching Program match, U.S. citizen and non-U.S. citizen IMGs together made up 10.3% of the categorical and 44.5% of the preliminary general surgery positions that were filled. For categorical positions in 2023, there was no major difference between positions matched by U.S. citizen IMGs (4.62%) and non-U.S. citizen IMGs (5.72%); on the other hand, for preliminary positions in 2023, non-U.S. citizen IMGs (31.96%) filled 2.5× times the number of positions as U.S. citizen IMGs (12.54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last 30 y, U.S. allopathic M.D. seniors matching into categorical general surgery positions have steadily decreased, while both U.S. osteopathic D.O. seniors and IMGs matching have increased. These data have important implications for the future U.S. surgical workforce.

Standardized Letter of Recommendation: Can Everyone Be Awesome?

OBJECTIVE

Standardized letters of recommendation (SLOR) are hypothesized to decrease bias and provide consistent domains for evaluation. However, their ability to differentiate among applicants is unknown. The utilization and functionality of SLOR and the impact of SLOR domain rating on matching for colon and rectal surgery (CRS) residency applicants have yet to be assessed.

DESIGN

Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were employed. Applicants were categorized into 3 groups; Top-tier(TT): applicants rated 100% Excellent/Very Good; Mid-Tier(MT) applicants rated 80-99% Excellent/Very Good; and Non-Top Tier(NTT) applicants rated <80% Excellent/Very Good.

SETTING

University of Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

SLORs submitted to a single colorectal surgery residency in 2019 were analyzed RESULTS: A total of 101 applicants were included, 54 (53.5%) of the applicants were male. 75 (74.2%) applicants who applied to our residency matched into a CRS residency, compared to the national rate of 66%. Of the 101 applicants with SLOR, 54 (53.5%) were categorized as TT, 26 (25.7%) as MT, and 21(20.8%) as NTT. The univariable analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in research experience (p=0.029) and match status (p=0.01) between applicant tiers. There were no statistically significant differences between applicant-tier and demographics, foreign medical graduates (FMG), H-indices, ABSITE scores, type of residency, preliminary year, completing an unaccredited CRS, and applicants with an additional degree. On multivariable analysis age (OR=0.65; CI=0.48-0.87) and FMG applicants (OR=0.05; CI=0.01-0.44) were inversely associated with successfully matching. Compared to TT applicants, MT (OR=0.07; CI=0.01-0.57) and NTT (OR=0.04; CI=0.01-0.34) applicants were inversely associated with a successful match. Individuals who completed research prior to residency but after medical school was associated with successfully matching (p=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of MT and NTT ratings is associated with failure to match and may represent an area of concern for CRS programs rather than a tool to discern differences between candidates.

Challenges for International Medical Graduates in the US Graduate Medical Education and Health Care System Environment: A Narrative Review

International medical graduates (IMGs) have become a vital part of the US graduate medical education (GME) and health care system (HCS) workforce; they contribute to essential diversity that relieves cultural and linguistic barriers to health care. The number of IMGs looking for medical training in the United States. has constantly been increasing in the last decades. The challenges they meet begin long before residency application, continue during their transition to residency programs, through early medical training, and eventually subside in senior years. IMGs' hurdles permeate the themes of navigating the US GME and HCS, adaptation to the US culture, communication skills, racial discrimination, emotional distress, and finances. This article aims to comprehensively review available information concerning the challenges encountered by IMGs in their transition to the US GME and HCS environments.

Evaluation of Predictors for Successful Residency Match in General Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictive factors for a successful residency match among general surgery applicants from 2018 to 2021.

DESIGN

A retrospective cross-sectional study of general surgery applicants who matched and went unmatched in match years 2018 to 2021. Applicant characteristics, geographic connections to a program, and away rotations were compared among matched and unmatched applicants.

SETTING

Data were sourced from the Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency initiative for general surgery applicants.

PARTICIPANTS

All fourth-year medical students applying in the 2018 to 2021 cycles at participating U.S. medical schools were eligible to respond to the Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency survey. This study included a total of 1,425 general surgery applicants.

