Representativeness of Workplace-Based Operative Performance Assessments for Resident Operative Experience

Predicting Resident Competence for Otolaryngology Key Indicator Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Competency-based surgical education requires practical assessments and meaningful benchmarks. In otolaryngology, key indicator procedure (KIP) minima are indicators of surgical exposure during training, yet it remains unknown how many times trainees must be evaluated on KIPs to ensure operative competence. Herein, we used Bayesian mixed effects models to compute predicted performance expectations for KIPs.

METHODS

From November 2017 to September 2021, a smartphone application (SIMPL OR) was used by attendings at five otolaryngology training programs to rate resident operative performance after each case on a five-level scale. Bayesian mixed effects models were used to estimate the probability that postgraduate year (PGY) 3, 4, or 5 trainees would earn a "practice-ready" (PR) rating on a subsequent evaluation based on their previously earned PR ratings for each KIP. Probabilities of earning a subsequent PR rating were examined for interpretability, and cross-validation was used to assess predictive validity.

RESULTS

A total of 842 assessments of KIPs were submitted by 72 attendings for 92 residents PGY 2-5. The predictive model had an average Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve of 0.77. The number of prior PR ratings that senior residents needed to attain a 95% probability of earning a PR rating on a subsequent evaluation was estimated for each KIP. For example, for mastoidectomies, PGY4 residents needed to earn 10 PR ratings whereas PGY5 residents needed 4 PR ratings on average to have a 95% probability of attaining a PR rating on a subsequent evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Predictive modeling can inform assessment benchmarks for competency-based surgical education.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:3341-3345, 2023.

Right Case, Right Time: Which Procedures Best Differentiate General Surgery Trainees' Operative Performance?

OBJECTIVE

Assessing surgical trainee operative performance is time- and resource-intensive. To maximize the utility of each assessment, it is important to understand which assessment activities provide the most information about a trainee's performance. The objective of this study is to identify the procedures that best differentiate performance for each general surgery postgraduate year (PGY)-level, leading to recommendations for targeted assessment.

DESIGN

The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) operative performance ratings were modeled using a multilevel Rasch model which identified the highest and lowest performing trainees for each PGY-level. For each procedure within each PGY-level, a procedural performance discrimination index was calculated by subtracting the proportion of "practice-ready" ratings of the lowest performing trainees from the proportion of "practice-ready" ratings of the highest performing trainees. Four-quadrant plots were created using the median procedure volume and median discrimination index for each PGY-level. All procedures within the upper right quadrant were considered "highly differentiating, high volume" procedures.

SETTING

This study was conducted across 70 general surgical residency programs who are members of the SIMPL collaborative.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 54,790 operative performance evaluations of categorical general surgery trainees were collected between 2015 and 2021. Trainees who had at least 1 procedure in common were included. Procedures with less than 25 evaluations per training year were excluded.

RESULTS

The total number of evaluations per procedure ranged from 25 to 2,131. Discrimination values were generated for 51 (PGY1), 54 (PGY2), 92 (PGY3), 105 (PGY4), and 103 (PGY5) procedures. Using the above criteria, a total of 12 (PGY1), 15 (PGY2), 22 (PGY3), 21 (PGY4), and 28 (PGY5) procedures were identified as highly differentiating, high volume procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study draws on national data to identify procedures which are most useful in differentiating trainee operative performance at each PGY-level. This list of procedures can be used to guide targeted assessment and improve assessment efficiency.

Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender

Objectives

This study tests the null hypotheses that overall sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and resident operative autonomy relative to performance are similar for female and male residents.

Background

Female and male surgical residents may experience training differently, affecting the quality of learning and graduated autonomy.

Methods

A longitudinal, observational study using a Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning collaborative dataset describing resident and attending evaluations of resident operative performance and autonomy and recordings of verbal feedback from attendings from surgical procedures performed at 54 US general surgery residency training programs from 2016 to 2021. Overall sentiment, adjectives, and gendered words in verbal feedback were quantified by natural language processing. Resident operative autonomy and performance, as evaluated by attendings, were reported on 5-point ordinal scales. Performance-adjusted autonomy was calculated as autonomy minus performance.

Results

The final dataset included objective assessments and dictated feedback for 2683 surgical procedures. Sentiment scores were higher for female residents (95 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-100] vs 86 [IQR 2-100]; P < 0.001). Gendered words were present in a greater proportion of dictations for female residents (29% vs 25%; P = 0.04) due to male attendings disproportionately using male-associated words in feedback for female residents (28% vs 23%; P = 0.01). Overall, attendings reported that male residents received greater performance-adjusted autonomy compared with female residents (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and performance-adjusted operative autonomy differed for female and male general surgery residents. These findings suggest a need to ensure that trainees are given appropriate and equitable operative autonomy and feedback.