Pelvic Floor Muscle Morphometry and Function in Women With Primary and Secondary Provoked Vestibulodynia

A randomised interventional parallel study to evaluate the effect of different frequencies of pelvic floor muscle exercises with core stabilisation using three-dimensional ultrasound: the PELSTAB study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The primary objective was to compare high- and low-frequency pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with the impact on urinary incontinence episode frequency over 1 week (IEF/week). The secondary objective was to compare the two groups with regard to pelvic floor muscle function, morphometry, incontinence quality of life, and patient global impression.

METHODS

This was a randomised parallel controlled study. The setting was regional gynaecological and urological outpatient clinics. The subjects consisted of a sample of 86 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Group A underwent high-frequency PFMT and group B underwent low-frequency PFMT for 12 weeks. We recorded the IEF/week. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) was used. Pelvic floor muscle function was evaluated using a perineometer. Pelvic floor muscle morphometry was evaluated with 3D/4D ultrasound. The Urinary Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (I-QoL) was used.

RESULTS

Significant differences between group A and B after treatment (p<0.001) were noted in favour of group A in IEF/week (group A 10.2±7.0/2.3±3.0 vs group B 9.3±4.7/6.3±4.9), in the ICIQ-UI SF (group A 9.7±3.0/3.7 ± 3.6 vs group B 9.9±3.2/9.4±3.4). Significant differences between groups A and B after treatment were noted in favour of group A for pelvic floor muscle function in terms of maximal voluntary contraction and its duration, and also for pelvic floor muscle morphometry in terms of a reduction of the hiatal area during rest, contraction, and the Valsalva manoeuvre.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency PFMT for 12 weeks significantly decreased IEF/week in comparison with low-frequency PFMT. In the high-frequency exercise group, women had significantly better pelvic floor muscle function, morphometry and quality of life than the low-frequency exercise group.

Are pelvic pain and increased pelvic floor muscle tone associated in women with persistent noncancer pelvic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between pelvic pain and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) tone in women with persistent noncancer pelvic pain (PNCPP) is unclear.

AIM

To synthesize the evidence of the association between pelvic pain and PFM tone in women with PNCPP.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted via MEDLINE, Emcare, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus to identify relevant studies. Studies were eligible if pelvic pain and PFM tone outcome measures were reported among women aged >18 years. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies was used to assess study quality. Studies were pooled by assessment of PFM tone via a random effects model. Associations between the presence of pelvic pain and PFM tone were assessed with odds ratio (OR), while linear associations were assessed with Pearson or Spearman correlation.

OUTCOMES

Pelvic pain measures (intensity, threshold, and frequency) and resting PFM tone in women with PNCPP, as evaluated by any clinical assessment method or tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included in this review. The presence of pelvic pain was significantly associated with increased PFM tone as assessed by digital palpation (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.66-4.89). Pelvic pain intensity was inversely but weakly associated with PFM flexibility when evaluated through dynamometry (r = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.17). However, no significant associations were found between pelvic pain and PFM tone when measured with other objective assessment methods.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Pelvic pain and increased PFM tone may not be directly associated; alternatively, a nonlinear association may exist. A range of biopsychosocial factors may mediate or moderate the association, and clinicians may need to consider these factors when assessing women with PNCPP.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. All possible findings from relevant theses and conference abstracts were considered in our search. However, nonlinear associations between pelvic pain and increased PFM tone were not assessed as part of this review.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic pain may be linearly associated with increased PFM tone and decreased PFM flexibility when measured with digital palpation or dynamometry; however, this association was not observed when other aspects of PFM tone were assessed through objective methods. Future studies are required using robust assessment methods to measure PFM tone and analyses that account for other biopsychosocial factors that may influence the association.