RESULTS

Of 1,425 general surgery applicants, 88% matched and 12% went unmatched. Significant predictors for a successful match included Step 1 Score ≥237 (odds ratio (OR) 1.59 [95% CI 1.15-2.19]; p = 0.005); Step 2 CK Score ≥252 (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.36-2.60]; p < 0.001); ≥3 Honored Clerkships (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.33-2.53]; p < 0.001); Honors in General Surgery Clerkship (OR 1.73 [95% CI 1.33-2.53]; p = 0.001); AOA membership (OR 2.14 [95% CI 1.34-3.42]; p = 0.001); ≥4 abstracts, posters, or publications (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.20-2.30]; p=0.002); and ≥1 peer-reviewed publications (OR 1.52 [95% CI 1.09-2.12]; p = 0.014). On average, matched applicants completed more away rotations than unmatched applicants (p = 0.004). Overall, 36% of matched applicants reported a geographic connection to the program where they matched.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that Step 2 CK score, research productivity, honored clerkships, AOA status, and away rotations are significant predictors for successfully matching into general surgery residency. Medical schools can encourage students to prepare a holistic application incorporating variables quantified in this study in preparation for the Step 1 reporting change.

International Medical Graduates: Promoting Equity and Belonging

International medical school graduates (IMGs) play a vital role in the health care system of the United States. They constitute roughly one-quarter of the physician workforce, comprising a significant proportion of the primary care providers in high-need rural and urban areas, where they provide equal and, in some instances, better care than U.S. graduates. Nonetheless, they face a series of hurdles in entering U.S. residency programs and throughout their training experiences.IMGs must expend significant resources to obtain Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates certification, which includes Steps 1, 2 Clinical Knowledge and 2 Clinical Skills of the United States Medical Licensing Examination. They encounter the uncertainty of matching and, if successful, obtaining a visa to enter the United States. Once here, they need to adapt to the complexities of the health care system and familiarize themselves with the cultural nuances, professional behaviors, and communication skills of another country. They encounter biases and microaggressions and lack support groups and mentors. Those who choose an academic career are less likely to obtain leadership positions.This Perspective provides an overview of these challenges and highlights opportunities for change at local and national levels. Specifically, it identifies strategies that would assist IMGs before entry, at entry, during training, at the transition to practice, and in practice. The current COVID-19 pandemic highlights the shortage of physicians in the United States and illustrates the importance of ensuring that IMGs, who are essential health care workers, feel welcome, valued, and recognized for their contributions.

What Do Former Residents Say About Their Nondesignated Preliminary Year? A Survey of Prelims' Experiences in a General Surgery Residency Program

OBJECTIVE

The nondesignated preliminary (NDP) position in general surgery (GS) offers a 1-year surgical training opportunity for medical school graduates prior to obtaining categorical residency positions. Given that there is little long-term follow-up on the experiences of NDP residents, we sought to determine how NDPs felt about their intern year in GS.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey of all NDP GS interns from 1993 to 2018.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care center with a large GS residency program (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).

PARTICIPANTS

NDP GS interns (n = 151).

RESULTS

Two-hundred and four surveys were emailed and 151 (62%) former NDP residents responded. Exposure to diverse pathology (85%), opportunity to work with experts (85%) and operative experience (72%) were the top 3 positive experiences from the NDP year. The uncertainty of being an NDP resident (78%) and experience compared to categorical counterparts (32%) were cited as the top 2 negative experiences. While 73% (n = 110) considered their NDP year to have laid a "strong" foundation for their future career, most respondents felt that the year was stressful and suggested improving mentoring and support for preliminary residents. Eighty-two percent (n = 124) of respondents stated that, they would be willing to redo their preliminary year. Fifty-four percent (n = 82) of respondents stated that they might have preferred a categorical position at a smaller institution versus a preliminary year. Forty percent of respondents (n = 60) reported fewer interviews and 24% (n = 36) reported a similar number of interviews offered when applying to the Match as a PGY1 prelim resident.

CONCLUSIONS

Pursuing the NDP year is difficult, given the uncertainty that looms and the immense pressure to perform well. While the vast majority of our NDPs obtained categorical residency spots following their 1 year of training, feedback from this survey using 25 years of experience suggests that we can and should do more to mentor, support, and assist these residents.

