Awareness of Surgeons in Saudi Arabia About the Surgical Costs and Investigations: Multicenter Study

No longer a blank cheque: a narrative scoping review of physician awareness of cost

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare costs have been steadily rising, and attention to cost containment in healthcare systems is increasingly important. It has been previously established that physicians lack adequate awareness of cost in health care and that by increasing awareness, costs can be reduced. This scoping review examines cost awareness of medications, investigations and procedures and identifies potential interventions that may serve to improve physician awareness.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature based on established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

A review of electronic databases was performed for studies regarding physician awareness of cost, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

An initial 4350 citations were identified, and 76 articles were included for full text analysis. Combined, these studies assessed 18,901 physicians. The overwhelming majority (91%) found cost awareness in physicians was low and demonstrated significant room for cost reduction. Eighteen of the 76 studies assessed an intervention to improve physician awareness of cost and used either a price list (89%) or a teaching session (11%) as the primary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research demonstrates that there is still a lack of awareness among physicians of the costs of medications, investigations and procedures/consumables. Initial approaches using price display and teaching sessions have shown promise. Further research into best practices for education around cost, beginning in medical school and continuing into established medical and surgical practices, may lead to increased cost savings in health care.

Cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at Universitas Academic Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa

Background

South Africa has high healthcare expenses. Improving cost-consciousness could decrease government expenditure on healthcare.

Objectives

To determine cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at a tertiary hospital. The objective was met by assessing the accuracy of cost estimation according to the level of training and speciality, whether participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness and if they had a desire to learn more about the cost of radiological imaging.

Method

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six clinical departments at Universitas Academic Hospital using an anonymous questionnaire that determined doctors’ cost awareness of five radiological studies. Each radiological study was answered using six different cost ranges, with one correct option. Costs were based on the Department of Health’s 2019 Uniform Patients Fee Schedule (UPFS).

Results

In total, 131 (67.2%) of 195 questionnaires distributed to registrars and consultants were returned. Overall, low accuracy of cost estimation was observed, with 45.2% of the participants choosing only incorrect options. No participant estimated all five costs correctly. Only the Internal Medicine clinicians demonstrated a significant difference between registrars and consultants for the number of correct answers (median 0 and 1, respectively) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between specialities stratified by registrars/consultants. Most participants (88.6%) would like to learn about imaging costs. Only 2.3% of the participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness of radiological studies.

Conclusion

Doctors were consistently inaccurate in estimating the cost of radiological studies. Educating doctors about the cost of radiological imaging could have a positive effect on healthcare expenditure.

Cost Awareness of Common Supplies Is Severely Impaired Among All Members of the Surgical Team

BACKGROUND

Increased health care spending concerns have generated interest in reducing operating room (OR) costs, but the cost awareness of the surgical team selecting intraoperative supplies remains unclear. This work characterizes knowledge of supply cost among surgeons and OR staff in a large academic hospital and seeks to examine the role of experience and training with regards to cost insight.

METHODS

This work is a cross-sectional study of surgeons, trainees, nurses, and surgical technicians (n = 372) across all surgical specialties at a large academic hospital. Participants completed a survey reporting frequency of use and estimated cost for 11 common surgical supplies as well as opinions on access to cost information in the OR. Cost estimation error was expressed as the ratio of estimated-to-actual cost, and groups were compared with one-way analysis of variance and chi-squared testing. Spearman correlation (ρ) was used to describe the relationship between monotonic variables.

RESULTS

Overestimation error was universal and ranged widely (3.80-49.79). There was no significant difference in estimation accuracy when stratified by role or years of experience. Less expensive items had higher rates of estimation error than more expensive items (P < 0.001), and a moderately strong relationship was found between decreased item cost and increased estimation error (ρ: 0.49). The overwhelming majority (91%) of respondents expressed a desire to learn more about supply pricing.

CONCLUSIONS

Price knowledge of common supplies is globally impaired for entire surgical team but coexists with a strong desire to augment cost awareness. Improved access to cost information has a high potential to inform surgical decision-making and decrease OR waste.

Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Does a cost-awareness campaign for gynaecologists lead to a change in use and costs of disposable surgical supplies for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) without increasing hospital utilisation measures (operating room (OR) time or hospital length of stay (LOS))?

DESIGN

Pre-post non-controlled study. The OR database was used to identify relevant cases before and after the cost-awareness intervention, and provided information on quantity of each supply item, operative details and LOS.

SETTING

Lois Hole Hospital for Women, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

12 laparoscopic trained gynaecologists (7 female, 5 male) participated in both phases of the study. Eligible surgical cases were all LH cases for any indication for women aged ≥18 years. 201 cases were undertaken before the intervention (2011-2013) and 229 cases after the intervention (2016-2017).

INTERVENTION

The cost-awareness intervention for gynaecologists included site meetings and rounds providing information on costs of disposable and reusable instruments, a full day skills lab, OR posters about cost and effectiveness of disposable and reusable surgical supplies and demonstrations of reusable equipment (2015-2016).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Disposable supplies costs per case (standardised for 2016 unit costs).

RESULTS

There was a significant (p<0.05) reduction (unadjusted) in disposable supplies cost per case for LH between cases before and after the intervention: from $C1073, SD 281, to $C943 SD 209. Regression analysis found that the adjusted cost per case after the intervention was $C116 lower than before the intervention (95% CI -160 to -71). Neither OR time nor hospital LOS differed significantly between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that cost-awareness campaigns may be associated with reduction in the cost of surgery for LH. However, many other factors may have contributed to this cost reduction, possibly including other local initiatives to reduce costs and emerging evidence indicating lack of effectiveness of some surgical practices.

Awareness of surgical expenditure amongst UK trainees and consultants: A questionnaire study

INTRODUCTION

Limited knowledge of surgical device and service costs restricts a surgeon's ability to make cost efficient choices and contribute to the efficiency savings required by the NHS to reduce the financial deficit. This study aims to assess how aware surgeons are of surgical equipment and regularly used services.

METHODS

A single sided hard copy questionnaire asking for the estimate cost of 24 surgical devices/services was handed out to individuals at two separate UK annual conferences. Items and services which are regularly used and/or clinically significant were selected and, where possible, alternatives to those items were included for comparison. Participants were also asked for their grade and specialty. An estimate was deemed correct if it was within 20% of the actual cost. Planned subgroup analyses for grade and specialty were performed.

RESULTS

The 143 participants consisted of 23 (16%) consultants, 39 (27%) registrars, 33 (23%) SHOs and 48 (34%) foundation doctors. Of the 95 participants who were SHO grade or more senior, 67 (71%) work within general surgery. Across all items, only 9.6% of estimates were correct. There was no statistically significant difference between training levels (consultant 11.5%, registrar 10.1%, SHO 8.6%, foundation 8.9%; p = 0.253). Participants were significantly less successful in correctly estimating the cost of high value (>£150 [USD $198; EUR €175]) items (8.5% vs. 11.1%); p = 0.011, and the cost of devices as compared to the cost of services (7.4% vs. 15.0%); p = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons across all grades and specialties have poor knowledge of device and service costs. It is important that this improves in order to allow surgeons to make a meaningful contribution to NHS efficiency savings by making informed decisions about their use of devices and services.