Pain Characteristics, Fear-avoidance Variables, and Pelvic Floor Function as Predictors of Treatment Response to Physical Therapy in Women With Provoked Vestibulodynia

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate whether pretreatment pain characteristics, psychological variables, and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function predict the response to physical therapy (PT) in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred-five women diagnosed with PVD underwent 10 weekly sessions of individual PT comprising education, PFM exercises with biofeedback, manual therapy, and dilators. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at pretreatment, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up and included pain intensity (numerical rating scale 0 to 10) and sexual function (Female Sexual Function Scale). Multilevel analyses were used to examine the potential predictors of response over time including pain characteristics (PVD subtype, pain duration), psychological variables (fear of pain, pain catastrophizing), and PFM function assessed with a dynamometric speculum (tone, flexibility, and strength).

RESULTS

PVD subtype and PFM tone were significant predictors of greater treatment response for pain intensity reduction. Secondary PVD (ie, pain developed after a period of pain-free intercourse) and lower PFM tone at baseline were both associated with greater reduction in pain intensity after PT and at follow-up. Among the psychological variables, fear of pain was the only significant predictor of better treatment response when assessed through improvement in sexual function, where higher fear of pain at baseline was associated with greater improvement after PT.

DISCUSSION

This study identified PVD secondary subtype, lower PFM tone, and higher fear of pain as significant predictors of better treatment response to PT in women with PVD.

A systematic review of diagnostic tests to detect pelvic floor myofascial pain

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Myofascial pain arising from pelvic floor muscles occurs in women with vaginismus, interstitial cystitis and endometriosis but is often overlooked. The aim is to examine alternative diagnostic tests to detect pelvic floor myofascial pain compared with standardized vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscles as the reference test.

METHODS

A systematic review was prospectively conducted (PROSPERO-CRD42020183092) according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included Ovid Medline 1946-, Embase 1957-, Scopus 1960-, Cochrane Combined, Clinical trials, Google Scholar (top 200 articles), Web of Science, TRIP, BIOSIS, DARE, CINHAL, EmCare, PEDro, ProQuest and EBSCOhost up to July 2020. Articles were independently screened by two authors and assessed for bias using QUASDAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

A total of 26,778 articles were screened and 177 were selected for full text review, of which 5 were selected for final analysis. Five studies included 9694 participants of which 1628 had pelvic floor myofascial pain. Only one study reported data to calculate sensitivities and specificities of the index test, which utilized a score of > 40 on the Central Sensitization Inventory to detect women with pelvic floor myofascial pain and revealed a sensitivity of 34.8% and a specificity of 84.9% compared to the reference test.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review did not reveal any diagnostic test superior to the pre-defined reference test. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of pelvic floor myofascial pain and a lack of a validated diagnostic criteria which must be addressed to progress with meaningful research in this field.

Vulvodynia-It Is Time to Accept a New Understanding from a Neurobiological Perspective

Vulvodynia is one the most common causes of pain during sexual intercourse in premenopausal women. The burden of vulvodynia in a woman's life can be devastating due to its consequences in the couple's sexuality and intimacy, in activities of daily living, and psychological well-being. In recent decades, there has been considerable progress in the understanding of vulvar pain. The most significant change has been the differentiation of vulvar pain secondary to pathology or disease from vulvodynia. However, although it is currently proposed that vulvodynia should be considered as a primary chronic pain condition and, therefore, without an obvious identifiable cause, it is still believed that different inflammatory, genetic, hormonal, muscular factors, etc. may be involved in its development. Advances in pain neuroscience and the central sensitization paradigm have led to a new approach to vulvodynia from a neurobiological perspective. It is proposed that vulvodynia should be understood as complex pain without relevant nociception. Different clinical identifiers of vulvodynia are presented from a neurobiological and psychosocial perspective. In this case, strategies to modulate altered central pain processing is necessary, changing the patient's erroneous cognitions about their pain, and also reducing fear avoidance-behaviors and the disability of the patient.