Outcomes of non-designated preliminary general surgery interns: A 25-year Mayo Clinic experience

BACKGROUND

Non-designated preliminary, general surgery interns have no job security after year 1. Understanding how such non-designated preliminary, general surgery interns fare at any single institution might help future prelim applicants make better ranking decisions. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of residents pursuing a non-designated preliminary year in general surgery at a single institution.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort analysis of non-designated preliminary interns, who completed a preliminary year at our institution from 1993 to 2017, was conducted to understand their career path after the preliminary general surgery year.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifteen non-designated preliminary interns (232 international medical graduates and 83 American medical graduates) were identified. Two hundred and thirty-five (75%) matched into categorical residency spots (115 [49%] in general surgery, 18 [8%] each in orthopedic surgery and anesthesiology) after their preliminary year, 58 (18%) matched into a second year preliminary spot, and 22 (7%) left graduate medical education. American medical graduates (90%) more commonly matched into categorical spots than international medical graduates (69%; P < .0001). One hundred and fifty-four (49%) of our total nondesignated, preliminary resident cohort eventually garnered categorical general surgery residency positions. Importantly, 33 (65%) of our non-designated, preliminary residents who pursued a postgraduate year 2 preliminary surgery position subsequently obtained a categorical general surgery position. Twenty-nine nondesignated, preliminary interns joined our general surgery training program to fill open postgraduate year 2 slots. Of our nondesignated, preliminary residents (n = 300), 95% are currently practicing in the United States.

CONCLUSION

Most nondesignated, preliminary residents at our institution secured categorical spots for continuing graduate medical education. A preliminary internship year seems a useful endeavor for most trainees and even a second prelim year produces a categorical position for most of these driven and hard-working individuals.

American Cleft-Palate Craniofacial Association Annual Meeting: International Medical Graduate's Perspective as a First-Time Attendee

In the United States, plastic surgery continues to be one of the most competitive fields to match into for medical graduates. However, the process is even more difficult for international medical graduates (IMGs) mostly due to their unknown academic backgrounds and unfamiliarity with US health-care system. While many IMGs pursue of research to publish articles in peer-reviewed journals and obtain letters of recommendations as a means to prove one's potential, networking with well-known plastic surgeons in US plastic surgery programs via national meetings is of utmost importance. These conferences provide the perfect opportunity to learn about the multidisciplinary US health-care system, expand one's network of mentors and colleagues, and demonstrate one's research experience. This article describes my experience as a first-time attendee in the American Cleft-Palate Craniofacial Association 76th Annual Meeting, with the aim to encourage other IMGs interested in applying to plastic surgery residency programs to actively pursue and attend national plastic surgery society meetings.

Supply, distribution and characteristics of international medical graduates in family medicine in the United States: a cross-sectional study

Background

To describe the supply, distribution, and characteristics of international medical graduates (IMGs) in family medicine who provide patient care in the U.S.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design, using descriptive statistics on combined data from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates and the American Medical Association, including medical school attended, country of medical school, and citizenship when entering medical school.

Results

In total, 118,817 physicians in family medicine were identified, with IMGs representing 23.8% (n = 28,227) of the U.S. patient care workforce. Of all 9579 residents in family medicine, 36.0% (n = 3452) are IMGS. In total, 35.9% of IMGs attended medical school in the Caribbean (n = 10,136); 19.9% in South-Central Asia (n = 5607) and 9.1% in South-Eastern Asia (n = 2565). The most common countries of medical school training were Dominica, Mexico, and Sint Maarten. Of all IMGs in family medicine who attended medical school in the Caribbean, 74.5% were U.S. citizens. In total, 40.5% of all IMGs in family medicine held U.S. citizenship at entry to medical school. IMGs comprise almost 40% of the family medicine workforce in Florida, New Jersey and New York.

Conclusions

IMGs play an important role in the U.S. family medicine workforce. Many IMGs are U.S. citizens who studied abroad and then returned to the U.S. for graduate training. Given the shortage of family physicians, and the large number of IMGs in graduate training programs, IMGs will continue to play a role in the U.S. physician workforce for some time to come. Many factors, including the supply of residency training positions, could eventually restrict the number of IMGs entering the U.S., including those contributing to family practice.

