Simulation Training Incorporating a Pulsatile Carotid Endarterectomy Model Results in Increased Procedure-Specific Knowledge, Confidence, and Comfort in Post-graduate Trainees

What are the learning objectives in surgical training - a systematic literature review of the surgical competence framework

OBJECTIVE

To map the landscape of contemporary surgical education through a competence framework by conducting a systematic literature review on learning outcomes of surgical education and the instructional methods applied to attain the outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Surgical education has seen a paradigm shift towards competence-based training. However, a gap remains in the literature regarding the specific components of competency taught and the instructional methods employed to achieve these outcomes. This paper aims to bridge this gap by conducting a systematic review on the learning outcomes of surgical education within a competence framework and the instructional methods applied. The primary outcome measure was to elucidate the components of competency emphasized by modern surgical curricula. The secondary outcome measure was to discern the instructional methods proven effective in achieving these competencies.

METHODS

A search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, ProQuest Eric, and Cochrane databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, limited to 2017-2021. Keywords included terms related to surgical education and training. Inclusion criteria mandated original empirical studies that described learning outcomes and methods, and targeted both medical students and surgical residents.

RESULTS

Out of 42 studies involving 2097 participants, most concentrated on technical skills within competency-based training, with a lesser emphasis on non-technical competencies. The effect on clinical outcomes was infrequently explored.

CONCLUSION

The shift towards competency in surgical training is evident. However, further studies on its ramifications on clinical outcomes are needed. The transition from technical to clinical competence and the creation of validated assessments are crucial for establishing a foundation for lifelong surgical learning.

Role of Simulated Training for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review

Vascular surgery trainees often do not get to perform carotid endarterectomy (CEA) directly on the patients as it requires meticulous surgical technique and has a high risk of procedure-related complications. Hence, the role of simulation in training future vascular surgeons becomes essential. This review aims to assess the types and utility of simulators available for CEA. In this systematic review, all the studies performed on CEA simulation were included. The purpose of this review was to assess different types of simulators and their usefulness for CEA. We identified 122 articles, of which 10 were eligible for review. A variety of simulators, ranging from animal models, virtual reality simulators and commercially designed models with high fidelity options were used. Technical competence was the major domain assessed in the majority of the studies (n=8), whereas four studies evaluated anatomical and procedural knowledge. Blinding was done in five studies for assessment purposes. The majority of studies (n=9) found the simulation to be an effective tool for achieving technical competence. This review shows the potential usefulness of simulation in acquiring technical skills and procedural acumen for CEA. The available literature is unfortunately too diverse to have a common recommendation.

A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Vascular Surgery

Introduction

Recent advancements in surgical technology, reduced working hours, and training opportunities exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an increase in simulation-based training. Furthermore, a rise in endovascular procedures has led to a requirement for high-fidelity simulators that offer comprehensive feedback. This review aims to identify vascular surgery simulation models and assess their validity and levels of effectiveness (LoE) for each model in order to successfully implement them into current training curricula.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched on January 1, 2021, for full-text English studies on vascular surgery simulators. Eligible articles were given validity ratings based on Messick’s modern concept of validity alongside an LoE score according to McGaghie’s translational outcomes.

Results

Overall 76 eligible articles validated 34 vascular surgery simulators and training courses for open and endovascular procedures. High validity ratings were achieved across studies for: content (35), response processes (12), the internal structure (5), relations to other variables (57), and consequences (2). Only seven studies achieved an LoE greater than 3/5. Overall, ANGIO Mentor was the most highly validated and effective simulator and was the only simulator to achieve an LoE of 5/5.

Conclusions

Simulation-based training in vascular surgery is a continuously developing field with exciting future prospects, demonstrated by the vast number of models and training courses. To effectively integrate simulation models into current vascular surgery curricula and assessments, there is a need for studies to look at trainee skill retention over a longer period of time. A more detailed discussion on cost-effectiveness is also needed.

Simulation in surgical education

Simulation is becoming an important tool in surgical education. Surgical faculty have been forced to modify how they teach technical skills. Instead of a complete reliance on teaching in the operating room, a structured curriculum and dedicated time in the simulation center are being used in many centers. Some of the advantages of this approach include the ability to learn and practice new procedures in a safe and nurturing environment. The disadvantages include the significant cost of virtual reality simulators and the competition, between various training programs, to gain access to simulation.