Predictors of Mucosal and Muscle Pain in Vulvodynia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From the National Vulvodynia Registry

Diagnostic criteria for provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) rely on mucosal pain in the vulvar vestibule, with less emphasis on pain from pelvic floor muscles. It is unknown how psychosocial variables associated with PVD are differentially associated with mucosal versus muscle pain. Analysis of data from the National Vulvodynia Registry (n = 202) revealed several factors associated with increased mucosal pain: pain duration (P = .043), the McGill sensory subscore (P = .0086) and the Gracely pain scale (P< .001). Increased mucosal pain was also associated with decreased arousal (P = .036). On the other hand, factors significantly associated with greater muscle pain included number of comorbid pain conditions (P = .001), decreased intercourse frequency post PVD onset (P = .02) and higher scores on the McGill sensory (P = .0001) and affective (P = .0002) subscores, the Gracely pain scale (P = .0012), and state anxiety (P < .001). Sexual function was also significantly impacted by high pelvic floor muscular pain, with lower scores for arousal (P = .046), orgasm (P = .0014) and satisfaction (P = .013), and higher pain (P = .01). Significant differences in the relationship between muscle and mucosal pain for pain duration (P = .005), McGill affective score (P = .001), orgasm (P = .049), change in intercourse frequency (P = .027), and state anxiety (P = .030) suggest the possibility of mucosal or muscle pain predominant PVD subtypes. PERSPECTIVE: Patients with higher pelvic floor muscle pain scores than mucosal pain scores may represent different subgroups or characteristics of patients with provoked vestibulodynia. This research highlights the importance of assessment of the pelvic floor muscles in addition to the cotton swab test of the vestibule.

Genitopelvic pain: retrospective evaluation of a multimodal treatment efficacy

BACKGROUND

Genitopelvic and sexual pain penetration disorder (GPPD) recognizes a multifaceted etiology. As with syndromes of chronic pain, it responds poorly to medications and its management is difficult. Clinicians consequently favor a multimodal comprehensive approach to tackle the different aspects of the disorder. To treat GPPD women, we chose a multimodal regimen including topical and systemic medications associated with physical interventions and behavioral couple therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the regimen efficacy and the influence that demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics may have on the outcome.

METHODS

Sixty self -referred women requesting medical care for GPPD, who were free of debilitating illness, in stable heterosexual relationships and with healthy and sexually functional partners, were treated according with the multimodal regimen we tailored on the specific needs of these women. As said, it associated topical and systemic medications combined with physical exercises used in behavioral sex therapy, and behavioral couple therapy. Past sexual history, characteristics of pain, vestibular hyperreactivity, pelvic floor hypertonicity, general health, and couple harmony were evaluated and statistically analyzed to determine which characteristics were associated with therapy outcome.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis of an association between demographic, reproductive, pain and medical conditions on one hand and therapy outcome on the other did not find any significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of association between the investigated characteristics and treatment outcome is disappointing; on the other hand, the statistically significant impact of couple harmony (evaluated as partner presence and participation) on the treatment results may be the answer to our search for factors predicting outcome.

Vulvodynia

Vulvodynia is a condition that occurs in 8-10% of women of all ages and is characterized by pain at the vulva that is present during sexual and/or non-sexual situations. Diagnosis is established through careful medical history and pelvic examination, including the cotton-swab test. The onset and maintenance of vulvodynia involves a complex interplay of peripheral and central pain mechanisms, pelvic floor muscle and autonomic dysfunction, anxiety, depression and childhood maltreatment as well as cognitive-affective, behavioural and interpersonal factors. Given the absence of empirically supported treatment guidelines, a stepwise approach of pelvic floor physical therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy as well as medical management is suggested, with surgery as the last option. Vulvodynia has a negative effect on the quality of life of women and their partners, and imposes a profound personal and societal economic burden. In addition, women with vulvodynia are more likely to report other chronic pain conditions, which further alters their quality of life. Future efforts should aim to increase girls', women's and healthcare professionals' education and awareness of vulvodynia, phenotype different subgroups of women based on biopsychosocial characteristics among more diverse samples, conduct longitudinal studies and improve clinical trial designs.