Value of Dedicated Research Time for IMGs in Obtaining Surgical Residency Training Positions: A 10-Year Review of Applicants from a Medical College in Pakistan

OBJECTIVE

International Medical Graduates (IMGs) secured greater than 10% of all general surgery (GS) residency positions in the US during the past decade. The Match process remains competitive, with a significant number of IMGs performing dedicated research before residency application. The impact of such research remains largely unknown. We aimed to provide an objective analysis of the impact of dedicated research time on obtaining a categorical GS residency position.

DESIGN

Data for National Resident Matching Program Match results from 2008-2017 was compiled from annual Match lists of the Aga Khan University, Medical College (Karachi, Pakistan). Medical graduates provided this information voluntarily each year. Data was exported to Microsoft Excel and used for descriptive and statistical analysis using SPSS. Candidates were divided into quasi-experimental groups based on their preference for direct application (no-research group, n = 64) or research prior to Match (research group, n = 20).

RESULTS

A total of 84 IMG applicants matched into GS residency positions in the US within the past decade. Amongst these, 18 matched directly into categorical positions while 66 applicants secured preliminary spots. A total of 37 (56%) preliminary candidates eventually secured categorical GS residency positions. Research group applicants had an overall 85% (n = 17) success rate of obtaining a categorical position, while no-research group had a 59% (n = 39) success rate (chi-square test, p = 0.04). Success rate was 69% (n = 38) for male applicants and 57% (n = 17) for female applicants. Median time to a categorical position was 4 years (2-6) for the research group and 3 years (1-6) for the no-research group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our quasi-experimental study demonstrated a higher success rate for Aga Khan University, Medical College applicants with significant research background in the US, compared to those who did not. Better social integration, enhanced mentorship available during research, overcoming of cultural and linguistic barriers and a perception as better qualified candidate can be some factors contributing to higher success rates.

Predictors of failure in the Advanced Trauma Life Support course

BACKGROUND

Over 1 million healthcare providers have participated in the Advanced Trauma Life Support course. No studies have evaluated factors that predict course performance. This study aims to identify these predictors.

METHODS

All participants taking the course at 2 centers over a 4-year period were identified. Demographics, background, and performance data were extracted. Participants who failed were compared with those who did not. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for failure.

RESULTS

Seven hundred forty-four healthcare providers participated in the course; 89.5% passed and 10.5% failed. Failure rates were lowest (.0%) among Trauma/Surgical Critical Care (SCC) providers and highest among pediatric providers (28.6%). Stepwise logistic regression identified age greater than 55, English as a second language, pretest score less than 75, and non-Trauma/SCC and non-Emergency Medicine background as predictors of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

A failure rate of 10.5% was demonstrated among the course participants. Age greater than 55, English as second language, pretest score less than 75, and non-Trauma/SCC and non-Emergency Medicine backgrounds were associated with failure. These subgroups may benefit from performance improvement measures.

Relationship between performance on the NBME® Comprehensive Clinical Science Self-Assessment and USMLE® Step 2 Clinical Knowledge for USMGs and IMGs

BACKGROUND

The Comprehensive Clinical Science Self-Assessment (CCSSA) is a web-administered multiple-choice examination that includes content that is typically covered during the core clinical clerkships in medical school. Because the content of CCSSA items resembles the content of the items on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK), CCSSA is intended to be a tool for students to help assess whether they are prepared for Step 2 CK and to become familiar with its content, format, and pacing.

PURPOSES

This study examined the relationship between performance on the National Board of Medical Examiners® CCSSA and performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination® Step 2 CK for U.S./Canadian (USMGs) and international medical school students/graduates (IMGs).

METHODS

The study included 9,789 participants who took CCSSA prior to their first Step 2 CK attempt. Linear and logistic regression analyses investigated the relationship between CCSSA performance and performance on Step 2 CK for both USMGs and IMGs.

RESULTS

CCSSA scores explained 58% of the variation in first Step 2 CK scores for USMGs and 60% of the variation for IMGs; the relationship was somewhat different for the two groups as indicated by statistically different intercepts and slopes for the regression lines based on each group. Logistic regression results showed that examinees in both groups with low scores on CCSSA were at a higher risk of failing their first Step 2 CK attempt.

