The Effect of Afternoon Operative Sessions of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed by Senior Surgeons on the General Surgery Residency Program: A Comparative Study

Multicenter retrospective cohort Italian study on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the surgical residents

PURPOSE

This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes (mortality rate, operative time, complications) of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) when performed by a surgical resident in comparison to experienced consultant in the backdrop of Italian academic centers.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing elective LC between January 2016 and January 2022 at six teaching hospitals across Italy was performed. Cases were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 5123 (LC without cholangiogram). All cases of emergency surgery, ASA score > 3, or when cholecystectomy was performed with another surgical procedure, were excluded. All suitable cases were divided into 2 groups based on primary surgeon: consultant or senior resident. Main outcome was complication rates (intraoperative and peri/postoperative); secondary outcomes included operative time, the length of stay, and the rate of conversion to open.

RESULTS

A total of 2331 cases (1425 females) were included, of which, consultants performed 1683 LCs (72%), while the residents performed 648 (28%) surgeries. The groups were statistically comparable regarding demographics, history of previous abdominal surgery, operative time, or intraoperative complications. The rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy was 1.42% for consultant and none for resident (p = 0.02). A statistically significant difference was observed between groups regarding the average length of stay (2.2 ± 3 vs 1.6 ± 1.3 days p = 0.03). Similarly, postoperative complications (1.7% vs 0.5%) resulted in statistically significant (p = 0.02) favoring resident group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that in selected patients, senior residents can safely perform LC when supervised by senior staff surgeons.

On-table hepatopancreatobiliary surgical consults for difficult cholecystectomies: A 7-year audit

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is considered a general surgical operation. However, general surgeons are not trained to manage severe complications such as bile duct injury (BDI) and should refer to hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeons when difficulty arises. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients who had on-table HPB consults during cholecystectomy.

METHODS

This is an audit of 50 patients who required on-table HPB consult during cholecystectomy from 2011 to 2017. Consultations were classified as "proactive" and "reactive", where consults were made before or after surgical incision, respectively. Patient demographics and perioperative details were collected.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 62.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 50.8-71.3 years]. Eight (16%) patients had underlying HPB co-morbidity. Gallbladder wall was thickened in all patients (median 5 mm, IQR 4-7 mm), and common bile duct was of normal caliber in all patients (median 5 mm, IQR 4-6 mm). Median length of operation and length of stay were 165 min (IQR 124-209 min) and five days (IQR 3-7 days), respectively. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 18 (36%) patients. Forty-eight patients were initially managed by laparoscopic approach, 15 (31%) required open conversion; majority (9/15, 60%) were initiated before on-table consult. Majority of referrals (98%) were reactive. Common reasons for referral included unclear anatomy or anatomical variations (30%), presence of dense adhesions and/or contracted gallbladder (18%) and impacted stones in Hartmann's pouch (16%). Three (6%) patients were referred for BDI (2 Strasberg D and 1 Strasberg E1), and two (4%) were referred for torrential bleeding from arterial injury (1 cystic artery and 1 right hepatic artery). Any morbidity and 30-day readmission were 22% and 6%, respectively. There was no 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Calling for help in BDI is obligatory, but in other instances is a personal choice. Calling for help prior to open conversion is lacking and this awareness should be raised. Whether surgical outcomes could be improved by early HPB consult needs to be determined by larger multicenter reports.

Is there a difference in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in a teaching hospital or a general hospital in The Netherlands?

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy may have a complicated course with severe complications such as bile duct injury. Studies in other countries than the Netherlands report ambivalent results regarding the influence of a residency program on patient safety, efficacy and financial consequences. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in a teaching hospital or a non-teaching general hospital in Dutch clinics. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was performed to examine the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a teaching hospital with a residency program and a general hospital without surgical residents. All consecutive cholecystectomies in these two hospitals between September 2014 and March 2015 were included. Patient characteristics, operative procedure, level of experience, operation time, per- and postoperative complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, re-admittance and conversions to laparotomy were analyzed. Results: A total of 294 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed in both hospitals. Cholecystectomies performed in the teaching hospital took an average of 25 min longer to complete compared with a non-residency setting. Both the number of conversions and the number of re-admissions were not significantly different between both clinics. The residency program showed smaller peroperative liver lesions along with more postoperative complications, with most complications in patients that required a conversion. Discussion: Current practice where residents perform supervised cholecystectomies should not be discouraged. We believe that is safe and lead to an acceptable increase in operation time.

Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Trainees: Predictors and Results in an Academic Teaching Hospital

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the first laparoscopic procedures performed by surgical trainees. This study aims to determine preoperative and/or intraoperative predictors of difficult LC and to compare complications of LC performed by trainees with that performed by trained surgeons. A cohort of 180 consecutive patients with cholelithiasis who underwent LC was analyzed. We used univariate and binary logistic regression analyses to predict factors associated with difficult LC. We compared the rate of complications of LCs performed by trainees and that performed by trained surgeons using Pearson's chi-square test. Patients with impacted stone in the neck of the gallbladder (GB) (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.59-15.77), with adhesions in the Triangle of Calot (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.27-6.83), or with GB rupture (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.02-11.41) were more likely to experience difficult LC. There was no difference between trainees and trained surgeons in the rate of cystic artery injury (p = .144) or GB rupture (p = .097). However, operative time of LCs performed by trained surgeons was significantly shorter (median, 45 min; IQR, 30-70 min) compared with the surgical trainees' operative time (60 min; IQR, 50-90 min). Surgical trainees can perform difficult LC safely under supervision with no increase in complications albeit with mild increase in operative time.