Practicing on the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing Curriculum (ATLAS): Is Mastery Learning in Residency Feasible to Achieve Expert-Level Performance in Laparoscopic Suturing?

Learning Curve of a Robotic Bio-Tissue Intestinal Anastomosis: Implications for Surgical Training Curricula

OBJECTIVE

The integration of robotic surgical training in a time-scarce residency program is a challenge for surgical educators. Simulation-based training is a tool that allows residents to acquire the necessary robotic skills without compromising patient safety. This study aimed to assess the learning curve of a robotic inanimate intestinal anastomosis drill.

DESIGN

Two trained graders performed a video-based assessment of each attempt of a side-to-side intestinal anastomosis drill using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) scale. Residents who achieved a passing score of 28 were included in the study. We assessed the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score and evaluated technical performance on different OSATS domains. Data were analyzed using independent t-test, 1-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.

SETTING

The University of Texas Southwestern PARTICIPANTS: 33 residents across 4 academic years RESULTS: Thirty-three residents performed 139 attempts with a mean of 4.2 ± 2 attempts per resident. On average, 3.3 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Average OSATS score increased from 21.7 to 27.2 between the 1st and the 4th attempt, respectively (p < 0.001). Of the OSATS subcategories, time and motion showed the greatest score improvement of 1.5 on a 5-point Likert scale, 95% CI [0.82, 2.18] (p < 0.001). Despite varying baseline OSATS scores between residents on initial assessment, there was no significant difference in the final attempt score. On the initial attempt, a lower score and failure to finish were associated with greater odds of requiring 5 or more attempts to pass the drill.

CONCLUSION

All OSATS metrics improved on an intestinal anastomosis drill after simulation training. A maximum of 6 attempts were required to achieve a passing score. Initial performance strongly predicts the number of attempts required to achieve a passing score. This feasible and effective drill provides trainees with robotic intestinal anastomosis training.

Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents

Background

The annual number of robotic surgical procedures is on the rise. Robotic surgery requires unique skills compared to other surgical approaches. Simulation allows basic robot skill acquisition and enhances patient safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and transferability of a mastery-based curriculum using a new virtual reality (VR) robotic simulator for surgery resident training.

Methods

Nineteen PGY2s and 22 PGY4s were enrolled. Residents completed a pretest and posttest consisting of five VR and three previously validated inanimate tasks. Training included practicing 33 VR tasks until a total score ≥ 90% (“mastery”) was achieved using automated metrics (time, economy of motion). Inanimate performance was evaluated by two trained, blinded raters using video review metrics (time, errors, and modified OSATS). Outcomes were defined as: curriculum feasibility (completion rate, training time, repetitions), training effectiveness (pre/post training skill improvement), and skill transferability (skill transfer to validated inanimate drills). Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests were used; median (IQR) reported.

Results

Thirty-four of 41 residents (83%) achieved mastery on all 33 VR tasks; median training time was 7 h (IQR: 5′26″–8′52″). Pretest vs. post-test performance improved (all p < 0.001) according to all VR and Inanimate metrics for both PGY2 and PGY4 residents. Significant pretest performance differences were observed between PGY2 and PGY4 residents for VR but not inanimate tasks; no PGY2 vs. PGY4 posttest performance differences were observed for both VR and inanimate tasks.

Conclusion

This mastery-based VR curriculum was associated with a high completion rate and excellent feasibility. Significant performance improvements were noted for both the VR and inanimate tasks, supporting training effectiveness and skill transferability. Additional studies examining validity evidence may help further refine this curriculum.

Does the advanced training in laparoscopic suturing enhance laparoscopic suturing skill beyond fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic suturing is associated with a steep learning curve. Hence, many general surgery graduate residents entering fellowship have reportedly not been able to proficiently suture laparoscopically despite achieving Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery certification. To address this deficiency, the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing curriculum was developed. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing curriculum in improving laparoscopic suturing skills compared with Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training.

METHODS

Novices were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled study. All novices followed proficiency-based training on Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery peg-transfer and intracorporeal suturing. Students were then stratified based on their peg-transfer performance and randomized into an Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing or Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery group. The Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing group trained on 3 of the 6 Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing tasks (needle handling, offset forehand suturing, confined space suturing), while the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery group was assigned more stringent suturing performance goals. Each group trained for an additional 6 hours, after which the laparoscopic suturing performance of the 2 groups was compared on a Nissen fundoplication porcine model.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine medical students were enrolled in the study; 17 (11 males and 6 females) completed the study protocol (44%). Controlling for confounders including the student suturing performance at the end of stage-1 training, the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing group at the porcine model was significantly faster/safer (coefficient = 102.7, P = .037), and more skilled (coefficient = 19.1, P = .048) compared with the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training alone the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing curriculum further enhances the laparoscopic suturing skill of novices. These findings support incorporating Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing into existing skills curricula.

The Effect of TISSEELTM on Confined Bowel Perforation: An Experimental Study

OBJECTIVE

During the last decades, surgeons of several specialties presenting different levels of expertise in colon handling have been involved in laparoscopic procedures. The aim of the present experimental study was to investigate the feasibility of TISSEELTM versus the conventional suture placement technique on confined bowel lesions in rats.

METHODS

Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats underwent confined bowel perforation and were divided into three groups: the SUTURE group (sutures were used), the SUTURE + TISSEELTM group (sutures and TISSEELTM were utilized), and the TISSEELTM group (only TISSEELTM was used). Blinded histopathologic analysis followed animal sacrifice.

RESULTS

The median weight of the rats was 526 ± 50 g. A single animal had hematochezia on the first postoperative day. Cessation of bleeding at the perforation margin was indicated intraoperatively after TISSEELTM application. Animals in the TISSEELTM group presented less intraperitoneal adhesions and lower hemorrhagic infiltration compared to animals of the two other groups. In addition, animals in the TISSEELTM group showed thrombus formation at the bowel perforation site compared to animals of the two other groups (p = 0.042). Histopathologic analysis demonstrated reduced inflammatory reaction (p = 0.003), diminished fibrosis (p = 0.001), and better tissue regeneration (p = 0.000) in the TISSEELTM group compared to the other two groups.

CONCLUSION

Application of TISSEELTM at the perforation site was associated with increased regeneration of the intestinal wall and less inflammatory and fibrotic reaction compared to suture placement. However, more experimental and clinical studies should be conducted before implementation in humans.