CONCLUSIONS

RESULTS suggest that CCSSA can provide students with a valuable practice tool and a realistic self-assessment of their readiness to take Step 2 CK.

A six year head-to-head comparison of osteopathic and allopathic applicants to a university-based, allopathic general surgery residency

OBJECTIVE

The number of osteopathic physicians is increasing as is the number applying to allopathic general surgery residency programs. A lack of knowledge of osteopathic schooling leads to a potential applicant bias in favor of allopathic applicants, but the 2 groups have not been compared head to head.

DESIGN

Applications over a 6-year period to an allopathic general surgery residency program were reviewed. Demographics, examination scores, employment, education, and research experience were catalogued into a database. Allopathic applicants were compared with osteopathic applicants utilizing statistical analysis.

SETTING

A university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Allopathic and osteopathic applicants to an allopathic general surgery residency program.

RESULTS

A total of 1290 applications were reviewed; 1155 allopathic and 135 osteopathic applications. Other than race, the 2 cohorts are similar in age, gender, and citizenship. The groups are not significantly different with regard to the number of letter of recommendations, volunteer activities, scholarly works, and advanced degrees. Graduates of both proceed directly to residency. A significantly higher percentage of allopathic graduates reported their United States medical licensing examination (USMLE) scores, yet when osteopaths released their USMLE transcript, they scored significantly higher on the USMLE Step 1 examination and required fewer attempts to pass. These differences do not apply to the USMLE Step 2 examination.

CONCLUSIONS

No single screening tool exists for selecting a successful general surgery resident. We are seeing increased numbers of osteopathic applicants. Many criteria used to evaluate applicants do not apply to osteopathic applicants, but our comparison of common selection variables on the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application did not demonstrate an overall difference. While our analysis demonstrated a statistically higher USMLE Step 1 score by osteopathic applicants, they may only self-report favorable data.

The use of a surgery-specific written examination in the selection process of surgical residents

OBJECTIVE

Selection of surgical residents is a difficult task, and program directors are interested in identifying the best candidates. Among the qualities being sought after is the ability to acquire surgical knowledge, and eventually do well on their board examinations. During the interview process, many programs use results from the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) to identify residents they think will do well academically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a different method of identifying such residents, through the use of a surgery-specific written exam (SSWE).

DESIGN

A retrospective review of residents in our program between 2004 and 2012 was done. A 50-question SSWE was designed and administered to candidates on the day of their interview. Scores on the SSWE and the USMLE were compared with results on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE). Correlation coefficients were calculated and compared.

SETTING

Community based General Surgery residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

Resident applicants.

RESULTS

Forty-three residents had scores available from the SSWE, USMLE Part 1 (USMLE-1), and Part 2 (USMLE-2). There were ABSITE scores available for 38 in postgraduate year (PGY) 1. USMLE-1 had a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.327, p = 0.045) with the ABSITE score in PGY-1 (ABSITE-1), while with USMLE-2 had slightly less correlation (r = 0.314, p = 0.055) with ABSITE-1. However, the SSWE had a much stronger correlation (r = 0.656, p < 0.001) than either of them.

CONCLUSIONS

An SSWE is a good method to identify residents who will later do well on the ABSITE. It is a better method than using the more general USMLE. Since the ABSITE has been shown to correlate with performance on board examinations, residency programs interested in identifying candidates that will do well on their board examinations, should consider incorporating an SSWE into their application process.

International medical graduates and health information technology use in the United States

PURPOSE

Health information technology (HIT) holds promise for improving the quality of health care and reducing health care system inefficiencies. Numerous studies have examined HIT availability, specifically electronic health records (EHRs), and utilization among physicians in individual countries. However, no one has examined EHR use among physicians who train in one country and move to practice in another country. In the United States, physicians who complete medical school outside the country but practice within the United States are commonly referred to as International Medical Graduates (IMGs). IMGs have a growing presence in the United States, yet little is known about the availability and use of HIT among these physicians. The purpose of this study is to explore the availability and use of HIT among IMGs practicing in United States.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

The Health Tracking Physician Survey (2008) was used to examine the relationship between availability and use of HIT and IMG status controlling for several physician and practice characteristics. Our analysis included responses from 4,720 physicians, 20.7% of whom were IMGs.

FINDINGS

Using logistic regression, controlling for physician gender, specialty, years in practice, practice type, ownership status and geographical location, we found IMGs were significantly less likely to have a comprehensive EHR in their practices (OR = 0.84; p = 0.005). In addition, findings indicate that IMGs are more likely to have and use several so-called first generation HIT capabilities, such as reminders for clinicians about preventive services (OR = 1.31; p = 0.001) and other needed patient follow-up (OR = 1.26; p = 0.007).

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

This study draws attention to the need for further research regarding barriers to HIT adoption and use among IMGs.

An ERAS-based survey evaluating demographics, United States Medical Licensing Examination Performance, and research experience between American medical graduates and United States citizen international medical graduates: is the bar higher on the continent?

OBJECTIVE

To provide an assessment and comparison of the demographics, medical school academic performance, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) performance, and research experience between American Medical Graduate (AMG) and United States International Medical Graduate (USIMG) candidates who applied for and successfully matched into categorical general surgery residency programs.

DESIGN

Data were obtained through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and a post-match survey distributed to all applicants.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a community-based, university-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All United States citizen graduates of allopathic American medical schools or international medical schools, who were applying for a general surgery residency position at our institution.

RESULTS

A total of 854 candidates applied, including 143 AMGs and 223 USIMGs. Seventy-two AMGs (50.3%) and 41 USIMGs (18.4%) were invited to interview (p < 0.0001). Mean USMLE step 1 scores were higher among USIMG applicants overall (USIMG: 212.1 ± 14.9 vs AMG: 206.9 ± 15.5; p < 0.0005) and among those invited to interview (USIMG: 227.8 ± 16.2 vs AMG: 215.5 ± 16.2; p < 0.0001). Seventy percent of AMGs matched into a categorical surgery residency compared with 31.6% of USIMGs (p < 0.001). Compared with AMGs, USIMGs applied to more programs (USIMG: 90.3 ± 42.8 vs AMG: 52.1 ± 26.4; p < 0.002), were offered fewer interviews (USIMG: 9.0 ± 6.9 vs AMG: 20.9 ± 13.7; p < 0.0001), and subsequently ranked fewer programs (USIMG: 7.5 ± 4.5 vs AMG: 12.5 ± 6.1; p < 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

USIMGs require higher USMLE scores than their AMG counterparts to be considered for categorical general surgery residency positions. However, excellence on the USMLE neither ensures an invitation to interview nor categorical match success. A well-rounded application in conjunction with a practical application strategy is critical for USIMGs to achieve success in attaining a general surgery residency position.

The identification of the general practice registrar needing assistance

BACKGROUND

Doctors undertaking vocational training in general practice in Australia may require assistance, in addition to the normal training offered as part of their training programme. Issues requiring assistance may go undetected for a period of time. Delay in the identification of issues leads to delay in the provision of the assistance. The aim of this study is to determine the most common reasons registrars require extra assistance, and how these issues are identified. The findings of this study will provide direction for 21 regionally based training providers (RTPs) to develop improved tools to ensure earlier detection of registrars requiring assistance.

METHOD

This study is based on qualitative research methods, using semi-structured interviews with senior medical education staff of four regional general practice training providers in Victoria, Australia.

RESULTS

Issues identified included language and cultural issues, applied knowledge and skills, attitude and professionalism, and health and family issues. The principal method that training providers identified issues was via the GP supervisor. This was predominantly by informal communication, rather than formal evaluation sheets. Other methods included the external clinical teaching visit and other training formative assessments. These more formalised procedures were more likely to identify issues later than desired. They were also used as a way of clarifying suspected problems. The selection process was not felt to be helpful, and the examinations provided information too late.

CONCLUSION

An increased awareness of the potential issues leading to a registrar to require assistance enables identification and subsequent action to occur in a more timely and more useful fashion. Informal communication between practices and training programme staff should be encouraged to enable these issues to be dealt with early in training.